x
FJ is now mobile friendly. Try it out on your mobile browser!
Click to expand

belikea

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Video Games Played: A lot
Date Signed Up:11/28/2010
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#5309
Highest Comment Rank:#5250
Comment Thumbs: 908 total,  1018 ,  110
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 176 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 177 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:313
FJ Points:777

latest user's comments

#29 - This is amazing. If/when this comes out, I think I might need …  [+] (1 new reply) 03/03/2015 on Beyond Skyrim Art Comp +1
#30 - orionthegreat (03/03/2015) [-]
There's so much content on the pc out now I'd say do it anyways.
#200 - And now will come the red thumbs, because even though you may …  [+] (1 new reply) 02/26/2015 on But..muh oppression. 0
User avatar #219 - economyexplain (02/26/2015) [-]
Thumbs aren't too important to me. I've been on this site for years and I know most of these people are (at least relatively) pretty smart. It's just pretty fucking painful to see them so wrong on an issue that makes front page nearly every fucking day. So if just a few FJ'ers read this and realize they look just as bad as the feminist extremists they hate, then maybe I've done some good.
#40 - I can 100% attest that sceptile is a bro  [+] (1 new reply) 02/22/2015 on rivalry +22
#103 - iowndemostest (02/22/2015) [-]
That's why I always pick Treecko.
#33 - Isn't it a spell to summon him three times while outside? 02/22/2015 on Hidden Skyrim Bosses +3
#31 - That's an amazing paradox. 02/22/2015 on Proof jet fuel cant melt... 0
#26 - If that's a stall, it's an intentional one, and there's no str…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/19/2015 on When You See Your Ex... 0
User avatar #27 - compared (02/20/2015) [-]
Thanks a lot for the mention, hope you are well.
#23 - I never contended that Sukhoi airframes are incredibly impress…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/18/2015 on When You See Your Ex... 0
User avatar #25 - darkoyan (02/19/2015) [-]
also, we are comparing a super obsolete Su-30 against the flaship of the USAF, and the old russian crap is still winning, i could show you SU-37, 47 and PAK-Fa's but i feel sorry for the F22 for having to face such humilliation
User avatar #24 - darkoyan (02/19/2015) [-]
all i see is the *'murica USAF's Pride* struggling to go out of stall while trying to fly doing slow-ass turning, and the most ridiculously SLOW Pugachev's Cobra lazy attempt i ever seen
User avatar #26 - belikea (02/19/2015) [-]
If that's a stall, it's an intentional one, and there's no struggle to get out of it, no more than there is with any video. I could have compared the Su-30 (If that is what is in the video you posted, I see canards) with an F-15, but I figured a video from the same source would more impartial. And while you could show videos of the Su-37 and -47, it'd be irrelevant, as both models were created solely to test technology (vectored thrust with the -37, forward swept wings with the -47) and show off, and are not, nor were ever intended to serve, in any other capacity, unlike the F-22. Meanwhile, the T-50, though intended to serve, is still under production and remains unproven.

"Russian Air Superiority", huh? Not quite. And this doesn't even take into account the actual usefulness of such fancy and slow maneuvers in a modern combat scenario where the top combatants generally rely on long range attacks and stealth (See: the reason why the T-50 is intended to become a mainline fighter) to sruvive
User avatar #27 - compared (02/20/2015) [-]
Thanks a lot for the mention, hope you are well.
#19 - [ citation needed ] Also, Sukhoi are nice, b…  [+] (7 new replies) 02/16/2015 on When You See Your Ex... -1
User avatar #22 - darkoyan (02/18/2015) [-]
sure you can pull of that over the stall speed and with full flap wih americunt flying crap, but do that on a sukhoi 30kt BELOW the stall speed, also it is true Su's and MiG's are not the only aircraft, there's also the eurofighter (+15% more thrust than MTOW) and saab Jas-39 Gripen

Russians and Eurofaggot pilots never heard of the word STALL

show me any USAF flying shit pulling this kind of stuff without losing a wing
(minute 2:00 onwards)
Sukhoi Maneouvers

that's russian air superiority for you faggot
User avatar #23 - belikea (02/18/2015) [-]
I never contended that Sukhoi airframes are incredibly impressive. I was questioning your statement that sukhoi and MiG aircraft are the only ones with igher thrust than weight.

Serious question, by the way: how are you figuring those percentages out? Does it have to do with the thrust to weight ratio? Because I haven't seen too many comparisons between maximum takeoff weight and thrust, and now I'm curious.

Also, I'm pretty sure the thing in the gif is a Su-33, since that is the variant meant for carrier operations, while the Su-30K (thought I don't know about ths Su-30kt, so I could be wrong) is the export version of the Su-30.

Also, here's a video of some "USAF flying shit" performing some different, but similarly impressive maneuvers, posted by the same guy.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EW-1TxtSjBY
User avatar #25 - darkoyan (02/19/2015) [-]
also, we are comparing a super obsolete Su-30 against the flaship of the USAF, and the old russian crap is still winning, i could show you SU-37, 47 and PAK-Fa's but i feel sorry for the F22 for having to face such humilliation
User avatar #24 - darkoyan (02/19/2015) [-]
all i see is the *'murica USAF's Pride* struggling to go out of stall while trying to fly doing slow-ass turning, and the most ridiculously SLOW Pugachev's Cobra lazy attempt i ever seen
User avatar #26 - belikea (02/19/2015) [-]
If that's a stall, it's an intentional one, and there's no struggle to get out of it, no more than there is with any video. I could have compared the Su-30 (If that is what is in the video you posted, I see canards) with an F-15, but I figured a video from the same source would more impartial. And while you could show videos of the Su-37 and -47, it'd be irrelevant, as both models were created solely to test technology (vectored thrust with the -37, forward swept wings with the -47) and show off, and are not, nor were ever intended to serve, in any other capacity, unlike the F-22. Meanwhile, the T-50, though intended to serve, is still under production and remains unproven.

"Russian Air Superiority", huh? Not quite. And this doesn't even take into account the actual usefulness of such fancy and slow maneuvers in a modern combat scenario where the top combatants generally rely on long range attacks and stealth (See: the reason why the T-50 is intended to become a mainline fighter) to sruvive
User avatar #27 - compared (02/20/2015) [-]
Thanks a lot for the mention, hope you are well.
#21 - dingdongpancakes (02/17/2015) [-]
11 carriers mother fucker with 1 being built and 2 more planned
#8 - He does. Its not like a worldwide effort means everywhere in t…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/10/2015 on Woke up in a new Lamborghini +304
User avatar #96 - plutarkus (02/11/2015) [-]
Sorry, don't mean to be salty...
I just wanted to point out that he is funding the Common-Core educational system in America, and** TL;DR, it will create a generation of Tumblr SJWs**...
Here is a video of a University teacher explaining what it is and how it is wrong.
Its 2 hours long, but if you're interested its interesting
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si-kx5-MKSE
#52 - If I just.. maybe a twist to the left...there! It isn… 02/10/2015 on title +2
[ 307 Total ]

items

Total unique items point value: 7363 / Total items point value: 11491

Comments(0):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)