you must be new here

I wanted to use that....

i apologize. here, take this on your journey, it may become of great use to you.

I can't disagree - but that's exactly my point. Anarchy even somehow "compromised", is still too much based on people's own capabilities of governing themselves.And let's get this straight - it's more possible that a total-capitalist country will emerge and success (I guess that in some periods of history USA was very close to complete capitalism) than a compromised-anarchistic country (that sounds like a paradox, doesn't it? Let's say community). I'm only pointing out, that believing in something unrealistic is a waste of time. Especially if it's not an aetheral thing like religion, but a very serious problem, like political and social beliefs.

I guess we can agree to disagree. Let me just leave off by saying that it's not impossible for an anarchaic, or compromised anarchaic society to witness as much success as a total-capitalist country, in the end, it's still entirely speculation, with nothing to lean back on except opinion and individual interpretation of various societies in the past. It's been a pleasure talking with you, I would've never thought I could have a talk like this on funnyjunk of all places.

a poet is really not a good example to show whether a belief is realistic or not.
i agree that the masses that connects anarchism with vandalism are wrong,
but i still consider anarchism as unrealistic and farfetched...

The basic fact is, like with communism, that anarchism is based upon belief that people can cooperate and be kind to each other. But it's too late to believe in fairy tales, world has seen too much already. And ain't shit changed.

Fair enough, but as with capitalism, democracy, monarchy, fascism, etc, no socioeconomic standpoint or system of government works as it's meant to, or atleast how it's put on paper. It's like physics, no transfer of energy is never 100%, some of it is always lost as thermal energy, this translates into government's inability to always act as it is planned to and avoid corruption or abuse. I admit to the fact that in today's society, where the very limits of the human population are reaching their peak, that anarchy is a horrible solution to this worlds troubles. Anarchy, like Communism, are meant for a more utopian setting. And like all things, any anarchaic society is subject to fail at any time, however this also includes, as i've mentioned before, capitalism and all of those things. So I chose to believe what I wish, regardless of it's potential application to a real world setting. Because I'd rather believe in something people believe is strange or far fetched, rather than a system in need of dire repair, already practically on it's death bed. In the end, no system will ever legitimately stand on it's own for long. Capitalism cannot last without regulation, Communism cannot stand without the ability for those meant to succeed, to succeed above their peers should they deserve it, and Anarchy cannot stand without some form of order to keep people from going completely chaotic

I can't disagree - but that's exactly my point. Anarchy even somehow "compromised", is still too much based on people's own capabilities of governing themselves.And let's get this straight - it's more possible that a total-capitalist country will emerge and success (I guess that in some periods of history USA was very close to complete capitalism) than a compromised-anarchistic country (that sounds like a paradox, doesn't it? Let's say community). I'm only pointing out, that believing in something unrealistic is a waste of time. Especially if it's not an aetheral thing like religion, but a very serious problem, like political and social beliefs.

I guess we can agree to disagree. Let me just leave off by saying that it's not impossible for an anarchaic, or compromised anarchaic society to witness as much success as a total-capitalist country, in the end, it's still entirely speculation, with nothing to lean back on except opinion and individual interpretation of various societies in the past. It's been a pleasure talking with you, I would've never thought I could have a talk like this on funnyjunk of all places.