I see your point, just don't bring bad things up when he does something good. Bring the bad things up when he does them.

Hardly, as all he done was a good deed and people are brining things up about him.

The other two done bad things and are now allowed to become respected members of society, the complete opposite of what the black man is having.

The other two have done things considered imoral not illegal. I still wouldn't vote for any of them though.

Yet, my point is: imagine the black guy is a drug dealer and a thief. For years he's been selling and ruining people's lives. One day he prevents those women from being abducted... Now he's a fucking HERO!! So, according to your logic we should forget about everything else bad he's done up until that moment?

It is fair for the media to publish what the white guys did but not what the black one did because he has done something heroic?

I see your point, just don't bring bad things up when he does something good. Bring the bad things up when he does them.

Well shit, yet again someone was able to best me
I could go and say that in there case its different but.. i would seem like a Hypocrite bigot then
I can't jest here, you are a man of logic and have earned my praise

Thank you, sir for accepting your loss with such kindness!
Chants of your dignity and longanimity will be made and sung throughout the whole internet!!

What is better? to be born good, or to overcome your evil nature through great effort?

Just because he did something good once doesn't mean he overcame his evil nature.

AND, just because the two white dudes did something bad once doesn't mean they're bad people.

Enlarge pic, Parthurnaax's eyes look so sad.

Meh he paid his debt to society right and whats more he was pushed into the spot light for helping out those poor girls. being in the right place at the right time. So why bring up his criminal record? i mean, whats that got to do with anything?

and for the record, that guy cheating on his wife and still getting elected should be an issue either, but it does make him a piece of shit.

Is it still worth it to bring something up like that?
I mean he may have very well saved that persons life, why does the media have to go and make him seem like the criminal?
What he did is in the past and while it can't be forgotten it doesnt mean he should live it everyday of his life.
I'm done i feel better now carry on.

Then I guess the same is applicable to the two white men.

I guess we have to criticise the media for telling us what the three of them did.

Hardly, as all he done was a good deed and people are brining things up about him.

The other two done bad things and are now allowed to become respected members of society, the complete opposite of what the black man is having.

The other two have done things considered imoral not illegal. I still wouldn't vote for any of them though.

Yet, my point is: imagine the black guy is a drug dealer and a thief. For years he's been selling and ruining people's lives. One day he prevents those women from being abducted... Now he's a fucking HERO!! So, according to your logic we should forget about everything else bad he's done up until that moment?

It is fair for the media to publish what the white guys did but not what the black one did because he has done something heroic?

I see your point, just don't bring bad things up when he does something good. Bring the bad things up when he does them.

Well shit, yet again someone was able to best me
I could go and say that in there case its different but.. i would seem like a Hypocrite bigot then
I can't jest here, you are a man of logic and have earned my praise

Thank you, sir for accepting your loss with such kindness!
Chants of your dignity and longanimity will be made and sung throughout the whole internet!!

I'mgladit'sarepostthen

k