baykhal
Rank #15363 on Comments
Level 124 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry Offline
Send mail to baykhal Block baykhal Invite baykhal to be your friend Last status update:  

 
Date Signed Up:  7/19/2013 
Last Login:  10/27/2016 
Stats  
Comment Ranking:  #15363 
Highest Comment Rank:  #7434 
Comment Thumbs:  312 total, 392 , 80 
Content Level Progress:  6.77% (4/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here 
Comment Level Progress:  20% (2/10) Level 124 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 125 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry 
Subscribers:  0 
Total Comments Made:  157 
FJ Points:  241 
Trump is 100% supportive of the PATRIOT Act and the NSA's unconstitutional use of surveillance. Even if Hillary is blocked from presidency, Assange will still have to fight for his life with Trump's administration next.
Even the Chief of the NSA says the leaks were completely manageable and the fearmongering was entirely unnecessary.
www.nytimes.com/2014/06/30/us/skyisntfallingaftersnowdennsachiefsays.html?_r=0
No one in the government has claimed a life was lost due to these leaks. No one. But you bought into the stack of misconceptions to deliberate lies, didn't you?
"Don't be a dumbass."
www.politifact.com/truthometer/statements/2016/aug/12/hillaryclinton/hasdonaldtrumptalkedaboutusingnukesagainst/
The best propaganda is the propaganda people like you don't understand is biased. If they sided against Trump every time then everyone would've seen through their lies.
So, basically they either side against or for him but never tell the truth, right?
Does this make sense to you, Homles?
The site strives to be viewed as neutral as possible but very often their fact checkups end as: Republican was 1% off? "Pants on fire"  Democrat was 1% off? "Mostly true"
If Trump even attempts to go that far I'd actually be surprised if no one assassinated him.
You mean that dumbass statement he made that I'm sure some moron will try to defend?
I honestly think Trump has no clue how to run a country. He never held a high government position (or even a low one), so I don't really believe anything he is saying in regards to extremely important political decisions. I think he will have his cabinet, congress and a lot of people advisors and he will listen to them. I don't think he is an absolute idiot and therefore will not go bananas as president.
So no, I actually don't believe him if he said such a thing. I also don't believe he will stop all Muslims from coming into the US and I am also highly skeptic of that wall.
(all whole number larger than 1)  (all whole numbers larger than 3)
there IS NOT CEILING
1. How many whole number are between three and 100
2. How many whole numbers are between one and 100
So this totally smashes you comparing a set of 100 real numbers and a set of infinite numbers since this example proves the two are distinctively different.
infinity doesnt
(all whole number larger than 1)  (all whole numbers larger than 3)
there IS NOT CEILING
We know that whole numbers above one are infinite, and we know that whole numbers above three are infinite, but even a child could tell you that one set is larger. If you subtracted one infinity from the other, the result would be two.
And before you tell me that you can't subtract infinity, do a course in any kind of advanced calc
1. How many whole number are between three and 100
2. How many whole numbers are between one and 100
So this totally smashes you comparing a set of 100 real numbers and a set of infinite numbers since this example proves the two are distinctively different.
infinity doesnt
(all whole number larger than 1)  (all whole numbers larger than 3)
there IS NOT CEILING
What I haven't done is gotten a stick so far up my ass that I'm afraid to use the word "larger" in a conversation about infinity.
anons proof #21 is entirely correct
We know that whole numbers above one are infinite, and we know that whole numbers above three are infinite, but even a child could tell you that one set is larger. If you subtracted one infinity from the other, the result would be two.
And before you tell me that you can't subtract infinity, do a course in any kind of advanced calc
1. How many whole number are between three and 100
2. How many whole numbers are between one and 100
So this totally smashes you comparing a set of 100 real numbers and a set of infinite numbers since this example proves the two are distinctively different.
infinity doesnt
(all whole number larger than 1)  (all whole numbers larger than 3)
there IS NOT CEILING