Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

battlesmurf

battlesmurf Avatar Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to battlesmurf Block battlesmurf Invite battlesmurf to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:6/19/2011
Last Login:12/16/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 700 total,  801 ,  101
Comment Thumbs: 1414 total,  1711 ,  297
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 70 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 71 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 14% (14/100)
Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:38571
Times Content Favorited:129 times
Total Comments Made:192
FJ Points:2131
Favorite Tags: comic (2)

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 22946
    Thumbs Up 737 Thumbs Down 75 Total: +662
    Comments: 229
    Favorites: 124
    Uploaded: 09/10/12
    how ro piss of your nerdy friens how ro piss of your nerdy friens
  • Views: 12427
    Thumbs Up 33 Thumbs Down 12 Total: +21
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 4
    Uploaded: 06/19/11
    uncle dolan uncle dolan
  • Views: 1004
    Thumbs Up 23 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +18
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 06/26/11
    Mustache Mustache

latest user's comments

#90 - These are almost always fake, you know  [+] (1 new reply) 05/11/2014 on salad -1
User avatar #91 - vetis (05/11/2014) [-]
If they're fake, then oh well. At least they're entertaining, but then what I said is not applicable. If it's real, then it's even more entertaining and what I said is applicable.
#140 - Yes, it does. It is not a principle held by revolutionary anar… 03/20/2014 on Anarchy -2
#130 - Yes, I know. However, it does not obey the non-aggression prin…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/20/2014 on Anarchy -1
#135 - anonymous (03/20/2014) [-]
self-defense does not violate the non-aggression principle

also this
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_revolution
User avatar #140 - battlesmurf (03/20/2014) [-]
Yes, it does. It is not a principle held by revolutionary anarchists, but rather by mutualists and anarcho-capitalists.

From Wikipedia:

"Aggression, for the purposes of NAP, is defined as the initiation or threatening of violence against a person or legitimately owned property of another. Specifically, any unsolicited actions of others that physically affect an individual’s property or person, no matter if the result of those actions is damaging, beneficial, or neutral to the owner, are considered violent or aggressive when they are against the owner's free will and interfere with his right to self-determination and the principle of self-ownership."

"Supporters of the NAP often appeal to it in order to argue for the immorality of theft, vandalism, assault, and fraud."
#111 - Well, by hierarchies I of course mean hierarchies on a societa… 03/20/2014 on Anarchy -1
#98 - And why would they not be anarchists? Insurrection and propaga… 03/20/2014 on Anarchy +1
#97 - No it isn't. Anarchism is mainly based on the principles of re…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/20/2014 on Anarchy 0
#129 - anonymous (03/20/2014) [-]
overthowing an oppressive government is no different than self-defense
User avatar #130 - battlesmurf (03/20/2014) [-]
Yes, I know. However, it does not obey the non-aggression principle, which is only held by those who seek to change by different means than by revolution.
#135 - anonymous (03/20/2014) [-]
self-defense does not violate the non-aggression principle

also this
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_revolution
User avatar #140 - battlesmurf (03/20/2014) [-]
Yes, it does. It is not a principle held by revolutionary anarchists, but rather by mutualists and anarcho-capitalists.

From Wikipedia:

"Aggression, for the purposes of NAP, is defined as the initiation or threatening of violence against a person or legitimately owned property of another. Specifically, any unsolicited actions of others that physically affect an individual’s property or person, no matter if the result of those actions is damaging, beneficial, or neutral to the owner, are considered violent or aggressive when they are against the owner's free will and interfere with his right to self-determination and the principle of self-ownership."

"Supporters of the NAP often appeal to it in order to argue for the immorality of theft, vandalism, assault, and fraud."
#95 - Anarcho-capitalism is not a branch of anarchism. A capitalisti…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/20/2014 on Anarchy +1
User avatar #100 - adu (03/20/2014) [-]
Any true form of anarchism (the resistance of authority and hierarchies) taken to the extreme is nihilism. Your body is a hierarchy of functions that are in submission to your brain, a family is a hierarchy of bodies that is submissive to the father or parents, a town is a hierarchy of families and individuals submissive to a mayor, etc. Literally nothing functions without a form of hierarchy. Anarcho-capitalism just strictly states its own preference of hierarchy. Many people have a warped perception of capitalism though, so a more comfortable term would be "free-market anarchism," which is truly what it is. No regulations. None. Prostitution, child labor, drugs and other illegal substances, kinder eggs, all of it. That's what anarcho-capitalism is, voluntary action applied especially to an organic economy.

I'm personally not an Ancap, but I sympathize with many of their messages and have to admit they make a great deal of sense. Their terminology is a lot of word-games sometimes, though. The definition between a government and a business is not clearly defined.
User avatar #111 - battlesmurf (03/20/2014) [-]
Well, by hierarchies I of course mean hierarchies on a societal level. Social classes, economic power, forced division of labor, the inherently unjust relationship between workers and capitalists (wage slavery etc), the power gained by accumulation of wealth, land or property etc etc. Those are all things that anarchists oppose and have opposed ever since the ideology was formed.

I agree that a lot of their ideas makes sense, but anarchists and anarcho-capitalists disagree on several fundamental issues. However, I am not one to say that such a society is not allowed to exist, as long as the people in an Ancap society are there by their own free will and are allowed to leave if they so wish. Which, I think, Ancaps won't oppose.
#216 - I reserve the right to dislike or hate whomever I want on the … 02/25/2014 on BRILLIANT -1
#134 - They never showed up even though they "knew this kid was … 02/07/2014 on Meeting your GF's father... 0
#132 - Why didn't he just contact the police before flexing his dick?…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/07/2014 on Meeting your GF's father... 0
User avatar #133 - xxnovey (02/07/2014) [-]
I grew up in a very small town where the police are pretty corrupt and all they care about is their turn over rate. They had no "proof" on the kid, my dad and my sister's mom contacted the police multiple times, they never showed up, and they never took care of the situation. The boy knew the police were a joke and they wouldn't touch him, so my dad had to just put him in his place.
User avatar #134 - battlesmurf (02/07/2014) [-]
They never showed up even though they "knew this kid was trouble"? And then they let your dad go after he beat the shit out of a kid that they couldn't prove ever even harassed your sister or her family? Sure. Sounds very plausible.
[ 192 Total ]

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)