|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
|Copyright Removal Request|
Rank #15654 on CommentsLevel 227 Comments: Mind Blower
OfflineSend mail to annoyingsmartguy Block annoyingsmartguy Invite annoyingsmartguy to be your friend flag avatar
latest user's comments
|#71 - What, does someone from the government come to your house, tie… [+] (1 new reply)||08/31/2012 on My cancer has been cured||+3|
|#576 - ok, thanks.||08/31/2012 on How to Sketch out Everyone...||0|
|#574 - No, sketchy means incomplete or unreliable. [+] (2 new replies)||08/31/2012 on How to Sketch out Everyone...||0|
|#571 - In this context, freak makes sense; sketch does not [+] (4 new replies)||08/31/2012 on How to Sketch out Everyone...||0|
|#566 - Why not say that, then? [+] (7 new replies)||08/31/2012 on How to Sketch out Everyone...||0|
|#546 - Sketch out? [+] (9 new replies)||08/31/2012 on How to Sketch out Everyone...||+1|
|#81 - The government takes our money (taxes) then fucking wastes it …||08/30/2012 on How the American Government...||0|
|#4 - Is there like, fish on that?||08/30/2012 on Challenge Accepted, I Guess||+1|
|#1 - Isn't being fucked the objective for guys?||08/30/2012 on It's the little things||+1|
|#91 - Not completely destroyed, apparently. [+] (1 new reply)||08/30/2012 on A message||+1|
|#86 - Why are there bridges that go only half-way across the water? [+] (3 new replies)||08/30/2012 on A message||+1|
|#62 - Slinkies are fun. [+] (1 new reply)||08/30/2012 on Origins of starters||+1|
|#45 - Games doesn't?||08/30/2012 on Fucking Lag||0|
|#20 - How cute!||08/30/2012 on strawBEARy||+2|
|#15 - Guns don't kill people...bullets do.||08/30/2012 on Switchblade Ducky||+3|
|#90 - It didn't looks good for they.||08/30/2012 on Don't Filming in the Sea||+1|
|#91 - Now THAT made me laugh!||08/30/2012 on Spot the difference||0|
|#60 - ok||08/30/2012 on Funeral fit for king Neptune||0|
|#58 - Marine animals live in salt water. Goldfish are freshwater fish. [+] (2 new replies)||08/30/2012 on Funeral fit for king Neptune||0|
|#654 - I don't disagree with what you're saying. It's just that, if h… [+] (1 new reply)||08/30/2012 on HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...||+1|
|#631 - I don't get it. It's his site, he doesn't charge you people to… [+] (10 new replies)||08/30/2012 on HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...||+1|
#640 - llllll (08/30/2012) [-]
He's a dickhead, plain and simple. Obviously he has the right to be one, but that does not in any way, shape or form make him a good a-dministrator. He spouts out the large traffic he gets and claims that it's his doing, so obviously he's amazing, when in fact this is a user-driven site, which depends on the uploads and comments of users.
He does not care shit about his users, and bans people left and right for the most retarded and childish reasons.
#705 - llllll (08/30/2012) [-]
I wasn't referring to the porn. I was permabanned for posting a harmless comment on one of his threads, without being warned beforehand, and many suffered a similar fate. Even so, to suddenly blow up and announce for the first time how posting porn in profiles isn't okay, and ban people for something they did way before even knowing about it, is ridiculous.
#711 - theexo (08/30/2012) [-]
but it's never been ok to post porn on profiles, check the rules. and if people keep bitching and saying "down with pinkie pie" they probably are going to get banned. i would ban them! the thing is bitching to pinkie pie is like bitching to zeus if you have a suggestion present it in a calm civil manner in the suggetsions box. don't scream that pinkie pie is a faggot on random posts, especially not on a suggestions page cause pinkie pie don't play
#726 - llllll (08/30/2012) [-]
He has never taken action about it before, so if people who don't read the terms and services assume it's all right, who can blame them? Also, instead of terminating accounts left and right, he could simply change it so that anons can't access profiles, thus making them nsfw and fine to have porn in them. Much, much simpler and user-friendly.
He replies the same to each and every suggestion, no matter how civil you were. He either calls you a faggot and retard, or he says "working on it" and then doesn't fix it.
#735 - theexo (08/30/2012) [-]
you know it takes a while to impliment new ideas on an already existing site right? pinkie can't just magically fix things a day after you suggest something. plus in order to accsess nsfw you have to be 18+ as stated on your birthday but you can be anything if you want to visit peoples profiles no matter what age. untill pinkie pie changes this then everyone just needs to hold on and wait before screaming murder on pinkie pie. and "ignorance of the law is no excuse to break it" i know in this day and age no one wants to read the rules of a forum or site but if the rule is there and you don't read it. then you break the rule, tough. you don't get to whine to pinkie pie about it it's your own fault
#767 - llllll (08/30/2012) [-]
When the same bug is being reported for months without anything happening about it, thus forcing users to post .gifs on their profiles just so they won't have them automatically flagged when wanting to use them in a nsfw board, it becomes a big problem.
What I said was that he could simply change it so that only users can access profiles. He has no intention of changing it like that.
Like I said, he never enforced the rule to begin with, so clearly it wasn't harming him.
Here's what he should have done:
1. Inform us of the rule
2. Warn users guilty of having porn on their profiles to get rid of it as soon as possible, or suffer a temporary ban for a more serious warning.
3. If said user still doesn't do anything about it, terminate the account.
Instantly perma-banning without warning or notice is ridiculous and dickish.
Anyway, I can see that there's nothing I can tell you that will make you stop praising him, so let's just leave it here and don't bother replying. I won't read it anyway.
#654 - annoyingsmartguy (08/30/2012) [-]
I don't disagree with what you're saying. It's just that, if he chooses to run the site poorly, and alienate the users, he has the right to do so. But I see your point. Seems like bad business, to me. If he relies on users to keep the site running, you'd think he would try to be nice to them.
|#211 - Is there some specific cut-off between who is a "gamer&qu…||08/30/2012 on Just something that's...||+1|
|#220 - No, I'm not lying. And I still don't know who she is.||08/30/2012 on Nicki Minaj||0|
|#256 - That is sick. I sincerely hope it's not real.||08/29/2012 on wat||-2|
|#207 - Who is this person? I never frickin' heard of her until today,… [+] (3 new replies)||08/29/2012 on Nicki Minaj||+1|
#215 - N. Korean citizen (08/29/2012) [-]
I'm pretty sure you're lying.