Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

auryn    

Rank #204 on Comments
no avatar Level 316 Comments: Wizard
Offline
Send mail to auryn Block auryn Invite auryn to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:3/17/2012
Last Login:7/30/2014
Location:The Netherlands
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#204
Highest Content Rank:#14558
Highest Comment Rank:#157
Content Thumbs: 94 total,  174 ,  80
Comment Thumbs: 18943 total,  25891 ,  6948
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 8 Content: New Here → Level 9 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 87.9% (879/1000)
Level 316 Comments: Wizard → Level 317 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:1
Content Views:12721
Times Content Favorited:14 times
Total Comments Made:4896
FJ Points:16769

latest user's comments

#35 - I don't know, I didn't see any giants. 05/04/2014 on Mind=Blown 0
#13 - Long time no see. 05/04/2014 on Never screw with people... 0
#150 - nO iDEA, iT'S rIDICULOUS. 05/04/2014 on Random Fact Comp. 20 +3
#22 - The Paranormal Activities movies get lamer and lamer. 05/04/2014 on Catch me if you can +17
#70 - In? 05/04/2014 on Dont read the tags 0
#120 - Not really. There must be a point where time and spac…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/04/2014 on In the beginning 0
User avatar #121 - ponchosdm (05/04/2014) [-]
must?
the same as infinity, it has no end, no need of a beginning if there is no end
#122 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Actual Infinity is unlimited, infinite in all aspects, not just numerical infinity.
Although they might be numerically infinite, time and space are a limitation on itself.

Ofcourse the ultimate and actual reality that sustains and transcends the cosmos inevitably is infinite, thus timeless, non dual, and absolute.
But the phenomenal world we call the cosmos and its aspect of time definitely has a beginning from our point of view.
User avatar #123 - ponchosdm (05/04/2014) [-]
indeed i was talking about Space and Time infinity. there always was and always will be. our point of view tries to give it a human comprehensive state, which asumes there must be a beginning and an end, even if it does not.
#124 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Yes, the source of everything is completely beyond intellectual comprehension since logic is dependant upon the inseperable qualities of the universe: causation, time and space, and not vice sersa (and therefore logic itself is limited).

I think we pretty much agree.

What I tried to say before was that ultimately the entire cosmos and its infinite universes exist within a boundless timeless reality, but from the point of view of each universe there'd be a definite point of beginning in time and space. And that even though time as whole is an illusion, our perception of it is still linear.
#171 - It's called a hyperbole, creating emphasis by exaggeration. … 05/04/2014 on Fuck your assumptions... 0
#170 - Yes, the same goes for 'terrific'. It can mean a really good t… 05/04/2014 on Fuck your assumptions... -1
#100 - Language changes, and language should change, but this isn't '…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/04/2014 on Fuck your assumptions... -1
User avatar #113 - blokrokker (05/04/2014) [-]
Did you know that "awful" used to mean "full of awe" and was used as a synonym for "amazing" or "reverential"? But now it's a synonym for "terrible." Do you know how that happened? Because language evolves. It's not a rigid construct, it's a fluid and dynamic entity.
#170 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Yes, the same goes for 'terrific'. It can mean a really good thing, although it comes from "causing terror.
It doesn't make it any less moronic though, I stand by my point, why make language unnecessarily complex and confusing?

Language evolves, but it doesn't mean we should mindlessly agree to accept all changes, just because a group of people misuses the word out of ignorance.
User avatar #139 - herpderpstrom (05/04/2014) [-]
same with "awesome", as in "God struck down his foes with awesome strength". Sample sentence from today: "You got two likes on your facebook picture? That's awesome!"
#118 - Even if it were a cycle, the cycle itself must've had a beginning.  [+] (6 new replies) 05/04/2014 on In the beginning 0
User avatar #119 - ponchosdm (05/04/2014) [-]
well, certanly in a cycle you could say that, but then theorically it have a beginning, its the same as who was first, the egg or the chicken
#120 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Not really.

There must be a point where time and space itself came into existence.
User avatar #121 - ponchosdm (05/04/2014) [-]
must?
the same as infinity, it has no end, no need of a beginning if there is no end
#122 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Actual Infinity is unlimited, infinite in all aspects, not just numerical infinity.
Although they might be numerically infinite, time and space are a limitation on itself.

Ofcourse the ultimate and actual reality that sustains and transcends the cosmos inevitably is infinite, thus timeless, non dual, and absolute.
But the phenomenal world we call the cosmos and its aspect of time definitely has a beginning from our point of view.
User avatar #123 - ponchosdm (05/04/2014) [-]
indeed i was talking about Space and Time infinity. there always was and always will be. our point of view tries to give it a human comprehensive state, which asumes there must be a beginning and an end, even if it does not.
#124 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Yes, the source of everything is completely beyond intellectual comprehension since logic is dependant upon the inseperable qualities of the universe: causation, time and space, and not vice sersa (and therefore logic itself is limited).

I think we pretty much agree.

What I tried to say before was that ultimately the entire cosmos and its infinite universes exist within a boundless timeless reality, but from the point of view of each universe there'd be a definite point of beginning in time and space. And that even though time as whole is an illusion, our perception of it is still linear.
#3 - As much as I hate that picture, that was a pretty good comment… 05/03/2014 on Put your dick in it 0
#8 - We're too late. I've just looked up "literally" in t…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/03/2014 on Fuck your assumptions... +5
#132 - Tormound (05/04/2014) [-]
It's been used that way starting from at least the 1700s by quite a few writers, including Mark Twain.

Heck if you guys are this worked up about words with opposite meanings, I wanna know how you feel about "clip" and "weather".
#171 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
It's called a hyperbole, creating emphasis by exaggeration.

It shouldn't be absorbed in the definition, in my opinion.
User avatar #9 - applejuiceforme (05/03/2014) [-]
Well. Thank you for showing me this... I'm gonna go read a book where words still mean what they are supposed to mean now.

goo.gl/sEkNoM

For anyone wondering if he was telling the truth, he was.

Luckily, it's an informal definition, but the two definitions are opposites of each other now.
#5 - Just to be sure, everyone from this generation should be forbi…  [+] (45 new replies) 05/03/2014 on Fuck your assumptions... +201
User avatar #148 - meuk (05/04/2014) [-]
i fracking agree.
User avatar #135 - nimba (05/04/2014) [-]
"bastardizes"
lol
#129 - drackmore (05/04/2014) [-]
Just like people and the words lose and loose.
User avatar #123 - bananarchy (05/04/2014) [-]
Nope, you're wrong Literally - Merriam-Webster Ask the Editor
Stop being so pedantic
User avatar #116 - welfarekid (05/04/2014) [-]
Did you literally just say that?
User avatar #111 - arlaxis (05/04/2014) [-]
It's literally too late for that.
#101 - anonymous (05/04/2014) [-]
Literally everyone know's people use it to effect, i dont get why FJ gets whipped up into such a furious kid and puppy stabbing fury over people using it. Its beyond pathetic.
User avatar #97 - undeadmaus (05/04/2014) [-]
It might be literally too late
User avatar #86 - kampi (05/04/2014) [-]
My friend the other day reached the maximum level of ignorance when it comes to language when he said "... I'm, literally speaking, serious!"

I mean, just... Come on, Collie. You can do better.
(Yes, that's his nickname and no, he's not a furry (or a dog).)
User avatar #75 - tehlulzbringer (05/04/2014) [-]
why is it too late? it says using it in that manner is incorrect
User avatar #68 - vgmddg (05/04/2014) [-]
User avatar #54 - vigilum (05/04/2014) [-]
"Oh no! The language is changing organically!"
#100 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Language changes, and language should change, but this isn't 'organic' change.

You don't realize that when a word at the same time can also mean the complete opposite it goes against the entire function of language, which is, to make ourselves clear, to be able to make the other understand what we mean.

In fact, if enough words could also mean the complete opposite, language would be meaningless, it would be futile.

I don't think you understand the sheer idiocracy of it.
User avatar #113 - blokrokker (05/04/2014) [-]
Did you know that "awful" used to mean "full of awe" and was used as a synonym for "amazing" or "reverential"? But now it's a synonym for "terrible." Do you know how that happened? Because language evolves. It's not a rigid construct, it's a fluid and dynamic entity.
#170 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Yes, the same goes for 'terrific'. It can mean a really good thing, although it comes from "causing terror.
It doesn't make it any less moronic though, I stand by my point, why make language unnecessarily complex and confusing?

Language evolves, but it doesn't mean we should mindlessly agree to accept all changes, just because a group of people misuses the word out of ignorance.
User avatar #139 - herpderpstrom (05/04/2014) [-]
same with "awesome", as in "God struck down his foes with awesome strength". Sample sentence from today: "You got two likes on your facebook picture? That's awesome!"
#46 - IGotThis (05/04/2014) [-]
-ally
User avatar #45 - dancingdoggy (05/04/2014) [-]
I believe it is too late. I heard that in the dictionary, the definition of "literally" has now expanded to include the idea of "figuratively."
Which, in my opinion, just kills the idea of the word, but what do I know?

Article: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/13/literally-broken-english-language-definition
#43 - endospore (05/04/2014) [-]
It's almost like people exaggerate to better emphasize their point. If only there was some word for that.

hyperbole
User avatar #34 - ScottP (05/04/2014) [-]
It is literally too late
#29 - vatra (05/04/2014) [-]
It's much too late for that man. Webster already changed the fucking definition to include figuratively as a secondary definition...
User avatar #130 - Tormound (05/04/2014) [-]
Except, literally has been used for "virtually" from at least the 1700s.
User avatar #175 - vatra (05/04/2014) [-]
Which is stupid. The changing of the definition was just the nail in the coffin.
User avatar #125 - droghandel (05/04/2014) [-]
Mate, thats how language works. The stupidity on this website is literally sublime.
User avatar #174 - vatra (05/04/2014) [-]
Figuratively is the opposite of literary. Tell me how the fuck it makes sense to say something means something and also the exact opposite.
User avatar #181 - droghandel (05/07/2014) [-]
It may not make sense to you, but much of language is inconsistent in which words swap meanings or loose meanings over time and it is just because it is the way that the humans on this planet use their words.
User avatar #22 - eezo (05/03/2014) [-]
That's literally the stupidest thing I've ever heard
User avatar #21 - nustix (05/03/2014) [-]
Words change of meaning, that the way it works I'm sorry for you. If they didn't we would still speak english like it's 1400 so I'm happy it changes.
#80 - anonymous (05/04/2014) [-]
But now literally is meaningless, it means what the oppposite of itself means aswell as its real meaning
User avatar #106 - nustix (05/04/2014) [-]
There's more words that mean it's opposite. There's even a word for words that means it's opposite.
#28 - guanyu (05/04/2014) [-]
If it didn't, we could still read ancient texts.
#15 - somethingpants (05/03/2014) [-]
User avatar #131 - McFuckUp (05/04/2014) [-]
It's still overused. I once heard a girl on the phone say, "I'm like literally at the Mountainlair." Half the time it's used for emphasis, it's not even necessary.
#65 - mrjunebug has deleted their comment.
User avatar #117 - welfarekid (05/04/2014) [-]
Thats how a language works.
#102 - theplogyr (05/04/2014) [-]
Do you understand how language works, you fucking piece of shit? FUCK! There are no words to describe what brainless shit excuse for a human being you are. Get fucked, you fucking fifth grade piece of shit.
User avatar #31 - zonicoi (05/04/2014) [-]
*3rd grade English class*
"Billy, did you define 'Art' with the word art?"
"Yes, Miss."
"You can't do that, Billy. It's not allowed."
"Have you looked at the definition of 'literally' recently?"

what for some reason i immediately thought of when i saw this
User avatar #63 - toosexyforyou (05/04/2014) [-]
"informal"

get fucked
User avatar #64 - zonicoi (05/04/2014) [-]
whoops literally skipped over that
User avatar #6 - applejuiceforme (05/03/2014) [-]
I feel like it has. Unfortunately.

I mean, it's not just this generation that is doing this. It's the older generations too.
#8 - auryn (05/03/2014) [-]
We're too late. I've just looked up "literally" in the dictionary.
Aparently these days one of the definitions also is: "Used for emphasis while not being literally true"

So now literally, instead of meaning the opposite of figuratively, can also mean figuratively.
Literally now means figuratively.

Madness.
#132 - Tormound (05/04/2014) [-]
It's been used that way starting from at least the 1700s by quite a few writers, including Mark Twain.

Heck if you guys are this worked up about words with opposite meanings, I wanna know how you feel about "clip" and "weather".
#171 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
It's called a hyperbole, creating emphasis by exaggeration.

It shouldn't be absorbed in the definition, in my opinion.
User avatar #9 - applejuiceforme (05/03/2014) [-]
Well. Thank you for showing me this... I'm gonna go read a book where words still mean what they are supposed to mean now.

goo.gl/sEkNoM

For anyone wondering if he was telling the truth, he was.

Luckily, it's an informal definition, but the two definitions are opposites of each other now.
#42 - They weren't good. Characters, plot, dialogue, story … 05/03/2014 on I'm easy to please 0
#28 - $1289.50 05/03/2014 on justpiratethings 0
#19 - >back away slowly >"..ran away..." 05/03/2014 on embrace the darkness +2
#167 - Comment deleted 05/03/2014 on inconcievable +1
#4 - Calm down there, Satan.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/03/2014 on Give the kid a cookie 0
User avatar #8 - alphavsomega (05/03/2014) [-]
calm down there, tumblr
#6 - You don't realize they make these kind of headlines on purpose… 05/03/2014 on Should have thought the... 0
#12 - There is nothing to know. 05/03/2014 on See, here's the deal. 0
#5 - Nailed it.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/03/2014 on Me after my first child was... +5
#12 - chocolatepuppy (05/03/2014) [-]
#10 - Are you kidding me, I'd grow updates all the times. 05/03/2014 on If we 0
#7 - I had the same problem and called the helpdesk of my provider,… 05/03/2014 on I may have made a mistake... +1
#24 - Everything that is subdue to change has a beginning and end.  [+] (8 new replies) 05/03/2014 on In the beginning 0
User avatar #111 - ponchosdm (05/04/2014) [-]
Not if its a cycle, universe expands till everything is infinite apart of everything, then it contracts till everything its in in the same point, then bigbangs and the cycle starts again
#118 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Even if it were a cycle, the cycle itself must've had a beginning.
User avatar #119 - ponchosdm (05/04/2014) [-]
well, certanly in a cycle you could say that, but then theorically it have a beginning, its the same as who was first, the egg or the chicken
#120 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Not really.

There must be a point where time and space itself came into existence.
User avatar #121 - ponchosdm (05/04/2014) [-]
must?
the same as infinity, it has no end, no need of a beginning if there is no end
#122 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Actual Infinity is unlimited, infinite in all aspects, not just numerical infinity.
Although they might be numerically infinite, time and space are a limitation on itself.

Ofcourse the ultimate and actual reality that sustains and transcends the cosmos inevitably is infinite, thus timeless, non dual, and absolute.
But the phenomenal world we call the cosmos and its aspect of time definitely has a beginning from our point of view.
User avatar #123 - ponchosdm (05/04/2014) [-]
indeed i was talking about Space and Time infinity. there always was and always will be. our point of view tries to give it a human comprehensive state, which asumes there must be a beginning and an end, even if it does not.
#124 - auryn (05/04/2014) [-]
Yes, the source of everything is completely beyond intellectual comprehension since logic is dependant upon the inseperable qualities of the universe: causation, time and space, and not vice sersa (and therefore logic itself is limited).

I think we pretty much agree.

What I tried to say before was that ultimately the entire cosmos and its infinite universes exist within a boundless timeless reality, but from the point of view of each universe there'd be a definite point of beginning in time and space. And that even though time as whole is an illusion, our perception of it is still linear.
#49 - I've seen enough Hentai. No really I have, I don't wish to see… 05/03/2014 on Where can i find this bait. 0

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#61 - auryn (07/20/2014) [-]
**auryn rolled image**
**auryn rolled image**
#60 - auryn (07/20/2014) [-]
**auryn rolled image**
#59 - auryn (07/20/2014) [-]
**auryn rolled image**
#58 - auryn (07/20/2014) [-]
**auryn rolled image**
#37 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
here have more LEARNING on FJ
#42 to #37 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
The fact that you think this would even annoy me the slightest cheers me up.

I wish I could thumb that comment up.
User avatar #46 to #42 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
so when someone else posts something educational and not funny to you, you bitch, when i do it, you want to thumb me up

logic is a white woman and youre the nigger raping her
#49 to #46 - auryn (04/25/2014) [-]
I didn't bitch.

I tried to explain the fallacy in your assumptions.

On the other hand, you started by rebuking the people who had a different opinion.
Haha, that hypocrisy thing again, huh.
User avatar #29 - drewsky (01/18/2013) [-]
You're literally on a track to get yourself banned from too many thumbs down because you feel the need to post your opinion. You know that, right?
#30 to #29 - auryn (01/18/2013) [-]
I need over 7500 more red thumbs to get close to that, so I've got a while.

Although I once managed to get over 9000 red thumbs within 3 weeks on my previous account.
Definitely worth the shitstorms.
#36 to #30 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
so you admit to what i said

you troll for fun
#38 to #36 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
I hardly do, check my previous comments.

And even if I did, it wouln't make a difference, my intentions doesn't take away from my arguments, even if I were trolling it doesn't mean I'm not right, and most certainly doesn't make any of what you said any less ridiculous. lol.
User avatar #39 to #38 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
ahem....9000 red thumbs in 3 weeks = Troll
#40 to #39 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
You're point being?
User avatar #41 to #40 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
stating my fact
youre a troll who comes here to be a dick for a giggle

again ill hope you hit puberty soon
#43 to #41 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
Yes, I come here for a giggle.

You're point being?
#45 to #43 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
* comes here for a giggle   
* bitches at me for having a different opinion
* comes here for a giggle
* bitches at me for having a different opinion
#47 to #45 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
I didn't bitch at you for having a different opinion.

I tried to explain some things to you that you had, and still have, difficulty understanding.
Things like that people might have thumbed the content down for other reasons.
User avatar #53 to #47 - konradkurze (04/25/2014) [-]
well you obviously dont know funnyjunkers

if you ever paid attention to them. they largely bitch at anything that contradicts mainstream ideals of political corectness

in the case of this pic, providing the non-PC truth about race/species, the FJ kids would bitch about it being 'racist'

then again you seem to devote your time to shitmouthing others instead of paying attention to them
#52 to #47 - konradkurze has deleted their comment [-]
#48 to #47 - konradkurze has deleted their comment [-]
#51 to #48 - auryn (04/25/2014) [-]
Read back all the comments of our conversation and you'll find that 90% of the shitmouthing is done by you. I've said a thing or two but you resort to ungrounded insults pretty much every comment.

Hypocrisy much?
#50 to #48 - auryn (04/25/2014) [-]
Read back all the comments of our conversation and you'll find that 90% of the shitmouthing is done by you. I've said a thing or two but you resort to ungrounded insults pretty much every comment.

Hypocrisy much?
#44 to #43 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
Your*
#31 to #30 - drewsky (01/18/2013) [-]
WHAT, 9000?!?!
#32 to #31 - auryn (01/18/2013) [-]
Haha, yeah.

It was on the ponytime channel, bronies are very easily to startle.
#33 to #32 - drewsky (01/18/2013) [-]
What if I told you that I'm a brony?
What if I told you that I'm a brony?
#35 to #34 - drewsky (01/18/2013) [-]
Well, then good day, sir.
Well, then good day, sir.
User avatar #14 - wittyuser (05/31/2012) [-]
your user name is my name without the L
inb4 cool story bro
#15 to #15 - auryn (05/31/2012) [-]
I picked Auryn because I liked the symbol of the talisman and what it represents, both depicting duality and infinity.
User avatar #55 to #15 - Falkor (05/21/2014) [-]
you didn't pick it for the neverending story? : (
#56 to #55 - auryn (05/21/2014) [-]
Ofcourse I did!

That's why I chose it in the first place.
User avatar #57 to #56 - Falkor (05/21/2014) [-]
i just looked up what talisman was, lol
User avatar #12 - kylecolb (05/05/2012) [-]
are you on bodybuilding.com? do you have a profile there? love that site
#13 to #12 - auryn (05/05/2012) [-]
I've read an assload of articles and threads on that site, but I don't have a profile.
#10 - sharkwaffle **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#7 - neededllama (04/02/2012) [-]
So you're gonna keep trolling?
Also, why did you choose this name, and not another Trek name?
Did you not want to be known as Trek anymore?
#8 to #7 - auryn (04/02/2012) [-]
I figured I'll just keep a low profile this time and keep the trolling to a minimum.

User avatar #3 - coolponyboy ONLINE (03/29/2012) [-]
hey whats up?
#6 to #3 - auryn (03/31/2012) [-]
The sky.
 Friends (0)