Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu


Rank #2329 on Comments
azroth Avatar Level 313 Comments: Wizard
Send mail to azroth Block azroth Invite azroth to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Interests: Being a giant faggot, mostly
Date Signed Up:5/24/2011
Last Login:9/17/2014
Location:Dying Blue Marble
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#5039
Comment Ranking:#2329
Highest Content Rank:#491
Highest Comment Rank:#423
Content Thumbs: 13186 total,  14599 ,  1413
Comment Thumbs: 13700 total,  14531 ,  831
Content Level Progress: 17% (170/1000)
Level 213 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 2.3% (23/1000)
Level 313 Comments: Wizard → Level 314 Comments: Wizard
Content Views:444916
Times Content Favorited:644 times
Total Comments Made:946
FJ Points:26428
Favorite Tags: dot (8) | and (3) | the (3) | a (2) | motherfucker (2) | to (2) | unicorn (2)
Yes, I am the glorious winged faggot you speak of

latest user's comments

#5 - Picture  [+] (50 new replies) 02/11/2013 on Beyoncé +424
#126 - navapimp has deleted their comment.
#121 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
Black w/ black outline can no be read on black,

HERPADERPA lolololololol
#119 - plutobr (02/11/2013) [-]
What about black with black outline in a black background?
#115 - subjectzerojack has deleted their comment.
#101 - kingsombra has deleted their comment.
#92 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
#83 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
even black text with black outline with a black background? nu-uh
#79 - butiloveu (02/11/2013) [-]
dark colors?
#78 - butiloveu has deleted their comment.
#61 - CobraStrike has deleted their comment.
#59 - toamax (02/11/2013) [-]
. . .
User avatar #51 - dankilitious (02/11/2013) [-]
not black text with black outline on a black background...
User avatar #50 - santapony (02/11/2013) [-]
Black text with a black outline can't be read on black.
#38 - beep (02/11/2013) [-]
#34 - nicfarted (02/11/2013) [-]
It reads "Not everything, nigger".
#29 - nicktheslayer (02/11/2013) [-]
Can black with black outline be read on black? I guess not.
User avatar #25 - drtrousersnake (02/11/2013) [-]
what about black on black filled with black?
#18 - taturk (02/11/2013) [-]
User avatar #17 - iamnotstevenhooper (02/11/2013) [-]
Black with a black outline on a black background
User avatar #12 - uncalledforgiraffe (02/11/2013) [-]
But how the fuck do you do that?
#15 - azroth (02/11/2013) [-]
#28 - uncalledforgiraffe (02/11/2013) [-]
But I actually want to know.
#24 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
and a little bit of LSD.
User avatar #8 - oceanmist (02/11/2013) [-]
Back with black outline can't be read on black. Checkmate.
#153 - fractalius (02/13/2013) [-]
Anything's possible when you're this high
#74 - natedimes (02/11/2013) [-]
Read the bottom left corner.
#20 - azroth (02/11/2013) [-]
any colour can be used - black isn't a colour

double checkmate, sweet thing
#89 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
if black isnt a color, what would you call it than?
User avatar #96 - daentraya (02/11/2013) [-]
Black is the absence of color and light. Light is color, and white is all colors
User avatar #48 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
But on the picture that you posted it says "Doesn't include black" implying that black is a colour, you contradict yourself making you lose no matter what. And although you are technically correct, the definition of the word colour is irrelevant as text is not limited to being written over "colours" but also shades and images among others.

TL;DR: You lose.
#137 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
It said anything not any color! The shade black is something.
User avatar #138 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Did you even read it? "Anything with a black outline can be read on any color" You douche.
#139 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
But did it say that black was a color? Exactly.
User avatar #140 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
I misquoted (I forgot the small text) It says "Doesn't include black" implying (with the earlier use of the word color) that black is in fact a color.

Were I to say, I hate all microwaves... oh except Televisions, sure it would be incorrect but I am still implying that Televisions are microwaves. He said "Anything with a black outline can be read on any color, doesn't include black" Implying that black is a color.
#141 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
But that's not my point D:

I said it says anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting red lasers out of their eyes. Implications are usually either spot on or wrong,meaning that what he said may be interpreted different ways: Literal to the T or Inferred.

He needs to shed some light on this.
User avatar #142 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Define implied: "Strongly suggest the truth or existence of (something not expressly stated): "the report implies that two million jobs might be lost".

When I say that he implied it, I meant his phraseology implied it, the way he worded it implies that he believed at the time of posting/creation that black was a colour. Whether this is true or not is irrelevant. He was giving someone else shit for saying that black was a colour while implying it himself. That is hypocritical and as such he has no argument.

Now you are here saying the that that isn't the point. Again, irrelevant. Your point doesn't matter, if the argument is already over. You are just drawing it out. If I were to say "God doesn't exist because God can't exist without Allah to create him", sure it would be ridiculous but I'm ridiculing someone for believing in god, while implying it myself (sorry about the poor comparisons, it isn't easy).
#143 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
Oh wow. Lemme help you out.

Going on your definition of implied, it means suggested strongly. Here's a scenario for clarification:

Person 1: Wanna go to my place and have some fun?
Person 2: Sure!

Person 2 thinks that Person 1 was implying sex, but what Person 1 actually wanted to do was play TERA Online. See where implications go wrong? Implications are just speculation put out and thought about by another individual. Thus proving my point that Implications are "Spot on or wrong" and that "what he said may be interpreted different ways"

Also, you misread my last post. I said that wasn't MY point. My point was that, and I quote,"It says anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting ed lasers out of their eyes"
User avatar #144 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Yes, suggests strongly, "wanna go have some fun" is not a strong suggestion for sex exclusively, in fact it would only be an implication at all if there were some background information. For example if Person 1 has previously asked an identical or at least similar question to Person 2, or perhaps even one of Person 2's friends, then Person 2 may have a good reason to assume that Person 1 meant sex.

However, without it Person 2 would have very little if any reason to believe this were the case so by my definition (Strongly suggest) it was never implied, only assumed.

Also I did not misread what you wrote, I simply stated that is made no difference, that it was not relevant. You said your point was that "it says anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting red lasers out of their eyes". What I found funny, was that is was another assumed implication. The difference being that mine was more reliable. You are assuming (Suppose to be the case, without proof) that by using the word color he meant something else entirely which would still defeat his purpose.

He ridiculed others for attempted to break his argument (about Black outline with any 'color' filling being readable over any other colour) with "Black outline, with black filling on a black background". In fact by saying that by color he meant any variety of different prints, entailing "anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting red lasers out of their eyes" then he had no reason to ridicule others for breaking his argument in which case he is being hypocritical and therefore has no argument.

Again, we are working in circles. To quote myself "Now you are here saying that that isn't the point. Again, irrelevant. Your point doesn't matter, if the argument is already over".
#145 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
I already said half the things you typed up. The rest is just contradiction to what you said earlier or in that post.
User avatar #147 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
The first part was not agreeing with you, it was drawing a comparison between the implication I talking about and the assumed implication that you gave.

I have information you don't. The comparisons were on two ends of the 'implication spectrum' so to speak. One is an assumption (that being your example) which doesn't suggest anything. The other is the example I gave, which is what we are arguing about which has virtually no other meaning than the implication which is expressed. The point you gave about it being any variety of print defeats his purpose. By claiming that colour refers to any print, black would be including. If black is included then his exclusion of black as an example would become obsolete.

What are you trying to argue exactly? Because it seems to change alot.
User avatar #148 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Holy fuck can i even grammar? I should have turned my music off before i tried to word that. Do you get my point though?
User avatar #146 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
So you agree with me? And there is no contradictions, only two separate reasons why I am correct using your logic to prove my point.
#149 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
Moreover that there are two right/wrong answers because of the uncertainty of proof.
User avatar #151 - cadencee (02/12/2013) [-]
Okay, well this conversation has taken a turn for the confusing so lets call it a stalemate and move on.
#152 - sapphirion (02/13/2013) [-]
#57 - herbolifee (02/11/2013) [-]
your face
User avatar #68 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Won't deny it
#22 - WATCHAGUNADOBOUTIT (02/11/2013) [-]
Well, even if it was, read the lower left hand corner
#23 - azroth (02/11/2013) [-]
User avatar #13 - Blargosnarf (02/11/2013) [-]
Black on Black on Black... nigger threesome?
#6 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 02/10/2013 on Force Fingering +158
#21 - unholyjebus (02/11/2013) [-]
#8 - That genuinly cheered me up 02/10/2013 on worlds best children's book +4
#24 - Picture 02/10/2013 on Tacos +3
#123 - Picture 02/10/2013 on Op wants the d...eGrasse +19
#48 - Comment deleted 02/08/2013 on Silly Boy..thats perfectly... +7
#39 - Comment deleted  [+] (8 new replies) 02/08/2013 on Silly Boy..thats perfectly... +21
#61 - ironsoul Comment deleted by azroth
#47 - nebuchadnezzaurus Comment deleted by azroth
#64 - pineapplechunkss Comment deleted by azroth
#56 - amuter Comment deleted by azroth
#55 - amuter Comment deleted by azroth
#51 - brothergrimm Comment deleted by azroth
#48 - azroth Comment deleted by azroth
#45 - brothergrimm Comment deleted by azroth
#48 - Obi-Wan sure is a dick 02/08/2013 on the power 0
#127 - Picture 02/08/2013 on #clopping +7
#32 - Pattinson is a great guy with a good sense of humour, the char…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/06/2013 on Cedric Diggory +89
#114 - imalizard (02/07/2013) [-]
#2 - Picture 02/03/2013 on NiggaBytes +5
#25 - CONTACTS!! they can't fool me with their clever eye magic  [+] (4 new replies) 01/31/2013 on japanese people +83
#96 - finni (01/31/2013) [-]
Can't be unseen!!!
User avatar #36 - aquae (01/31/2013) [-]
I like the normal eye better.
#30 - thebronykindthree has deleted their comment.
#33 - annogram (01/31/2013) [-]
#4 - In the nice words of Neil Degrasse; The great thing about scie…  [+] (12 new replies) 01/31/2013 on Science +18
#45 - itrooztrooperdown (01/31/2013) [-]
See, I don't understand why such a smart man as Dr. Tyson would say something like this. Science, unlike religion, is not dogmatic. Its goal is to find the ultimate truth, but science in itself is not a truth. At least not at the moment. An example: nobody has seen atoms, but there is evidence of their existence. Is it true that atmos exit because science says so? No! If somebody proves that atoms do not exist, and the answer to everything was something else, true scientist will agree with that. And even better scientist will work on finding counter-arguments to that new theory. Science is a path, not a truth.
User avatar #7 - allamericandude (01/31/2013) [-]
Hate to disagree with Mr. Tyson, but that quote isn't really that great.

If science was always true, then the Earth would still be flat and everything in the universe would be rotating around it. Those were perfectly valid scientific (not religious) theories at one point.

If scientists were correct about everything, there'd be no need for science. Science is a journey, not a destination. It's not a set of correct answers, it's the process of finding those answers. That's what makes it great.
#14 - adamks (01/31/2013) [-]
So what you are trying to say, is that back the day, scientists prooved that the earth was flat? It was not just an assumption?
User avatar #105 - allamericandude (01/31/2013) [-]
It was the best theory they could make with the evidence they had. They hadn't yet done the experiments and measurements to prove otherwise.

Granted, the flat earth theory was debunked thousands of years ago by ancient Greek sailors, and by the middle ages we had a pretty good estimate of the Earth's size (although the differences in those estimations helped lead to the whole Christopher Columbus debacle.)
User avatar #9 - saddestofbreads (01/31/2013) [-]
Theories. Science has always and will always be true, Theories such as the flat earth one was never proven and so it was always just a theory while the truth is that it is a sphere, which we know by scientific theories backed up by evidence.
User avatar #106 - allamericandude (01/31/2013) [-]
What I'm trying to say is that science is not a set of correct answers. Science is the process of finding those answers. The thing is, we're never going to know if the answers we have are absolutely correct. That's why we need science to either prove our answers correct or find new ones.
#78 - anonymous (01/31/2013) [-]
If there weren't correct observations and proofs, it was never a theory. The saying "just a theory" is ridiculously ignorant. The reason they're called theories and not truths is because nothing is absolute. NOTHING! If something is a theory (not some bullshit one with incorrect or no evidence) you can treat it like a fact. The flat earth claim didn't have other proof than their own intuition. Nowadays theories are never based on intuition.


User avatar #10 - MrMustacho (01/31/2013) [-]
science is a process, so science itself isn't right or wrong, the answers it gets us are and when we have limited information science often gives us the wrong answer (though probably a better one than blind speculation)
User avatar #11 - thatguywhohasbacon (01/31/2013) [-]
With enough testing you can get a correct answer though to any problem using science, such as the earth being round(ish), that is scientific fact established using testing and observation(Satellites).
User avatar #8 - desuforeverlulz (01/31/2013) [-]
Depends on the way you're defining science.

"Science" is always true.

Science is always true, but somehow not all the answers are there yet.
User avatar #6 - manter (01/31/2013) [-]
except when we find something that disproves science with other science. Like how we recently found out that atoms can go below absolute zero degrees.
User avatar #18 - darkjacky (01/31/2013) [-]
prove or it didn't happen.. thats science so show your prove! since absolute 0 is the point where atoms don't move relative to each other(close to it).
#21 - The one time I can actually remember having a lucid dream, I f…  [+] (6 new replies) 01/31/2013 on How to control your dreams... +60
#210 - anonymous (03/28/2013) [-]
i calmed my self down when i dreamt last time, was pretty sweet. I've never banged so many females.
#174 - butiloveu (01/31/2013) [-]
Reminds me of a dream I had some day before.
Be in forest, hear some strange noises.
'There is no source for this noises in the forest'
Then I remember this noises, every goddamn Wednesday our
cleaner runs amok with her mops.
'Fucking hate that bitch'
Woke up.
'I Fucking hate that bitch!'
User avatar #167 - gunni (01/31/2013) [-]
That often happens on your first time. Try again.
User avatar #89 - dmagen (01/31/2013) [-]
you can spin in the dream.
it helps keep you dreaming.
btw it doesn't say it obviously enough, but if you want to have lucid dreaming, you must keep a dreaming journal. without it, most efforts wouldn't matter much.
#65 - tekoronia (01/31/2013) [-]
That's very normal, a tip I used is making a routine when awake to stare at my hands. So when I discover I'm dreaming I'll focus on my hands in my dream to prevent myself from waking up.
#38 - hueman (01/31/2013) [-]
#14 - porn logic  [+] (4 new replies) 01/30/2013 on What're you gonna do? +61
User avatar #75 - ericzxvc (01/31/2013) [-]
It's not porn, it's a skit from attack of the show, some video game/tech show on G4
#27 - anonymous (01/31/2013) [-]
The puppet on the left completely misses lmao
User avatar #33 - AmaterasuNoOkami (01/31/2013) [-]
It had one job
User avatar #19 - elysium (01/30/2013) [-]
i love how they're all fake little hands
#4 - i feel naughty.. 01/30/2013 on Snail Takes a Shower 0
#10 - Hundreds of thousands of people had watched his works on sites… 01/30/2013 on just waiting +4
#11 - TECHNOOOO VIKINNNGGGGG!! WOOP WOOP! 01/30/2013 on It’s time for a big change +9
#54 - All I could hear in my head was If you could just gi…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/29/2013 on Way to be an asshole Aladdin +79
#77 - skords (01/29/2013) [-]
Yeah..if you could just go ahead give me that bread, that'd be great
#42 - I don't think you know what one is, you might be thinking of t… 01/27/2013 on Irony, by definition +1
#20 - It isn't a bandwagon, it is a beautiful experience that will h…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/27/2013 on Irony, by definition +6
#24 - anonymous (01/27/2013) [-]
Nah, it's a bandwagon, but a well justified one
User avatar #27 - xzynth (01/27/2013) [-]
well It does change people for the better, wouldn't call it a bandawagon.
#30 - anonymous (01/27/2013) [-]
You clearly dont know what a bandwagon is.
User avatar #42 - azroth (01/27/2013) [-]
I don't think you know what one is, you might be thinking of the stereotypical view of a bandwagon in which a lot of people jump onto a something that's relatively new for a short time. This game's been out for quite a while now and there's been content about it for months, it's just gotten a lot bigger lately
User avatar #31 - xzynth (01/27/2013) [-]
I see them as a hugely popular fad that occurs fast and is short lived. I doubt people will forget katawa shoujo that fast. I may be worng, but thats my guess.
#78 - Picture 01/27/2013 on Have a nice day +3
#10 - I'm not a fan of racing, but that is incredible 01/26/2013 on Pit crews +4
#26 - Picture  [+] (3 new replies) 01/23/2013 on saw this on /b/ and had to... +20
#27 - facetiousrunner (01/23/2013) [-]
#39 - vonspyder (01/23/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#44 - facetiousrunner (01/23/2013) [-]
#5 - I loved the subtle father & son interactions between Hayth… 01/23/2013 on Plot of AC III +4
Sort by:


Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1250



Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)