|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #2264 on CommentsLevel 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
OfflineSend mail to aviatrix Block aviatrix Invite aviatrix to be your friend flag avatar
Hi, I'm Tori. I like things that move fast. I am in the Navy. I am studying Mechanical Engineering and I am slowly losing my mind.
- Text/Links 1
- Pictures 13
- YouTube 3
- Favorites2 new102
- Friends 13
- Comments33 new718
- Channels 5
- All 855
- Views: 9220My Music Tastes
213 19 Total: +194
- Views: 9408Just... something to think about
167 35 Total: +132
- Views: 22074/20
72 23 Total: +49
- Views: 3248Fuck the Police Comp
43 1 Total: +42
- Views: 2751I went to /b/ for advice.
37 11 Total: +26
- Views: 1159Dolnies
24 7 Total: +17
latest user's comments
|#151 - Christ people. It's not my theory.||9 hours ago on My Penis||+1|
|#133 - Also, that's exactly how ancient cultures worked. Those that …||10 hours ago on My Penis||0|
|#131 - Read my reply. Much more likely.||10 hours ago on My Penis||0|
|#129 - Oh **** .||10 hours ago on My Penis||+8|
|#128 - Meh. It's a theory. I posted the source from NatGeo at …||10 hours ago on My Penis||0|
|#119 - Continue down the thread. Source in National Geographic.||10 hours ago on My Penis||0|
|#87 - (:||11 hours ago on My Penis||+2|
|#68 - Picture||11 hours ago on My Penis||0|
|#67 - Women discern colors better than men, but men discern detail i… [+] (50 new replies)||11 hours ago on My Penis||+173|
#151 - aviatrix (9 hours ago) [-]
Christ people. It's not my theory.
#136 - unfortunately (10 hours ago) [-]
#114 - cdsams (10 hours ago) [-]
While this sounds cool and logical In all honesty, I have no reason why I should make an argument over it , if you tried to convince the scientific community that this is fact, you would be shot down for not having extensive proof unless you do, in that case, ignore the rest despite the harmless nature of it. However, if you wrote these harmless facts into a book that created a devout religious cult of followers, they will hold these facts as absolute truth even if we do gain the technology to analyse this idea for real evidence.
They would stand in the way of ground braking research claiming that science is some how defiling their way of life in proving their book wrong, and that science is some how affronting nature, all because the author of their great book did not site their research. if you do have research to supports this then you can consider my post complete bullshit and carry on.
That is the difference between science and religion.
#116 - alleksi (10 hours ago) [-]
Technically it could be evolution, as natural selection still somewhat concerned people ages ago. It could be possible that a female, who wasn't sufficient in gathering or a male, who wasn't sufficient in hunting, had harder time mating, than those who were more successful in said things. That said I agree that evolution probably has a fairly little to do with it and is just purely coincidental (or even just something that you learn, boys are often put to sports teams from a young age where such things could develop faster, whereas girls...I don't know...play with dolls or something.)
#122 - helenwheels (10 hours ago) [-]
You have a point, but the only way that would be breed into women is if they killed women who didn't demonstrate superior color discerning ability.
That might be true but little girls run around in circles just as much as little boys do. Lots of gender stuff is coincidental.
#128 - aviatrix (10 hours ago) [-]
Meh. It's a theory.
I posted the source from NatGeo at the bottom of the page.
The male adaptation makes sense by itself in the fact that the better fast vision they had, the less likely they were to be killed.
The female adaptation makes logical sense if you think that this mutation started out in one tribe of people. Those people would have been less likely to starve if the women could find food easier. It's a stretch, but an interesting theory nonetheless.
#126 - alleksi (10 hours ago) [-]
the only way that would be breed into women is if they killed women who didn't demonstrate superior color discerning ability.
Not necessarily. The ones with said trait need to reproduce while the others...well...don't reproduce. The less talented ones don't need to be killed off as long as they don't get laid.
#135 - daemascus (10 hours ago) [-]
You're thinking in the context of one individual. In early human history almost everyone in a tribe were close relatives of one another. So instead of one woman not being able to see berries or get laid, it would be an entire tribe not being able to find food, and in the end failing to survive. Always remember evolution happens to the population not the individual.
|#98 - Someone was doing some triple integral calculus,,,||12/10/2013 on Things i hate||+1|
Join Subscribe 4chan
Join Subscribe dirty-secrets
Join Subscribe feels
Join Subscribe stoner-humor