Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

anoxz    

Rank #23447 on Comments
anoxz Avatar Level 210 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to anoxz Block anoxz Invite anoxz to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:11/01/2011
Last Login:10/30/2014
Location:Denmark
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#23447
Highest Content Rank:#4322
Highest Comment Rank:#5229
Content Thumbs: 1972 total,  2322 ,  350
Comment Thumbs: 1228 total,  1439 ,  211
Content Level Progress: 73% (73/100)
Level 119 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 120 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 80% (40/50)
Level 210 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 211 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:78757
Times Content Favorited:60 times
Total Comments Made:403
FJ Points:3124

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 41236
    Thumbs Up 1526 Thumbs Down 179 Total: +1347
    Comments: 151
    Favorites: 50
    Uploaded: 03/26/12
    DDR DDR
  • Views: 14524
    Thumbs Up 558 Thumbs Down 55 Total: +503
    Comments: 15
    Favorites: 8
    Uploaded: 02/24/12
    FML FML
  • Views: 1493
    Thumbs Up 25 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +23
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/26/12
    Seriously why? Seriously why?
  • Views: 866
    Thumbs Up 29 Thumbs Down 12 Total: +17
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/28/12
    Innovative title Innovative title
  • Views: 1059
    Thumbs Up 25 Thumbs Down 9 Total: +16
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/29/12
    School School
  • Views: 626
    Thumbs Up 16 Thumbs Down 2 Total: +14
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/28/12
    When i was young... When i was young...
1 2 3 > [ 16 Funny Pictures Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

youtube videos

latest user's comments

#40 - So Neo-nazism is on the rise in eastern europe? Sort of i… 10/19/2014 on Miss Hitler 2014 +1
#650 - Dishonored and Europa Universalis 4... I can't wait t… 09/23/2014 on ? 0
#102 - Picture 09/18/2014 on Factual Feminist +2
#44 - Well a five minute google search didn't confirm the precence o… 09/05/2014 on RIP in pieces 0
#42 - What is really pathetic, is randomly tossing historical inaccu…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/04/2014 on RIP in pieces 0
User avatar #43 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/04/2014) [-]
I don't need to back them up, a quick five minute google search will confirm most of what I say.

If you're to lazy to go an look, thats fine. But that doesn't automatically mean i'm wrong. I know what i'm talking about, if you want to research it that is your prerogative.
User avatar #44 - anoxz (09/05/2014) [-]
Well a five minute google search didn't confirm the precence of a Dutch fleet at the Battle of Copenhagen. It clearly show you don't know what you talk about.
#40 - No... I question what I read and what I hear. You took th…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/04/2014 on RIP in pieces 0
User avatar #41 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/04/2014) [-]
A new field? My Friend, we are talking about wars of our past and, if I am not mistaken, World War 2 was, in fact, a war.

If we go down the "you took the discussion of out its premise and context" may i avert your attention to your previous comment where you, out of nowhere, brought up the Batavian Republic which had absolutely no connection with what we were talking about/no connection with the discussion.

Lets just get things straight before accusing one another (i.e. you accusing me) of taking things in the wrong direction.

Also, I love how defeated you are; "Call it Hitler Card, WW2 Card of Chirchil... I do not care." As soon as you have nothing to say its all "I don't care anyway!"

Pathetic.
User avatar #42 - anoxz (09/04/2014) [-]
What is really pathetic, is randomly tossing historical inaccuracies with no sources or confirmation... stating it as fact. But I already noted that earlier.

If however we are talking war, then why didn't you use your WWII argument at the beginning? Continue that, and I hope that you will back your sources up next time and try to be just little more objective.

User avatar #43 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/04/2014) [-]
I don't need to back them up, a quick five minute google search will confirm most of what I say.

If you're to lazy to go an look, thats fine. But that doesn't automatically mean i'm wrong. I know what i'm talking about, if you want to research it that is your prerogative.
User avatar #44 - anoxz (09/05/2014) [-]
Well a five minute google search didn't confirm the precence of a Dutch fleet at the Battle of Copenhagen. It clearly show you don't know what you talk about.
#38 - The Hitler-card... Really? I couldn't give a single f…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/04/2014 on RIP in pieces 0
User avatar #39 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/04/2014) [-]
Thats exactly what you have been doing.

And the Hitler card? I didn't pull the Hitler card. The Hitler card comes out when you compare someone with Hitler, WHERE did I do that?
User avatar #40 - anoxz (09/04/2014) [-]
No... I question what I read and what I hear.
You took the discussion out of its premissed and context, by drawing it into a new field, were you try to show of a anecdote, which you know nobody can mess with.

Call it Hitler-card, WWII-card or Churchill... I do not care.
User avatar #41 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/04/2014) [-]
A new field? My Friend, we are talking about wars of our past and, if I am not mistaken, World War 2 was, in fact, a war.

If we go down the "you took the discussion of out its premise and context" may i avert your attention to your previous comment where you, out of nowhere, brought up the Batavian Republic which had absolutely no connection with what we were talking about/no connection with the discussion.

Lets just get things straight before accusing one another (i.e. you accusing me) of taking things in the wrong direction.

Also, I love how defeated you are; "Call it Hitler Card, WW2 Card of Chirchil... I do not care." As soon as you have nothing to say its all "I don't care anyway!"

Pathetic.
User avatar #42 - anoxz (09/04/2014) [-]
What is really pathetic, is randomly tossing historical inaccuracies with no sources or confirmation... stating it as fact. But I already noted that earlier.

If however we are talking war, then why didn't you use your WWII argument at the beginning? Continue that, and I hope that you will back your sources up next time and try to be just little more objective.

User avatar #43 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/04/2014) [-]
I don't need to back them up, a quick five minute google search will confirm most of what I say.

If you're to lazy to go an look, thats fine. But that doesn't automatically mean i'm wrong. I know what i'm talking about, if you want to research it that is your prerogative.
User avatar #44 - anoxz (09/05/2014) [-]
Well a five minute google search didn't confirm the precence of a Dutch fleet at the Battle of Copenhagen. It clearly show you don't know what you talk about.
#37 - Comment deleted 09/04/2014 on RIP in pieces 0
#34 - Funny, because in my history class, we were told it was the da…  [+] (9 new replies) 09/03/2014 on RIP in pieces +1
User avatar #35 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/04/2014) [-]
Yeah, i really don't think we should thank you for waterloo... at all. Waterloo was a triumph for the British because of Wellington. We had less men and less equipment than Napoleon (even with all the extra soldiers from the Netherlands, Hannover and what not) and it was Wellingtons skill that won the day, not the fucking Dutch.

The Dutch involvement really does show the integrity of the Dutch people; "The French are about to win! Quick, attack the brittish!@

"Oh shit they defeated us! Now the French are about to lose! Quick, help the British!"

"We won! We truly are the best!"

Also, are you trying to defend your own country by passing blame onto a completely unrelated country? That doesn't change the fact that the Dutch have no integrity whatsoever and just want fucking trade routs.

Also, the Dutch should be thanking the British who, during WW2, housed the Dutch Royal family who fled. Where as the British Royal family refused to flee to Canada even though the Nazis were knocking down our door.

Also, before you say we weren't invaded, consider this; at the time they refused to flee our army was in tatters, Hitler was on the beaches of France with lust in his eyes and we were expecting an invasion any day. The British Royal Family refused to flee because they knew it wasn't the right thing for a Monarch to do. If Britain was going down, they were going down with the ship. But theres the Dutch Family, running away on a British ship.
User avatar #38 - anoxz (09/04/2014) [-]
The Hitler-card... Really?

I couldn't give a single flying fuck about who and whoever is more powerfull than the other. It's in the past, and using ones past as justification for the present is silly. History is the mere study of the past and to give us a cultural understanding of our present.
One thing that rustles my jimmies though, are neckbeards who blindly throws out historical anecotes, without any confirmation or sources to back them up.

It's pathetic to see how people ignorantly blind themself from an objectiv view, to satisfy their own ideal imagination of the past.
User avatar #39 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/04/2014) [-]
Thats exactly what you have been doing.

And the Hitler card? I didn't pull the Hitler card. The Hitler card comes out when you compare someone with Hitler, WHERE did I do that?
User avatar #40 - anoxz (09/04/2014) [-]
No... I question what I read and what I hear.
You took the discussion out of its premissed and context, by drawing it into a new field, were you try to show of a anecdote, which you know nobody can mess with.

Call it Hitler-card, WWII-card or Churchill... I do not care.
User avatar #41 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/04/2014) [-]
A new field? My Friend, we are talking about wars of our past and, if I am not mistaken, World War 2 was, in fact, a war.

If we go down the "you took the discussion of out its premise and context" may i avert your attention to your previous comment where you, out of nowhere, brought up the Batavian Republic which had absolutely no connection with what we were talking about/no connection with the discussion.

Lets just get things straight before accusing one another (i.e. you accusing me) of taking things in the wrong direction.

Also, I love how defeated you are; "Call it Hitler Card, WW2 Card of Chirchil... I do not care." As soon as you have nothing to say its all "I don't care anyway!"

Pathetic.
User avatar #42 - anoxz (09/04/2014) [-]
What is really pathetic, is randomly tossing historical inaccuracies with no sources or confirmation... stating it as fact. But I already noted that earlier.

If however we are talking war, then why didn't you use your WWII argument at the beginning? Continue that, and I hope that you will back your sources up next time and try to be just little more objective.

User avatar #43 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/04/2014) [-]
I don't need to back them up, a quick five minute google search will confirm most of what I say.

If you're to lazy to go an look, thats fine. But that doesn't automatically mean i'm wrong. I know what i'm talking about, if you want to research it that is your prerogative.
User avatar #44 - anoxz (09/05/2014) [-]
Well a five minute google search didn't confirm the precence of a Dutch fleet at the Battle of Copenhagen. It clearly show you don't know what you talk about.
#37 - anoxz has deleted their comment.
#33 - Those ships are "Bomb Vessels" or later "Monito…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/03/2014 on RIP in pieces +1
User avatar #36 - flybager (09/04/2014) [-]
Ah, so mortars.
I thought at first howitzers, which seemed odd to me.
Thanks for the info.

user's channels

Join Subscribe fj-fitness

user's friends

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1052 / Total items point value: 1456

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #4 to #3 - anoxz (06/20/2014) [-]
OP delivers...
User avatar #5 to #4 - soundofwinter (06/20/2014) [-]
soundofwinter always delivers
User avatar #1 - irwincardozo (06/11/2012) [-]
**irwincardozo rolls 17** first comment is dubs
#2 to #1 - irwincardozo (06/11/2012) [-]
This image has expired
nevermind
 Friends (0)