| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
arrisarrad
| Rank #2247 on Comments Offline Send mail to arrisarrad Block arrisarrad Invite arrisarrad to be your friend flag avatar |
|
I love raspberries. I like the color purple. I like rain. I enjoy tasteful irony. I don't think saying the word "Nigger" for no reason is funny. I can be mildly entertaining, except for when I make an ass of myself. Other than that, I'd say I'm a fairly serious person capable of being the exact opposite :)
latest user's comments
| #23 - Adultery is only an offense in biblical law, where there is no… | 5 hours ago on Tumblr at it's finest | +1 |
| #22 - Man, I had this same exact argument the last time this popped … | 5 hours ago on Tumblr at it's finest | +1 |
| #143 - Not at all. The only thing I originally contended with you was… | 5 hours ago on wat | 0 |
| #17 - Haven't we been through this? Adultery includes rape. I mean, … [+] (5 new replies) | 6 hours ago on Tumblr at it's finest | +19 |
| does raping the person you are married to count as adultery? i do not know all laws. Adultery is only an offense in biblical law, where there is no such thing as spousal rape. Legally, I think you can be prosecuted for it, but it's a murky area and hard to prove. i read it as unmarried rape for some reason... yeh i did miss it. Man, I had this same exact argument the last time this popped up. According to the Bible, there is no such thing as rape within the marriage bed, so it isn't classified as adultery. But personally, I think that forced sex is possible within a marriage, but that it shouldn't be legally classified as rape. I think that in that case, spousal rape should be used as a point of merit for divorce. Prosecuting someone for rape in addition to the regular divorce proceedings seems superfluous, and if a person stays married to someone who rapes them, then they're just stupid. And I don't think we should make laws designed around the idiocies of the stupid. | ||
| #10 - Lord Cthulu is ready to invade the Kanto. | 6 hours ago on Fuck yo Pokemon fuser... | +5 |
| #30 - I don't even LIKE jelly! | 7 hours ago on M'aiq | 0 |
| #28 - Well fine then, I didn't even care. [+] (2 new replies) | 8 hours ago on M'aiq | 0 |
| | ||
| #141 - I am not restating what YOU said. Reread the comment #33 made … [+] (2 new replies) | 8 hours ago on wat | 0 |
| That wasn't the anon I was referring to. Either way everything you have said is simply restating what I said originally. But you are too thick to notice it. Not at all. The only thing I originally contended with you was how the Big Bang Theory shouldn't be considered a theory. That's been the point of this exchange since the beginning. I said something correcting what you said, then you made a counter response, which I then addressed. Then you made another point of contention on the same vein as the previous one, which I addressed with the exact same response since it was applicable. Then we got started talking about the anon, and now you're being a defensive ass. | ||
| #137 - Actually, he was only partially right in his assessment. Theor… [+] (5 new replies) | 05/22/2013 on wat | 0 |
| Did you even read what I wrote? Because you're simply restating what I said. Also, did you just learn what empirical evidence is or something? The way you keep restating the same thing without really mentioning much else suggest such a thing. I am not restating what YOU said. Reread the comment #33 made by Anonymous. He states that theory IS fact, where I make the exact opposite argument. That theory is NOT fact just because it's a theory. That wasn't the anon I was referring to. Either way everything you have said is simply restating what I said originally. But you are too thick to notice it. Not at all. The only thing I originally contended with you was how the Big Bang Theory shouldn't be considered a theory. That's been the point of this exchange since the beginning. I said something correcting what you said, then you made a counter response, which I then addressed. Then you made another point of contention on the same vein as the previous one, which I addressed with the exact same response since it was applicable. Then we got started talking about the anon, and now you're being a defensive ass. | ||
| #26 - Apology...rejected. [+] (4 new replies) | 05/22/2013 on M'aiq | 0 |
| | ||
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

