beatmasterz

Rank #9482 on Content
beatmasterz Avatar Level 312 Comments: Wizard
Offline
Send mail to beatmasterz Block beatmasterz Invite beatmasterz to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 19
Consoles Owned: Xbox 360, PC
Date Signed Up:3/06/2011
Last Login:1/29/2015
Location:Netherlands
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9482
Comment Ranking:#12491
Highest Content Rank:#6889
Highest Comment Rank:#282
Content Thumbs: 723 total,  977 ,  254
Comment Thumbs: 12470 total,  15997 ,  3527
Content Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 72 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 73 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 19.3% (193/1000)
Level 312 Comments: Wizard → Level 313 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:2
Content Views:3558
Total Comments Made:5212
FJ Points:3492

latest user's comments

#172959 - **beatmasterz used "*roll cah answer*"** **beatmasterz roll… 1 hour ago on Advice - love advice,... 0
#45 - It's these kinds of classes. Supposed to make lifting more &qu… 2 hours ago on Bar Joke 0
#323 - no..? 3 hours ago on rekdify the situation 0
#179 - Does that justify her actions? Thought not. Besides gay people…  [+] (1 new reply) 17 hours ago on rekdify the situation -24
User avatar #182 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
because I could totally ship off to the next country anytime i wanted, we've all got that kind of money again, i see your point though
#174 - That's not even remotely close to what I implied. I was saying…  [+] (5 new replies) 17 hours ago on rekdify the situation +11
User avatar #280 - fiveblackmen (12 hours ago) [-]
They aren't getting their lives ruined for thinking homosexuality is wrong. They are getting their lives ruined because they are cheating on their spouses.
User avatar #268 - Ruspanic (13 hours ago) [-]
I've read the article. Conservative politicians in Alabama oppose gay marriage primarily on the basis of "family values". This lady's reasoning is that if they're going to tell her she can't marry her partner on the basis of "family values", then she's going to out them as hypocrites who don't abide by their own family values and who only want those values to restrict other people's behaviors.

Furthermore, cheaters are scumbags.
User avatar #178 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
I see your point, but you're kind of screwing over gay people's lives if you tell them they can't get married.
User avatar #179 - beatmasterz (17 hours ago) [-]
Does that justify her actions? Thought not. Besides gay people can move to other countries to get married.
User avatar #182 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
because I could totally ship off to the next country anytime i wanted, we've all got that kind of money again, i see your point though
#144 - Your red thumbs only fuel my erection. Keep them coming.  [+] (2 new replies) 17 hours ago on rekdify the situation +3
User avatar #233 - darkangeloffire (14 hours ago) [-]
Anything to make people fap
User avatar #151 - mvtjets (17 hours ago) [-]
Gladly
#129 - so? 18 hours ago on rekdify the situation -3
#72 - Oh look, a fat bitch trying to force her liberal opinion on ot…  [+] (57 new replies) 21 hours ago on rekdify the situation -131
User avatar #308 - lulzformalaysiaair (11 hours ago) [-]
Why were you thumbed down? De fuck?
User avatar #291 - ronyx (12 hours ago) [-]
They ruined their lives themselves by being cheating scum.
#278 - mikeoxlong (12 hours ago) [-]
I can't understand how this has so many red thumbs..
User avatar #264 - timeiskey (13 hours ago) [-]
nono, maybe he has a point

its one thing to dislike gay marriage.

its another to publicly ridicule someone, ruining their career..

for all you know, his wife may already know of his cheating and he is just in a stage he is trying to get over.
User avatar #260 - coonseth (13 hours ago) [-]
The more down thumbs you get, the more correct you look hahaha so true.
User avatar #294 - ronyx (12 hours ago) [-]
That's a retarded way of looking at things.
#257 - newoldfagdeluxe (13 hours ago) [-]
that's no way to talk about your mother
#254 - soyfriedbryce (14 hours ago) [-]
My issue with it has nothing to do with opinions or laws, and I can honestly say using it to her advantage like that is despicable. But I do think she should just expose them, not for her own gain, but because its the right thing to do. Affairs are just shitty behavior, if you dont want to be with someone, get a divorce, break up with them. Its that simple, dont go sneaking around and trying to get away with it. Thats just asking for shit to happen.
User avatar #245 - famkehoopers (14 hours ago) [-]
Judging by your thumbs down I see feminists are taking over FJ. This is bad.
User avatar #290 - ronyx (12 hours ago) [-]
Choke on a dick nigga
User avatar #287 - penileburglar (12 hours ago) [-]
This has nothing to do with feminism.

There's a difference between using death threats and DDOS attacks against people you disagree with and threatening to out people for behavior hypocritical to the very cause they're arguing (in this case, so called 'family values.')

They're hypocrites trying to use the concept of 'family values' to oppress other people while they themselves don't believe in those same values. If they were debating over health care law or taxes or some shit, then she'd be wrong for sure. But if you're going to claim you are against gay marriage because you believe in 'strong family values,' you fucking better demonstrate those beliefs in your own family life--and if she can prove that they don't, then she can prove that they are simply prejudiced.

She basically just said 'Look you little shits, I know you don't believe in family values because half of you cheat on your fucking wives. So drop that fucking act or I'll tell them.'
#216 - yuukoku (15 hours ago) [-]
This is true, but having an affair is just putting yourself in that situation. If her colleagues were actually good people, they wouldn't be having affairs. She's just as bad using that against them, but they gave her the backing to do that with. It's a legitimate strategy and she's using it to her favor, which is how a good politician gets things done.

This is why politicians are all scum, regardless of their party.
#219 - anonymous (15 hours ago) [-]
I don't remember getting the memo that blackmail is a legitimate strategy..
User avatar #284 - penileburglar (12 hours ago) [-]
You would make a terrible politician.
User avatar #209 - huffe (15 hours ago) [-]
So, according to you affairs are a good thing?
User avatar #323 - beatmasterz (3 hours ago) [-]
no..?
#202 - anonymous (15 hours ago) [-]
downvote this guy? too many liberals on this site
User avatar #144 - beatmasterz (17 hours ago) [-]
Your red thumbs only fuel my erection. Keep them coming.
User avatar #233 - darkangeloffire (14 hours ago) [-]
Anything to make people fap
User avatar #151 - mvtjets (17 hours ago) [-]
Gladly
User avatar #91 - Deathena (20 hours ago) [-]
Oh look, politicians trying to force their conservative opinions on others by not allowing any one who doesn't follow their sexual orientation / religious beliefs to marry.

Have I seen this comment before?
In addition she isn't forcing her views since she isn't actually going through with it since she doesn't have proof. It was an emotional response to the fact the politicians do not have the power to overrule the constitution without a constitutional amendment and the judges ruled the gay marriage ban unconstitutional. At least that's the way Canadian law works, not 100% sure if American law is the same
www.alabamas13.com/news/patricia-todd-backs-away-from-outing-politicians/30959666
#309 - slimscheibe (11 hours ago) [-]
Thanks for the logical input, I was almost inclined to agree with an idiot until I read what you had to say.
User avatar #105 - commoncrunch (19 hours ago) [-]
Still though, if she DID have proof and back out from telling on the basis that they follow her orders, she's be just as guilty of unintentionally supporting cheating.
User avatar #108 - Deathena (19 hours ago) [-]
No if she backed down because they followed her orders she would be guilty of blackmailing.
And supporting someone cheat is not illegal just immoral as far as I know unless they have some law about it in the state which even if they do I would think it would only apply in civil court such as divorce proceeding or child custody maybe
User avatar #110 - commoncrunch (19 hours ago) [-]
To people like her, what it lacks in illegality, it makes up for it in immorality.
You don't have to worry about legal troubles from refraining from spilling the beans about affairs, but hoo boy, you sure are gonna carry that weight.
User avatar #114 - Deathena (18 hours ago) [-]
I would think the people HAVING the affairs, but claiming gay marriage ruins family values, would carry that weight more.
That's the point she is trying to make. She was angry that these people are being hypocritical by having families, and cheating on their spouses, while claiming gay marriage will ruin family values.
She made an emotional statement on facebook which I'm sure we all do but she took it too far being a political representative and she has retracted the statement.
User avatar #115 - commoncrunch (18 hours ago) [-]
Hmm, that's a good point.
And that's a reasonable action on her part, retracting her statement.
#227 - anonymous (14 hours ago) [-]
she should also publicly apologise, at least in my anonymous opinion.
User avatar #80 - imagnetsux (21 hours ago) [-]
extramarital affairs are just as un-Christian as homosexuality, if not more.
User avatar #175 - Carthusia (17 hours ago) [-]
sorry, bro. Hit the wrong reply button. You and I are in agreement.
don't hit me plz :-<
User avatar #176 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
hits you with green thumbs
#183 - Carthusia (17 hours ago) [-]
#172 - Carthusia (17 hours ago) [-]
You're completely missing the point, you stupid git.
You can't condemn homosexuality on the premise of defending the "sanctity of marriage" while carrying out an extramarital affair.

User avatar #173 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
that's pretty much exactly what I just said.
#170 - asurasxnight (17 hours ago) [-]
homosexual extramarital affairs. how would she know?
User avatar #171 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
she found the pics they posted on lemonparty.org
#177 - asurasxnight (17 hours ago) [-]
that is funny.
User avatar #152 - IamSofaKingdom (17 hours ago) [-]
The guy you responded to didn't mention religion at all, just liberals.
User avatar #155 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
yeah but that's the government's main concern with gay marriage.
User avatar #174 - beatmasterz (17 hours ago) [-]
That's not even remotely close to what I implied. I was saying it's wrong to breach people's privacy because you disagree with their democratic decision. People have the right to think homosexuality is wrong and you shouldn't get your life screwed over for merely your opinion.

What this fat bitch does is take things personally and replies with committing a crime, as if that makes her in the right somehow.
User avatar #280 - fiveblackmen (12 hours ago) [-]
They aren't getting their lives ruined for thinking homosexuality is wrong. They are getting their lives ruined because they are cheating on their spouses.
User avatar #268 - Ruspanic (13 hours ago) [-]
I've read the article. Conservative politicians in Alabama oppose gay marriage primarily on the basis of "family values". This lady's reasoning is that if they're going to tell her she can't marry her partner on the basis of "family values", then she's going to out them as hypocrites who don't abide by their own family values and who only want those values to restrict other people's behaviors.

Furthermore, cheaters are scumbags.
User avatar #178 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
I see your point, but you're kind of screwing over gay people's lives if you tell them they can't get married.
User avatar #179 - beatmasterz (17 hours ago) [-]
Does that justify her actions? Thought not. Besides gay people can move to other countries to get married.
User avatar #182 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
because I could totally ship off to the next country anytime i wanted, we've all got that kind of money again, i see your point though
User avatar #157 - IamSofaKingdom (17 hours ago) [-]
But your comment was directly a response to his, which didn't mention it. It isn't fair to attack him for the issues involving a topic outside of his statement.
User avatar #159 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
i'm just trying to g reason for what the woman did. i'm not attacking him. stop being an SJW.
User avatar #163 - IamSofaKingdom (17 hours ago) [-]
I am not being SJW for pointing out something obvious, not even close. In fact, you trying to call me an SJW for pointing out an irrational statement on your point sound more like an SJW defensive cry. He made a statement, however irrational and harsh, about liberals and then you just randomly threw a religious argument at him with the purpose of refuting his statement.

After I pointed out that he didn't mention that you could easily just say, "oh" and that would be that but instead you cry that I am being some overly defensive SJW for making an observation.
User avatar #169 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
no, you accused me of attacking him when I was just pointing out the logic in what she did. the government's main reason for forbidding gay marriage is religious, therefore they should be keeping to the same rules, but they're not, so they can't claim publicly to be better than gay people. your observation that I was attacking him, however well intentioned, is incorrect, and i'm just pointing out that labelling every conflicting opinion you come across as an attack sounds kind of like one of them.
User avatar #184 - IamSofaKingdom (16 hours ago) [-]
You realize that your entire comment was pointless right? You are describing your statement in detail as if I don't understand the relationship between the governments actions and religion when that wasn't even the topic of the first comment or mine. You explained it for no reason.

You responded to his comment in order to present a counter to his statement and your chosen topic was unrelated to his statement. That is what I said, that is what happened and I don't know why you are still trying to debate out why religion is relevant to his comment.

If you had posted your comment on your own it would make sense but you didn't, you made a reply.
User avatar #185 - imagnetsux (16 hours ago) [-]
he called her a fat bitch trying to force her opinion, I pointed out that those politicians are trying to force their opinion without even keeping to it. and i'm still not attacking him.
User avatar #186 - IamSofaKingdom (16 hours ago) [-]
That first half has nothing to do with the flaw I pointed out in your original response. The second half of your comment is pointless since I said you tried to present a counter point to his statement and in nowhere repeated the word "attack" in that response. You are repeating it unprovoked.
User avatar #189 - imagnetsux (16 hours ago) [-]
religion does have something to do with it as it is the foundation of these people's opinion
User avatar #160 - imagnetsux (17 hours ago) [-]
*give
User avatar #129 - beatmasterz (18 hours ago) [-]
so?
User avatar #79 - GnRNoD (21 hours ago) [-]
Well aren't those who oppose gay marriage kinda doing the same in the first place?
Except it's not the liberal opinion, and it's not calling them out on doing something that's shitty and wrong but yeah what the fuck do I know...
User avatar #74 - mytomanenbre (21 hours ago) [-]
All of my thumbs, you can have them.
#13 - That would've made a better trilogy than the current one. 01/27/2015 on How it should have ended -2
#44 - What a refreshing insight in urban culture. 01/27/2015 on Black Twitter Compilation #14 +1

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #64 - revengeforfreeze (02/24/2014) [-]
www.funnyjunk.com/advice/117911#117911

This person can't be right

Is this reality?
User avatar #62 - lolocaustic ONLINE (09/01/2013) [-]
Your avatar suits you, friend.
User avatar #63 to #62 - beatmasterz (09/02/2013) [-]
Thank you.
User avatar #53 - paintbucket (03/18/2013) [-]
www.funnyjunk.com/user/spurieuleweteuh
using 2 accounts is pretty lame.
User avatar #54 to #53 - beatmasterz (03/18/2013) [-]
what are you talking about?
User avatar #55 to #54 - paintbucket (03/18/2013) [-]
it's pretty obvious.
User avatar #56 to #55 - beatmasterz (03/18/2013) [-]
Seriously, I don't know what you're talking about...
User avatar #57 to #56 - paintbucket (03/18/2013) [-]
oh, i think you do.
but whatever.
User avatar #58 to #57 - beatmasterz (03/18/2013) [-]
I don't see how you would bring something like that up to then proceed to stop talking about it but alright.
User avatar #59 to #58 - paintbucket (03/18/2013) [-]
just letting you know that i know.
that's all that needs to be said.
User avatar #60 to #59 - beatmasterz (03/18/2013) [-]
If you're talking about spurieuleweteuh, he's a friend of mine at school who happens to be on this site. No need to get all paranoid when I'm backed up by someone.
User avatar #61 to #60 - paintbucket (03/18/2013) [-]
right right right
User avatar #52 - turkboy (01/28/2013) [-]
oh wait

u are going to have to go to my profile

then where all my items are there should be a button that says trade with turkboy or something

in the trading window,
click "add points"

then type in your amount of points you have

then click next
thentype in the captcha
then click send :D
User avatar #47 - turkboy (01/28/2013) [-]
hey man,

is there any chance i could maybe have ur fj points?

as they serve no purpose except for random items junk?
User avatar #48 to #47 - beatmasterz (01/28/2013) [-]
And why would I give them to you?
#49 to #48 - turkboy (01/28/2013) [-]
because you are an awesome person and i will give you this groovy wallpaper :D
User avatar #50 to #49 - beatmasterz (01/28/2013) [-]
Fine, how do give them?
User avatar #51 to #50 - turkboy (01/28/2013) [-]
i will send for them

all u have to do, is go to the "items interface"

and click "view request"

then type in the captcha, then press "accept trade :D
User avatar #4 - blastizard (11/04/2012) [-]
Can I have that discontinued watermelon
User avatar #3 - diamondhead (07/14/2011) [-]
Ok. I'm the first to admit my mistakes.
The font seem fake.
But hes not guilty of those FJ messages.
Those messages are fake.

Anyway,

Regards,

DH
#1 - iMagnet Comment deleted by beatmasterz [-]
 Friends (0)