| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

arisaka  

Rank #14675 on Comments
arisaka Avatar Level 137 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Offline
Send mail to arisaka Block arisaka Invite arisaka to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 101
Interests: Nietzsche, Adorno, "Philosophy", "Art"
Date Signed Up:12/05/2011
Last Login:5/21/2013
Location:Canada
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#14675
Highest Content Rank:#4409
Highest Comment Rank:#14848
Content Thumbs: 1431 total,  1574 ,  143
Comment Thumbs: 376 total,  774 ,  398
Content Level Progress: 31% (31/100)
Level 114 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 115 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 137 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 138 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Content Views:48260
Times Content Favorited:26 times
Total Comments Made:746
FJ Points:1819
Favorite Tags: tags (3) | are (2) | fucking (2) | here (2)

It's you and I vs. everybody.
It's us vs. the squares.
You're my Bernadine Dorhn.

latest user's comments

#258 - WHY IS IT THAT I CAN NEVER TELL ONLINE GOD DAMMIT Now…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/26/2012 on eiffel 0
#259 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Because there's no sarcasm font.

Here is some ice, use them to calm those savage titties of yours.
User avatar #260 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
sarcasm font what

(titties have subdued)
User avatar #261 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Never mind, bro.
Sorry for the confusion. No hard feelings?
User avatar #262 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
Pfft, of course not!
User avatar #263 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Cool beans. -brofist-
#256 - Yup. Message fucking received. You know, there's a re…  [+] (7 new replies) 12/25/2012 on eiffel 0
User avatar #257 - rel (12/25/2012) [-]
Dude, calm your tits. I'm just fooling with you.
User avatar #258 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
WHY IS IT THAT I CAN NEVER TELL ONLINE GOD DAMMIT

Now my tits are all aggravated and I need to find some way to calm them down, fucking shit
#259 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Because there's no sarcasm font.

Here is some ice, use them to calm those savage titties of yours.
User avatar #260 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
sarcasm font what

(titties have subdued)
User avatar #261 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Never mind, bro.
Sorry for the confusion. No hard feelings?
User avatar #262 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
Pfft, of course not!
User avatar #263 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Cool beans. -brofist-
#254 - Okay, roger that loud and clear. No need to, you know, repeat …  [+] (9 new replies) 12/24/2012 on eiffel 0
User avatar #255 - rel (12/24/2012) [-]
Girl.
Have a vagina.
Estrogen.
User avatar #256 - arisaka (12/25/2012) [-]
Yup. Message fucking received.

You know, there's a reason I said "personal experience" but good job taking that out of context anyways.
User avatar #257 - rel (12/25/2012) [-]
Dude, calm your tits. I'm just fooling with you.
User avatar #258 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
WHY IS IT THAT I CAN NEVER TELL ONLINE GOD DAMMIT

Now my tits are all aggravated and I need to find some way to calm them down, fucking shit
#259 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Because there's no sarcasm font.

Here is some ice, use them to calm those savage titties of yours.
User avatar #260 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
sarcasm font what

(titties have subdued)
User avatar #261 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Never mind, bro.
Sorry for the confusion. No hard feelings?
User avatar #262 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
Pfft, of course not!
User avatar #263 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Cool beans. -brofist-
#252 - Oh, sorry. Just assumed you were male (ironic since we're disc…  [+] (11 new replies) 12/23/2012 on eiffel 0
User avatar #253 - rel (12/24/2012) [-]
Nope, I'm a girl.
User avatar #254 - arisaka (12/24/2012) [-]
Okay, roger that loud and clear. No need to, you know, repeat that a THIRD time or anything.
User avatar #255 - rel (12/24/2012) [-]
Girl.
Have a vagina.
Estrogen.
User avatar #256 - arisaka (12/25/2012) [-]
Yup. Message fucking received.

You know, there's a reason I said "personal experience" but good job taking that out of context anyways.
User avatar #257 - rel (12/25/2012) [-]
Dude, calm your tits. I'm just fooling with you.
User avatar #258 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
WHY IS IT THAT I CAN NEVER TELL ONLINE GOD DAMMIT

Now my tits are all aggravated and I need to find some way to calm them down, fucking shit
#259 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Because there's no sarcasm font.

Here is some ice, use them to calm those savage titties of yours.
User avatar #260 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
sarcasm font what

(titties have subdued)
User avatar #261 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Never mind, bro.
Sorry for the confusion. No hard feelings?
User avatar #262 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
Pfft, of course not!
User avatar #263 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Cool beans. -brofist-
#251 - He said he was a quasi-feminist. That does not mean you're a f… 12/23/2012 on eiffel 0
#124 - No problem! 12/23/2012 on eiffel 0
#123 - He called himself a "quasi" feminist. I don…  [+] (15 new replies) 12/23/2012 on eiffel 0
User avatar #247 - rel (12/23/2012) [-]
I'm a girl, by the way.
User avatar #252 - arisaka (12/23/2012) [-]
Oh, sorry. Just assumed you were male (ironic since we're discussing feminism, I guess). Most people on this website from personal experience are.

User avatar #253 - rel (12/24/2012) [-]
Nope, I'm a girl.
User avatar #254 - arisaka (12/24/2012) [-]
Okay, roger that loud and clear. No need to, you know, repeat that a THIRD time or anything.
User avatar #255 - rel (12/24/2012) [-]
Girl.
Have a vagina.
Estrogen.
User avatar #256 - arisaka (12/25/2012) [-]
Yup. Message fucking received.

You know, there's a reason I said "personal experience" but good job taking that out of context anyways.
User avatar #257 - rel (12/25/2012) [-]
Dude, calm your tits. I'm just fooling with you.
User avatar #258 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
WHY IS IT THAT I CAN NEVER TELL ONLINE GOD DAMMIT

Now my tits are all aggravated and I need to find some way to calm them down, fucking shit
#259 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Because there's no sarcasm font.

Here is some ice, use them to calm those savage titties of yours.
User avatar #260 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
sarcasm font what

(titties have subdued)
User avatar #261 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Never mind, bro.
Sorry for the confusion. No hard feelings?
User avatar #262 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
Pfft, of course not!
User avatar #263 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Cool beans. -brofist-
User avatar #127 - myrtille (12/23/2012) [-]
Well, aren't any feminists actual feminists? Wouldn't you mean like...regular feminist?
Word choice just seemed off to me, that's all.
User avatar #251 - arisaka (12/23/2012) [-]
He said he was a quasi-feminist. That does not mean you're a feminist.

When a group is quasi-religious it does not mean they are religious; they may have religious properties, but are not a religious group altogether. A quasi-feminist is not a feminist.
#113 - We call them radfems. Radical feminism isn't a specif…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/23/2012 on eiffel 0
User avatar #114 - ilovehitler (12/23/2012) [-]
Well, thanks for sharing this bit of knowledge!
User avatar #124 - arisaka (12/23/2012) [-]
No problem!
#82 - I'm an actual feminist and I believe those things too.  [+] (21 new replies) 12/23/2012 on eiffel -3
User avatar #119 - myrtille (12/23/2012) [-]
What do you mean actual feminist?
User avatar #123 - arisaka (12/23/2012) [-]
He called himself a "quasi" feminist.

I don't think you know what that means, so I'll tell you (in the most non-sarcastic way possible, I sincerely do mean this): having some resemblance usually by possession of certain attributes.

I know why he used that term. He wanted to distance himself from radfems, which is understandable, just like how I don't call myself certain things because of what that might be associated with.
User avatar #247 - rel (12/23/2012) [-]
I'm a girl, by the way.
User avatar #252 - arisaka (12/23/2012) [-]
Oh, sorry. Just assumed you were male (ironic since we're discussing feminism, I guess). Most people on this website from personal experience are.

User avatar #253 - rel (12/24/2012) [-]
Nope, I'm a girl.
User avatar #254 - arisaka (12/24/2012) [-]
Okay, roger that loud and clear. No need to, you know, repeat that a THIRD time or anything.
User avatar #255 - rel (12/24/2012) [-]
Girl.
Have a vagina.
Estrogen.
User avatar #256 - arisaka (12/25/2012) [-]
Yup. Message fucking received.

You know, there's a reason I said "personal experience" but good job taking that out of context anyways.
User avatar #257 - rel (12/25/2012) [-]
Dude, calm your tits. I'm just fooling with you.
User avatar #258 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
WHY IS IT THAT I CAN NEVER TELL ONLINE GOD DAMMIT

Now my tits are all aggravated and I need to find some way to calm them down, fucking shit
#259 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Because there's no sarcasm font.

Here is some ice, use them to calm those savage titties of yours.
User avatar #260 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
sarcasm font what

(titties have subdued)
User avatar #261 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Never mind, bro.
Sorry for the confusion. No hard feelings?
User avatar #262 - arisaka (12/26/2012) [-]
Pfft, of course not!
User avatar #263 - rel (12/26/2012) [-]
Cool beans. -brofist-
User avatar #127 - myrtille (12/23/2012) [-]
Well, aren't any feminists actual feminists? Wouldn't you mean like...regular feminist?
Word choice just seemed off to me, that's all.
User avatar #251 - arisaka (12/23/2012) [-]
He said he was a quasi-feminist. That does not mean you're a feminist.

When a group is quasi-religious it does not mean they are religious; they may have religious properties, but are not a religious group altogether. A quasi-feminist is not a feminist.
User avatar #107 - ilovehitler (12/23/2012) [-]
I don't see why people are thumbing you down. That's what feminism is.

What most "feminists" are practicing isn't feminism at all. I'm not sure what to call it (other than the more obvious and insulting terms) but it ain't feminism.
User avatar #113 - arisaka (12/23/2012) [-]
We call them radfems.

Radical feminism isn't a specific ideology, but a radical perspective of feminism. Radical feminists don't want female dominance, they just take a radical approach to feminism, that's all.

In my opinion it's an outdated perspective on feminism. It's pretty second-wave, focusing wayy to much on the difference between genders whereas third-wave is much more about gender roles in general and genderqueer etc.

The biggest problem with radical feminism is that it is stuck in the second wave of feminism (although it has branched out and parts of it can be more or less third wave too!).

I know funnyjunk is very anti-feminist. It goes along with the fact that this place is predominately right-winged.
User avatar #114 - ilovehitler (12/23/2012) [-]
Well, thanks for sharing this bit of knowledge!
User avatar #124 - arisaka (12/23/2012) [-]
No problem!
#16059 - Ask quebec for help. We're pros at dealing with failing infras… 12/20/2012 on Politics - politics news,... +1
#147 - Historical materialism was certainly not in the bible... get a… 12/19/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#146 - no, he didn't. Because Jesus was talking about GOD. Communists… 12/19/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#143 - Also if Jesus was a confirmed communist why isn't he recorded … 12/19/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#142 - The first time the word communist was used was roughly in 1823… 12/19/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#140 - Firstly: Jesus was not a communist secondly human nat… 12/19/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#138 - *your oh my goodness gracious me 12/19/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#137 - NO, IT'S NOT. this shit getting through you're head y…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/19/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
User avatar #138 - arisaka (12/19/2012) [-]
*your

oh my goodness gracious me
#135 - The difference here is that Marx actually wrote things down, t… 12/18/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#131 - Yet again you imply that it HAS ALREADY BEEN ESTABLISHED. If i… 12/16/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#126 - You have done a perfect job describing to me the events of the… 12/16/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#124 - You have zero knowledge of communism. There are equal… 12/15/2012 on Its Just A Phase -1
#123 - Oh, of course. But I meant the literal definition of terrorism… 12/15/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#122 - Yes. They're quite silly. 12/15/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
#70 - I know I'm killing this little thread here but the RAF were mo…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/15/2012 on Its Just A Phase +1
User avatar #110 - lasmamoe (12/15/2012) [-]
Every freedom fighter is a terrorist in the eyes of the ones they fight.

There were plenty of American terrorists during world war 2, if you ask the people on the other side.
User avatar #123 - arisaka (12/15/2012) [-]
Oh, of course. But I meant the literal definition of terrorism; the RAF used fear as a weapon and as a means of political leverage. They could still be freedom fighters, whatever. But they're still terrorists by definition.
#68 - >Mussolini >communist I'm going to pretend …  [+] (2 new replies) 12/15/2012 on Its Just A Phase 0
User avatar #113 - lasmamoe (12/15/2012) [-]
Mistaken, sorry.

Although to some people Communism is as bad as Fascism.
User avatar #122 - arisaka (12/15/2012) [-]
Yes. They're quite silly.
<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> [ 746 Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 13000 / Total items point value: 13000
Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
User avatar #1 - airguitar (07/17/2012) [-]
First!! :D
 Friends (0)