Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

auryn

Rank #319 on Comments
no avatar Level 327 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Offline
Send mail to auryn Block auryn Invite auryn to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 25
Date Signed Up:3/17/2012
Last Login:12/19/2014
Location:The Netherlands
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#319
Highest Content Rank:#14558
Highest Comment Rank:#46
Content Thumbs: 95 total,  175 ,  80
Comment Thumbs: 33806 total,  42192 ,  8386
Content Level Progress: 80% (4/5)
Level 8 Content: New Here → Level 9 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 53.4% (534/1000)
Level 327 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 328 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:2
Content Views:12822
Times Content Favorited:14 times
Total Comments Made:6703
FJ Points:27417

latest user's comments

#56 - It doesn't pose any actual counterargument. It just s…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/15/2014 on Abortion Explained +22
User avatar #132 - castereleven (12/16/2014) [-]
A good person wouldn't choose at all.
#244 - anonymous (12/16/2014) [-]
Irrelevant to the thought experiment. It implies a situation where you have no real choice but to choose. If you want, you can imagine that if you yourself don't choose then the man enforcing the situation would kill both. If you want to get all "but then i'd try and save them!" type of third option: imagine you're bound in shackles and can't move an inch, so your choices are choose one and let the other live or choose neither and kill both. I hate to assume you'd go that way, but people on the internet man... you can't even explain the mechanics of something without them assuming you're on the other side.
User avatar #57 - Funnel (12/15/2014) [-]
Truth.
It's like saying: Either kill these 2 people or kill this 1 person. Ok you chose to kill the 1 person so that means you find 1 life worthless.
#9 - Awkward is only in the mind. It's not awkward if you …  [+] (1 new reply) 12/15/2014 on Works for me +4
User avatar #10 - themastertroller (12/15/2014) [-]
the truth has been spoken
#70 - Finally some common sense. 12/15/2014 on Mens Rights Activist +1
#29 - Because I don't like the sight of wires on walls, let alone se… 12/15/2014 on WANTTTTTTTTTTT 0
#99 - Fair enough. Just trying to get into your logic, I'm … 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel 0
#97 - 1) Yes, you're right, my original comment is not role revervis… 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel 0
#95 - But that wasn't the question. The question was "… 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel 0
#93 - It has everything to do. Because if you would mind, i… 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel 0
#91 - So if you were an animal you wouldn't mind getting killed and …  [+] (9 new replies) 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel 0
#100 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
That would be a huge ass hole move. I'm a human, bitch! I'm not saying that humans aren't ass holes. Humans are total ass holes to animals. But, that's because we're superior. That's why animals attempt to fight back (or flight) and lose,. They don't want to get eaten, but we're superior and don't let them get away.

So if some developed species tried to do whatever (eat, etc.) to me then I would fight them until I died.
#98 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Well, duh. That's life. Animals eat each other all the time. It's called Darwinism. And I'm pretty sure animals don't want to get eaten even though they eat each other.

That's why I eat animals and don't expect to get eaten; because I do shit to animals (like kill and eat them) that I wouldn't like to be done to me (being killed and eaten).

Let's just agree to disagree. Let's just say that everyone and everything is a hypocrite.
#99 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Fair enough.

Just trying to get into your logic, I'm curious, so if a more developed species (than mankind) came along you think they would be justified to do whatever they want to human beings and you wouldn't find that an asshole thing to do in any way?
#96 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You don't need to suspect anything. I answered your question. Read my last comment again. And it's not 'if the roles were reversed." You said that the person who flew the squirrel should be thrown themselves. That's not role reversal. I then asked if I (as a human) should be eaten because I eat animals. Just because I don't want to get eaten if I were an animal doesn't mean there's a double standard.

Humans are superior to animals and should eat them. Just because if I were an animal and I don't want to get eaten doesn't mean I now think it's not okay to eat animals.
#97 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
1) Yes, you're right, my original comment is not role revervise. I said it because it's the only reastic option to make people realize it's not fun getting shot away like that, because turning them into a squirrel is not really a viable option here, since I have not yet masters the art of occult magic.

2) Okay, so forget everything I said about hypocrisy and double standards, just forget everything I said before.
So my observation correct when I state: "You do something to others which you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed"

Because that was actually my entire point.
#94 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I can't reply to your last comment because purple lines.

It's not a double standard because animals are inferior to humans. I'm a human, not an animal. Again, if we were talking about eating humans and I said I shouldn't be eaten yet I still eat other humans then you would be right.

We keep dogs in kettles, yet none of us would ever want to be caged (unless it's sexual) so is this a double standard?

In the gif, if that was a person instead of a squirrel then I would totally agree with you.
#95 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
But that wasn't the question.

The question was "If you were an animal, won't you rather live instead of getting killed and eaten by a human being?"

It wouldn't be a double standard if you were an animal and you would think it's okay for humans to kill and eat you, but I have a vague suspicion you rather live too instead getting killed for food.

It's about the principle that you do something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if you if the roles were reversed.
And I don't treat my pets in any way that I wouldn't have liked to have done to me if I were a pet.

#92 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I just said that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I never said that and you're simply changing the subject. Yes, I would mind. As we both have said in this conversation: Nobody wants to get eaten.

But, that still has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
#93 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
It has everything to do.

Because if you would mind, it means you're doing something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed.
And this is what I mean with double standard.
#89 - I see humans as superior too. But if I were an animal…  [+] (11 new replies) 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel 0
#90 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm not saying anything wants to be eaten. That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
#91 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
So if you were an animal you wouldn't mind getting killed and eaten by a human?
#100 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
That would be a huge ass hole move. I'm a human, bitch! I'm not saying that humans aren't ass holes. Humans are total ass holes to animals. But, that's because we're superior. That's why animals attempt to fight back (or flight) and lose,. They don't want to get eaten, but we're superior and don't let them get away.

So if some developed species tried to do whatever (eat, etc.) to me then I would fight them until I died.
#98 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Well, duh. That's life. Animals eat each other all the time. It's called Darwinism. And I'm pretty sure animals don't want to get eaten even though they eat each other.

That's why I eat animals and don't expect to get eaten; because I do shit to animals (like kill and eat them) that I wouldn't like to be done to me (being killed and eaten).

Let's just agree to disagree. Let's just say that everyone and everything is a hypocrite.
#99 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Fair enough.

Just trying to get into your logic, I'm curious, so if a more developed species (than mankind) came along you think they would be justified to do whatever they want to human beings and you wouldn't find that an asshole thing to do in any way?
#96 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You don't need to suspect anything. I answered your question. Read my last comment again. And it's not 'if the roles were reversed." You said that the person who flew the squirrel should be thrown themselves. That's not role reversal. I then asked if I (as a human) should be eaten because I eat animals. Just because I don't want to get eaten if I were an animal doesn't mean there's a double standard.

Humans are superior to animals and should eat them. Just because if I were an animal and I don't want to get eaten doesn't mean I now think it's not okay to eat animals.
#97 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
1) Yes, you're right, my original comment is not role revervise. I said it because it's the only reastic option to make people realize it's not fun getting shot away like that, because turning them into a squirrel is not really a viable option here, since I have not yet masters the art of occult magic.

2) Okay, so forget everything I said about hypocrisy and double standards, just forget everything I said before.
So my observation correct when I state: "You do something to others which you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed"

Because that was actually my entire point.
#94 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I can't reply to your last comment because purple lines.

It's not a double standard because animals are inferior to humans. I'm a human, not an animal. Again, if we were talking about eating humans and I said I shouldn't be eaten yet I still eat other humans then you would be right.

We keep dogs in kettles, yet none of us would ever want to be caged (unless it's sexual) so is this a double standard?

In the gif, if that was a person instead of a squirrel then I would totally agree with you.
#95 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
But that wasn't the question.

The question was "If you were an animal, won't you rather live instead of getting killed and eaten by a human being?"

It wouldn't be a double standard if you were an animal and you would think it's okay for humans to kill and eat you, but I have a vague suspicion you rather live too instead getting killed for food.

It's about the principle that you do something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if you if the roles were reversed.
And I don't treat my pets in any way that I wouldn't have liked to have done to me if I were a pet.

#92 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I just said that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I never said that and you're simply changing the subject. Yes, I would mind. As we both have said in this conversation: Nobody wants to get eaten.

But, that still has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
#93 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
It has everything to do.

Because if you would mind, it means you're doing something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed.
And this is what I mean with double standard.
#63 - I'm saying you can't really have a moral objection to being ea…  [+] (13 new replies) 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel -1
#64 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I disagree.

I have a moral objection to being eaten because I'm a human and I think humans deserve more than animals do. It's not a double standard because I don't see the world like you; having one should only do something if they want it done to themselves.

Now, if I eat humans and then said that I shouldn't be eaten, then I would agree with you.
#89 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I see humans as superior too.

But if I were an animal I'd rather not be eaten, would you?
#90 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm not saying anything wants to be eaten. That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
#91 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
So if you were an animal you wouldn't mind getting killed and eaten by a human?
#100 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
That would be a huge ass hole move. I'm a human, bitch! I'm not saying that humans aren't ass holes. Humans are total ass holes to animals. But, that's because we're superior. That's why animals attempt to fight back (or flight) and lose,. They don't want to get eaten, but we're superior and don't let them get away.

So if some developed species tried to do whatever (eat, etc.) to me then I would fight them until I died.
#98 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Well, duh. That's life. Animals eat each other all the time. It's called Darwinism. And I'm pretty sure animals don't want to get eaten even though they eat each other.

That's why I eat animals and don't expect to get eaten; because I do shit to animals (like kill and eat them) that I wouldn't like to be done to me (being killed and eaten).

Let's just agree to disagree. Let's just say that everyone and everything is a hypocrite.
#99 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Fair enough.

Just trying to get into your logic, I'm curious, so if a more developed species (than mankind) came along you think they would be justified to do whatever they want to human beings and you wouldn't find that an asshole thing to do in any way?
#96 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You don't need to suspect anything. I answered your question. Read my last comment again. And it's not 'if the roles were reversed." You said that the person who flew the squirrel should be thrown themselves. That's not role reversal. I then asked if I (as a human) should be eaten because I eat animals. Just because I don't want to get eaten if I were an animal doesn't mean there's a double standard.

Humans are superior to animals and should eat them. Just because if I were an animal and I don't want to get eaten doesn't mean I now think it's not okay to eat animals.
#97 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
1) Yes, you're right, my original comment is not role revervise. I said it because it's the only reastic option to make people realize it's not fun getting shot away like that, because turning them into a squirrel is not really a viable option here, since I have not yet masters the art of occult magic.

2) Okay, so forget everything I said about hypocrisy and double standards, just forget everything I said before.
So my observation correct when I state: "You do something to others which you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed"

Because that was actually my entire point.
#94 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I can't reply to your last comment because purple lines.

It's not a double standard because animals are inferior to humans. I'm a human, not an animal. Again, if we were talking about eating humans and I said I shouldn't be eaten yet I still eat other humans then you would be right.

We keep dogs in kettles, yet none of us would ever want to be caged (unless it's sexual) so is this a double standard?

In the gif, if that was a person instead of a squirrel then I would totally agree with you.
#95 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
But that wasn't the question.

The question was "If you were an animal, won't you rather live instead of getting killed and eaten by a human being?"

It wouldn't be a double standard if you were an animal and you would think it's okay for humans to kill and eat you, but I have a vague suspicion you rather live too instead getting killed for food.

It's about the principle that you do something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if you if the roles were reversed.
And I don't treat my pets in any way that I wouldn't have liked to have done to me if I were a pet.

#92 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I just said that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I never said that and you're simply changing the subject. Yes, I would mind. As we both have said in this conversation: Nobody wants to get eaten.

But, that still has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
#93 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
It has everything to do.

Because if you would mind, it means you're doing something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed.
And this is what I mean with double standard.
#61 - Yes, you can. It was still there when you loaded the …  [+] (15 new replies) 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel -1
#62 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I thought it says that the comment is no longer available or something if that happens?

Oh, wait. So, you're saying that I should be eaten because I eat animals?
#63 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm saying you can't really have a moral objection to being eaten if you eat others, without having some sort of double standard.
#64 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I disagree.

I have a moral objection to being eaten because I'm a human and I think humans deserve more than animals do. It's not a double standard because I don't see the world like you; having one should only do something if they want it done to themselves.

Now, if I eat humans and then said that I shouldn't be eaten, then I would agree with you.
#89 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I see humans as superior too.

But if I were an animal I'd rather not be eaten, would you?
#90 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm not saying anything wants to be eaten. That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
#91 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
So if you were an animal you wouldn't mind getting killed and eaten by a human?
#100 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
That would be a huge ass hole move. I'm a human, bitch! I'm not saying that humans aren't ass holes. Humans are total ass holes to animals. But, that's because we're superior. That's why animals attempt to fight back (or flight) and lose,. They don't want to get eaten, but we're superior and don't let them get away.

So if some developed species tried to do whatever (eat, etc.) to me then I would fight them until I died.
#98 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Well, duh. That's life. Animals eat each other all the time. It's called Darwinism. And I'm pretty sure animals don't want to get eaten even though they eat each other.

That's why I eat animals and don't expect to get eaten; because I do shit to animals (like kill and eat them) that I wouldn't like to be done to me (being killed and eaten).

Let's just agree to disagree. Let's just say that everyone and everything is a hypocrite.
#99 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Fair enough.

Just trying to get into your logic, I'm curious, so if a more developed species (than mankind) came along you think they would be justified to do whatever they want to human beings and you wouldn't find that an asshole thing to do in any way?
#96 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You don't need to suspect anything. I answered your question. Read my last comment again. And it's not 'if the roles were reversed." You said that the person who flew the squirrel should be thrown themselves. That's not role reversal. I then asked if I (as a human) should be eaten because I eat animals. Just because I don't want to get eaten if I were an animal doesn't mean there's a double standard.

Humans are superior to animals and should eat them. Just because if I were an animal and I don't want to get eaten doesn't mean I now think it's not okay to eat animals.
#97 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
1) Yes, you're right, my original comment is not role revervise. I said it because it's the only reastic option to make people realize it's not fun getting shot away like that, because turning them into a squirrel is not really a viable option here, since I have not yet masters the art of occult magic.

2) Okay, so forget everything I said about hypocrisy and double standards, just forget everything I said before.
So my observation correct when I state: "You do something to others which you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed"

Because that was actually my entire point.
#94 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I can't reply to your last comment because purple lines.

It's not a double standard because animals are inferior to humans. I'm a human, not an animal. Again, if we were talking about eating humans and I said I shouldn't be eaten yet I still eat other humans then you would be right.

We keep dogs in kettles, yet none of us would ever want to be caged (unless it's sexual) so is this a double standard?

In the gif, if that was a person instead of a squirrel then I would totally agree with you.
#95 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
But that wasn't the question.

The question was "If you were an animal, won't you rather live instead of getting killed and eaten by a human being?"

It wouldn't be a double standard if you were an animal and you would think it's okay for humans to kill and eat you, but I have a vague suspicion you rather live too instead getting killed for food.

It's about the principle that you do something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if you if the roles were reversed.
And I don't treat my pets in any way that I wouldn't have liked to have done to me if I were a pet.

#92 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I just said that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I never said that and you're simply changing the subject. Yes, I would mind. As we both have said in this conversation: Nobody wants to get eaten.

But, that still has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
#93 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
It has everything to do.

Because if you would mind, it means you're doing something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed.
And this is what I mean with double standard.
#59 - I've deleted the comment before you even replied, I figured it…  [+] (17 new replies) 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel -1
#60 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You can't reply to a deleted comment. So, you deleted it after I started this conversation.

All I'm trying to say is don't be so naive. You say that people deserve to be treated the same way they treat other things (like animals), yet when I asked if I deserve to be eaten because I eat animals you said no. Why do you get to tell me what's right and what's wrong? Where's the line that switches from "this is not okay" to "this is okay"?

That's a contradiction. There's your elaboration of the scenario I was speaking of.
#61 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Yes, you can.

It was still there when you loaded the page, I've deleted it shortly before you replied.

"yet when I asked if I deserve to be eaten because I eat animals you said no."
lol, how did you pick up a "no" from this? Read again, that's not what I said.
#62 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I thought it says that the comment is no longer available or something if that happens?

Oh, wait. So, you're saying that I should be eaten because I eat animals?
#63 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm saying you can't really have a moral objection to being eaten if you eat others, without having some sort of double standard.
#64 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I disagree.

I have a moral objection to being eaten because I'm a human and I think humans deserve more than animals do. It's not a double standard because I don't see the world like you; having one should only do something if they want it done to themselves.

Now, if I eat humans and then said that I shouldn't be eaten, then I would agree with you.
#89 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I see humans as superior too.

But if I were an animal I'd rather not be eaten, would you?
#90 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm not saying anything wants to be eaten. That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
#91 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
So if you were an animal you wouldn't mind getting killed and eaten by a human?
#100 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
That would be a huge ass hole move. I'm a human, bitch! I'm not saying that humans aren't ass holes. Humans are total ass holes to animals. But, that's because we're superior. That's why animals attempt to fight back (or flight) and lose,. They don't want to get eaten, but we're superior and don't let them get away.

So if some developed species tried to do whatever (eat, etc.) to me then I would fight them until I died.
#98 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Well, duh. That's life. Animals eat each other all the time. It's called Darwinism. And I'm pretty sure animals don't want to get eaten even though they eat each other.

That's why I eat animals and don't expect to get eaten; because I do shit to animals (like kill and eat them) that I wouldn't like to be done to me (being killed and eaten).

Let's just agree to disagree. Let's just say that everyone and everything is a hypocrite.
#99 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Fair enough.

Just trying to get into your logic, I'm curious, so if a more developed species (than mankind) came along you think they would be justified to do whatever they want to human beings and you wouldn't find that an asshole thing to do in any way?
#96 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You don't need to suspect anything. I answered your question. Read my last comment again. And it's not 'if the roles were reversed." You said that the person who flew the squirrel should be thrown themselves. That's not role reversal. I then asked if I (as a human) should be eaten because I eat animals. Just because I don't want to get eaten if I were an animal doesn't mean there's a double standard.

Humans are superior to animals and should eat them. Just because if I were an animal and I don't want to get eaten doesn't mean I now think it's not okay to eat animals.
#97 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
1) Yes, you're right, my original comment is not role revervise. I said it because it's the only reastic option to make people realize it's not fun getting shot away like that, because turning them into a squirrel is not really a viable option here, since I have not yet masters the art of occult magic.

2) Okay, so forget everything I said about hypocrisy and double standards, just forget everything I said before.
So my observation correct when I state: "You do something to others which you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed"

Because that was actually my entire point.
#94 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I can't reply to your last comment because purple lines.

It's not a double standard because animals are inferior to humans. I'm a human, not an animal. Again, if we were talking about eating humans and I said I shouldn't be eaten yet I still eat other humans then you would be right.

We keep dogs in kettles, yet none of us would ever want to be caged (unless it's sexual) so is this a double standard?

In the gif, if that was a person instead of a squirrel then I would totally agree with you.
#95 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
But that wasn't the question.

The question was "If you were an animal, won't you rather live instead of getting killed and eaten by a human being?"

It wouldn't be a double standard if you were an animal and you would think it's okay for humans to kill and eat you, but I have a vague suspicion you rather live too instead getting killed for food.

It's about the principle that you do something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if you if the roles were reversed.
And I don't treat my pets in any way that I wouldn't have liked to have done to me if I were a pet.

#92 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I just said that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I never said that and you're simply changing the subject. Yes, I would mind. As we both have said in this conversation: Nobody wants to get eaten.

But, that still has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
#93 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
It has everything to do.

Because if you would mind, it means you're doing something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed.
And this is what I mean with double standard.
#57 - And by that you mean?  [+] (19 new replies) 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel -1
#58 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
By that I mean you stated in the comment that conveniently got deleted that no one should do something if they don't want it done to them, but then you stated that there's a double standard because different scenarios call for different principles.

So, who are you to say that one thing is okay and another is not?

Meaning: it's very naive to think that someone should get flown because they did it to a squirrel yet at the same time say "but in a different scenario I don't follow that rule."
#59 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I've deleted the comment before you even replied, I figured it wasn't worth the hassle.

I still stand by it, and still have no idea in the point you're trying to convey or how I contradicted myself.
Could you elaborate in which scenario you're speaking of I don't follow that rule?
#60 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You can't reply to a deleted comment. So, you deleted it after I started this conversation.

All I'm trying to say is don't be so naive. You say that people deserve to be treated the same way they treat other things (like animals), yet when I asked if I deserve to be eaten because I eat animals you said no. Why do you get to tell me what's right and what's wrong? Where's the line that switches from "this is not okay" to "this is okay"?

That's a contradiction. There's your elaboration of the scenario I was speaking of.
#61 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Yes, you can.

It was still there when you loaded the page, I've deleted it shortly before you replied.

"yet when I asked if I deserve to be eaten because I eat animals you said no."
lol, how did you pick up a "no" from this? Read again, that's not what I said.
#62 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I thought it says that the comment is no longer available or something if that happens?

Oh, wait. So, you're saying that I should be eaten because I eat animals?
#63 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm saying you can't really have a moral objection to being eaten if you eat others, without having some sort of double standard.
#64 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I disagree.

I have a moral objection to being eaten because I'm a human and I think humans deserve more than animals do. It's not a double standard because I don't see the world like you; having one should only do something if they want it done to themselves.

Now, if I eat humans and then said that I shouldn't be eaten, then I would agree with you.
#89 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I see humans as superior too.

But if I were an animal I'd rather not be eaten, would you?
#90 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm not saying anything wants to be eaten. That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
#91 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
So if you were an animal you wouldn't mind getting killed and eaten by a human?
#100 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
That would be a huge ass hole move. I'm a human, bitch! I'm not saying that humans aren't ass holes. Humans are total ass holes to animals. But, that's because we're superior. That's why animals attempt to fight back (or flight) and lose,. They don't want to get eaten, but we're superior and don't let them get away.

So if some developed species tried to do whatever (eat, etc.) to me then I would fight them until I died.
#98 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Well, duh. That's life. Animals eat each other all the time. It's called Darwinism. And I'm pretty sure animals don't want to get eaten even though they eat each other.

That's why I eat animals and don't expect to get eaten; because I do shit to animals (like kill and eat them) that I wouldn't like to be done to me (being killed and eaten).

Let's just agree to disagree. Let's just say that everyone and everything is a hypocrite.
#99 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Fair enough.

Just trying to get into your logic, I'm curious, so if a more developed species (than mankind) came along you think they would be justified to do whatever they want to human beings and you wouldn't find that an asshole thing to do in any way?
#96 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You don't need to suspect anything. I answered your question. Read my last comment again. And it's not 'if the roles were reversed." You said that the person who flew the squirrel should be thrown themselves. That's not role reversal. I then asked if I (as a human) should be eaten because I eat animals. Just because I don't want to get eaten if I were an animal doesn't mean there's a double standard.

Humans are superior to animals and should eat them. Just because if I were an animal and I don't want to get eaten doesn't mean I now think it's not okay to eat animals.
#97 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
1) Yes, you're right, my original comment is not role revervise. I said it because it's the only reastic option to make people realize it's not fun getting shot away like that, because turning them into a squirrel is not really a viable option here, since I have not yet masters the art of occult magic.

2) Okay, so forget everything I said about hypocrisy and double standards, just forget everything I said before.
So my observation correct when I state: "You do something to others which you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed"

Because that was actually my entire point.
#94 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I can't reply to your last comment because purple lines.

It's not a double standard because animals are inferior to humans. I'm a human, not an animal. Again, if we were talking about eating humans and I said I shouldn't be eaten yet I still eat other humans then you would be right.

We keep dogs in kettles, yet none of us would ever want to be caged (unless it's sexual) so is this a double standard?

In the gif, if that was a person instead of a squirrel then I would totally agree with you.
#95 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
But that wasn't the question.

The question was "If you were an animal, won't you rather live instead of getting killed and eaten by a human being?"

It wouldn't be a double standard if you were an animal and you would think it's okay for humans to kill and eat you, but I have a vague suspicion you rather live too instead getting killed for food.

It's about the principle that you do something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if you if the roles were reversed.
And I don't treat my pets in any way that I wouldn't have liked to have done to me if I were a pet.

#92 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I just said that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I never said that and you're simply changing the subject. Yes, I would mind. As we both have said in this conversation: Nobody wants to get eaten.

But, that still has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
#93 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
It has everything to do.

Because if you would mind, it means you're doing something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed.
And this is what I mean with double standard.
#55 - There certainly seems to be a double standard, yes.  [+] (21 new replies) 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel -2
#56 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Then maybe don't be so naive about the squirrel?
#57 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
And by that you mean?
#58 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
By that I mean you stated in the comment that conveniently got deleted that no one should do something if they don't want it done to them, but then you stated that there's a double standard because different scenarios call for different principles.

So, who are you to say that one thing is okay and another is not?

Meaning: it's very naive to think that someone should get flown because they did it to a squirrel yet at the same time say "but in a different scenario I don't follow that rule."
#59 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I've deleted the comment before you even replied, I figured it wasn't worth the hassle.

I still stand by it, and still have no idea in the point you're trying to convey or how I contradicted myself.
Could you elaborate in which scenario you're speaking of I don't follow that rule?
#60 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You can't reply to a deleted comment. So, you deleted it after I started this conversation.

All I'm trying to say is don't be so naive. You say that people deserve to be treated the same way they treat other things (like animals), yet when I asked if I deserve to be eaten because I eat animals you said no. Why do you get to tell me what's right and what's wrong? Where's the line that switches from "this is not okay" to "this is okay"?

That's a contradiction. There's your elaboration of the scenario I was speaking of.
#61 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Yes, you can.

It was still there when you loaded the page, I've deleted it shortly before you replied.

"yet when I asked if I deserve to be eaten because I eat animals you said no."
lol, how did you pick up a "no" from this? Read again, that's not what I said.
#62 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I thought it says that the comment is no longer available or something if that happens?

Oh, wait. So, you're saying that I should be eaten because I eat animals?
#63 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm saying you can't really have a moral objection to being eaten if you eat others, without having some sort of double standard.
#64 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I disagree.

I have a moral objection to being eaten because I'm a human and I think humans deserve more than animals do. It's not a double standard because I don't see the world like you; having one should only do something if they want it done to themselves.

Now, if I eat humans and then said that I shouldn't be eaten, then I would agree with you.
#89 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I see humans as superior too.

But if I were an animal I'd rather not be eaten, would you?
#90 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm not saying anything wants to be eaten. That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
#91 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
So if you were an animal you wouldn't mind getting killed and eaten by a human?
#100 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
That would be a huge ass hole move. I'm a human, bitch! I'm not saying that humans aren't ass holes. Humans are total ass holes to animals. But, that's because we're superior. That's why animals attempt to fight back (or flight) and lose,. They don't want to get eaten, but we're superior and don't let them get away.

So if some developed species tried to do whatever (eat, etc.) to me then I would fight them until I died.
#98 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Well, duh. That's life. Animals eat each other all the time. It's called Darwinism. And I'm pretty sure animals don't want to get eaten even though they eat each other.

That's why I eat animals and don't expect to get eaten; because I do shit to animals (like kill and eat them) that I wouldn't like to be done to me (being killed and eaten).

Let's just agree to disagree. Let's just say that everyone and everything is a hypocrite.
#99 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Fair enough.

Just trying to get into your logic, I'm curious, so if a more developed species (than mankind) came along you think they would be justified to do whatever they want to human beings and you wouldn't find that an asshole thing to do in any way?
#96 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You don't need to suspect anything. I answered your question. Read my last comment again. And it's not 'if the roles were reversed." You said that the person who flew the squirrel should be thrown themselves. That's not role reversal. I then asked if I (as a human) should be eaten because I eat animals. Just because I don't want to get eaten if I were an animal doesn't mean there's a double standard.

Humans are superior to animals and should eat them. Just because if I were an animal and I don't want to get eaten doesn't mean I now think it's not okay to eat animals.
#97 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
1) Yes, you're right, my original comment is not role revervise. I said it because it's the only reastic option to make people realize it's not fun getting shot away like that, because turning them into a squirrel is not really a viable option here, since I have not yet masters the art of occult magic.

2) Okay, so forget everything I said about hypocrisy and double standards, just forget everything I said before.
So my observation correct when I state: "You do something to others which you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed"

Because that was actually my entire point.
#94 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I can't reply to your last comment because purple lines.

It's not a double standard because animals are inferior to humans. I'm a human, not an animal. Again, if we were talking about eating humans and I said I shouldn't be eaten yet I still eat other humans then you would be right.

We keep dogs in kettles, yet none of us would ever want to be caged (unless it's sexual) so is this a double standard?

In the gif, if that was a person instead of a squirrel then I would totally agree with you.
#95 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
But that wasn't the question.

The question was "If you were an animal, won't you rather live instead of getting killed and eaten by a human being?"

It wouldn't be a double standard if you were an animal and you would think it's okay for humans to kill and eat you, but I have a vague suspicion you rather live too instead getting killed for food.

It's about the principle that you do something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if you if the roles were reversed.
And I don't treat my pets in any way that I wouldn't have liked to have done to me if I were a pet.

#92 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I just said that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I never said that and you're simply changing the subject. Yes, I would mind. As we both have said in this conversation: Nobody wants to get eaten.

But, that still has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
#93 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
It has everything to do.

Because if you would mind, it means you're doing something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed.
And this is what I mean with double standard.
#52 - Well ofcourse nobody wants to be eaten, but there's defintel…  [+] (23 new replies) 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel -2
#53 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I think I'm entitled to eat whatever I want.

I also think that I shouldn't be eaten.

Am I a hypocrite?
#55 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
There certainly seems to be a double standard, yes.
#56 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Then maybe don't be so naive about the squirrel?
#57 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
And by that you mean?
#58 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
By that I mean you stated in the comment that conveniently got deleted that no one should do something if they don't want it done to them, but then you stated that there's a double standard because different scenarios call for different principles.

So, who are you to say that one thing is okay and another is not?

Meaning: it's very naive to think that someone should get flown because they did it to a squirrel yet at the same time say "but in a different scenario I don't follow that rule."
#59 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I've deleted the comment before you even replied, I figured it wasn't worth the hassle.

I still stand by it, and still have no idea in the point you're trying to convey or how I contradicted myself.
Could you elaborate in which scenario you're speaking of I don't follow that rule?
#60 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You can't reply to a deleted comment. So, you deleted it after I started this conversation.

All I'm trying to say is don't be so naive. You say that people deserve to be treated the same way they treat other things (like animals), yet when I asked if I deserve to be eaten because I eat animals you said no. Why do you get to tell me what's right and what's wrong? Where's the line that switches from "this is not okay" to "this is okay"?

That's a contradiction. There's your elaboration of the scenario I was speaking of.
#61 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Yes, you can.

It was still there when you loaded the page, I've deleted it shortly before you replied.

"yet when I asked if I deserve to be eaten because I eat animals you said no."
lol, how did you pick up a "no" from this? Read again, that's not what I said.
#62 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I thought it says that the comment is no longer available or something if that happens?

Oh, wait. So, you're saying that I should be eaten because I eat animals?
#63 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm saying you can't really have a moral objection to being eaten if you eat others, without having some sort of double standard.
#64 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I disagree.

I have a moral objection to being eaten because I'm a human and I think humans deserve more than animals do. It's not a double standard because I don't see the world like you; having one should only do something if they want it done to themselves.

Now, if I eat humans and then said that I shouldn't be eaten, then I would agree with you.
#89 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I see humans as superior too.

But if I were an animal I'd rather not be eaten, would you?
#90 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm not saying anything wants to be eaten. That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
#91 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
So if you were an animal you wouldn't mind getting killed and eaten by a human?
#100 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
That would be a huge ass hole move. I'm a human, bitch! I'm not saying that humans aren't ass holes. Humans are total ass holes to animals. But, that's because we're superior. That's why animals attempt to fight back (or flight) and lose,. They don't want to get eaten, but we're superior and don't let them get away.

So if some developed species tried to do whatever (eat, etc.) to me then I would fight them until I died.
#98 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Well, duh. That's life. Animals eat each other all the time. It's called Darwinism. And I'm pretty sure animals don't want to get eaten even though they eat each other.

That's why I eat animals and don't expect to get eaten; because I do shit to animals (like kill and eat them) that I wouldn't like to be done to me (being killed and eaten).

Let's just agree to disagree. Let's just say that everyone and everything is a hypocrite.
#99 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Fair enough.

Just trying to get into your logic, I'm curious, so if a more developed species (than mankind) came along you think they would be justified to do whatever they want to human beings and you wouldn't find that an asshole thing to do in any way?
#96 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You don't need to suspect anything. I answered your question. Read my last comment again. And it's not 'if the roles were reversed." You said that the person who flew the squirrel should be thrown themselves. That's not role reversal. I then asked if I (as a human) should be eaten because I eat animals. Just because I don't want to get eaten if I were an animal doesn't mean there's a double standard.

Humans are superior to animals and should eat them. Just because if I were an animal and I don't want to get eaten doesn't mean I now think it's not okay to eat animals.
#97 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
1) Yes, you're right, my original comment is not role revervise. I said it because it's the only reastic option to make people realize it's not fun getting shot away like that, because turning them into a squirrel is not really a viable option here, since I have not yet masters the art of occult magic.

2) Okay, so forget everything I said about hypocrisy and double standards, just forget everything I said before.
So my observation correct when I state: "You do something to others which you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed"

Because that was actually my entire point.
#94 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I can't reply to your last comment because purple lines.

It's not a double standard because animals are inferior to humans. I'm a human, not an animal. Again, if we were talking about eating humans and I said I shouldn't be eaten yet I still eat other humans then you would be right.

We keep dogs in kettles, yet none of us would ever want to be caged (unless it's sexual) so is this a double standard?

In the gif, if that was a person instead of a squirrel then I would totally agree with you.
#95 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
But that wasn't the question.

The question was "If you were an animal, won't you rather live instead of getting killed and eaten by a human being?"

It wouldn't be a double standard if you were an animal and you would think it's okay for humans to kill and eat you, but I have a vague suspicion you rather live too instead getting killed for food.

It's about the principle that you do something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if you if the roles were reversed.
And I don't treat my pets in any way that I wouldn't have liked to have done to me if I were a pet.

#92 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I just said that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I never said that and you're simply changing the subject. Yes, I would mind. As we both have said in this conversation: Nobody wants to get eaten.

But, that still has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
#93 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
It has everything to do.

Because if you would mind, it means you're doing something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed.
And this is what I mean with double standard.
#49 - If anything, you are the one who seems butt blistered by my comment.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel +1
User avatar #88 - iizsimon (12/15/2014) [-]
PETA PLS GO
#20 - I think it's the people from Spy Kids or something. 12/15/2014 on feel old yet? 0
#19 - The girls looks exactly the same, just less clothes and a slut… 12/15/2014 on feel old yet? 0
#46 - Comment deleted  [+] (25 new replies) 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel 0
#50 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
So only eat meat if you want to be eaten?

Or is that different?

Don't answer that. I already know the answer.
#52 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Well ofcourse nobody wants to be eaten, but there's defintely hypocrisy involved if you think are entitled to do things that others shouldn't do to you.
#53 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I think I'm entitled to eat whatever I want.

I also think that I shouldn't be eaten.

Am I a hypocrite?
#55 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
There certainly seems to be a double standard, yes.
#56 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Then maybe don't be so naive about the squirrel?
#57 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
And by that you mean?
#58 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
By that I mean you stated in the comment that conveniently got deleted that no one should do something if they don't want it done to them, but then you stated that there's a double standard because different scenarios call for different principles.

So, who are you to say that one thing is okay and another is not?

Meaning: it's very naive to think that someone should get flown because they did it to a squirrel yet at the same time say "but in a different scenario I don't follow that rule."
#59 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I've deleted the comment before you even replied, I figured it wasn't worth the hassle.

I still stand by it, and still have no idea in the point you're trying to convey or how I contradicted myself.
Could you elaborate in which scenario you're speaking of I don't follow that rule?
#60 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You can't reply to a deleted comment. So, you deleted it after I started this conversation.

All I'm trying to say is don't be so naive. You say that people deserve to be treated the same way they treat other things (like animals), yet when I asked if I deserve to be eaten because I eat animals you said no. Why do you get to tell me what's right and what's wrong? Where's the line that switches from "this is not okay" to "this is okay"?

That's a contradiction. There's your elaboration of the scenario I was speaking of.
#61 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Yes, you can.

It was still there when you loaded the page, I've deleted it shortly before you replied.

"yet when I asked if I deserve to be eaten because I eat animals you said no."
lol, how did you pick up a "no" from this? Read again, that's not what I said.
#62 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I thought it says that the comment is no longer available or something if that happens?

Oh, wait. So, you're saying that I should be eaten because I eat animals?
#63 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm saying you can't really have a moral objection to being eaten if you eat others, without having some sort of double standard.
#64 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I disagree.

I have a moral objection to being eaten because I'm a human and I think humans deserve more than animals do. It's not a double standard because I don't see the world like you; having one should only do something if they want it done to themselves.

Now, if I eat humans and then said that I shouldn't be eaten, then I would agree with you.
#89 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
I see humans as superior too.

But if I were an animal I'd rather not be eaten, would you?
#90 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I'm not saying anything wants to be eaten. That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
#91 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
So if you were an animal you wouldn't mind getting killed and eaten by a human?
#100 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
That would be a huge ass hole move. I'm a human, bitch! I'm not saying that humans aren't ass holes. Humans are total ass holes to animals. But, that's because we're superior. That's why animals attempt to fight back (or flight) and lose,. They don't want to get eaten, but we're superior and don't let them get away.

So if some developed species tried to do whatever (eat, etc.) to me then I would fight them until I died.
#98 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
Well, duh. That's life. Animals eat each other all the time. It's called Darwinism. And I'm pretty sure animals don't want to get eaten even though they eat each other.

That's why I eat animals and don't expect to get eaten; because I do shit to animals (like kill and eat them) that I wouldn't like to be done to me (being killed and eaten).

Let's just agree to disagree. Let's just say that everyone and everything is a hypocrite.
#99 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
Fair enough.

Just trying to get into your logic, I'm curious, so if a more developed species (than mankind) came along you think they would be justified to do whatever they want to human beings and you wouldn't find that an asshole thing to do in any way?
#96 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
You don't need to suspect anything. I answered your question. Read my last comment again. And it's not 'if the roles were reversed." You said that the person who flew the squirrel should be thrown themselves. That's not role reversal. I then asked if I (as a human) should be eaten because I eat animals. Just because I don't want to get eaten if I were an animal doesn't mean there's a double standard.

Humans are superior to animals and should eat them. Just because if I were an animal and I don't want to get eaten doesn't mean I now think it's not okay to eat animals.
#97 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
1) Yes, you're right, my original comment is not role revervise. I said it because it's the only reastic option to make people realize it's not fun getting shot away like that, because turning them into a squirrel is not really a viable option here, since I have not yet masters the art of occult magic.

2) Okay, so forget everything I said about hypocrisy and double standards, just forget everything I said before.
So my observation correct when I state: "You do something to others which you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed"

Because that was actually my entire point.
#94 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I can't reply to your last comment because purple lines.

It's not a double standard because animals are inferior to humans. I'm a human, not an animal. Again, if we were talking about eating humans and I said I shouldn't be eaten yet I still eat other humans then you would be right.

We keep dogs in kettles, yet none of us would ever want to be caged (unless it's sexual) so is this a double standard?

In the gif, if that was a person instead of a squirrel then I would totally agree with you.
#95 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
But that wasn't the question.

The question was "If you were an animal, won't you rather live instead of getting killed and eaten by a human being?"

It wouldn't be a double standard if you were an animal and you would think it's okay for humans to kill and eat you, but I have a vague suspicion you rather live too instead getting killed for food.

It's about the principle that you do something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if you if the roles were reversed.
And I don't treat my pets in any way that I wouldn't have liked to have done to me if I were a pet.

#92 - Penn (12/15/2014) [-]
I just said that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I never said that and you're simply changing the subject. Yes, I would mind. As we both have said in this conversation: Nobody wants to get eaten.

But, that still has nothing to do with what we were talking about.
#93 - auryn (12/15/2014) [-]
It has everything to do.

Because if you would mind, it means you're doing something to others that you wouldn't have liked to be done upon you if the roles were reversed.
And this is what I mean with double standard.
#45 - That wasn't me. I don't care about red thumbs. 12/15/2014 on Flying Squirrel -1
#4 - What about your boyfriend?  [+] (1 new reply) 12/15/2014 on wait a minute... 0
User avatar #6 - whiterabit (12/15/2014) [-]
He's obviously already on FJ
#11 - Who gives a **** about digimon anymore..  [+] (1 new reply) 12/15/2014 on nailed it +12
#69 - anonymous (12/15/2014) [-]
>calling neopets digimon
#4 - This is like the intro of a good porn movie. 12/15/2014 on Good guy Lee Everett +17
#7 - Comment deleted 12/15/2014 on Greatest Quote of the FJ... 0
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #62 - maybetraffy (09/05/2014) [-]
you're not ajrin
User avatar #65 to #64 - maybetraffy (09/06/2014) [-]
death by dying
User avatar #63 to #62 - ajrin (09/05/2014) [-]
no he's not
#37 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
here have more LEARNING on FJ
#42 to #37 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
The fact that you think this would even annoy me the slightest cheers me up.

I wish I could thumb that comment up.
User avatar #46 to #42 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
so when someone else posts something educational and not funny to you, you bitch, when i do it, you want to thumb me up

logic is a white woman and youre the ****** raping her
#49 to #46 - auryn (04/25/2014) [-]
I didn't bitch.

I tried to explain the fallacy in your assumptions.

On the other hand, you started by rebuking the people who had a different opinion.
Haha, that hypocrisy thing again, huh.
User avatar #29 - drewsky (01/18/2013) [-]
You're literally on a track to get yourself banned from too many thumbs down because you feel the need to post your opinion. You know that, right?
#30 to #29 - auryn (01/18/2013) [-]
I need over 7500 more red thumbs to get close to that, so I've got a while.

Although I once managed to get over 9000 red thumbs within 3 weeks on my previous account.
Definitely worth the ********** .
#36 to #30 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
so you admit to what i said

you troll for fun
#38 to #36 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
I hardly do, check my previous comments.

And even if I did, it wouln't make a difference, my intentions doesn't take away from my arguments, even if I were trolling it doesn't mean I'm not right, and most certainly doesn't make any of what you said any less ridiculous. lol.
User avatar #39 to #38 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
ahem....9000 red thumbs in 3 weeks = Troll
#40 to #39 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
You're point being?
User avatar #41 to #40 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
stating my fact
youre a troll who comes here to be a dick for a giggle

again ill hope you hit puberty soon
#43 to #41 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
Yes, I come here for a giggle.

You're point being?
#45 to #43 - konradkurze (04/24/2014) [-]
* comes here for a giggle   
* bitches at me for having a different opinion
* comes here for a giggle
* bitches at me for having a different opinion
#47 to #45 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
I didn't bitch at you for having a different opinion.

I tried to explain some things to you that you had, and still have, difficulty understanding.
Things like that people might have thumbed the content down for other reasons.
User avatar #53 to #47 - konradkurze (04/25/2014) [-]
well you obviously dont know funnyjunkers

if you ever paid attention to them. they largely bitch at anything that contradicts mainstream ideals of political corectness

in the case of this pic, providing the non-PC truth about race/species, the FJ kids would bitch about it being 'racist'

then again you seem to devote your time to ************ others instead of paying attention to them
#52 to #47 - konradkurze has deleted their comment [-]
#48 to #47 - konradkurze has deleted their comment [-]
#51 to #48 - auryn (04/25/2014) [-]
Read back all the comments of our conversation and you'll find that 90% of the ************ is done by you. I've said a thing or two but you resort to ungrounded insults pretty much every comment.

Hypocrisy much?
#50 to #48 - auryn (04/25/2014) [-]
Read back all the comments of our conversation and you'll find that 90% of the ************ is done by you. I've said a thing or two but you resort to ungrounded insults pretty much every comment.

Hypocrisy much?
#44 to #43 - auryn (04/24/2014) [-]
Your*
#31 to #30 - drewsky (01/18/2013) [-]
WHAT, 9000?!?!
#32 to #31 - auryn (01/18/2013) [-]
Haha, yeah.

It was on the ponytime channel, bronies are very easily to startle.
#33 to #32 - drewsky (01/18/2013) [-]
What if I told you that I'm a brony?
What if I told you that I'm a brony?
#35 to #34 - drewsky (01/18/2013) [-]
Well, then good day, sir.
Well, then good day, sir.
User avatar #14 - wittyuser (05/31/2012) [-]
your user name is my name without the L
inb4 cool story bro
#15 to #15 - auryn (05/31/2012) [-]
I picked Auryn because I liked the symbol of the talisman and what it represents, both depicting duality and infinity.
User avatar #55 to #15 - Falkor (05/21/2014) [-]
you didn't pick it for the neverending story? : (
#56 to #55 - auryn (05/21/2014) [-]
Ofcourse I did!

That's why I chose it in the first place.
User avatar #57 to #56 - Falkor (05/21/2014) [-]
i just looked up what talisman was, lol
User avatar #12 - kylecolb (05/05/2012) [-]
are you on bodybuilding.com? do you have a profile there? love that site
#13 to #12 - auryn (05/05/2012) [-]
I've read an assload of articles and threads on that site, but I don't have a profile.
#10 - sharkwaffle **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#7 - neededllama (04/02/2012) [-]
So you're gonna keep trolling?
Also, why did you choose this name, and not another Trek name?
Did you not want to be known as Trek anymore?
#8 to #7 - auryn (04/02/2012) [-]
I figured I'll just keep a low profile this time and keep the trolling to a minimum.

User avatar #3 - coolponyboy (03/29/2012) [-]
hey whats up?
#6 to #3 - auryn (03/31/2012) [-]
The sky.
 Friends (0)