Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:6/27/2011
Last Login:7/16/2015
Content Thumbs: 2147 total,  2585 ,  438
Comment Thumbs: 7842 total,  10709 ,  2867
Content Level Progress: 47% (47/100)
Level 121 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 122 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 99% (99/100)
Level 277 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 278 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Content Views:88601
Times Content Favorited:235 times
Total Comments Made:3576
FJ Points:10108
Favorite Tags: Minecraft (2) | no (2) | tags (2) | this (2) | You (2)
I'm Cool :D

latest user's comments

#24 - Picture 12/02/2013 on Puns up in here +2
#374 - Name me one properly tested view that was published and…  [+] (1 reply) 12/02/2013 on My Affirmation 0
User avatar
#386 - Sethorein (12/02/2013) [-]
Phrenology was a joke, though to be fair it pioneered the idea that our brain is separated based on function so aspects of it weren't disproven.

After going back and forth with another guy, I think my point was missed. The guy who made this post said "EVERY theory is going to be disproven". I stand here saying "disprove gravity then"

I'm not arguing that every theory made after year X will never be disproven, but I will say that the stuff we're publishing right now is a lot more trustworthy than a lot of the stuff that came before proper scientific procedure was developed in like... the '70s.

Phrenology was most certainly NOT properly tested before being publicly accepted. That's how it was disproven.