Its not so much that "I" want to make FJ a soap box, it simply is, one thing in comedy many comedians are likely to tell you is known your audience ( of course there are always those who dont give a shit). Basically I don't disagree with you, its just that for all intents and purposes there is, seemingly, a large portion of people that want to see this stuff on funnyjunk, and for some (myself included sometimes) the shit is hilarious as it is sad. I mean shit tons of people enjoy stories from that one dude Arena and his misadventures with the SJW/Bronies/fat feminazi. Whats more is trying to stop people from posting shit you or anyone else doesn't like seems to have the opposite effect, its the troll post effect, the more you complain about it the more you will see it.
This also does technically fall under what you should expect from FJ, its the junk, hence Funny Junk ( believe that was the thumbs way back when too...) My best advice is just move on if you don't like it, seems kinda assholish to say but it is what it is.

From my experience and considerable observation of people, in a purely not creepy mad scientists that wants to kidnap you to join his island of genetic mutated animal people kinda way, I have noticed that people change their mentality about as much as say... things in the bible get changed, that is to say almost never because of what others say and very little on its own.

I can also tell you that you will be hard pressed to find any site that is better all around than funny junk, you may find a few but they will certainly lack quantity, and if they have quantity they will certainly end up like FJ, or worse, its just the way shit works in this world I'm afraid. There are tons of examples of this, and while it might be a bit trite, video games is one of the best examples I ( and many people ) can relate to. Games used to be really good, about fun and interesting new directions, but once it truly went mainstream things went down hill, it became about money and getting as much of it as possible. Call of Duty ( ya know fucking COD rabble rabble rabble) is a good marker for this, that game used to be fuck all hard and engrossing but over time as it became popular its quality went to shit, it became easier, and it became shorter, and while many might say that is because of being used to it, or nostalgia, the older stuff is still just as hard to me as it was back then.

Like it or not almost everything seems to work this way in any case of consumerism ( guess thats what you would call it ) you either starve for content or you have so much of it that it just because white noise rubbish.

I used Imgur for the longest time(lurker), It had a lot of the same content as FJ, just for most reasons I prefer FJ, of course you can also search around for funny/stupid funny things on youtube, just be careful with the suggested videos because those can quickly lead to the 'darker side' of youtube rather quickly ( not everyone wants to see bat shit crazy Water Canopy theory bs or Mango worm infestations)

Also if you are having trouble with sitting then it could be your chair, sounds like yours may not have good neck and back support, two pillows could probably help, one for your lower back and one behind your neck will likely fix some of the problems, of course only if you can lay back against them in your chair.

As for exercise I would suggest that if you can get your hands on them to get a pair of adjustable dumbbells(plates), a pair of 50lbs is a good thing to shoot for, you can start light if need be and work up through them, lots of things you can do with them from the privacy of your own home without worry of the weather, its what I'm actually doing right now though I would have liked to get a set of 100lb adjustable rather than just 50lb but I don't have that kinda money right now and have to work myself up to that, its honestly cheaper to get adjustable dumbbells than it is to get solid dumbbells, better on space too, though the solid ones for most people are easier to use.

Ah well I didn't mean to imply religious belief, he did a work on altruism that from what I understand of it, basically says there is no truly selfless act, its been a long time since I originally looked a it so things might not be exactly what I remember, but I do remember he came up with the theory of no true altruism.
As for the whole multiple sciences and understanding of them leading to new idea, ya is in my experience a true thing. Where a single skilled person might say... come up with a new alloy, they may not know how to apply it, where as a person who has their mind build around multiple fields will likely come up with many ways it can be used in said fields or even in fields beyond their understanding.
With enough understanding of different sciences you can actually bullshit your way( logical approximation ) to a true answer to a problem or question, though proving it is a bit hard for people without the knowledge to create the formula or research backing it. There is actually a lot of science kind of done that way really aside from the obvious scientific method( or Socratic method depending on how you go about it) , they take and make an educated guess on things based on what they already know, the Higgs boson I believe was one such incident where everything that was known pointed towards the Boson existing despite actual evidence on hand, and it proved to be right.

Anyways while this was an interesting chat I need to go get shit done, have a good day/night though.

yeah but the social norms attached to biological sex ARE just that: social norms. They can change at any moment: like for the last few centuries, men have generally short hair and wear pants. A few centuries ago, boys and men had long hair and often wore fluffy shorts or skirt-like shit. Because having long hair means you are rich enough to maintain such a hair-style (because you can afford to take baths often enough and can afford hair products).

It can also depend on region: women and children in the Middle East are "seen and not heard", whereas women and children in Africa often play important roles in society. So of course "gender roles" exist in society, but as long as gender roles have existed there have been people that break these rules. We don't need to continue to bash our heads against a wall on this issue - it's been dealt with time and time again: men can wear skirts and have long hair; women can wear jeans; men can act effeminate and it's OK for them to learn to cook and sew and shit. A woman can be the bread-winner. So, we don't have to fight for "equality among gender perceptions" - we already have it.

Or it's crixuz and he posts whatever the hell he can find.

i don't come to fj to read a ten-line paragraph which is wholly just regurgitating the same stuff we already know

thing is, majority of gun related deaths are suicides. the violent crime/murder stats have been decreasing in the last few decades too, but no one brings up those numbers. They keep shouting "This thousand died, this ten thousand died" when that's a drop in the bucket if not less than the total population in america which is in the goddamn 300 million's.

sorry man i found it on another media site so not sure, but the logo in the bottom is comedy central if that helps

You replied to the wrong person, mate

Slab on grade, doubt they went through the trouble of building a house like that then just forgot the in floor heat. Heating bill wouldn't be too bad considering the size of the place.

Three Gatling guns spreading death in all directions.

she is trying to incite violence or make a threat witch is not protected by free speech

I assumed she got arrested for actually doing something and the post put beside her arresting pic was just for irony

Believe it or not, the first amendment doesn't protect ALL forms of expression. Anything that can breach the peace is not protected. What that is, exactly, depends on the judge in charge of the case.

>dindu nothing
>Inciting Violence
>cants hide behind first amendment

kek

She should be charged for inciting a riot. Influential people meaning people who get enough views, can be viewed differently than someone just saying it online. I'm terrible at describing this, but she was in the wrong.