Upload
Login or register
x

arkis

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Consoles Owned: Nes,Snes,N64,GC,Wii,GBC,GBA,GBSP,PSP,PS3 total backwards compat,Xbox,360,PC
Interests: Games, paintball, metalwork, weapons,Fire
Date Signed Up:11/06/2014
Last Login:1/14/2016
Location:Washington
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#1121
Comment Ranking:#431
Highest Content Rank:#1011
Highest Comment Rank:#153
Content Thumbs: 2823 total,  3199 ,  376
Comment Thumbs: 12369 total,  13671 ,  1302
Content Level Progress: 84% (84/100)
Level 121 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 122 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 58% (58/100)
Level 292 Comments: Post Master → Level 293 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:2
Content Views:152859
Times Content Favorited:136 times
Total Comments Made:1901
FJ Points:11442

latest user's comments

#1 - Considering it looks somewhat solid, my guess is glass or Ice,…  [+] (6 new replies) 12/08/2015 on Jelly Tumblr Acting Fishy +6
#9 - asugar has deleted their comment.
#2 - mayoroftownsville (12/09/2015) [-]
Nope, that's a jellyfish. They wash up on the Jersey shore every August. Some people play frisbee with them.
#10 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]
Who the fuck plays frisbee with JELLYFISH!?!?!?
#14 - anon (12/09/2015) [-]
Every male kid from Scandinavia during summer.
User avatar
#11 - jaknova (12/09/2015) [-]
im more concerned if it really works, i mean, what distance does it normally get when thrown?
#3 - assrocket (12/09/2015) [-]
#1 - Hello Darwin Awards, I have a possible future candidate  [+] (1 new reply) 12/08/2015 on Getting a tan +7
#4 - anon (12/08/2015) [-]
Hello Death, yeah don't worry about this one. Natural selection will take its course.
#2 - Comment deleted 12/07/2015 on 5 minutes into chiv and chill 0
#7 - King of Infinite Hearts, no wonder I'm so good at Zelda, I jus… 12/07/2015 on Your Tarot card name 0
#11 - You can keep trying to tell people that, but your basically …  [+] (3 new replies) 12/07/2015 on Daily reminder/edgy facts +2
User avatar
#13 - bobtombobbob (12/07/2015) [-]
Matthew 10:35
"Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35"For I came to SET A MAN AGAINST HIS FATHER, AND A DAUGHTER AGAINST HER MOTHER, AND A DAUGHTER-IN-LAW AGAINST HER MOTHER-IN-LAW; 36and A MAN'S ENEMIES WILL BE THE MEMBERS OF HIS HOUSEHOLD."
He says it himself, one of his purposes was to sow spite and chaos
#16 - hisss (12/07/2015) [-]
Actually that's referring to the fact that anyone who followed Christ went against their old religion (Judaism). Set against his father=father wouldn't condone his new religion
User avatar
#12 - bobtombobbob (12/07/2015) [-]
Matthew 5:17 "Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. 18"For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished.…"
Kill the witches burn the wizards kill the women who have sex with animals kill the homo sexuals kill the non messianic jews kill those who eat unclean meats, pork catfish ecdra.
Kill the adulterers kill most of every one
#5 - Old and white with a decent laptop/tablet that isn't like 20yr…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/07/2015 on Fuck +22
User avatar
#44 - donatelo (12/08/2015) [-]
>white

he litterally looks pink
User avatar
#39 - stickmansam (12/08/2015) [-]
I wouldnt gamble my life on a 1/100 chance
#6 - christhechris (12/07/2015) [-]
which is why nobody will suspect it, and that's why it'll work
#3 - the problem with convictions is they sometimes get the wrong p…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/07/2015 on Solutions +8
#12 - malkfur (12/07/2015) [-]
the reason death penalty can be more expensive is because of the mass amount of paperwork and legal stuff that goes around before it happens.
User avatar
#24 - predatorwolf (12/07/2015) [-]
Surely the people who control the use of the death penalty could also say: 'Fuck that expensive paperwork, here's one slip of paper. Sign here. Adiós, fucker.
User avatar
#27 - cursedjester (12/08/2015) [-]
Many would like that too, I'd imagine, but you've got a lot of factors to consider...

Criminal's property needs to be signed off and ownership of any items passed down. This can become problematic if no will is written, there are no next of kin or if they have debt.

If there are next of kin they also need to be notified and given adequate time to either get there or give goodbies, if they want to.

After that you've got basic human rights such as last meals, sentencing, religious freedoms, allowing them their last moments, etc... as well as ensuring all proper records will be notified of the death and the right people will be present: Witnesses, executioners... You need the morgue to be ready too.
User avatar
#31 - predatorwolf (12/09/2015) [-]
That's what I mean. Can't the people in charge just say 'Fuck this stuff?'
#6 - This is how manslaughter happens 12/07/2015 on Lol So Fahnny Joke xDD +3
#37 - There is good music out there, but its drowned in a ri… 12/07/2015 on very relatable insightful post 0
#78 - Read what I said in later posts, I had someone argue with me, … 12/07/2015 on Just Cause 0
#4 - Comment deleted 12/07/2015 on What if... 0
#1 - Comment deleted  [+] (2 new replies) 12/07/2015 on What if... +1
#3 - blindthethief Comment deleted by arkis
#4 - arkis Comment deleted by arkis
#59 - "Science was created as a field because christian priests… 12/06/2015 on Facepalm at both parties 0
#8 - Apple juice is only good when its in a box with a straw, you u…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/06/2015 on Us As Parents 0
User avatar
#10 - distortedflare (12/06/2015) [-]
Fuck that, drink straight from the carton.
#28 - A jet that can handle OP's huge ass 12/06/2015 on 747 has space +4
#7 - dude I don't know what to tell ya, peoples iz dumz 12/06/2015 on Just Cause +4
#4 - You would think that but like the last time I saw this post an…  [+] (9 new replies) 12/06/2015 on Just Cause +3
User avatar
#20 - Funnel (12/06/2015) [-]
First off, you're not allowed to go faster than the speed limit when overtaking. Second, the person that hit's the other person from behind is always at fault, the only exception to that rule is when the one in front is backing up.
User avatar
#27 - sonoobish (12/07/2015) [-]
There are actually 4 reasons why you can rear end somebody and not be at fault

a driver reverses suddenly
a driver stops suddenly to make a turn and fails to execute the turn
a driver’s brake lights do not function
a driver gets a flat tire, but does not pull over and does not engage the vehicle's hazard

sauce www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/is-fault-automatic-rear-end-car-accident-case.html
User avatar
#85 - Funnel (12/07/2015) [-]
True, but those aren't universal, the one I said is true in all states, the other ones vary from state to state.

In many states it's the driver in the back that has responsibility to ensure that he has enough room to stop if the driver in front does one of those things.
User avatar
#84 - xchewsifferx (12/07/2015) [-]
I don't know if other states have this law, but in Oklahoma if you're not established in your lane and someone rear-ends you, it's your fault.

For instance: if I was changing lanes and then immediately slammed on my brakes and got rear-ended, it's my fault because I entered the lane and didn't give the other driver enough time to accommodate.

The only reason i know about this is beacuse my sister's boyfriend was guilty of causing a collision because of switching lanes and braking. The cop told him that you need to be in a lane for a minimum of 3 seconds to be considered "established" in it.
User avatar
#74 - stegovii (12/07/2015) [-]
I live in Tennessee and if you run into the back of someone on the road for any reason it's your fault.
User avatar
#87 - tennessee (12/11/2015) [-]
You're the only ten I see.
#6 - amuzen (12/06/2015) [-]
That straight up pisses me off, why do so many cyclists preach that cars should be twice as careful in order to accommodate them but then at the same time they encourage cyclists to be half as cautious by giving them free passes on reckless behavior? Sometimes solidarity is just plain retarded ARRRRAGH!
#5 - amuzen (12/06/2015) [-]
That guy's fucking retarded. The only possible 'needle' of fault one could see in the car is he didn't have his signal on long enough for someone going almost twice the speed of traffic that's swerving between lanes like a mad man in order to maintain said speeds to stop in time before ramming into him.

which basically translates to the only reason anyone would think the cars in the wrong here is because the other guys on a motorcycle. If the other guy was in a car he'd be douche bag #1 on everyone's shit list.
#7 - arkis (12/06/2015) [-]
dude I don't know what to tell ya, peoples iz dumz
#1 - Saw his face and this was the first thing I thought of… 12/06/2015 on A real hero! 0
#5 - Probably as normal as my ability to push my fingers backwards … 12/06/2015 on (untitled) 0
#1 - I still maintain that its the cyclist's fault for going obviou…  [+] (15 new replies) 12/06/2015 on Just Cause +147
User avatar
#72 - ImmortalBaconEater (12/07/2015) [-]
I don't understand how that could not be his fault.
User avatar
#78 - arkis (12/07/2015) [-]
Read what I said in later posts, I had someone argue with me, trying to say it was the car's fault and not the cyclists.
User avatar
#71 - xdiabolicx (12/07/2015) [-]
It IS his fault.
#3 - amuzen (12/06/2015) [-]
It's entirely the cyclists fault, the other car even signals before starting to change lanes. In no universe could it be construed as anyone BUT the cyclists fault.
User avatar
#79 - manofparody (12/07/2015) [-]
It's both their fault.

The cyclist is more in the wrong, but that car put on the turn signal, then .3 seconds later started switching lanes. This is why you're supposed to wait longer than half a second after putting on the signal.
User avatar
#4 - arkis (12/06/2015) [-]
You would think that but like the last time I saw this post and deconstructed it, someone got in an argument with me saying it was the cars fault, sooooo ya
User avatar
#20 - Funnel (12/06/2015) [-]
First off, you're not allowed to go faster than the speed limit when overtaking. Second, the person that hit's the other person from behind is always at fault, the only exception to that rule is when the one in front is backing up.
User avatar
#27 - sonoobish (12/07/2015) [-]
There are actually 4 reasons why you can rear end somebody and not be at fault

a driver reverses suddenly
a driver stops suddenly to make a turn and fails to execute the turn
a driver’s brake lights do not function
a driver gets a flat tire, but does not pull over and does not engage the vehicle's hazard

sauce www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/is-fault-automatic-rear-end-car-accident-case.html
User avatar
#85 - Funnel (12/07/2015) [-]
True, but those aren't universal, the one I said is true in all states, the other ones vary from state to state.

In many states it's the driver in the back that has responsibility to ensure that he has enough room to stop if the driver in front does one of those things.
User avatar
#84 - xchewsifferx (12/07/2015) [-]
I don't know if other states have this law, but in Oklahoma if you're not established in your lane and someone rear-ends you, it's your fault.

For instance: if I was changing lanes and then immediately slammed on my brakes and got rear-ended, it's my fault because I entered the lane and didn't give the other driver enough time to accommodate.

The only reason i know about this is beacuse my sister's boyfriend was guilty of causing a collision because of switching lanes and braking. The cop told him that you need to be in a lane for a minimum of 3 seconds to be considered "established" in it.
User avatar
#74 - stegovii (12/07/2015) [-]
I live in Tennessee and if you run into the back of someone on the road for any reason it's your fault.
User avatar
#87 - tennessee (12/11/2015) [-]
You're the only ten I see.
#6 - amuzen (12/06/2015) [-]
That straight up pisses me off, why do so many cyclists preach that cars should be twice as careful in order to accommodate them but then at the same time they encourage cyclists to be half as cautious by giving them free passes on reckless behavior? Sometimes solidarity is just plain retarded ARRRRAGH!
#5 - amuzen (12/06/2015) [-]
That guy's fucking retarded. The only possible 'needle' of fault one could see in the car is he didn't have his signal on long enough for someone going almost twice the speed of traffic that's swerving between lanes like a mad man in order to maintain said speeds to stop in time before ramming into him.

which basically translates to the only reason anyone would think the cars in the wrong here is because the other guys on a motorcycle. If the other guy was in a car he'd be douche bag #1 on everyone's shit list.
#7 - arkis (12/06/2015) [-]
dude I don't know what to tell ya, peoples iz dumz
#15 - It has to be links awakening, it looks like the windfish egg i… 12/05/2015 on I know you can guess this... +9
#4 - Comment deleted 12/05/2015 on Stump 4 Trump 0
#3 - I have negative thoughts all the time, it comes with being a r… 12/05/2015 on This post is pretty shitty +4
#2 - A Doctor that supposedly doesn't believe in evolution 12/05/2015 on Doctor Carson -2
#26 - I call ******** on that, or just people are unlucky wit…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/05/2015 on 2 birds -1
User avatar
#71 - kibuza (12/05/2015) [-]
You can call bullshit all you want but when multiple people have the same issue it's not an unlucky coincidence. Look it up. There's quite a few people complaining about it.

Some of them completely missed the Kellog dialogue because he immediately attacks you as soon as you enter the room. I was lucky and thought that was odd since he says "Ok, I'm telling the Synths to stand down" and then just immediately opened fire on me so I looked it up and lo and behold as soon as I removed the helmet on my PA it was fixed.
#40 - rockstarownage (12/05/2015) [-]
theres reports that it will sometimes randomly aggro people in the covenant, and someone up above in the comments said it glitched out their silver shroud quest.

Comments(1):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
1 comments displayed.
User avatar #1 - nought (07/24/2015) [-]
profile comment virginity is mine
 Friends (0)