Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

azroth    

Rank #2080 on Comments
azroth Avatar Level 312 Comments: Wizard
Offline
Send mail to azroth Block azroth Invite azroth to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Interests: Being a giant faggot, mostly
Date Signed Up:5/24/2011
Last Login:8/28/2014
Location:Dying Blue Marble
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#5170
Comment Ranking:#2080
Highest Content Rank:#491
Highest Comment Rank:#423
Content Thumbs: 13186 total,  14599 ,  1413
Comment Thumbs: 13406 total,  14235 ,  829
Content Level Progress: 17% (170/1000)
Level 213 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 81.39% (814/1000)
Level 312 Comments: Wizard → Level 313 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:1
Content Views:444776
Times Content Favorited:644 times
Total Comments Made:936
FJ Points:26219
Favorite Tags: dot (8) | and (3) | the (3) | a (2) | motherfucker (2) | to (2) | unicorn (2)
Yes, I am the glorious winged faggot you speak of

latest user's comments

#37 - no 04/06/2013 on Hanako you dun goofed -1
#134 - As cool as it would be, I'm sure that something like this woul…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/01/2013 on New DBZ episodes? +3
#143 - bersrker (04/01/2013) [-]
Thats true, but you have to take into consideration of the fact how much success that the dragonball series has been. If the guy decided to come back with one of the most known anime series ever, to add to it, I think the whoever funds it would just be short of actually throwing money at him.

It could be that they wanted him to come back for a while, and perhaps with this movie, and its success, that he feels he can do it again, and so will do so again.

Then again, I could be completely wrong.
#135 - The world thinks some things are more important < 03/12/2013 on This week in science +1
#60 - Picture 03/11/2013 on Wait For It +1
#44 - It's weird that he gets called a Faggot, Girl, Lesbian, Douche…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/11/2013 on Irrelevant Title +10
#188 - onenightstand (03/11/2013) [-]
Cause he knows he's a Faggot, Girl, Lesbian, Douche, Pricknigger, Cunt, Useless Twat-stick, androgynous and Talentless Assfuck....
But he's no moron.
#30 - As much as I love to exaggerate my hatred for the fussy little…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/11/2013 on Dramaqueen +39
User avatar #254 - mondominiman (03/11/2013) [-]
I never hated him because he makes bad music but if he's going to be a dick to his fans than that's a low. If it weren't for those people who wouldn't even be famous and she shoves them off. The fame's gone to his head he thinks he can do whatever he wants and get away with it by apologizing over twitter. Within a few years he'll just be like aaron carter. Does anyone even remember him or still talk about him to this day?
#130 - missing has deleted their comment.
User avatar #258 - hollyfries (03/11/2013) [-]
Or this www .youtube. com/watch?v=eQxOZMgimLM
User avatar #167 - siridontcare (03/11/2013) [-]
That last one is the only one thats false. The Prime minister showed up without warning apparently.
#81 - yeah, total losers 03/07/2013 on Centaur Police +11
#30 - "I have OCD" Every FJ user ever.  [+] (1 new reply) 03/06/2013 on I think we can all agree... 0
User avatar #58 - fredthemilkman (03/06/2013) [-]
I don't have OCD
#166 - You play as Haytham Kenway's father 03/06/2013 on Alpha as fuck! 0
#35 - I obviously haven't seen or played the PS4 yet, but when I dis…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/04/2013 on preferences +14
User avatar #96 - TheShadowMan (03/04/2013) [-]
Not true, Sony recently came out with a statement that said that there never was and never will be anything as not having the ability to re-buy games on PS network. It was a rumour that just got huge. Backwards compatibility is probably on it's way too. Just have to wait for Sony to clear that up too.
#52 - anonymous (03/04/2013) [-]
but when you consider the fact that they only lack backwards compatibility because doing so would mean putting the ps3 hardware into it as well (and adding its price on top of the ps4's) or emulating the ps3 games (something i don't think even the best PCs can do right now) it makes sense and you can't really say they are doing it because they want your money.

It's keeping the ps4 affordable while still giving people some sort of way to enjoy past gen games
#99 - anonymous (03/05/2013) [-]
Or just buy a decent PC and enjoy backwards compatibility with every game ever made, whilst still enjoying superior hardware beef.

The only reason I'm excited about the mfinally crapping out another batch of consoles is that now game programmers will be working on essentially the same hardware across the board so us PC gamers won't end up with the ass-shittingly bad ports.
User avatar #58 - viscerys (03/04/2013) [-]
Good PCs can run games better than the PS3.
#19 - ← ← Every woman's definition of a 'Nerd'  [+] (6 new replies) 03/04/2013 on (1)Facebook +126
#72 - anonymous (03/04/2013) [-]
Your mistake is the use of the word 'every'
#28 - dacrimsonfucker (03/04/2013) [-]
User avatar #82 - sploilerman (03/04/2013) [-]
Fuck yeah, Spencer!
User avatar #80 - areialview (03/04/2013) [-]
The guy on the left looks Alpha as fuck
User avatar #25 - zorororonoa (03/04/2013) [-]
Exactly, just slap glasses and a book on a hunk and he becomes a "nerd"
#56 - anonymous (03/04/2013) [-]
Are you people seriously trying to pull some high ground or ownership over a stupid word?
#20 - Picture  [+] (4 new replies) 02/28/2013 on See the Difference!! +22
User avatar #55 - fatspartan (02/28/2013) [-]
May I have the name of this anime?

Scientific reasons, of course...
User avatar #71 - animepsycchosecond (02/28/2013) [-]
UFO Ultramaiden Valkyrie
User avatar #26 - theaddviser (02/28/2013) [-]
what is this, magic?
#49 - erotictentacle (02/28/2013) [-]
It's puberty, can't you read?
THIS is magic.
#23 - Picture 02/11/2013 on Beyoncé +17
#20 - any colour can be used - black isn't a colour double …  [+] (22 new replies) 02/11/2013 on Beyoncé +33
#89 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
if black isnt a color, what would you call it than?
User avatar #96 - daentraya (02/11/2013) [-]
Black is the absence of color and light. Light is color, and white is all colors
User avatar #48 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
But on the picture that you posted it says "Doesn't include black" implying that black is a colour, you contradict yourself making you lose no matter what. And although you are technically correct, the definition of the word colour is irrelevant as text is not limited to being written over "colours" but also shades and images among others.

TL;DR: You lose.
#137 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
WRONG!
It said anything not any color! The shade black is something.
User avatar #138 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Did you even read it? "Anything with a black outline can be read on any color" You douche.
#139 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
But did it say that black was a color? Exactly.
User avatar #140 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
I misquoted (I forgot the small text) It says "Doesn't include black" implying (with the earlier use of the word color) that black is in fact a color.

Were I to say, I hate all microwaves... oh except Televisions, sure it would be incorrect but I am still implying that Televisions are microwaves. He said "Anything with a black outline can be read on any color, doesn't include black" Implying that black is a color.
#141 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
But that's not my point D:

I said it says anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting red lasers out of their eyes. Implications are usually either spot on or wrong,meaning that what he said may be interpreted different ways: Literal to the T or Inferred.

He needs to shed some light on this.
User avatar #142 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Define implied: "Strongly suggest the truth or existence of (something not expressly stated): "the report implies that two million jobs might be lost".

When I say that he implied it, I meant his phraseology implied it, the way he worded it implies that he believed at the time of posting/creation that black was a colour. Whether this is true or not is irrelevant. He was giving someone else shit for saying that black was a colour while implying it himself. That is hypocritical and as such he has no argument.

Now you are here saying the that that isn't the point. Again, irrelevant. Your point doesn't matter, if the argument is already over. You are just drawing it out. If I were to say "God doesn't exist because God can't exist without Allah to create him", sure it would be ridiculous but I'm ridiculing someone for believing in god, while implying it myself (sorry about the poor comparisons, it isn't easy).
#143 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
Oh wow. Lemme help you out.

Going on your definition of implied, it means suggested strongly. Here's a scenario for clarification:

Person 1: Wanna go to my place and have some fun?
Person 2: Sure!

Person 2 thinks that Person 1 was implying sex, but what Person 1 actually wanted to do was play TERA Online. See where implications go wrong? Implications are just speculation put out and thought about by another individual. Thus proving my point that Implications are "Spot on or wrong" and that "what he said may be interpreted different ways"

Also, you misread my last post. I said that wasn't MY point. My point was that, and I quote,"It says anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting ed lasers out of their eyes"
User avatar #144 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Yes, suggests strongly, "wanna go have some fun" is not a strong suggestion for sex exclusively, in fact it would only be an implication at all if there were some background information. For example if Person 1 has previously asked an identical or at least similar question to Person 2, or perhaps even one of Person 2's friends, then Person 2 may have a good reason to assume that Person 1 meant sex.

However, without it Person 2 would have very little if any reason to believe this were the case so by my definition (Strongly suggest) it was never implied, only assumed.

Also I did not misread what you wrote, I simply stated that is made no difference, that it was not relevant. You said your point was that "it says anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting red lasers out of their eyes". What I found funny, was that is was another assumed implication. The difference being that mine was more reliable. You are assuming (Suppose to be the case, without proof) that by using the word color he meant something else entirely which would still defeat his purpose.

He ridiculed others for attempted to break his argument (about Black outline with any 'color' filling being readable over any other colour) with "Black outline, with black filling on a black background". In fact by saying that by color he meant any variety of different prints, entailing "anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting red lasers out of their eyes" then he had no reason to ridicule others for breaking his argument in which case he is being hypocritical and therefore has no argument.

Again, we are working in circles. To quote myself "Now you are here saying that that isn't the point. Again, irrelevant. Your point doesn't matter, if the argument is already over".
#145 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
I already said half the things you typed up. The rest is just contradiction to what you said earlier or in that post.
User avatar #147 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
The first part was not agreeing with you, it was drawing a comparison between the implication I talking about and the assumed implication that you gave.

I have information you don't. The comparisons were on two ends of the 'implication spectrum' so to speak. One is an assumption (that being your example) which doesn't suggest anything. The other is the example I gave, which is what we are arguing about which has virtually no other meaning than the implication which is expressed. The point you gave about it being any variety of print defeats his purpose. By claiming that colour refers to any print, black would be including. If black is included then his exclusion of black as an example would become obsolete.

What are you trying to argue exactly? Because it seems to change alot.
User avatar #148 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Holy fuck can i even grammar? I should have turned my music off before i tried to word that. Do you get my point though?
User avatar #146 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
So you agree with me? And there is no contradictions, only two separate reasons why I am correct using your logic to prove my point.
#149 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
Moreover that there are two right/wrong answers because of the uncertainty of proof.
User avatar #151 - cadencee (02/12/2013) [-]
Okay, well this conversation has taken a turn for the confusing so lets call it a stalemate and move on.
#152 - sapphirion (02/13/2013) [-]
Agreed.
#57 - herbolifee (02/11/2013) [-]
your face
User avatar #68 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Won't deny it
#22 - WATCHAGUNADOBOUTIT (02/11/2013) [-]
Well, even if it was, read the lower left hand corner
#23 - azroth (02/11/2013) [-]
#15 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 02/11/2013 on Beyoncé +18
#28 - uncalledforgiraffe (02/11/2013) [-]
But I actually want to know.
#24 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
and a little bit of LSD.
#5 - Picture  [+] (50 new replies) 02/11/2013 on Beyoncé +424
#126 - navapimp has deleted their comment.
#121 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
Black w/ black outline can no be read on black,

HERPADERPA lolololololol
#119 - plutobr (02/11/2013) [-]
What about black with black outline in a black background?
#115 - subjectzerojack has deleted their comment.
#101 - kingsombra has deleted their comment.
#92 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
STROKE THAT SHIT
#83 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
even black text with black outline with a black background? nu-uh
#79 - butiloveu (02/11/2013) [-]
dark colors?
#78 - butiloveu has deleted their comment.
#61 - CobraStrike has deleted their comment.
#59 - toamax (02/11/2013) [-]
. . .
User avatar #51 - dankilitious (02/11/2013) [-]
not black text with black outline on a black background...
User avatar #50 - santapony (02/11/2013) [-]
Black text with a black outline can't be read on black.
#38 - beep (02/11/2013) [-]
#34 - nicfarted (02/11/2013) [-]
It reads "Not everything, nigger".
#29 - nicktheslayer (02/11/2013) [-]
Can black with black outline be read on black? I guess not.
User avatar #25 - drtrousersnake (02/11/2013) [-]
what about black on black filled with black?
#18 - taturk (02/11/2013) [-]
User avatar #17 - iamnotstevenhooper (02/11/2013) [-]
Black with a black outline on a black background
User avatar #12 - uncalledforgiraffe (02/11/2013) [-]
But how the fuck do you do that?
#15 - azroth (02/11/2013) [-]
#28 - uncalledforgiraffe (02/11/2013) [-]
But I actually want to know.
#24 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
and a little bit of LSD.
User avatar #8 - oceanmist (02/11/2013) [-]
Back with black outline can't be read on black. Checkmate.
#153 - fractalius (02/13/2013) [-]
Anything's possible when you're this high
#74 - natedimes (02/11/2013) [-]
Read the bottom left corner.
#20 - azroth (02/11/2013) [-]
any colour can be used - black isn't a colour

double checkmate, sweet thing
#89 - anonymous (02/11/2013) [-]
if black isnt a color, what would you call it than?
User avatar #96 - daentraya (02/11/2013) [-]
Black is the absence of color and light. Light is color, and white is all colors
User avatar #48 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
But on the picture that you posted it says "Doesn't include black" implying that black is a colour, you contradict yourself making you lose no matter what. And although you are technically correct, the definition of the word colour is irrelevant as text is not limited to being written over "colours" but also shades and images among others.

TL;DR: You lose.
#137 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
WRONG!
It said anything not any color! The shade black is something.
User avatar #138 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Did you even read it? "Anything with a black outline can be read on any color" You douche.
#139 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
But did it say that black was a color? Exactly.
User avatar #140 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
I misquoted (I forgot the small text) It says "Doesn't include black" implying (with the earlier use of the word color) that black is in fact a color.

Were I to say, I hate all microwaves... oh except Televisions, sure it would be incorrect but I am still implying that Televisions are microwaves. He said "Anything with a black outline can be read on any color, doesn't include black" Implying that black is a color.
#141 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
But that's not my point D:

I said it says anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting red lasers out of their eyes. Implications are usually either spot on or wrong,meaning that what he said may be interpreted different ways: Literal to the T or Inferred.

He needs to shed some light on this.
User avatar #142 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Define implied: "Strongly suggest the truth or existence of (something not expressly stated): "the report implies that two million jobs might be lost".

When I say that he implied it, I meant his phraseology implied it, the way he worded it implies that he believed at the time of posting/creation that black was a colour. Whether this is true or not is irrelevant. He was giving someone else shit for saying that black was a colour while implying it himself. That is hypocritical and as such he has no argument.

Now you are here saying the that that isn't the point. Again, irrelevant. Your point doesn't matter, if the argument is already over. You are just drawing it out. If I were to say "God doesn't exist because God can't exist without Allah to create him", sure it would be ridiculous but I'm ridiculing someone for believing in god, while implying it myself (sorry about the poor comparisons, it isn't easy).
#143 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
Oh wow. Lemme help you out.

Going on your definition of implied, it means suggested strongly. Here's a scenario for clarification:

Person 1: Wanna go to my place and have some fun?
Person 2: Sure!

Person 2 thinks that Person 1 was implying sex, but what Person 1 actually wanted to do was play TERA Online. See where implications go wrong? Implications are just speculation put out and thought about by another individual. Thus proving my point that Implications are "Spot on or wrong" and that "what he said may be interpreted different ways"

Also, you misread my last post. I said that wasn't MY point. My point was that, and I quote,"It says anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting ed lasers out of their eyes"
User avatar #144 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Yes, suggests strongly, "wanna go have some fun" is not a strong suggestion for sex exclusively, in fact it would only be an implication at all if there were some background information. For example if Person 1 has previously asked an identical or at least similar question to Person 2, or perhaps even one of Person 2's friends, then Person 2 may have a good reason to assume that Person 1 meant sex.

However, without it Person 2 would have very little if any reason to believe this were the case so by my definition (Strongly suggest) it was never implied, only assumed.

Also I did not misread what you wrote, I simply stated that is made no difference, that it was not relevant. You said your point was that "it says anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting red lasers out of their eyes". What I found funny, was that is was another assumed implication. The difference being that mine was more reliable. You are assuming (Suppose to be the case, without proof) that by using the word color he meant something else entirely which would still defeat his purpose.

He ridiculed others for attempted to break his argument (about Black outline with any 'color' filling being readable over any other colour) with "Black outline, with black filling on a black background". In fact by saying that by color he meant any variety of different prints, entailing "anything which can range from red to zebra print with puppies shooting red lasers out of their eyes" then he had no reason to ridicule others for breaking his argument in which case he is being hypocritical and therefore has no argument.

Again, we are working in circles. To quote myself "Now you are here saying that that isn't the point. Again, irrelevant. Your point doesn't matter, if the argument is already over".
#145 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
I already said half the things you typed up. The rest is just contradiction to what you said earlier or in that post.
User avatar #147 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
The first part was not agreeing with you, it was drawing a comparison between the implication I talking about and the assumed implication that you gave.

I have information you don't. The comparisons were on two ends of the 'implication spectrum' so to speak. One is an assumption (that being your example) which doesn't suggest anything. The other is the example I gave, which is what we are arguing about which has virtually no other meaning than the implication which is expressed. The point you gave about it being any variety of print defeats his purpose. By claiming that colour refers to any print, black would be including. If black is included then his exclusion of black as an example would become obsolete.

What are you trying to argue exactly? Because it seems to change alot.
User avatar #148 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Holy fuck can i even grammar? I should have turned my music off before i tried to word that. Do you get my point though?
User avatar #146 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
So you agree with me? And there is no contradictions, only two separate reasons why I am correct using your logic to prove my point.
#149 - sapphirion (02/11/2013) [-]
Moreover that there are two right/wrong answers because of the uncertainty of proof.
User avatar #151 - cadencee (02/12/2013) [-]
Okay, well this conversation has taken a turn for the confusing so lets call it a stalemate and move on.
#152 - sapphirion (02/13/2013) [-]
Agreed.
#57 - herbolifee (02/11/2013) [-]
your face
User avatar #68 - cadencee (02/11/2013) [-]
Won't deny it
#22 - WATCHAGUNADOBOUTIT (02/11/2013) [-]
Well, even if it was, read the lower left hand corner
#23 - azroth (02/11/2013) [-]
User avatar #13 - Blargosnarf (02/11/2013) [-]
Black on Black on Black... nigger threesome?
#6 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 02/10/2013 on Force Fingering +158
#21 - unholyjebus (02/11/2013) [-]
#8 - That genuinly cheered me up 02/10/2013 on worlds best children's book +4
#24 - Picture 02/10/2013 on Tacos +3
#123 - Picture 02/10/2013 on Op wants the d...eGrasse +19
#48 - Comment deleted 02/08/2013 on Silly Boy..thats perfectly... +7
#39 - Comment deleted  [+] (8 new replies) 02/08/2013 on Silly Boy..thats perfectly... +21
#61 - ironsoul Comment deleted by azroth
#47 - nebuchadnezzaurus Comment deleted by azroth
#64 - pineapplechunkss Comment deleted by azroth
#56 - amuter Comment deleted by azroth
#55 - amuter Comment deleted by azroth
#51 - brothergrimm Comment deleted by azroth
#48 - azroth Comment deleted by azroth
#45 - brothergrimm Comment deleted by azroth
#48 - Obi-Wan sure is a dick 02/08/2013 on the power 0
#127 - Picture 02/08/2013 on #clopping +7
#32 - Pattinson is a great guy with a good sense of humour, the char…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/06/2013 on Cedric Diggory +89
#114 - imalizard (02/07/2013) [-]
PIC RELATED
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1250

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)