So Obama changes and we should just accept it, but Romney flip-flops and he should be demonized for it?

10 years to change

10 hours to change

Yes.

Yes. If he were to change, then fine. Like the thing with the dog. Changing and flip flopping are entirely different political beasts.

The Philoaedfasdfasdf is just noobish. No skill and you're worthless to the team. You only accomplish 1 out of the tons of things a pyro can do for the team! The stock flame can, at least, do what the class is meant to do.

Agreed there, but what about soldiers for BB ?

I understand BB has it uses on maps , hell it's better probably if you're a roaming pyro who knows the drops/map.

In "competitive" though , unless you're a roaming pyro it's meh. I have many reasons to airblast, and ammo is scarce sometimes.

So yeah I guess it depends on the map / what you're doing.

I only find myself in trouble when I have 2 soldiers on me or a soldier and something else distracting me like a spy going for a backstab. Otherwise, I just turn his rockets on him. You forget, I can airblast too. As long as I know the map, ammo will never be a problem. Even if I fuck up and miss my airblast, most soldiers will be wary of it and will either switch to shotgun or run off to snipe from another area.

I stopped bothering airblasting ubers. D:

I try to jump down from my ambush site and blast the medic away, but the teams I've faced have been well organized and the heavy just turns and mows me down right away.

Sorry for jumping to assumptions, most people just call Backburners WM1-ers because they think more ammo consumption automatically means we never airblast. :/

Nha, I use it off and on, usually on maps where I can sneak up behinde a pushing offence with a tunnel or little used buliding and crit the fuck out of their medic/heavy.

All good, if you're good with it, you're good with it.
But the Phlog and Vanilla can go fuck themselves.

The Philoaedfasdfasdf is just noobish. No skill and you're worthless to the team. You only accomplish 1 out of the tons of things a pyro can do for the team! The stock flame can, at least, do what the class is meant to do.

Agreed there, but what about soldiers for BB ?

I understand BB has it uses on maps , hell it's better probably if you're a roaming pyro who knows the drops/map.

In "competitive" though , unless you're a roaming pyro it's meh. I have many reasons to airblast, and ammo is scarce sometimes.

So yeah I guess it depends on the map / what you're doing.

I only find myself in trouble when I have 2 soldiers on me or a soldier and something else distracting me like a spy going for a backstab. Otherwise, I just turn his rockets on him. You forget, I can airblast too. As long as I know the map, ammo will never be a problem. Even if I fuck up and miss my airblast, most soldiers will be wary of it and will either switch to shotgun or run off to snipe from another area.

You haven't seen any good backburners then.

I forget the map name. But it's the one where there's a facility and a brown, moutainous terrain outside it...

Anyways, there are like 3 paths to take to get to the last cap point. As the defending team, I would get my team to bottle up the other team in one corridor and take an alternative one, appear behind, and just destroy the entire team.

It's effective.

The only problem I face as a backburner is when I'm in a really small corridor fighting a soldier who is just out of range of my flamethrower... especially if he has the liberty launcher/direct hit. Hard ot airblast then.

Oh, and <3 shotgun. Nothing more satisfying then killing another pyro running at you with his flamethrower.

I never said Backburner was bad ;~;

I just said degreaser was good, you said no good pyro would need more chances at airblasting, which is true if you use it for more than just reflections, it can dissorient and confuse enemies super easy.

I stopped bothering airblasting ubers. D:

I try to jump down from my ambush site and blast the medic away, but the teams I've faced have been well organized and the heavy just turns and mows me down right away.

Sorry for jumping to assumptions, most people just call Backburners WM1-ers because they think more ammo consumption automatically means we never airblast. :/

Nha, I use it off and on, usually on maps where I can sneak up behinde a pushing offence with a tunnel or little used buliding and crit the fuck out of their medic/heavy.

All good, if you're good with it, you're good with it.
But the Phlog and Vanilla can go fuck themselves.

The Philoaedfasdfasdf is just noobish. No skill and you're worthless to the team. You only accomplish 1 out of the tons of things a pyro can do for the team! The stock flame can, at least, do what the class is meant to do.

Agreed there, but what about soldiers for BB ?

I understand BB has it uses on maps , hell it's better probably if you're a roaming pyro who knows the drops/map.

In "competitive" though , unless you're a roaming pyro it's meh. I have many reasons to airblast, and ammo is scarce sometimes.

So yeah I guess it depends on the map / what you're doing.

I only find myself in trouble when I have 2 soldiers on me or a soldier and something else distracting me like a spy going for a backstab. Otherwise, I just turn his rockets on him. You forget, I can airblast too. As long as I know the map, ammo will never be a problem. Even if I fuck up and miss my airblast, most soldiers will be wary of it and will either switch to shotgun or run off to snipe from another area.

I'm a ginger and i live in Australia, got called ranga all through school lol

Oh fair enough, i just can't believe you actually got thumbs up for that comment, faith in humanity has been drained ever so slightly

Im an hate and I faggot Aussie rangas

let me call him again needmoredairy !!

Why do you need people just google it.

this could most probably explain that in terms of test results.
awootten this might be helpful for you too.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_predictive_value

will come back with results.

I realise it's a bit hard to recognize sarcasm on the internet.. Don't take that seriously at all.

:) still could use your help here's the question
when can you declare a person is free of cancer? at should be the ratio of the benign and malign cells?

Most people are only temporarily free from cancer after "beating it". People will argue with this by saying that people beat cancer and live for the rest of their lives. In short, you can't really declare a person "free of cancer", simply rid of it for the time being. There is always a chance that someone could get it, beat it, still have it (dormant) in their body, and still live happily for the rest of their lives. As for the benign and malign cell ratio, I am not sure.. But you would definitely want less Malignant cells if you have a tumor.

That definitely fits the predictive values tests. Its a probability that signifies cancer tests. Which might go on even after the person is cured.