Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

blackhawksfan    

blackhawksfan Avatar Level 160 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Offline
Send mail to blackhawksfan Block blackhawksfan Invite blackhawksfan to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:3/16/2012
Last Login:4/04/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Thumbs: 607 total,  810 ,  203
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 160 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 161 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:308
FJ Points:642

latest user's comments

#157 - Right? Do you live in Iowa too?  [+] (7 new replies) 11/08/2013 on Well that escalated quickly. +1
#462 - ookichinchindesu (11/09/2013) [-]
Yes I do
User avatar #192 - bcsaint (11/08/2013) [-]
i do i do
#198 - flarenight (11/08/2013) [-]
have a link to the new article for this? im rather interested in reading it now.
#340 - flarenight (11/09/2013) [-]
thanks for the link and vid. will check it out in a min. have a thumb for your effort
User avatar #345 - blackhawksfan (11/09/2013) [-]
Thanks man, I live about 15 mins from Ames, where it happened. Been allover the news here. The media is doing what it always does and acting like the kid was all innocent and shit but in my opinion what the cops did was justified
#368 - flarenight (11/09/2013) [-]
it all comes down to potential damage done to value of a human life at this time. well at least in my opinion. if the damage they are/are about to/potentially can do if left alone exceeds the life of one person i see nothing wrong with removing of said person. but like i said my personal view on it.
#150 - they got into an argument because the dad wouldnt buy cigarett…  [+] (7 new replies) 11/08/2013 on Well that escalated quickly. 0
User avatar #158 - charagrin (11/08/2013) [-]
I have since found the whole story, and I am glad the kid is dead. He risked the lives of dozens of people, cost god knows how much property damage, all over a pack of cigs. The only thing I am upset about is him living long enough to do what he did. Good thing it ended this way, and not with him finding his dads hunting rifle.
User avatar #322 - oodlesandoodles (11/09/2013) [-]
Wow, charagrin. Sure, the kid was probably a dick, but you're glad he's dead? I wouldn't go that far. A bullet in the ass, maybe
User avatar #361 - charagrin (11/09/2013) [-]
Your right. That way he could lie to do it again. I have a zero tolerance policy for that kind of thing. If they CHOSE to do that once, they can CHOOSE to do that again. And next time might not be as tame.
User avatar #382 - oodlesandoodles (11/09/2013) [-]
So, what you're saying is, screw mistakes. If you fuck up once, you deserve to be put down. That about right?

He was a stupid, jackass kid. Let me write the word KID again in bold for extra emphasis. How do you know wouldn't have grown out of it eventually. Also, had he survived, I'm pretty sure he wouldn't be breathing free air right now, so that pretty much negates his chances of trying anything like that again, at least for a while. I understand that he could've killed somebody, but he didn't and for people like you to say that you're glad he's dead, or that he deserved to die, that's just low, man You don't know if he would've tried again in the future. No one does.
User avatar #387 - charagrin (11/09/2013) [-]
You are right, I do not know he would have tried it again. Maybe we should also free all the murderers and rapists too. I mean, we don't KNOW they will do it again, right? No. He made his choice, and now he has to live with it. Or not, in this case. I don't believe in second chances for extreme behavior. it is just like an apology, meaningless. Because no matter what you may say or do afterwords, the fact is, at the time, the person CHOSe to act that way because they WANTED to.
User avatar #391 - oodlesandoodles (11/09/2013) [-]
The difference between those murderers you mentioned and this guy is that

A. They killed people

and

B. They're currently still breathing

Believe or not, but there are people who've killed innocent people before, served their time and came out of prison decent individuals. And a lot of them were adults. But I'm not argue this anymore. I barely care and I'm not really in the mood
User avatar #384 - charagrin (11/09/2013) [-]
I am GLAD he is dead, rather then whoever he WOULD HAVE KILLED had they not stopped him.
#134 - yeah except you left out the part where he rammed multiple cop…  [+] (84 new replies) 11/08/2013 on Well that escalated quickly. +9
User avatar #172 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
That outcome didn't seem reasonable at all, what so ever.
#185 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/08/2013) [-]
The guy endangered dozens of lives and assaulted two police officers. Yes i'd say it was reasonable.
User avatar #190 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
No, no that's not reasonable at all.
They obviously had him where he was unable to do more with the car. They had several trees blocking the way and police vehicles too. Shooting him was very unreasonable.
You're basically saying that >anderangering< (Not killing someone), and driving into a police car (Once, or twice according to the video since the police-cars rammed into him afterwards) equals a death sentence. If they had him alive, he wouldn't be put in the electric chair, now would he?
#261 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/08/2013) [-]
they didn't know if he had a gun or not and the truck was a weapon too.

stop believing action movies... shooting a tire doesn't stop any vehicle.
User avatar #263 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
It's as if you're completely ignoring everything else.
"Let's shoot the person IN CASE HE HAS A GUN".
for the latter argument, I think you should read the thread and actually watch the video to see what situation he was in.
#289 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/08/2013) [-]
He already proved himself to be a threat so it's completely reasonable to continue to think so. Also, calm your fatass down kid, you're getting all butthurt about a incident in a country that according to your comments, isn't even your own.
User avatar #294 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
He already proved a threat, therefore shoot him.
Best logic I've ever seen.

Nah nigga, ur so mad u should calm down. Look at all the raging pixels that clearly indicate my state of butt-hurtness.
#299 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
When do you not shoot someone who has already been proved to be a threat and continue to be a threat?
User avatar #303 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Clearly, I wouldn't shoot someone because we don't have guns here.
and obviously, if I had one. I wouldn't shoot someone just because of an itty bitty suspicion of him having a gun.
A thug is a threat. Shoot him.
Piss-for-brain logic you use over there.
#317 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
Arguing with you is literally killing my braincells...
Well, I'm done, no point in trying to argue with idiot kids.
User avatar #325 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
"Arguing with you is literally killing my braincells...
Well, I'm done, no point in trying to argue with idiot kids."
User avatar #334 - Tormound (11/09/2013) [-]
If you're gonna argue with someone who's not even there at least try to think of a better comeback then copying and pasting his own...
User avatar #348 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Also, I don't doubt you're the anon since you've been down-voting and monitoring this thread for a while now. Just going off from strong implications, but it's funny how many actually went anon to post.

Muh freedom. Muh murricah.
User avatar #359 - Tormound (11/09/2013) [-]
A little wanna be detective i see.
But no, I saw you being a little bitch so i decided to see just how much stupid you can be.
User avatar #365 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
"He doesn't agree with the American logic, he's being a bitch".
User avatar #366 - Tormound (11/09/2013) [-]
you were acting like a bitch... It's pretty obvious if anyone reads your comments.
User avatar #367 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
"No, you were acting like a bitch".
User avatar #371 - Tormound (11/09/2013) [-]
See what i mean?
User avatar #377 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
How is that being a bitch?
User avatar #459 - flybager (11/09/2013) [-]
Would you prefer the term 'Faggot', then?
User avatar #344 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
I don't think you understand the purpose of the comment.
#270 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/08/2013) [-]
i saw the video. look, if you see a crazed kid in a stolen truck trying to hit several people and ramming the stolen truck in police car, but still want to reason with him? how? wait there and hope the gas runs out fast? or shoot the tires out and the car magically stops moving? yea why didn't they just run there and risk they life for nothing, right? the kid was dangerous
User avatar #283 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
Excuse me while I try to find the place where he tries to intentionally hit pedestrians.
Oh, right. There isn't any part of the clip where he does that. There's the pedestrian crossing the road, but he's not really trying to hit him at all.
Wait, what would you do when chasing him? Lean out of the window and shoot at the car like a lunatic? That's right, you wouldn't.
The funny thing is that the part where he shot, was when no one were moving. Shoot the tires and it'd be unable to function normal, especially since they are on grass. Additionally (I believe I've mentioned this), the car was smashed. The kid was dangerous, but didn't deserve that. The back-up was there pretty quickly. They had him surrounded.
#295 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
like i said, even if the shot out the tires (all 4) the truck could still easy move, it is not a movie.

in a country where everyone can have a gun you always assume the suspect has one too. the suspect drives a stolen car, hits a police car, runs away from the police while endangering civillians several times. it doesn't matter if he didn't hit anyone, it was not because he did or didn't want to.

they did the right thing, but your liberal brain might not understand it very well... yea sure why didn't they just let him go and maybe he can kill an innocent civillian and then have a reason to actually care... right
User avatar #300 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Easily move.
Like, easily manevour in the grass, with two police cars blocking his way (as he obviously rammed the car directly into the site of the police car), with several trees blocking him.
Maybe you're confusing this with a movie, assuming every criminal has a gun.

Yeah, always assume the suspect has a gun too, and always shoot because of this suspicion. Six shots, that was pretty overkill you know. He clearly aimed to kill and not just to injure.

I think you're twisting this a bit too much, again. Nowhere did I say they should let him go, but I suppose you're too idiotic to see that. I mean, it is evident that there is a problem with how you handle things in America. No-where else does this happen, let alone as often as in America.

Calm your fat murrican ass because you're obviously mad here, right. As the anon above would interpret it.
#310 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
it doesn't happen everywhere else, because US is the only one with it's open gun-law. you always assume they have a gun where everyone can get one, yes. it is alone not a reason to shoot, but in this situation where someone was going crazy it can be a reason

not sure which video you saw, because at the end he wasn't blocked by anything. he turned around and hit the police car (the driver was already out) when he was shot. if he could so easily turn around in one go then i don't really think he was stuck.

i'm not the one who is mad, you just can't be reasoned with.
User avatar #316 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
I'm sorry.
What do you think Canada has to say to that?
and Switzerland? I believe they have that too.

No no no, it is you that can't be reasoned with. Obviously, the only way to prevent people from doing bad things, is to kill them.
and I'm not sure if you watched the same video either, because the criminal obviously rammed the police-car from the side. Do you also think you can't turn your head and arm to shoot? Because you can.

#326 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
pretty sure their ownership is more restricted then the one in america.

who said it wasn't from the side? he still turned around to hit it while the policeman was standing NEXT to the car. and that's when he got shot. the truck was not stuck. if you check how the other police car came from that way and how the truck turned around in one go.

he was a maniac, but you know what, i'm curious what would you do in a situation like this in a country like the US (legal guns) as a policeman.

seriously, what would you do? you saw the video, you step out of your car, the kid in the truck hits your car from the other side on purpose and is NOT blocked by anything (so it can go away again). how would you stop him?
User avatar #338 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Pretty sure this tells us that there's obviously something wrong with the American logic.
As for gun ownerships, it's pretty high in Finland, Switzerland and Canada. Whether it's more restricted or not.

I'm not sure what you're trying to point out there.

What I'd do? 1. I'd disagree with the idiocy of the American way of handling situations. 2. I'd move away as fast as possible because of the idiocy like so many other people do. 3. I would ever be in such a situation where I'd have to use a gun against someone the same way and recklessly fire 6 shots.

I'm not a trained policeman, but I'm pretty sure that when stuff like this happens here, it is handled and no one is shot. The way it is handled would be firing and immobilizing the car completely.
If I was in the black car, I'd block off his way instead of driving forward after that, obviously. If he can't gain speed, he can't ram into you. The trees would be of great help too, so I'd judge the environment and use it best to my advantage.

If it was necessary, I wouldn't fire 6 shots at the guy, but try to immobilize the man the best way possible. Because with the way hospitals work here, it'd be much safer to say, shoot him near the biceps if anything. Though, I'd avoid shooting unless absolutely necessary.

but I'll just end with this and leave you with your deathrates and constant fire-arms problems.
#354 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
"hurr durr merica is different than my shitty country" ... cuz that's all you say in almost EVERY of your replies.

moving on: my point is that when i said "not sure which video you saw cuz the truck could easily turn around" your reply was: "you didn't watch the same video, the car was hit from the side"

you keep saying the truck was stuck, i watched the video several times and guess what... the truck wasn't stuck. no matter how the black car moved, since the truck was going away from it... oh right, if you check that video again, you can clearly see the truck is moving away, but for some reason he chose to turn around and hit the car with a policeman next to it.

"shoot in the biceps" yea sure because shooting a kid's biceps in a big ass truck is soooo fucking easy

i asked you how would you handle the situation, because you clearly know how it should've been handled (you keep saying they didn't handle it well...) and none of the answers you gave answers to my question.
User avatar #363 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
"Hurr durr, murricah is good" that's all you say in almost EVERY of your replies.

The car WAS hit from the side. Obviously, you can see the dashcam's angle and the other car that rammed in to the police car.
Wait, where exactly did I say the car was stuck? Yeah, he turned around to hit the police car. That's the point I'm referring to where he was highly immobalized and there was room for a lot of actions. However, gotta resort to shooting because murricah. I did it again, but I do it because it's obviously fun mocking you gun-horny idiots.

I said "try to". I wouldn't shoot six times recklessly in a row. It's as if he never heard about aiming. Again, I'm pointing out he shot SIX TIMES. That's obviously way too many times. I never said it was easy.

Again, where did I say they didn't handle it well? I'm pointing out that the outcome was unreasonable. You should learn how to read, because you're obviously just trying, again to twist what I'm saying here.

What do you want answered? What question? How I would handle it? I suggest you re-read, if you can't comprehend it.

#379 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
and since 1000 char is the limit:

a lot of room for action? oh you mean that 1 or 2 seconds before the truck can move again? THAT's a lot. yea why didn't they just... i dunno... why not just fly there and punch the suspect (who is assumed to have a gun) like supaman from the moovah, right?
User avatar #381 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Yeah and he'd be like, with super powers right.
Because I'm totally making this into a movie like you are.
#386 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
what would you expect a normal human to do with a truck in a few seconds?
User avatar #400 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Oh noo, I'm just kidding.
Of course I think people have magical powers.
User avatar #395 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Yeah, because I wasn't being sarcastic at all.
#397 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
aha, so now you were sarcastic
User avatar #389 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Like, lift it and fly it to the police station.
Like in movies.
#392 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
that's what i was referring to. you expect a normal human policeman to do magical things. i mean a few seconds is "a lot of room for action" to you even they were around or more than 10m away.
#375 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
and i'm gonna bring up "it is not a movie" again. have you ever shot with a gun? just asking. even a trained policeman missed 4 times out of 6. (no wonder, but gonna guess you only used a gun in a videogame)

I NEVER SAID HE WASN'T HIT FROM THE SIDE, THAT'S WHY HE TURNED AROUND. but yea, you didn't actually said "stuck", but you said "blocked" many times... neither is true

what would you do in the same fucking situation: "What I'd do? 1. I'd disagree with the idiocy of the American way of handling situations. 2. I'd move away as fast as possible because of the idiocy like so many other people do. 3. I would ever be in such a situation where I'd have to use a gun against someone the same way and recklessly fire 6 shots. " yea because it is an answer to that question

and then you went on the black car, and how you'd "block" the truck, guess what that black car was facing a different direction and the truck was moving AWAY from that car..
#380 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Why do you want it to be a movie? I never said it was or referred to it. Stop using piss-for-brains logic. Sorry buddy, but I've got two shooting trophies right here next to my razer black widow. I suppose you're the one who thinks this is a movie where cops always miss, despite being trained.

>implying that little part you cropped out of the argument was the only thing I'd do in such a situation.
Derp.

Cars don't have reverse gears, right? If you look at the video, instead of driving in reverse, he drives forward. He actually just was there. Doing nothing, just to drive forward.
#385 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
i say not a movie, because you think shooting out a tire stops a vehicle magically. and that trying to shoot someone in a big ass truck just after it crashed into the car next to you is the same as shooting a rifle (or whateva) while holding it still and focusing for hours
User avatar #424 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Just, no.
#426 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
check it then
User avatar #419 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Yeeah, no. This moved from somewhat idiotic arguments to completely retarded arguments.
Desperately trying to defend a flat tire, even saying it gives more grip. Totally improves vehicle speed and manevouring.
Kill with what? The "suspected" gun? As if they'd let him walk freely. That's just stupid.
#423 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
with the vehicle? if he could turn around the easily then he could just go on again

and yea actually flat and/or low-aired tires are better in many cases
User avatar #405 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Obviously, he won't be driving on grass for long and no, having flat tires doesn't help you drive. You're trying too hard now. You try driving with a flat tire. Go ahead, I'm not stopping you.

but point being, he can't get speed, he can't kill people with vehicle, he's no threat, the shooting was highly unecessary if he had just shot the tires.
Good that that's sorted out.
#417 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
well guess when he hit the police car from the side it wasn't on grass... and actually it helps because of the surface giving it more grip (but ofc a shot tire will just slowly became flat and not instantly)

well, the kid was stopped there and that's what matters, maniac like him deserve treatment like that. if the cops didn't shoot the kid, he could just go and kill someone on the road. (that's what i meant when i said "yea sure why didn't they just let him go and maybe he can kill an innocent civillian")

ignore the other one, it's pretty late, already 3am so keep on hating (oh yea i'm not actually american)
#415 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
well guess when he hit the police car from the side it wasn't on grass... and actually it helps because of the surface gives it more grip (but ofc a shot tire will just slowly became flat and not instantly)

well, if the kid was stopped there and that's what matters, maniac like him deserve treatment like that. if the cops didn't shoot the kid, he could just go and kill someone on the road. (that's what i meant when i said "yea sure why didn't they just let him go and maybe he can kill an innocent civillian")
User avatar #399 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
I think you are a retard. (Boom, argument over. You lost this, gotcha.) Especially since you assumed that.
Oh, excuse me. How many fucking people can you kill with a slow moving car that isn't manevourable what so ever.
#403 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
a flat tire just helps on grass, and it doesn't lose that much maneuverability until the tires actually peel off. (of course hard and fast turns are a no-no). i'm gonna assume you you meant that (why else would it be less manevourable? cuz of grass? oh yea on a grass next to a truck that can just fling it's back at you? no threat there)

i assumed it because you said they should have shoot the tire to stop it from going away
User avatar #394 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Here's what I said too. "Shoot the tires and it'd be unable to function normal"
You completely missed the point and only a retard would think a car couldn't drive from having the tires shot.
Here's some simple knowledge for you, since you so adore to compare my logic to videogames and movies.
Even in movies, the cars drive with punctured wheels.
Even in videogames, cars can drive with punctured wheels.

What do you think the purpose of spike strips are? Oh right, they do nothing what so ever because the car can still drive.
#396 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
i think you are a retard... so yea i pretty much think you thought it couldn't move (and also cuz you mentioned it many times)

spike strips are only useful against fast moving cars, punctured tires lose side traction only
User avatar #388 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
and I ask yet again for you to direct me to where I said it completely stopped the darn vehicle. "Magically".
"Or whateva". You don't know how it works, now do you? I didn't even compare a rifle to a gun, I was simply adding on to support my knowledge, unlike what you have done what so ever.
#390 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/09/2013) [-]
i said whateva cuz i dunno what you shoot with, you know you can get cups for shooting pistols and other guns and not just rifles.

you said "shoot the tires so the car wouldn't function"
#197 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/08/2013) [-]
His truck was still operable, you'd rather him just drove on and accidentally run over some bystander? He was ramming police, which could've easily killed or maimed them severely, he was an active threat to them.
User avatar #201 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
Because those gunshots couldn't just be to shoot the tires so the car wouldn't function (despite being pretty much torn apart).
I suppose you're forgetting the part where he rammed into the police car, rendering his position totally useless in escape.

but I'm sure his life was rightfully taken away, such as all the others that guy killed.
(I'm being sarcastic here and mocking the american way of dealing with such problems in case you couldn't tell, anon.)
#207 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/08/2013) [-]
Gunshots to the tires would stop the truck eventually shooting the tires doesn't stop the vehicle instantly, it can still go on. Not only that but those cops would be crack fucking shots if they could hit all four tires (two of which not being in their field of vision. He was an active threat to the police officers and others in the general area.

The american way of dealing with things? You mean killing a guy actively trying to injure or kill others?
User avatar #216 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
"It can still go on, despite the car not being in motion... on grass.. surrounded by trees.. and cops..".
I see your ignorance, it is that of which you Americans are known for and often stereotyped for.

Obviously, there is something wrong with the American way if you have to kill a person to actually deal with him. I suppose rationally judging a situation is frowned upon over there as there are far too many who resort to using their weapons.

I'm sure all the people standing near the car were in danger. Oh, right. There were none and the police couldn't have done anything about him driving like a lunatic with their guns on the street. I'm sorry, but your kind of logic is just hilarious.
#224 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/08/2013) [-]
The cops were behind him, you're saying he couldn't have driven straight ahead?

Obviously there is something wrong with your way if you think someone should be allowed to endanger dozens of people and assault (with deadly force might I add) multiple officers.

To be honest there really isn't a reason to continue this conversation since you're already at ad homenims. I'm not really surprised, every time I have a conversation with you you just bring up nationality and try to insult people instead of focus on the conversation. But hey, if that's how they do things in your country instead of having a civilized discussion that's fine.

So with that I bid you farewell.
User avatar #235 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
I do wonder who you are though, to think that you have to go as an anon. Kind of silly.
User avatar #234 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
Did you even watch the god damn video?
You're twisting what I'm saying, I never said someone should be allowed to endanger "dozens" of people and assault "with deadly force, despite only putting a dent in the car at low speed" one officer (because the other one didn't even get assaulted, he was the one ramming his car into the other car).
5th grader/10 arguments you've got, right there. Well supported by a lot of evidence from the video.

You might as well just put in "ur dum, im rite, ur rong." I don't even know you.

Farewell, mr. idiot, it was nice talking to someone who isn't very good at judging things logically based on clear evidence. (I'm referring to the video again).
User avatar #267 - flybager (11/08/2013) [-]
Tylo, it was a preventive action of the cop. Dont get too caught up in something as stupid as that again..
User avatar #271 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
Sorry that I don't agree with Murrican logic here.
User avatar #278 - flybager (11/08/2013) [-]
You cannot 'agree' with logic, you can get it, or agree with rules It's true that their policemen are rather trigger-happy, but the 'let-the-criminal-shoot-you-first tactic wehave wher eI live seems a bit flawed too in my opinion..
(My point here is that there's no real good way of doing this that I know of, when is it legal to kill someone? when is it ever good to? He shot the 'criminal' to prevent other deaths(or more damage to whatever). Or so I assume..)
User avatar #291 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
I said "American logic".
Obviously means that it is a different type of logic you're using.
As in, Americans find it logical. While it isn't.

Nothing is perfect in life, but you can't just go around shooting people because you're unsure whether they are armed.
"He might be armed guys, shoot him!". We're not arguing when things are legal to do, I'm saying the outcome was clearly unreasonable.
It is highly illogical, but fuck that. I'll just let Americans deal with the "he shot a man he wasn't supposed to shoot" problem because of the logic used over there.
User avatar #269 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
Oh, really? Why don't we just go shooting everyone to prevent every criminal.
User avatar #272 - flybager (11/08/2013) [-]
Guess that'd be stupid and illogical.
User avatar #285 - tylosaurus (11/08/2013) [-]
Exactly.
User avatar #298 - flybager (11/09/2013) [-]
You say that as if your point has been proven..
You're just desperatly jumping towards extreem conclusions.
User avatar #301 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Sorry, don't you understand why I said exactly? Should I cut it into pieces for you?

I said exactly, because shooting someone to prevent criminality just like that is "stupid and illogical".
User avatar #328 - mrbuu (11/09/2013) [-]
um, do you understand he was half a second away from killing some people. what if it was your mother or grandmother to slow to get out of the way. would you feel the same. would you still feel naw don't shoot the guy. just hope is still very functioning vehicle doesn't kill anybody else. oh, shoot he killed my dog. and my father now. police please don't shoot him. don't worry if he kills anybody else because a dangerous criminals life is much more important than multiple others. there this is how your opinion looks right now.
User avatar #341 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Are you really that retarded?
Nah, everyone should just die because fuck criminals in every way. "Oh he killed my dog, I gotta shot this guy".
No I wouldn't fucking wish the guy dead because he shot someone I hold dear. That's in-human. What your opinion looks like is "Shoot all criminals who hurt people".
User avatar #351 - mrbuu (11/09/2013) [-]
you didn't read you retard. crimanls that are still fully functioning behind a deadly weapon and still trying to hurt somebody. i don't say shoot a criminal after you de-arm him. I say if this guy with a gun shot a few people and still has a gun then he should be shot to prevent further damage. its inhuman to let somebody who seconds away from killing people to be let live. the kid didn't kill anybody,but was only a second or two from multiple and was still trying to ram police to hurt them and drive like a crazy person that could also hurt and kill people.
User avatar #376 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
"His car wasn't that damage".
Please, put on some glasses. He lost several parts of the car too, it started smoking as well. If he hadn't drove out, what would the cops do? Shoot him? Oh, right.
Again, you're ignoring it so I'll just refer back to it. "Only a retarded civilian wouldn't be alarmed when two police cars have their siren on.
Only a retarded citizen wouldn't be able to get to a safe place from such a damage car. I like how you call it "a deadly weapon". Everything is a deadly "weapon" by that logic, because you can kill people with quite a lot of things. "Seconds away from killing people".
User avatar #358 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
No no no, you don't understand. Mr. retard has problems with his spelling and reading apparently. Here's what you do. You don't just kill people, especially since he's not dangerous after what happened there. Only a retarded civilian wouldn't be alarmed when two police cars have their siren on.
Only a retarded citizen wouldn't be able to get to a safe place from such a damage car. I like how you call it "a deadly weapon". Everything is a deadly "weapon" by that logic, because you can kill people with quite a lot of things. "Seconds away from killing people".
I'm sorry, was the tree he was near about to get hurt? He was "a second or two" away from killing one pedestrian crossing the road. Which he didn't, because that obviously, according to the video wasn't his intention. I'm sure he could have hit that pedestrian spot-on if he intended to. It'd be an easy road-kill.
User avatar #369 - mrbuu (11/09/2013) [-]
his vehicle wasn't that damaged. no i consider it a deadly weapon because of how easy it is to kill somebody with one. a child could grab a car and kill a grown man with ease,but he couldn't say grab a pencil and do the same. and it might of not been the kids intentions,but its how it happens. vehicular manslaughter is still a horrible offense.
and if his intentions where not to hurt anybody he should of just pulled over and stopped. he never stopped until he was shot his truck only seemed stop because he changed gears to back up to ram a cop. he could of drove out. you know a truck can pretty easily push a car out of the way. The cops had the right to use deadly force. the person should of just stopped his damn vehicle.
User avatar #312 - flybager (11/09/2013) [-]
No, I got what you ment, but you're clearly just over-desperate to prove your point, which has been effortfully been probed at before to be proven, which it hasn't because you're sort-off not agreed with the logic of an entire continent on the other side of the sea.
Like; Question one: Why do you care?
Question two: Why do you care so much?
Question three: why areyou so desperate to prove your cared?
Question four( which you don't have to answer me for, but I'd just love to poke at it a bit ):Why do you act as i everything you say is 'obvious' or 'only logical' while you are clearly, as shown before, socially incapible of -some- social situations?

and to have a go at your second statement which I deemed obsolete without even having read it;
He was being looked out for a crime, he ran for it with his car, even though the policecar had its sirens on, 'obviously' rammed it intentionally and frequently.
And, as I said before to finish my contribution into this lovely 'retard-rant' of yours, American policemen are quick on the trigger.
Quicktime, he reacted. Bit of a wrong move perhaps, but he did get stopped during his criminal hit'n'run.
User avatar #324 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
"No, you're over-desperate to prove your point".
Question, why do you care?
Question, why are you so stupid?
Question, why are you so desperate?
Question, why are you so illogical that you point out clearly subjective things instead of arguing properly?
Caring is of no matter what so ever.
Saying "You efffortlessly", "You're wrong" and then just ending it at that may make you feel good, but it doesn't do shit other than that.
Why do you act as if Americans think they are right all the time? Clearly, it is evident that everywhere else in the world, situations are handled way more differently than Americans handle their shit?

Only a retard would say he wasn't stopped, because he was. I was saying it was an unreasonable outcome. That he died. I suppose someone as retarded as you can't read properly though and you're basically only supporting my arguments by saying "they are trigger-happy".
and to finish my contribution to this "retard muh murrican freedom" rant, I just want to point to the fact that this is pretty much an American problem. You can't deny that fact and the truth hurts.
User avatar #456 - flybager (11/09/2013) [-]
A1: Because arguing with you has proven hiliariously pointless and fun to read, it's sort-off the same form of entertainment as watching someone trying to kill something you know he cant in a game (example for relevance, I know you sometimes go to the VG-board so I assume you can relate)
A2: oh, tylo! you cant just ask people why they're stupid! impolite! And to anwer your question i'll just throw; "I don't know tylo, why are you so predictable?"
A3esperate for what? To prove my point? I can't recall if I had one. To try and make your point disproven? Because I find it entertaining in some weird way, besides, I like to think it's allowed on the internet.
A4: You think of that as illogical? Do you see anything other than your own (assuminly) made-up logic is 'illogical'? Just you, as one... let's go ahead and call you human/person assuming it's still able to call you that other than just being an properly incontrolled walking sack of meat to 'dissagree' or, rather, not get the logic of an entire... nation, really. And I believe why I'm not 'arguing properly' for ["OBVIOUS/CLEAR" -Tylo reasons (Appointing to if you paid attention to what i've been saying you should obviously agree with my point and it's absolutly not arguable!]

I'm not supporting you, sorry to neglect what you've hoped, but i'm not dissagreeing with you in its full aspect. I just though that that outcome was, perhaps not reasonable enough for many, but it was to be expected, and there's little to do about that now, other than to prevent it from happening again! But.. wait a minute! You were incapible of knowing what preventive actions are! Well, Tylo, it's basically doing something to make sure other things dont happen. such like shooting someone on a 'rampage' to prevent him from doing more damage, being it property damage or people.

Do you really think it's a good idea for YOU to say the truth hurts, tylo?

User avatar #457 - tylosaurus (11/09/2013) [-]
Oh boy, that's like a wall of pointless idiocy right there. You're not even arguing about this, you're just going with personal attacks constantly, to make yourself feel better despite your immense idiocy. I suppose idiocy is a bliss, because you seem to have fun being an idiot.
I'm just gonna sit back as you americans shoot eachother constantly and people will keep debating about this, where as every other country has this happen veeeery rarely because we aren't inbred retarded moral-stomping faggots.
If you didn't have a point, that just proves you're the one pointlessly arguing and I bid you farewell to leave you sulking in your own pool of idiocy.
User avatar #458 - flybager (11/09/2013) [-]
You keep using that word, but I don't think you know what it means.
And yes, arguing over something on the internet with someone of which I know is pointless to argue with because he or she is incapible of ever even considering the other's point or argument and just always being fully for its own (retarded?) opinion.

"I'll just sit back watching americans shoot each other"
Ah, will you now?
Or will you continiue to just argue their logic/way of doing things fruitlessly like you've been doing for.. what, 40 comments in this thread alone?

and to be fair I was just swimming around in my own personal pool and when I saw an internet-fight slide with your name in it I just couldn't resist but hop in.
It's fun to argue with you in a way of knowing how pointless it is, but how you still try to fuel your own opinion, even though you'd think it would'veran out already, or get hit too much. yet it really doesn't, amazing how much of a firm little... err... (moron? not sure how to describe ) you are because there's just so much you give out to poke at, and if we do hit it you just try to talk your way out of it by showing even more weaknessess ( if that's even a word )

But yeah, truth hurts, doesn't it, tylo.
wonder how much went wrong in your childhood, even though that's a really awfull thing to think about.
User avatar #315 - flybager (11/09/2013) [-]
Man I'm so excited I made typo's left and right, have fun pointing those out
User avatar #273 - flybager (11/08/2013) [-]
*because
#631 - Update - Banks is now playing in the NFL, although the Atlanta…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/23/2013 on Effect of Feminism 35 +6
User avatar #673 - evilruck (10/23/2013) [-]
Just a bit, that bitch should be in jail.


User avatar #658 - groundzero (10/23/2013) [-]
Thank GOD a justice well deserved indeed!
#39 - Well I'm currently at a hotel... i'll have to do the elevator … 10/08/2013 on To Do List 0
#64 - damn. missed the chance... 10/08/2013 on My brother broke his phone 0
#39 - my galaxy looked very similar to that after i had it sitting o…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/07/2013 on My brother broke his phone +1
#52 - Spikeydeath (10/08/2013) [-]
I was expecting a nokia joke
User avatar #64 - blackhawksfan (10/08/2013) [-]
damn. missed the chance...
#44 - sasyboncho has deleted their comment.
#48 - if you call the police (the non emergency number) they'll open… 10/07/2013 on wasn't me +2
#207 - Richard Daughenbaugh, 40, also beat to death by 3 black guys i… 09/24/2013 on Murdered 0
#20 - true story. manning IS the broncos 09/24/2013 on All grown up +1
#18 - except... you know... manning made you guys look like pee wees  [+] (4 new replies) 09/24/2013 on All grown up -1
User avatar #26 - idkwhatthatmeans (09/25/2013) [-]
No, the raiders got 3 touchdowns on the broncos, which is three times the amount Eli Manning got.

Not to mention Peyton Manning got his ass sacked like a fucking schoolgirl in the 3rd quarter.
User avatar #19 - trueraiderfan (09/24/2013) [-]
I'm fine with that though, we went in knowing we could get beat, we just wanted to have a good game and we did. Pryor threw for 317 yards which is awesome/ He is going to be a great qb in the future. Also Only Manning won, the broncos didn't
User avatar #44 - zakvanloocke (09/25/2013) [-]
Pryor threw for for 281 and got sacked 3 times. Stop acting like you watched the game.
User avatar #20 - blackhawksfan (09/24/2013) [-]
true story. manning IS the broncos
#17 - i was at that game 09/24/2013 on All grown up +3
#207 - **** was amazing man... best 17 seconds ever... 06/27/2013 on Pitty date +1
#206 - Picture 06/27/2013 on Pitty date +1
#205 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 06/27/2013 on Pitty date +1
#206 - blackhawksfan (06/27/2013) [-]
#204 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 06/27/2013 on Pitty date +1
#205 - blackhawksfan (06/27/2013) [-]
#206 - blackhawksfan (06/27/2013) [-]
#197 - Went to high school with Shawn Johnson, the olympic gymnast...…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/27/2013 on Pitty date 0
#204 - blackhawksfan (06/27/2013) [-]
#205 - blackhawksfan (06/27/2013) [-]
#206 - blackhawksfan (06/27/2013) [-]
#200 - scotlandhome (06/27/2013) [-]
Me again, how bout that cup?
User avatar #207 - blackhawksfan (06/27/2013) [-]
shit was amazing man... best 17 seconds ever...
#1 - back up and playing with 2 set of stitches in 5 mins. tough as… 06/25/2013 on Andrew Shaw Knocked Out By... 0
#258 - Mississippi plates but an iowa hawkeye logo on the first pictu… 06/19/2013 on van completly done in sharpie -1
#62 - would make being in the top 25 in your class fairly easy..... … 06/12/2013 on MFW Seeing Classmates at... +1
#76 - gun shows my friend. you can find as much of whatever you may need. 06/06/2013 on /k/ finds ammo in stock 0
#253 - every one of these are on a buzzfeed vidya is one of… 06/05/2013 on title 0
#34 - You're the reason the world hates Americans. Thanks bro.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/03/2013 on American Aid +23
#80 - bulbakip (06/03/2013) [-]
Doon't fead tha trol.
#127 - lol not many people here either but you know how it is with ba…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/03/2013 on Slightly almost heart attack 0
User avatar #130 - scotlandhome (06/03/2013) [-]
But im hoping for Boston to whoop up on Pittsburg some more. After what Crosby did (attempted to do) to Chara was just a total mistake.
User avatar #128 - scotlandhome (06/03/2013) [-]
Not here in Kentucky....for awhile, when I was younger, I was a Thrashers fan, and nothing made me more happy than knocking the Rangers chances of going to the playoffs when the Thrashers had nothing to loose. Brian Little and all those ATL relics were kicking ass, then once I start to be a big fan, NOPE, movin' to Winnipeg.
#124 - i was at buffalo wild wings... place went crazy when they scor…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/03/2013 on Slightly almost heart attack +1
User avatar #126 - scotlandhome (06/03/2013) [-]
NObody likes hockey here. So it was basically me and my dad yelling at the TV.
User avatar #138 - moldypubes (06/03/2013) [-]
I live in Texas. It is mostly Football and Baseball. On the side, basketball. Hockey hwat?

"Chicago, it's a great place...to be from"
User avatar #127 - blackhawksfan (06/03/2013) [-]
lol not many people here either but you know how it is with bandwagon fans when a team in any sport is doing good
User avatar #130 - scotlandhome (06/03/2013) [-]
But im hoping for Boston to whoop up on Pittsburg some more. After what Crosby did (attempted to do) to Chara was just a total mistake.
User avatar #128 - scotlandhome (06/03/2013) [-]
Not here in Kentucky....for awhile, when I was younger, I was a Thrashers fan, and nothing made me more happy than knocking the Rangers chances of going to the playoffs when the Thrashers had nothing to loose. Brian Little and all those ATL relics were kicking ass, then once I start to be a big fan, NOPE, movin' to Winnipeg.
[ 308 Total ]

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)