Why wouldn't he?

Yeah, I agree with you, but don't be putting down the concept of faith. The big bang theory, while it has some evidence (doppler shift of galaxies moving away from us) it still requires a lot of faith to actually firmly believe in it.

OK here's how I see it:
Nobody will ever be right. We as humans are not able to comprehend the universe. All scientific theories are wrong and all we have is a set of rules that usually / more or less work. All we have to base these theories off of is evidence and we connect the dots the theories. The best theories are the ones with the least amount of assumption because the less assumptions you have, the less chance there is of coming up with a wrong theory. The only way to have a correct theory is to have every single piece of evidence in the universe and to tie them all together but this is not possible for humans. The best thing we can do is to keep the theories we have until a better one comes up. Faith is the epitome of an assumption. Personally I'm agnostic.

This may sound stupid but i believe the bible is enough evidence and feel it takes alot of faith to believe in things like the big bang, i felt the other way less than a year ago but something changed and this is what i believe now, and i accept a lot of people have a problem with it

One of the reasons why i became agnostic was because knowing how the human race can not possibly know if there is a god (supreme being) or not and that we do not know everything and even widely accepted theory could be false but it just the close we could get at the time to explain different things like the big bang explained alot but not all and how evolution could explain how life came to be as we know it today but it does have its flaws