I try to let other people have their own beliefs, since it doesn't matter what anyone thinks as long as they do good. Everyone (ill admit, this includes me sometimes) is just attacking Christianity because of the hypocrites, not for any real religious reason.

ill tell you how i feel about your opinion

The reason people tell Christians they are wrong is because Christians provably make untruthful claims, and some of them promote those claims to be taught as fact to children who aren't old enough to arm themselves against fallacious misinformation. Also, Christianity is a hateful religion filled with homophobia, bigotry, sexism, racism and immoral teachings.
Now, Christians are provably wrong, and the book they claim to be the completely true word of god is also provably wrong.

However, the idea of a God overall cannot be disproven. The idea of a creator of the universe who doesn't interfere with human affairs or even care, cannot be disproven. Does that mean we should believe it? No, look up unfalsifiable hypotheses for more information.
People who believe in this 'god' are called Deists. You never see anyone attacking deists, and that's because they are not claiming anything impossible, immoral, cruel, or just plain stupid.

tl;dr People attack Christians because Christianity is stupid and mean.

Only an idiot would say that there was never a historical figure named Jesus.
On a separate note, there may have been a large flood in the area of Jerusalem when the old testament was being written, but whether or not it was a worldwide flood or just a larger flood than usual (the Tigris and Euphrates rivers flooded quite often) is anyone's guess.

I don't usually get involved in religion arguments, but Jesus' main memo was for you to love everyone.

And if you're going to say something is "provably wrong", then why not sure any proof at all? There's no real proof that disproves or proves that God exists,

Jesus actually said himself that he came ''not to spread peace'' but ''with a sword''. He also said that none of the old testament rules were repealed.

And as I actually said in my original post, you can't disprove A God, but you can disprove the CHRISTIAN God, because if the Christian God was the real one, and the Bible was his word- as it is reported to be- then it should have no mistakes, and it does. If you wanted me to list them all, you'd have a list which went of for a heck of a long time. You can find some examples at Skeptics Annotated Bible .com

Whilst that may be true, it says in the bible that anyone who tries to spread word of other religions should be murdered, and their village should be burnt to the ground. That's the word of GOD... you know, that 'thing' that they worship?

I'm assuming that they're from the old testament. I'm not one of those "old testament means nothing" type of person, but the whole point of Jesus was to change the laws of God and show what the religion of Christianity is all about. God would've never sent Jesus if he wanted his "policy" to remain the same.

I'm not exactly sure how it's hypocrisy... I don't promote/condone violence, and anything/anyone that does is a "bad person" per se. Now sure, the Bible promotes a lot of peace, and I actually think that religion has a lot of good fundamental points.

To address(?) your point on that the Bible is the "word of God, as interpreted by man"... Well surely GOD would make sure that his word is perfect, like Mortspear said. Also, I've read that chapter (which mentions the killing other religious prophets) in many different versions and they same the same thing, more or less.

Finally, to answer Mortspear's point, please correct me if I'm wrong; but I do believe that Jesus was sent to Earth to try and rid people of their sins.... Also, one thing that bugs me is if GOD is Christian (as Christians would have you believe) then why was Jesus a Jew? Just something that I can never get my head around... please enlighten me.

You're right, he did come to rid people of their sins. Somewhere in Matthew, Jesus says "I did not come to destroy the law, but to fulfill them." Which is meaning he isn't saying everything God told you not to do in the OT is alright now, but to show that everyone deserves the opportunity of choice, which is totally different from the God you saw in the OT (See the story of Noah).

To the God being Christian statement, this is strictly my opinion, so don't take it personal, but first God has no religion, he is the religion. I was never sure if Jesus was called a Jew because of the region he was born, or his religious preferences. I've always seen it as Jesus being a Jew, and following his death began the religion of Christianity.

I know a lot of people believe that since it has flaws because it was wrote by man, but honestly think about it, if God does exist and is everything that he says he is, do you really think he would let his "words" be flawed?

I meant since it is wrote by man, its has flaws. Got it backwards, sorry.

Proper logic without generalising Christians on their religion? In MY FunnyjunK!?

it's more likely than you think

nicely said.

Matthew 12:31

But other than that yes, you will be forgiven through true penetance.

Goddamnit....okay first atheists don't believe in evolution, that's not a staple of atheism. If you believe it personally than fine, but atheism is simply "Refuting the existence of a god with the lack of evidence provided"

Also god could have done that, fine, first prove god exists.

mostly 4chan, lets be honest.

yes but they can be only one

Yeah, although Aunt Wu may have just said it to hurry Katara along.

I love how adorable he is! Like when he ate to many noodles and had to waddle out of the restaurant.

Pabu is the best he is so cute he has the best poker face too

Really close! Pabu. And yeah I like him too. ^_^

me too. Although after the new episode my new favorite character has to be the pro-bending announcer.

Haha i like papu spelling is most likely wrong but Bolin's pet the fire ferret

I love how adorable he is! Like when he ate to many noodles and had to waddle out of the restaurant.

Pabu is the best he is so cute he has the best poker face too

Really close! Pabu. And yeah I like him too. ^_^

probebly viegar and riven

ofc

Who do you play most like your best character

probebly viegar and riven

Well it was supposed to be a funny analogy to point out a flaw in logic

you clearly don't understand that it was a joke...

Nope i didnt sorry i thought you were serious i dont know i fucked up basically lol.

Well it was supposed to be a funny analogy to point out a flaw in logic

I will try to do this as briefly as possible
We evolved from a common ancestor as modern chimpanzees. The reason we took a different path from them was the environment we lived in, the resources available to us, the dangers around us, etc.

Take for example the finches studied by Charles Darwin
The ones that lived near berries had smaller, weaker beaks, while the ones that lived near nuts had bigger, stronger beaks. The ones the lived near nuts that had small and weak beaks died out and could not pass on the genetic material for small beaks.

the same happened with humans. In our environment, predicted to be south africa, it was hot, so we didn't need a lot of hair (fur), and there were larger predators, so we needed to run faster (2 legs over 4), and the lack of trees made opposable toes and tails unnecessary

Vestigial organs in our bodies prove we once used them, like the tail bone.

So you're saying, that Evolution doesn't make sense, but that saying "the magic man in the sky made us from dirt", does?

Right cause i said that wow way to put words im my mouth

*sigh* have u read anything about evolution ever?
We ARE animals. humans are animals. people learn that in like the second grade
and we didn't evolve from the animals we see today so that statement makes no sense

please tell me you are trolling...

I know we are animals it's just i meant other animals like reptiles and shit like that. If we didnt evolve from the animals we see today then please explain how they got here. I'm ignorant to evolution so if you could explain that would be nice

I will try to do this as briefly as possible
We evolved from a common ancestor as modern chimpanzees. The reason we took a different path from them was the environment we lived in, the resources available to us, the dangers around us, etc.

Take for example the finches studied by Charles Darwin
The ones that lived near berries had smaller, weaker beaks, while the ones that lived near nuts had bigger, stronger beaks. The ones the lived near nuts that had small and weak beaks died out and could not pass on the genetic material for small beaks.

the same happened with humans. In our environment, predicted to be south africa, it was hot, so we didn't need a lot of hair (fur), and there were larger predators, so we needed to run faster (2 legs over 4), and the lack of trees made opposable toes and tails unnecessary

Vestigial organs in our bodies prove we once used them, like the tail bone.