That pretty much sums it up.
Addiction is nasty tho, but weed is not the worst one, speed is kinda a bit worse.

**respirator used "*roll picture*"**
**respirator rolled image**

>I Follew duh rulez!

Three brownie points to you, you fucking boy scout.

"i don't make the laws i do follow them"

I'm sure all your music isn't pirated either.

I used to be a heavy pot smoker and i have gone months without it with literally no withdrawal.
The worst of that psychological dependence i've ever experienced was that i felt like lighting up a couple of times at the end of a stressful day, and that's it.

So i don't really know where you get your bullshit facts from, but they're complete and utter bullshit. Also my experiences with quitting exactly match everyone i know who has had a break from smoking for longer than a month. I know about 20-30 people who smoke regularly, exactly 0 of them became schizophrenic and absolutely none of them required any treatment to get off the damn thing.

That pretty much sums it up.
Addiction is nasty tho, but weed is not the worst one, speed is kinda a bit worse.

As much of a chode that other guys being, why the fuck must people go on about psychological addiction as though it's the easiest shit to both avoid and get out of? You know that one habit you have you don't really see the downside of while everyone else looks at you with disdain as they list off the reasons you're probably better off not doing it, or maybe even just calming the fuck down with? That's a psychological addiction. It's not physical because the way to get out of it is behavioural. It's not as bad as a physical addiction with respect to severity, but is as difficult to drop as working out is a habit to pick up, particularly if you're doing it for the same reason you wouldnt work out.

Like most habits, marijuana's one of those habits that really only negatively impacts your life if you throw your life at it like a fat kid would himself on cake. The same can be said about any habit like that, which I why my belief is it should be made legal, but I'm not just gonna sit here and listen to a community who believes depression is something you "just get over" as a group of resident experts on psychological addiction.

**respirator used "*roll picture*"**
**respirator rolled image**

>I Follew duh rulez!

Three brownie points to you, you fucking boy scout.

"i don't make the laws i do follow them"

I'm sure all your music isn't pirated either.

I used to be a heavy pot smoker and i have gone months without it with literally no withdrawal.
The worst of that psychological dependence i've ever experienced was that i felt like lighting up a couple of times at the end of a stressful day, and that's it.

So i don't really know where you get your bullshit facts from, but they're complete and utter bullshit. Also my experiences with quitting exactly match everyone i know who has had a break from smoking for longer than a month. I know about 20-30 people who smoke regularly, exactly 0 of them became schizophrenic and absolutely none of them required any treatment to get off the damn thing.

That pretty much sums it up.
Addiction is nasty tho, but weed is not the worst one, speed is kinda a bit worse.

it didn't do anything to them

As much of a chode that other guys being, why the fuck must people go on about psychological addiction as though it's the easiest shit to both avoid and get out of? You know that one habit you have you don't really see the downside of while everyone else looks at you with disdain as they list off the reasons you're probably better off not doing it, or maybe even just calming the fuck down with? That's a psychological addiction. It's not physical because the way to get out of it is behavioural. It's not as bad as a physical addiction with respect to severity, but is as difficult to drop as working out is a habit to pick up, particularly if you're doing it for the same reason you wouldnt work out.

Like most habits, marijuana's one of those habits that really only negatively impacts your life if you throw your life at it like a fat kid would himself on cake. The same can be said about any habit like that, which I why my belief is it should be made legal, but I'm not just gonna sit here and listen to a community who believes depression is something you "just get over" as a group of resident experts on psychological addiction.

**respirator used "*roll picture*"**
**respirator rolled image**

>I Follew duh rulez!

Three brownie points to you, you fucking boy scout.

"i don't make the laws i do follow them"

I'm sure all your music isn't pirated either.

I used to be a heavy pot smoker and i have gone months without it with literally no withdrawal.
The worst of that psychological dependence i've ever experienced was that i felt like lighting up a couple of times at the end of a stressful day, and that's it.

So i don't really know where you get your bullshit facts from, but they're complete and utter bullshit. Also my experiences with quitting exactly match everyone i know who has had a break from smoking for longer than a month. I know about 20-30 people who smoke regularly, exactly 0 of them became schizophrenic and absolutely none of them required any treatment to get off the damn thing.

That pretty much sums it up.
Addiction is nasty tho, but weed is not the worst one, speed is kinda a bit worse.

Thank you

>being a bad person

it didn't do anything to them

As much of a chode that other guys being, why the fuck must people go on about psychological addiction as though it's the easiest shit to both avoid and get out of? You know that one habit you have you don't really see the downside of while everyone else looks at you with disdain as they list off the reasons you're probably better off not doing it, or maybe even just calming the fuck down with? That's a psychological addiction. It's not physical because the way to get out of it is behavioural. It's not as bad as a physical addiction with respect to severity, but is as difficult to drop as working out is a habit to pick up, particularly if you're doing it for the same reason you wouldnt work out.

Like most habits, marijuana's one of those habits that really only negatively impacts your life if you throw your life at it like a fat kid would himself on cake. The same can be said about any habit like that, which I why my belief is it should be made legal, but I'm not just gonna sit here and listen to a community who believes depression is something you "just get over" as a group of resident experts on psychological addiction.

**respirator used "*roll picture*"**
**respirator rolled image**

>I Follew duh rulez!

Three brownie points to you, you fucking boy scout.

"i don't make the laws i do follow them"

I'm sure all your music isn't pirated either.

I used to be a heavy pot smoker and i have gone months without it with literally no withdrawal.
The worst of that psychological dependence i've ever experienced was that i felt like lighting up a couple of times at the end of a stressful day, and that's it.

So i don't really know where you get your bullshit facts from, but they're complete and utter bullshit. Also my experiences with quitting exactly match everyone i know who has had a break from smoking for longer than a month. I know about 20-30 people who smoke regularly, exactly 0 of them became schizophrenic and absolutely none of them required any treatment to get off the damn thing.

That pretty much sums it up.
Addiction is nasty tho, but weed is not the worst one, speed is kinda a bit worse.

1950s : The Greek finance minister is signing off a 50% reduction of German debt. Live and let live brother. Dont say harsh words. I know the greeks produce little cause they have all ran to their cities (im Greek , i know) but dont you dare say that i am lazy. Dont you dare say that my father , mother , sister , friends , etc are lazy. I'll say that again : live and let live.

I love how Greeks argue they Germany should do this because they did it.

In 1953 German debt constituted 25% of their GDP. Meaning cutting it in half would mean reducing it by 12%. Today Greek debt is at 180%, cutting it in half would mean reducing it by 60%. That's five times more money or well, at least in comparison to the GDP

The truth is, you can't rely on other countries to save you, and Germany would've payed off that debt eventually, because they had the ability to pay their loans when they were due. Reducing the loan only meant that Germany would be able to pay back the rest they owed a lot faster, since halfing their national debt freed up money. In Greece the debt is so massive that even cutting it in half won't mean Greece will manage, and it will also mean that tax money worth about what Greece produce in an entire year has been given away as charity.

The problem is that your politicians have not proven themselves to be trustworthy and stable partners, and now, with the recent referendum - the people seem to be equally rebellious. This creates distrust, and is in part a reason to why the interest is so high too.

The austerity measures have helped in Portugal, Ireland and Spain - slowly and steadily, and they will help in Greece too. If you are willing to listen, and cut where its needed. The pention system of Greece is fantasy, and needs to be tightened greatly. And I say that as a Norwegian. Not even we, who have money in abundance, have so good pentions and terms of pentions.

Growing an economy will take a lot of time, and that was what shouldve been done from the 80s until now - you can't expect people to not get their money for the time period that will take.

Also, spitting in a shitton of money to boost the Greek economy may sound sensible - but its not really. You lack industry, and factories doesn't just sprout out of nowhere. To attract investors you need some comparative advantage, and to get that you need cuts, and right now you have fairly high wages - crazy pentions, early retirement ages, and not a particularily skilled work force. Cut wages, pentions and increase the retirement age and you might cut down on unemployment and the costs of the state.

Just spitting money in to stimulate the economy has rarely worked whenever it has been tried. Mitterand tried it in France in the 80s and it failed miserably for instance. He turned around completely and ended up cutting too. I think its sad that Syriza has deluded the Greek public to thinking that there's actually a fairytale solution that the finest economic minds of former governments and the entirety of Europe hasn't come up with yet - and I also think that its sad that the Greek public once again believes in someone who tell them fairytales. The last time they did, it ended up with great pentions, high wages and early retirement ages.

The only way out, if you ask me, is to accept the demands or declare bankruptcy. The last alternative will make you shunned for a long long while, but it might be shorter and less painful.

As of now the most important business sector for Greece is tourism, isn't it? I'm scared by that too. The way this case is portrayed makes it easy for potential tourists to dislike, and avoid Greece. Can be really negative for tourism too.

Sorry if I seem harsh or something, but I feel quite strongly about this - and if I seem one-sided in the post I would just add that I blame everyone. The EU states should've never let Greece into it in the first place, and then should've never let them into the Euro as Greece needed to grow from their agricultural focus. Greek politicians should've been more honest, and less populistic. The Greek people should've voted more sensible and sustainable, rather than voting for fairytales.

1000 euros a household is not a lot, no - but again, being forced to retire at 63 is way too early. Where I come from you can get your pention at either 62 or 67 - but you can still work if you want to (however, if your income reaches a certain level the pention will be reduced). Lately a lot of elders have been complaining greatly about the retirement age, because they want to increase it - and work until they are at least 75.

Yeah, where I'm from the state department has told people not to order new vacations to Greece because of the uncertain economic situation, and people who've already booked are being told to take precautions (take out cash in advance etc).

Yeah, that's the problem with declaring bankruptcy. It will fuck you over for a whole generation. If you are able to accept austerity measures, and pull yourself out however - you will have it a bit worse for 10 years, and then you'll have a solid foundation to build on.

Selfishness is alright, and everyone are selfish. Its because of their selfish need to have a bigger common market, and a strong EU that Germany wants to keep Greece in the eurozone. The problem is that you have, if you ask me, long term selfishness and short term selfishness. Greeks want everything to be as best as possible right now, with no regard to what happens in a couple of months, let alone a year. The German government have on the other hand thought that lending money to you have been a stupid move on the short term, as they will lose liquidity, and could've used it on increasing welfare or improving their own economy etc. - but a smart move on the long term because it will save Greece, and make the EU stronger for everything else.

The previous generations aren't the only ones to blame though. From the newsreports I've seen from Greece after the referendum it seemed as if the old people more frequently than young people voted "yes" - and the people who voted now aren't only the previous generations but the current too. Everyone is responsible, and ultimately, the people are the ones responsible for decisions made by their delegates in a democracy.

You seem pretty sensible, and I'm relieved that there are some of you in Greece too. Gives me hope. I've discussed this topic several times online with Greeks, and never have I come across anyone who has not drawn out the war reperations card, called me a Nazi I have "ger" in my nick, and people assume I'm German even though I'm not or for some reason said that the current situation was everyone elses fault, and not the Greeks'. One even babbled about how it all was a conspiracy because the EU wanted to steal Greeces natural resources and enslave the people - and that it was really "the corporations" which was responsible for the downfall of Greece. When I presented him with actual world bank data and facts drawn from Greek national budgets and reports to back my claims he just told me all I wrote was Merkel propaganda.

And thats the flaw with democracy. A fool who rejects concrete evidence, and who lives in an "alternate" world has equal voting rights as someone who's got his shit together, knows shit - and will vote for sustainability.

Damn, my posts are getting long.

www.theguardian.com/world/2011/oct/27/eurozone-crisis-banks-50-greece

It's as if their debt wasn't reduced before....

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Now look at the word bear. "[WITH OBJECT]
1(Of a person) carry:"
So saying you can't carry in public means you are infringing on a person's rights to bear arms. Thus the logic using the 14th Amendment means that I have the guaranteed right to carry arms everywhere, anywhere, and anytime because saying I can't is denying my rights. Now I'm not saying you're wrong, what I am saying is that using the current logic and argument that was used for gay marriage can also be used for Gun rights. My point is this new logic nullifies all previous logic and law. So yes you are indeed correct but my point makes your correctness no longer matter. I hope that clarifies what I'm trying to say.

like many things, some people thought it was cool and others thought it was lame. the scene/emo kids were never considered to be the "cool" kids at my school, they were just another clique in the mob of kids.
pic related, me and my homeboys about to drop the hottest cinema shooting of 2011

Scene to me is basically a more happy emo. Lot of colors, probably some tattoos and piercings. It comes in varying degrees. Guys usually have that longish wispy hair.

Personally I find scene chicks super hot but they are much more likely to be crazy.

I'm not a scene guy myself but I appreciate the subculture. It's kinda cringe in some cases but to me it seems uniquely "teenager" and interesting.

You mean a group dedicated to freedom of religion? Google nigga, do you use it?

ERRLUMONATIS KONFORMED

Technically all gun laws are nullified because gun laws are infringements on the 2nd Amendment. So the SCOTUS just legalized Constitutional carry in all states and nullified every gun law in existance.

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Now look at the word bear. "[WITH OBJECT]
1(Of a person) carry:"
So saying you can't carry in public means you are infringing on a person's rights to bear arms. Thus the logic using the 14th Amendment means that I have the guaranteed right to carry arms everywhere, anywhere, and anytime because saying I can't is denying my rights. Now I'm not saying you're wrong, what I am saying is that using the current logic and argument that was used for gay marriage can also be used for Gun rights. My point is this new logic nullifies all previous logic and law. So yes you are indeed correct but my point makes your correctness no longer matter. I hope that clarifies what I'm trying to say.

Technically all gun laws are nullified because gun laws are infringements on the 2nd Amendment. So the SCOTUS just legalized Constitutional carry in all states and nullified every gun law in existance.

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Now look at the word bear. "[WITH OBJECT]
1(Of a person) carry:"
So saying you can't carry in public means you are infringing on a person's rights to bear arms. Thus the logic using the 14th Amendment means that I have the guaranteed right to carry arms everywhere, anywhere, and anytime because saying I can't is denying my rights. Now I'm not saying you're wrong, what I am saying is that using the current logic and argument that was used for gay marriage can also be used for Gun rights. My point is this new logic nullifies all previous logic and law. So yes you are indeed correct but my point makes your correctness no longer matter. I hope that clarifies what I'm trying to say.

**cultistjesus used "*roll picture*"**
**cultistjesus rolled image**

Besides I ain't complaining bout gay marriage. I am thankful to gays. Because their marriage is legal I can now conceal carry a fire arm in every state they can get married in.

Technically all gun laws are nullified because gun laws are infringements on the 2nd Amendment. So the SCOTUS just legalized Constitutional carry in all states and nullified every gun law in existance.

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Now look at the word bear. "[WITH OBJECT]
1(Of a person) carry:"
So saying you can't carry in public means you are infringing on a person's rights to bear arms. Thus the logic using the 14th Amendment means that I have the guaranteed right to carry arms everywhere, anywhere, and anytime because saying I can't is denying my rights. Now I'm not saying you're wrong, what I am saying is that using the current logic and argument that was used for gay marriage can also be used for Gun rights. My point is this new logic nullifies all previous logic and law. So yes you are indeed correct but my point makes your correctness no longer matter. I hope that clarifies what I'm trying to say.