I can't even a enjoy a simple brolove content without having some knob thinking how to somehow include SJW bashing to the totally unrelated content that this is.

wordsiwheelby.com/2013/09/just-one-of-the-guys/

I come with sauce

I knew it would make me angry and I read it anyway.

**djmaryhikineet used "*roll picture*"**
**djmaryhikineet rolled image**to be fair shes more stating how she feels for teh first paragraph but tldr kicked in so i dont know what else she said about it all i saw after words is "its 2013" ITS 2013

Fantastic stuff, the nuclear explosions are always so beautiful.

>standard size of modern nukes today are greater than the tsar

My sources state that most modern nukes, especially the ones most often used in a nuclear war average around 500-800kt. Coming in groups of 2 or 3, and 90% of them are going to be aimed at nuclear silos and command centers. The larger scale bombs 20mt and greater are nearly impractical in weight and size.

I'm not saying that nukes larger than 50mt are impossible. Heck, the Tsar that was tested had an entire stage removed to halve it's potential yield. And Russia had that "leak" of the Status-6 100mt nuclear torpedo meant to create manmade tsunamis. I'm just saying they aren't very standard by any means and you're not very likely to see a boom that big unless the crucial first strike to disable nuclear capability falls short and the subsequent peace negotiations and/or conventional war go really, really terrible. My source for this being a current researcher of international nuclear strategy. Possibly have the idea confused with the commonly stated fact that average modern nukes are far, far more efficient than the original atom bombs, which averaged only 20kt.

Now that's some proper dakka

It's still not done in a lab. Creating a GMO basicaly consists of planting two different strains together, and then hoping that the offspring have the traits you want And then doing that over and over again for like 7 years

I don't have anything against GMOs. But one thing is us breeding out traits we dislike indirectly, fucking around with the DNA of a plant and reconfiguring/splicing RNA/DNA like it was lego bricks is a whole different game. We don't know so much about it, that is why researchers call for a bad on human genetics in 2015 and a bunch moralfag reasons too... .

Like 26 said, there's really no difference, it just takes longer to get there if we selectively breed organisms. The gene's pretty much the same either way. Even in bacteria, which have ridiculous mutation and reproduction rates thereby making them far riskier , genetic modification has only had positive effects like the ability to produce human insulin for diabetics in a lab that I know of.

people are flipping out over gmo's that are created from two completely different species. for example taking genes that makefireflies light up and putting them in a tobacco plant to make nirnroot

Holy fucking shit.

It's real.

Oh, believe me, I know. I still argue with my mom over her insistence on buying organic because that way there's no pesticides which are harmful to us, even though there's no evidence to suggest that the trace amounts of synthetic pesticides present on conventional produce is capable of having any effect, positive or negative, on the human body.

It's especially funny because she likes to use brown rice for a lot of things, because it's "healthier." All rice, especially that grown in the American South, where most rice produced in the US comes from, has significant levels of Arsenic. More than 80% of that is found in the bran/germ, which are not present in white rice.

glowing nirnroot got me like:

no.

Not even in Texas, sadly.