Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

blackandwhitegod    

Rank #36869 on Subscribers
no avatar Level 141 Comments: Faptastic
Offline
Send mail to blackandwhitegod Block blackandwhitegod Invite blackandwhitegod to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:10/02/2011
Last Login:6/16/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 9 total,  1 ,  10
Comment Thumbs: 418 total,  1674 ,  1256
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level -9 Content: Sort of disliked → Level -6 Content: Sort of disliked
Comment Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 141 Comments: Faptastic → Level 142 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:1
Content Views:308
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:531
FJ Points:432

latest user's comments

#242 - American college is very easy to get into. Community / Private… 02/07/2013 on Truth 0
#240 - After reading 3/4 of the comments here I can assume the majori…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/07/2013 on Truth -2
#243 - Womens Study Major (02/07/2013) [-]
sounds like a butt-hurt liberal arts major to me
;)
#249 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
Yes, that is logical. An engineer with a BA who makes a whopping 30,000$ entry (which is less than most management/business degrees) are a master race.

The beauty really is when you have people with a liberal arts PHD making 90,000 for doing nothing and you have engineers who can barely tie their shoes. I finished my drafting courses, my programming courses, my electrical engineering courses and I assure you there are just as many dead beats in those programs as in LA. The difference is people with business degrees who know nothing about engineering will probably end up hiring people with an engineering degree and a C average.
User avatar #251 - zramn (02/07/2013) [-]
psst... maybe how much you make vs how much you have in your job matters... if you just go for money you will never be happy...
User avatar #252 - zramn (02/07/2013) [-]
Wow I accidentally that sentence... how much fun you have...
#254 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
I frankly enjoy my career. Read the comments and tell me that people don't actually believe Engineering is master race because they make "more" money, which isnt true.

This post is specifically about how people who believe the pic is wrong for many reasons.
#236 - History major here. I teach. Every military brat I've met in t…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/07/2013 on Truth 0
User avatar #283 - ninjapwnyourmom (02/10/2013) [-]
well I legitimately love history, I plan to teach after I earn my masters in the military... oh and I have a 3.1 GPA right now, I know it's not great but that's due to my ancient near eastern professor boning me hard last semester. =-/
#233 - It's your responsibilty to figure out how to get into college.…  [+] (8 new replies) 02/07/2013 on Truth +1
User avatar #239 - tobituary (02/07/2013) [-]
This. Research colleges in your area.
Don't know how the american system works, but here we do GCSE's in years 10 and 11, then A levels in year 12 and 13. A levels pretty much dictate what course you do at university, as do GCSE's dictate A levels.
Your local colleges will say what subjects they want you to take, although a safe bet for engineering is maths, further maths and physics. You'll also need to make yourself stand out from the crowd on interview day. So go get some work experience with whatever local bushiness that do engineering type stuffs.
#242 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
American college is very easy to get into. Community / Private colleges (IE Devry / Phoenix / other rip offs) HAVE to accept you as long as you are able to fill out your name. I have no idea how people get through life without asking the right people the right questions. Its like when someone cant find a Dr to see because they can't open a phone book.
User avatar #241 - isomeras (02/07/2013) [-]
Really? I went to college without A-levels as college courses are the alternative to sixth form/A levels.

(I'm a britfag)
#257 - Womens Study Major (02/07/2013) [-]
Ber/ tell NEIGHBOR WHO IS VISITING TO MOVE BACK / OHH LETS SEE INTERNET/ JAIL CELL U DEW MATH HONEY BEE/ MR I ALWSYS TOLD TRUTH/ I SM A SPYGIRL/ I LOOK U IN EYE TELL TRUTH LOVE
User avatar #244 - tobituary (02/07/2013) [-]
To my understanding, american college is the equivalent to our universities, while our colleges are an alternative to sixth forms
User avatar #245 - isomeras (02/07/2013) [-]
This feels so backwards.
User avatar #247 - tobituary (02/07/2013) [-]
Paha, it's just a name. But now you mention it, yeah it does.
User avatar #237 - snakefire (02/07/2013) [-]
See these are the kinds of things I need to know.
#221 - Wrong. The problem is a lot of people blow their money while t… 02/07/2013 on America, the Short Description +1
#309 - A. I agree you can enjoy the world without religion. but you c…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... 0
User avatar #314 - certifiedidiot (02/07/2013) [-]
#312 - certifiedidiot (02/07/2013) [-]
Riiiiight, so because science doesn't have the answers for EVERYTHING figured out yet we should raise our children to be scientificly iliterate.

Hell, it's not like someone like the Pope down right tells Africa that condoms lead to aids, the huge amounts of human potentual wasted to these make belief space traveling deities.

And religion didn't really help it, some religious people may have used science to create essential tools for mankinds rush in technology, no god told them how to mine for copper or iron and make stronger tools, no god imprinted the manual of the printing press into the head of man.

And yeah you're so right, genocide isn't a fair point to use, or the fact people got flayed for owning a bible in their own language or anything, I mean that was people back then we don't have to give a fuck.

And who the fuck cares? You can seriously tell me that you can look at this vast world of wonders, let alone the galaxy and the universe itself, from the unfathomably large molten stars to black holes and the vastness itself of space and not wonder or care about any of it?

Delusion of the masses combined with scientific iliteracy is NOT a thing I would advice people to endorse.

Women are being denied their right to abortions because of religious dogma, which have lead to women dying without reason except some religious nut job found it wrong to their beliefs.
#307 - Christ you are stupid. You are somehow misreading everything t…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... 0
User avatar #313 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
You are ASSUMING that because the branding irons don't include something to represent atheism then it means that atheism is being promoted. I suppose it is also promoting Scientology because it's not included either. what you are doing is ridiculous. you are over analyzing the image and seeing something that simply is not there. It is not saying "only religious people indoctrinate their children". that is an assumption. What it is saying is that "a baby born into a religious family is basically branded with that family's religion." The image offers no alternative, it is simply ridiculing religion, and perhaps saying "don't indoctrinate your children with religion. let them think for themselves." now here you come, thinking, "wow, hypocritical atheists! telling us not to indoctrinate our children, and then they do the same thing but with atheism!" I'm not saying that atheists don't try to make their children avoid religion, or indoctrinate them with atheism, but it's not a problem like religion. theres hardly even anything to brand your child with. you can tell them "there's no god" does that really hold any heat? the next day the kid will go play outside with their friends, and come back home a christian because their friends are. on the other hand, a christian may play with their atheists friends, who tell them about how there is no god, and the christian will come home christian.
I don't doubt the creator of the image may be trying to make atheism look like "the right thing" but it's irrelevant and cannot be concluded based on the image alone.

It seems college has taught you to make your opinions facts. maybe I should drop out so it doesnt happen to me.
#304 - You can broaden a mindset without needing to know everything. … 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... 0
#303 - .... If you say something unless the person is brainl… 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... 0
#301 - Dude... I am not sure we are looking at the same picture.... …  [+] (3 new replies) 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... 0
User avatar #306 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
The classes you took told you that he makes propaganda which encourages others to force atheism down their children's throats?

You're adding your own ideas to the image. All the image is doing, aside from the added text, is mocking how religious parents indoctrinate their kids. The image is trying to make indoctrination look like a bad thing! the image is not about forcing atheism! I want you to look at the image with an unbiased perspective. Tell me what you SEE. not what you THINK you see.
#307 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
Christ you are stupid. You are somehow misreading everything that has been posted.

The absence of a "religion" is what? Atheism? This picture is IMPLYING that ONLY RELIGIOUS PEOPLE INDOCTRINATE THEIR CHILDREN. YOU CAN INDOCTRINATE WITH ATHEISM TOO. I CAN INDOCTRINATE WITH PEANUT BUTTER YOU TWAT.

Go to college. Learn what propaganda is. Take several courses on the study of art/rhetoric/logic. Come back. Understand you are being a hypocrite and wrong at the same time. Apologize to everyone for wasting their time trying to show that this picture, is in fact propaganda that supports atheism. If you are unable to do that, which you very well might be based on your posts in this thread, take this picture to a group of unbiased people with PHD's in this field and ask them.
User avatar #313 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
You are ASSUMING that because the branding irons don't include something to represent atheism then it means that atheism is being promoted. I suppose it is also promoting Scientology because it's not included either. what you are doing is ridiculous. you are over analyzing the image and seeing something that simply is not there. It is not saying "only religious people indoctrinate their children". that is an assumption. What it is saying is that "a baby born into a religious family is basically branded with that family's religion." The image offers no alternative, it is simply ridiculing religion, and perhaps saying "don't indoctrinate your children with religion. let them think for themselves." now here you come, thinking, "wow, hypocritical atheists! telling us not to indoctrinate our children, and then they do the same thing but with atheism!" I'm not saying that atheists don't try to make their children avoid religion, or indoctrinate them with atheism, but it's not a problem like religion. theres hardly even anything to brand your child with. you can tell them "there's no god" does that really hold any heat? the next day the kid will go play outside with their friends, and come back home a christian because their friends are. on the other hand, a christian may play with their atheists friends, who tell them about how there is no god, and the christian will come home christian.
I don't doubt the creator of the image may be trying to make atheism look like "the right thing" but it's irrelevant and cannot be concluded based on the image alone.

It seems college has taught you to make your opinions facts. maybe I should drop out so it doesnt happen to me.
#286 - Seeing someone capable of higher thinking is nice. Though I di…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... 0
User avatar #289 - Crusader (02/07/2013) [-]
What I mean by you can't teach everything is that you obviously will know more about one area than another, a Muslim will know more about Islam than paganism, a Christian will know more about Christianity than Hinduism, etc.
Therefore you can't teach anything, because you can't teach everything.
#304 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
You can broaden a mindset without needing to know everything. Most people in a religious group choose their religion without knowing everything about it. The key is understanding the key concepts of each religion, the purpose, the end game, the faith.
#279 - Not sure if troll ing or just ignorant. Where in my … 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... 0
#276 - It doesn't matter what atheism is about, I am talking in the c…  [+] (6 new replies) 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... 0
User avatar #290 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
Nowhere in the image does it suggest that you should make your child atheist. All it is doing is suggesting that you should let them think for themselves. Where are you getting extra info from to make your assumption? Is there really small text that says "make sure you tell your children that there is no god!"

and how is the image propaganda?
#301 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
Dude... I am not sure we are looking at the same picture....

The purpose of this picture is to show that people who have children brand them for life with a religion. The dark tone and "evil" undertone demonstrates that there is in fact a "superior" and righteous mindset, in this case the absence of religion. I have taken classes on this man, this is blatant propaganda that is critisizing religion the same way you are. No where does this picture say "let your child think for itself" because that would require a vacuum. Unless you keep your child locked away eventually he will be exposed to other ways of thought regardless of what you teach him. The point of parenting is making your child a good person. Even if you tried not to let your religion rub off, eventually it would simply from the proximity.

I have yet to meet a religious person who FORCED someone to think their way. They try to convince them sure, but SO DOES ATHEISM. There is no fundamental difference between two groups that are consistently trying to convert people to their mindset. This picture is trying to convert people to a particular mindset, the implied mindset is atheism and is therefor propaganda. If you are still unsure of this take this picture to a local state college, find the heads of the humanities and art departments and ask them what this picture is implying.
User avatar #306 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
The classes you took told you that he makes propaganda which encourages others to force atheism down their children's throats?

You're adding your own ideas to the image. All the image is doing, aside from the added text, is mocking how religious parents indoctrinate their kids. The image is trying to make indoctrination look like a bad thing! the image is not about forcing atheism! I want you to look at the image with an unbiased perspective. Tell me what you SEE. not what you THINK you see.
#307 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
Christ you are stupid. You are somehow misreading everything that has been posted.

The absence of a "religion" is what? Atheism? This picture is IMPLYING that ONLY RELIGIOUS PEOPLE INDOCTRINATE THEIR CHILDREN. YOU CAN INDOCTRINATE WITH ATHEISM TOO. I CAN INDOCTRINATE WITH PEANUT BUTTER YOU TWAT.

Go to college. Learn what propaganda is. Take several courses on the study of art/rhetoric/logic. Come back. Understand you are being a hypocrite and wrong at the same time. Apologize to everyone for wasting their time trying to show that this picture, is in fact propaganda that supports atheism. If you are unable to do that, which you very well might be based on your posts in this thread, take this picture to a group of unbiased people with PHD's in this field and ask them.
User avatar #313 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
You are ASSUMING that because the branding irons don't include something to represent atheism then it means that atheism is being promoted. I suppose it is also promoting Scientology because it's not included either. what you are doing is ridiculous. you are over analyzing the image and seeing something that simply is not there. It is not saying "only religious people indoctrinate their children". that is an assumption. What it is saying is that "a baby born into a religious family is basically branded with that family's religion." The image offers no alternative, it is simply ridiculing religion, and perhaps saying "don't indoctrinate your children with religion. let them think for themselves." now here you come, thinking, "wow, hypocritical atheists! telling us not to indoctrinate our children, and then they do the same thing but with atheism!" I'm not saying that atheists don't try to make their children avoid religion, or indoctrinate them with atheism, but it's not a problem like religion. theres hardly even anything to brand your child with. you can tell them "there's no god" does that really hold any heat? the next day the kid will go play outside with their friends, and come back home a christian because their friends are. on the other hand, a christian may play with their atheists friends, who tell them about how there is no god, and the christian will come home christian.
I don't doubt the creator of the image may be trying to make atheism look like "the right thing" but it's irrelevant and cannot be concluded based on the image alone.

It seems college has taught you to make your opinions facts. maybe I should drop out so it doesnt happen to me.
User avatar #287 - Crusader (02/07/2013) [-]
Would you say that atheism is a religion?
Because Religion is a faith, which is belief without evidence.
And the belief that there is no god, has as much evidence that there is a god, therefore is belief that there is no god, is as much of a faith as the belief that there is a god.
Therefore atheism is a faith?
#272 - Comment deleted 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... 0
#222 - A. The comparison he made is actually right. B. This …  [+] (16 new replies) 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... 0
#228 - Womens Study Major (02/07/2013) [-]
So you're saying the religious people are right and that god exsist and it's not mass delusion where humanity deposit alot of it's resources to glorify a telepathic space traveler?

Why shit, I've lived my life wrong.
#279 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
Not sure if trolling or just ignorant.

Where in my post did I take a side in saying there is or isn't a god? I am pointing out that the people who agree with this image are twats who need some serious time in school learning logic and rhetoric.
User avatar #226 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
what? you are assuming beyond what the image suggests. the comparison is terrible.
User avatar #238 - Crusader (02/07/2013) [-]
No it's not.
It's comparing the idea that parents cram religion down the throat of their children to the idea that raising a child with no religion, making them ignorant and/or apathetic, which is just as bad if not worse.
User avatar #270 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
You're assuming that the image is telling people that they shouldn't teach about religion at all, which is not what atheism is about. atheism is simply the disbelief or belief that there is no god. you're trying to make atheism look just as bad as religion by attaching an assumption.
User avatar #278 - Crusader (02/07/2013) [-]
That is exactly what the picture implies, that you should either teach about all religions or no religions, because by only teaching one or a few religions, you therefore create a bias and therefore you are "indoctrinating"

And as few people know about all religions, you cannot each about them all, and therefore you can only teach none, which leads to ignorance and apathy, which is worse than any religion.
#286 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
Seeing someone capable of higher thinking is nice. Though I disagree with the fact you can't teach someone a little bit of everything. If i have a kid I would raise him to be good regardless of which religion he picked, I would also show him all of the religions I could and when he was older enough he can choose his own. I was raised Christian and I am a deist because I never felt any ties to what I was taught so I taught myself. I've spent years in college researching religions, sociology, and history. If anything I would like to raise my child with a cultural understanding, and to judge based on specific intellectual criteria.



The thing that burns me about this image is that it is supposed to be "atheist" but it only attacks one religion. Any faith system, in terms of what happens when you die, that attacks another faith system is shit and deserves to be snuffed out. Judge people on their actions and beliefs that affect the living and not the dead. If someone wants to be a good person and hindu, buddhist, zoriastrian, christian, or any other demonination then let them. But if people are going to be "religious", and yes atheism is a religion when you are teaching people to be atheist, and a bad person then fuck them.
User avatar #289 - Crusader (02/07/2013) [-]
What I mean by you can't teach everything is that you obviously will know more about one area than another, a Muslim will know more about Islam than paganism, a Christian will know more about Christianity than Hinduism, etc.
Therefore you can't teach anything, because you can't teach everything.
#304 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
You can broaden a mindset without needing to know everything. Most people in a religious group choose their religion without knowing everything about it. The key is understanding the key concepts of each religion, the purpose, the end game, the faith.
#276 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
It doesn't matter what atheism is about, I am talking in the context of this image. Take this image to someone who studies images and they will tell you it is propaganda. The image is counter proving its own point by being hypocritical. It doesn't matter if you raise your kid religious or atheist YOU ARE DOING THE SAME THING.
User avatar #290 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
Nowhere in the image does it suggest that you should make your child atheist. All it is doing is suggesting that you should let them think for themselves. Where are you getting extra info from to make your assumption? Is there really small text that says "make sure you tell your children that there is no god!"

and how is the image propaganda?
#301 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
Dude... I am not sure we are looking at the same picture....

The purpose of this picture is to show that people who have children brand them for life with a religion. The dark tone and "evil" undertone demonstrates that there is in fact a "superior" and righteous mindset, in this case the absence of religion. I have taken classes on this man, this is blatant propaganda that is critisizing religion the same way you are. No where does this picture say "let your child think for itself" because that would require a vacuum. Unless you keep your child locked away eventually he will be exposed to other ways of thought regardless of what you teach him. The point of parenting is making your child a good person. Even if you tried not to let your religion rub off, eventually it would simply from the proximity.

I have yet to meet a religious person who FORCED someone to think their way. They try to convince them sure, but SO DOES ATHEISM. There is no fundamental difference between two groups that are consistently trying to convert people to their mindset. This picture is trying to convert people to a particular mindset, the implied mindset is atheism and is therefor propaganda. If you are still unsure of this take this picture to a local state college, find the heads of the humanities and art departments and ask them what this picture is implying.
User avatar #306 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
The classes you took told you that he makes propaganda which encourages others to force atheism down their children's throats?

You're adding your own ideas to the image. All the image is doing, aside from the added text, is mocking how religious parents indoctrinate their kids. The image is trying to make indoctrination look like a bad thing! the image is not about forcing atheism! I want you to look at the image with an unbiased perspective. Tell me what you SEE. not what you THINK you see.
#307 - blackandwhitegod (02/07/2013) [-]
Christ you are stupid. You are somehow misreading everything that has been posted.

The absence of a "religion" is what? Atheism? This picture is IMPLYING that ONLY RELIGIOUS PEOPLE INDOCTRINATE THEIR CHILDREN. YOU CAN INDOCTRINATE WITH ATHEISM TOO. I CAN INDOCTRINATE WITH PEANUT BUTTER YOU TWAT.

Go to college. Learn what propaganda is. Take several courses on the study of art/rhetoric/logic. Come back. Understand you are being a hypocrite and wrong at the same time. Apologize to everyone for wasting their time trying to show that this picture, is in fact propaganda that supports atheism. If you are unable to do that, which you very well might be based on your posts in this thread, take this picture to a group of unbiased people with PHD's in this field and ask them.
User avatar #313 - shaunr (02/07/2013) [-]
You are ASSUMING that because the branding irons don't include something to represent atheism then it means that atheism is being promoted. I suppose it is also promoting Scientology because it's not included either. what you are doing is ridiculous. you are over analyzing the image and seeing something that simply is not there. It is not saying "only religious people indoctrinate their children". that is an assumption. What it is saying is that "a baby born into a religious family is basically branded with that family's religion." The image offers no alternative, it is simply ridiculing religion, and perhaps saying "don't indoctrinate your children with religion. let them think for themselves." now here you come, thinking, "wow, hypocritical atheists! telling us not to indoctrinate our children, and then they do the same thing but with atheism!" I'm not saying that atheists don't try to make their children avoid religion, or indoctrinate them with atheism, but it's not a problem like religion. theres hardly even anything to brand your child with. you can tell them "there's no god" does that really hold any heat? the next day the kid will go play outside with their friends, and come back home a christian because their friends are. on the other hand, a christian may play with their atheists friends, who tell them about how there is no god, and the christian will come home christian.
I don't doubt the creator of the image may be trying to make atheism look like "the right thing" but it's irrelevant and cannot be concluded based on the image alone.

It seems college has taught you to make your opinions facts. maybe I should drop out so it doesnt happen to me.
User avatar #287 - Crusader (02/07/2013) [-]
Would you say that atheism is a religion?
Because Religion is a faith, which is belief without evidence.
And the belief that there is no god, has as much evidence that there is a god, therefore is belief that there is no god, is as much of a faith as the belief that there is a god.
Therefore atheism is a faith?
#220 - OP is a faggot who implies that anyone who teaches someone som… 02/07/2013 on Well, what are you waiting... -1
#84 - Frankly you are the reason 'reality TV' is considered not only…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/05/2013 on Oh.... +1
#105 - aerosol (02/05/2013) [-]
The difference being that we actually have a soul and don't feed off of pointless drama, such as that which you seem to be creating. This post may seem ridiculous to you, but a great actor once said "A little nonsense, now and then, is relished by the wisest men." I believe this this to be true. If you don't like it,_ leaving_ would be wise.
#82 - The **** does that have to do with a joke that is… 02/05/2013 on Oh.... 0
#44 - I... I don't even.... Being able to read and speak ar… 02/05/2013 on English Teachers 0
#43 - Well this isn't funny, so it must be junk. Mostly tho… 02/05/2013 on English Teachers -3
#41 - Cool story. Wrong, but cool story. 02/05/2013 on English Teachers 0
#45 - how the **** are people finding this funny, where…  [+] (9 new replies) 02/05/2013 on Oh.... -20
#63 - koalasonfire (02/05/2013) [-]
User avatar #62 - bloodspider (02/05/2013) [-]
Just leave FJ and your problem is solved.
#58 - comanderspy (02/05/2013) [-]
#57 - nahsahsenn (02/05/2013) [-]
#53 - jokingcargo (02/05/2013) [-]
#52 - Womens Study Major (02/05/2013) [-]
It's funny because FONV is the shit and fuck you.
#82 - blackandwhitegod (02/05/2013) [-]
The fuck does that have to do with a joke that isn't funny?

4000 years of evolution and there is still a group of people left that think "hur I name my imaginary self the same way as everyone else with big penis joke and words sound funny and everyone love me and think i comic genius hur hur."
User avatar #61 - bloodspider (02/05/2013) [-]
I loved both games, they each have their offerings that make them unique.
#46 - carnivorouswalnut (02/05/2013) [-]
Then leave.
#98 - Im calling ******** . Ive seen your posts, the…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/03/2013 on Deep atheist -1
User avatar #99 - prettyflyforaderp (02/03/2013) [-]
wow u clearly havent seen me at all. i posted a few for other atheists or other people who feel that way i never argued with somthing that wasnt my own.
#96 - I want to strangle everyone who is half as ignorant, if not as… 02/03/2013 on Deep atheist -1
#94 - That statement is so wrong. Logically stop and think,… 02/03/2013 on Deep atheist -1

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - Womens Study Major (04/21/2013) [-]
Grow a brain you enormous faggot
 Friends (0)