Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

alltimetens

Rank #2973 on Subscribers
alltimetens Avatar Level 312 Content: Wizard
Offline
Send mail to alltimetens Block alltimetens Invite alltimetens to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Interests: Interesting things
Date Signed Up:2/07/2012
Last Login:12/25/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#12678
Comment Ranking:#28645
Highest Content Rank:#14
Highest Comment Rank:#1365
Content Thumbs: 120653 total,  132059 ,  11406
Comment Thumbs: 4958 total,  8689 ,  3731
Content Level Progress: 3.07% (307/10000)
Level 312 Content: Wizard → Level 313 Content: Wizard
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/100)
Level 246 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 247 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:27
Content Views:4765339
Times Content Favorited:7236 times
Total Comments Made:4373
FJ Points:110115
Favorite Tags: The Game (2)
Just an average Funny Junk user who shares images. I am not accepting any trade requests. You can have my items, however, I am not giving/trading my FJ points. Feel free to subscribe.

latest user's comments

#12 - No one in your family runs.  [+] (14 new replies) 06/03/2014 on That Dude is Fluffy +278
#108 - silverlance (06/03/2014) [-]
Obvious, despicable samefagging
User avatar #79 - aizeinstein (06/03/2014) [-]
No offense but I really suspect this could be a set up joke.
User avatar #68 - schnizel (06/03/2014) [-]
I don't want to say samefag, but samefag.
User avatar #55 - noisia (06/03/2014) [-]
Unless they're passing a salad bar.
User avatar #27 - deadnanners (06/03/2014) [-]
for real though there are people who have extreme difficulties losing weight and an extreme ease gaining it
#90 - kez (06/03/2014) [-]
Those extreme difficulties are that they are lazy and cant be bothered to put some work in.
#70 - anonymous (06/03/2014) [-]
there are people who are unable to gain weight... but there is noone who is unable to lose weight.
#71 - mixedfeelings (06/03/2014) [-]
forgot to log in
#47 - itsbendingtime (06/03/2014) [-]
uh huh
User avatar #48 - deadnanners (06/03/2014) [-]
metabolic disorders. now get out
#49 - itsbendingtime (06/03/2014) [-]
most metabolic disorders cause weight loss, not gain.
one of the only ones to cause gain is hypothyroidism... pic related.
#22 - icameisawilostit (06/03/2014) [-]
what kinda shit you trying to pull here
#20 - anonymous (06/03/2014) [-]
Samefag
User avatar #57 - mynameisnotmike (06/03/2014) [-]
going with this^
#83 - Do it, faget. 06/02/2014 on gender: girl, attributes:... 0
#65 - American Yemeni master race reporting in.  [+] (2 new replies) 06/02/2014 on gender: girl, attributes:... 0
User avatar #82 - EjaculationMan (06/02/2014) [-]
america certainly wont be the place i go if i leave the country.
User avatar #83 - alltimetens (06/02/2014) [-]
Do it, faget.
#65 - **** yeah 06/01/2014 on Oldphag 0
#70446 - I am supposed to write a long ass paragraph.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/01/2014 on Religion Board 0
#70447 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
in the common sense, what the Hindus are worshiping just display a total stupidity

OH LOOK A SACRED GOD IN THIS PIC BEING SLAUGHTERED AND WE WILL FEED ON HIM

what a humility and filthy heretical beliefs
#48 - That looks like the hand of a Nazi.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/01/2014 on Funnyjunk Hand modelling... +1
#49 - ohhh (06/01/2014) [-]
Well then that must make me a double nazi, because its on both of my hands.They will never know i am hitler.
#47 - Ew 06/01/2014 on Funnyjunk Hand modelling... -1
#46 - Comment deleted 06/01/2014 on Funnyjunk Hand modelling... 0
#70435 - Can someone help me out with question #2? My profess…  [+] (35 new replies) 06/01/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70474 - revengeforfreeze (06/01/2014) [-]
The Brahman sleep cycle basically states that we are one out of an infinity of universes. Not physically paparallel universes, but temporally. They will alll exist in the place of eachother. This universe will die and it will be replaced by another one ad infinitum
User avatar #70442 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
hindu is just a total pagan crappy religion.
in common sense is a cow god????
they worship stones and monkey and cows or whatever
which is a total bullshit.
so i am sure the answer shall be to your professor:
are you retard or dump deaf and blind or what??
User avatar #70448 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
You cut 1/5 of your dick, you pray to a box, you must pray five times a day and your women look like ninjas.
#70451 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
because you are heretic Bosnian bastard
the foreskin might get a chance of disease
that box is a direction
yeah we pray 5 times a day, at least we dont discover dead bodies in bosnia every day
and yeah at least our women are not prostitutes
User avatar #70454 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
No, the most circumcised country in the world is the US, and they have the highest recorded rate of AIDS, and you can't stop a disease by doing that. That's nothing but a big lie.
The box is still a box.
That had nothing to do with the fact that you act like slaves.
Your ninjas are the biggests sluts in Bosnia.
#70464 - youregaylol (06/01/2014) [-]
Actually there has been a confirmed link between circumcision and combating the spread of HIV. The World Health Organization recommends circumcision in areas where HIV is prevalent, namely Africa.

Also the US doesn't have the highest infection rate of AIDS. African countries consistently top the the charts for the spread of HIV. Russia is also of some concern.

In the end it's all about the environment. If you live in an area with a low risk factor for STD's then you probably don't need to be cut. You do run the risk of getting Phimosis and Paraphimosis, both of which can be extremely uncomfortable and can possibly result in gangrene. Both of these usually happen when you're an infant, but it's been known to happen to adults who masturbate frequently or don't practice good hygiene.

Personally I recommend circumcision. It's not torture or mutilation by any means, and no reputable medical organization advocates it's abolition. You do have to take certain precautions beforehand, always make sure the urologist or obstetrician has a good reputation.
User avatar #70467 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
Or you could just wear a condom.
Bare in mind that circumcision is genital mutilation.

It is amputation of the foreskin, which is not "extra skin," but a complex structure with specialized tissues and about 20,000 specialized nerve endings. Circumcision amputates the foreskin, with the nerve endings, and damages other nerves/nerve endings on the penis. It permanently severs veins and blood vessels.

The foreskin is necessary for complete, natural and normal sexual feeling, function and ability.
Circumcision is the major reason for the high usage of Viagra-type drugs in the USA.

These days, circumcision is only being forced on about 33% of American male infants. More and more people are finally understanding that it is genital mutilation. Most of the rest of the world doesn't circumcise males; about 80% of the males in the world are not circumcised.

On average, circumcision destroys about 50-75% of male sexual sensitivity, but it can be even more in some cases, as there are no standards to male genital mutilation. The damage varies wildly, as evidenced by the scarring from the wounds to the penis, which can be located anywhere from the base to the glans, and the depth of the wounds also varies.

You can cut a part of your dick off to avoid AIDS, or just avoid fucking sluts and wear a condom.
#70468 - youregaylol (06/01/2014) [-]
If it actually was genital mutilation then every medical organization in the world would call for its abolition, instead none of them do, at least not the reputable ones.

Circumcision can protect you against certain cancers, urinary infections, and a host of other penile diseases. Thats a fact. Not all of them have to do with having sex with another person.

Another thing, the "sensation" myth completely misunderstands the concept of sexual satisfaction. Study after study has shown that there is no difference in sensation between circumcised men and non circumcised men. The main difference being that circumcised men have a better chance of not contracting diseases.

And your Viagra claim is doubtful, if sexual stimulants are available and affordable then people will use them. I'm guessing you're uncircumcised, so you assume that all the pleasure you receive from masturbating comes from your foreskin. It doesn't, circumcised men feel the exact same stimulation.

www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2515674/Its-official-Circumcision-DOESNT-affect-sexual-pleasure-according-biggest-study-issue.html

One out of every three males is circumcised, so I'm not sure if people are "waking up" yet. Doctors around the world are pushing for circumcision to prevent disease, if the entire world was on the same level as africa in regards HIV the entire world would start advocating circumcision. Theres really no debate, it's clearly the better option. Claiming that circumcision is mutilation discredits real cases of mutilation.

I wouldn't attempt to legislate it into being a mandatory thing, but I also would make other harmful acts like unprotected sex with strangers illegal.
#70472 - anonymous (06/01/2014) [-]
You should remove your brain to avoid brain cancer.
#70475 - youregaylol (06/01/2014) [-]
A better analogy would be you live in an area where an airborne virus is attacking unnecessary neuronal structures, which once infected attacks the rest of your brain.

It is better to remove these neuronal structures then face the the possibility of contracting a very serious disease.
User avatar #70471 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
Also, boys who have been circumcised have felt more pain that those who have been uncircumcised during vaccination.
#70470 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
>Circumcision can protect you against certain cancers, urinary infections, and a host of other penile diseases.
All within the 1% chance?
>If it actually was genital mutilation then every medical organization in the world would call for its abolition
They have done tests but they have terminated them due to harsh tests.
>Another thing, the "sensation" myth completely misunderstands the concept of sexual satisfaction. Study after study has shown that there is no difference in sensation between circumcised men and non circumcised men. The main difference being that circumcised men have a better chance of not contracting diseases.
You know that you just rekt yourself right there. The dick goes numb and looses it's sensitivity due to circumcision and constant rubbing against the persons underpants.
>And your Viagra claim is doubtful, if sexual stimulants are available and affordable then people will use them. I'm guessing you're uncircumcised, so you assume that all the pleasure you receive from masturbating comes from your foreskin. It doesn't, circumcised men feel the exact same stimulation.
I am circumcised. Foreskin add on pleasure. It's like an extra cake.
>Theres really no debate, it's clearly the better option. Claiming that circumcision is mutilation discredits real cases of mutilation.
>Claiming that circumcision is mutilation discredits real cases of mutilation.
>Pain
>Risk of bleeding and infection at the site of the circumcision
>Irritation of the glans
>Increased risk of meatitis (inflammation of the opening of the penis)
>Risk of injury to the penis
Also:
Only abstinence or safe sex, including the use of condoms, can prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS.



#70476 - youregaylol (06/01/2014) [-]
I don't have the exact number, but I'm willing to bet it's a bit more than a 1% chance, especially when you factor all the contact your penis will receive in it's lifetime. I have no idea what tests you are referring too. I assure you that it isn't mutilation, if it was then the entire field of preventative surgery would also be mutilation.

I think you're speculating a bit too much. You have no idea what an uncircumcised penis feels like during stimulation, why do you assume that they feel more? Study after study has shown that 99% of circumcised men have healthy fulfilling sexual experiences.

Also this numbness you're describing may be unique to yourself, I've never experienced it.

There are risks in any preventative operation, but if done correctly there will be no complications and you'd be in a better position to resist harmful diseases.
#70477 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
>You have no idea what an uncircumcised penis feels like during stimulation, why do you assume that they feel more?
Because they do, they don't have dead nerve endings.
>you'd be in a better position to resist harmful diseases
As I've said, only abstinence or safe sex, including the use of condoms, can prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS.
In fact, cutting a baby boy's genitals creates immediate health risks. The foreskin is actually an important and functional body part, protecting the head of the penis from injury and providing moisture and lubrication. Circumcision also diminishes sexual pleasure later in life.
Most men in the United States are circumcised, but our STD rates are as high as or higher than those in countries where circumcision is rare.
No professional medical association in the United States or the rest of the world recommends routine neonatal circumcision. The American Medical Association calls it "non-therapeutic." At no time in its 75 years has the American Academy of Pediatrics ever recommended infant circumcision.
Urinal infections are treatable and science is getting closer in finding the cure for AIDS, and they have a treatment that will work if you got it within 14 days.
And your dick looks like an alien.
#70478 - youregaylol (06/01/2014) [-]
#70479 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
User avatar #70482 - lulzfornigeriagirl (06/01/2014) [-]
You didn't win, he probably got bored or had to go.
#70483 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
To you it matters because it's an old tradition of destroying the goys identity to his tribe.
User avatar #70542 - lulzfornigeriagirl (06/02/2014) [-]
nah i don't care that i got a circumcision, its not good/bad for me.
#70469 - youregaylol (06/01/2014) [-]
*wouldn't make other harmful acts like unprotected sex with strangers illegal.
#70455 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
>heretic bosnian slave shit to the serb lost a war trying to win by trolling


what a joke..

go win a war against serbia heretic
User avatar #70456 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
Jokes on you, the inquisition is part of the Imperial cult, not of islam.
#70457 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
special K, still loser.
now go win a war against the serb heretic
User avatar #70458 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
We did win the war.
#70459 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
another heresy?
8,373 died in the massacre of bosnia
calls it win
THE JOKES IS SOOO CRINGY
MY BARE FOOT UP YOUR ASS
User avatar #70460 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
How many Syrians have died Omar?
#70461 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
the more syrian died
the triple are born

and still men are higher than women in the population. not like bosnia slave which the women is higher than men
User avatar #70462 - schnizel (06/01/2014) [-]
Shure thing bro, also, the war is still going strong, have fun.
#70463 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
good we are winning the war, 2 years and faggots failed to take down syria, good luck!!
User avatar #70484 - lulzfornigeriagirl (06/01/2014) [-]
I thought you lived in Kuwait
User avatar #70487 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
i live in kuwait
User avatar #70541 - lulzfornigeriagirl (06/02/2014) [-]
Then why have you been talking about Syria like you live there or something?
User avatar #70553 - syrianassassin (06/02/2014) [-]
because i am syrian
User avatar #70446 - alltimetens (06/01/2014) [-]
I am supposed to write a long ass paragraph.
#70447 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
in the common sense, what the Hindus are worshiping just display a total stupidity

OH LOOK A SACRED GOD IN THIS PIC BEING SLAUGHTERED AND WE WILL FEED ON HIM

what a humility and filthy heretical beliefs
#70431 - Actually, the alternatives only indicate that the universe can… 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
#70412 - Your alternatives do not have any definite solutions.  [+] (2 new replies) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70413 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
The alternatives provide evidence that god isn't needed for a universe to come into existence.
User avatar #70431 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Actually, the alternatives only indicate that the universe can be indirectly created by the creator.

Meaning, the apparatus such as virtual particles themselves are not definite.
#70408 - So what exactly are you doing by throwing out all of these cou…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70410 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
You asked for an alternative explanation with evidence so i gave you one. What you're doing is side-stepping the fact that you failed to provide logically proof that god exists.
User avatar #70412 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Your alternatives do not have any definite solutions.
User avatar #70413 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
The alternatives provide evidence that god isn't needed for a universe to come into existence.
User avatar #70431 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Actually, the alternatives only indicate that the universe can be indirectly created by the creator.

Meaning, the apparatus such as virtual particles themselves are not definite.
#70407 - These "what ifs" aren't useless at all. That means t…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70409 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
That doesn't mean that causality isn't violated you dumbfuck, that just means that you're special pleading. Like i said there is no such thing as before and after in empty space.
#70403 - But isn't applicable to this argument. I'm giving a p… 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
#70401 - Exactly. Poop began as food, and food began as something else.… 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
#70399 - Actually, I have, which proves that you have no argumentative …  [+] (2 new replies) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70402 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
Uhm no that's not how it works at all.

I can say that Lamarck's theory of evolution is correct, but someone else will ask for evidence that it's correct. They don't have to provide an alternative explanation because they aren't making any claims, they're asking for evidence.
User avatar #70403 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
But isn't applicable to this argument.

I'm giving a proposition.

You want to prove it wrong.

In order to prove it wrong, you have to provide evidence that it is wrong, otherwise I am not convinced.
#70398 - I know that they come from empty space. But that does…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70400 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
That's akin to saying that just because poop comes out of your anus that doesn't mean that that's proof that me eating the food was the definite origin. It could've been that a demon planted that food inside me and gave us the illusion that we ate the food.

This is why we have principles such as occam's razor where the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions is the preferred one.
User avatar #70401 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Exactly. Poop began as food, and food began as something else.

Saying that virtual particles have one definite origin is one-sided and ignorant.
#70395 - Yet I still manage to counter every single "substantiated…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70397 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
No you didn't, you're simply showing how ignorant you are regarding the field of physics.
User avatar #70399 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Actually, I have, which proves that you have no argumentative skill/background.

If I'm going to make an unsubstantiated claim, then you better give me a substantiated counter that proves me wrong.

For example, I can say that Lamarck's Theory of Evolution is correct, but in order to counter that, you have to say that Darwin's Theory is correct and then provide me with evidence as a way to prove me wrong.
User avatar #70402 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
Uhm no that's not how it works at all.

I can say that Lamarck's theory of evolution is correct, but someone else will ask for evidence that it's correct. They don't have to provide an alternative explanation because they aren't making any claims, they're asking for evidence.
User avatar #70403 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
But isn't applicable to this argument.

I'm giving a proposition.

You want to prove it wrong.

In order to prove it wrong, you have to provide evidence that it is wrong, otherwise I am not convinced.
#70394 - You still have not provided sufficient evidence that they have…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70396 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
Seriously the evidence is everywhere, physcists have done literally experiments that confirm that they come from empty space, read a book, read a journal, read anything based on physics and you'll find evidence, it's not rocket science to look it up.
www.newscientist.com/article/dn16095-its-confirmed-matter-is-merely-vacuum-fluctuations.html#.U4osKfl_vD8
books.google.nl/books?id=DyhyFSL7bNUC&pg=PP1&dq=intitle:Probing+intitle:the+intitle:Quantum+intitle:Vacuum&hl=nl#v=onepage&q&f=false
User avatar #70398 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
I know that they come from empty space.

But that does not prove that empty space is their definite origin.
User avatar #70400 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
That's akin to saying that just because poop comes out of your anus that doesn't mean that that's proof that me eating the food was the definite origin. It could've been that a demon planted that food inside me and gave us the illusion that we ate the food.

This is why we have principles such as occam's razor where the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions is the preferred one.
User avatar #70401 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Exactly. Poop began as food, and food began as something else.

Saying that virtual particles have one definite origin is one-sided and ignorant.
#70391 - Nothing coming from nothing doesn't violate causality.  [+] (6 new replies) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70392 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
But something coming from a zero energy field does, and black holes do, and particle-wave duality does, and even time delay does.
User avatar #70394 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
You still have not provided sufficient evidence that they have originated there to begin with.

Virtual particles could have originated from zero energy universes, but what proof do you bring that states that they didn't come from another source?
User avatar #70396 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
Seriously the evidence is everywhere, physcists have done literally experiments that confirm that they come from empty space, read a book, read a journal, read anything based on physics and you'll find evidence, it's not rocket science to look it up.
www.newscientist.com/article/dn16095-its-confirmed-matter-is-merely-vacuum-fluctuations.html#.U4osKfl_vD8
books.google.nl/books?id=DyhyFSL7bNUC&pg=PP1&dq=intitle:Probing+intitle:the+intitle:Quantum+intitle:Vacuum&hl=nl#v=onepage&q&f=false
User avatar #70398 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
I know that they come from empty space.

But that does not prove that empty space is their definite origin.
User avatar #70400 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
That's akin to saying that just because poop comes out of your anus that doesn't mean that that's proof that me eating the food was the definite origin. It could've been that a demon planted that food inside me and gave us the illusion that we ate the food.

This is why we have principles such as occam's razor where the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions is the preferred one.
User avatar #70401 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Exactly. Poop began as food, and food began as something else.

Saying that virtual particles have one definite origin is one-sided and ignorant.
#70390 - If you're going to counter my claim, then you have to provide …  [+] (6 new replies) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70393 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
I don't even have to counter your claim because you haven't given any evidence of your claim in the first place.
User avatar #70395 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Yet I still manage to counter every single "substantiated" counter you threw at me.

You still contradicted yourself because you criticize me for not having evidence but you don't have any evidence of your own. We are essentially leading an argument that has absolutely no purpose because we don't have enough knowledge on either side.
User avatar #70397 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
No you didn't, you're simply showing how ignorant you are regarding the field of physics.
User avatar #70399 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Actually, I have, which proves that you have no argumentative skill/background.

If I'm going to make an unsubstantiated claim, then you better give me a substantiated counter that proves me wrong.

For example, I can say that Lamarck's Theory of Evolution is correct, but in order to counter that, you have to say that Darwin's Theory is correct and then provide me with evidence as a way to prove me wrong.
User avatar #70402 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
Uhm no that's not how it works at all.

I can say that Lamarck's theory of evolution is correct, but someone else will ask for evidence that it's correct. They don't have to provide an alternative explanation because they aren't making any claims, they're asking for evidence.
User avatar #70403 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
But isn't applicable to this argument.

I'm giving a proposition.

You want to prove it wrong.

In order to prove it wrong, you have to provide evidence that it is wrong, otherwise I am not convinced.
#70387 - I already explained to you that they describe what is going on… 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
#70385 - I already refuted your zero energy fields argument. A…  [+] (16 new replies) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70389 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
And i'm merely showing you facts, i don't have to provide any alternative explanations because i'm not the one making the claim that god doesn't exist, you are the one claiming god does exist and you have failed to give one logical argument or evidence for it's existence.
User avatar #70390 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
If you're going to counter my claim, then you have to provide evidence. It doesn't matter who is making the claim, it matters who has provided the best evidence.


User avatar #70393 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
I don't even have to counter your claim because you haven't given any evidence of your claim in the first place.
User avatar #70395 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Yet I still manage to counter every single "substantiated" counter you threw at me.

You still contradicted yourself because you criticize me for not having evidence but you don't have any evidence of your own. We are essentially leading an argument that has absolutely no purpose because we don't have enough knowledge on either side.
User avatar #70397 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
No you didn't, you're simply showing how ignorant you are regarding the field of physics.
User avatar #70399 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Actually, I have, which proves that you have no argumentative skill/background.

If I'm going to make an unsubstantiated claim, then you better give me a substantiated counter that proves me wrong.

For example, I can say that Lamarck's Theory of Evolution is correct, but in order to counter that, you have to say that Darwin's Theory is correct and then provide me with evidence as a way to prove me wrong.
User avatar #70402 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
Uhm no that's not how it works at all.

I can say that Lamarck's theory of evolution is correct, but someone else will ask for evidence that it's correct. They don't have to provide an alternative explanation because they aren't making any claims, they're asking for evidence.
User avatar #70403 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
But isn't applicable to this argument.

I'm giving a proposition.

You want to prove it wrong.

In order to prove it wrong, you have to provide evidence that it is wrong, otherwise I am not convinced.
User avatar #70388 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
No you didn't, you only showed your poor understanding of physics. You claim that zero energy universes don't explain whether or not they come from nothing while a zero energy universe IS NOTHING BY DEFINITION and particles come from this state hence violating causality. It's very likely that empty space is a default position that didn't came from anything because it's NOTHING.

I already showed you evidence that time and causality can be violated even without quantum mechanics, or are you going to deny the very principles of relativity aswell?
User avatar #70391 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Nothing coming from nothing doesn't violate causality.
User avatar #70392 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
But something coming from a zero energy field does, and black holes do, and particle-wave duality does, and even time delay does.
User avatar #70394 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
You still have not provided sufficient evidence that they have originated there to begin with.

Virtual particles could have originated from zero energy universes, but what proof do you bring that states that they didn't come from another source?
User avatar #70396 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
Seriously the evidence is everywhere, physcists have done literally experiments that confirm that they come from empty space, read a book, read a journal, read anything based on physics and you'll find evidence, it's not rocket science to look it up.
www.newscientist.com/article/dn16095-its-confirmed-matter-is-merely-vacuum-fluctuations.html#.U4osKfl_vD8
books.google.nl/books?id=DyhyFSL7bNUC&pg=PP1&dq=intitle:Probing+intitle:the+intitle:Quantum+intitle:Vacuum&hl=nl#v=onepage&q&f=false
User avatar #70398 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
I know that they come from empty space.

But that does not prove that empty space is their definite origin.
User avatar #70400 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
That's akin to saying that just because poop comes out of your anus that doesn't mean that that's proof that me eating the food was the definite origin. It could've been that a demon planted that food inside me and gave us the illusion that we ate the food.

This is why we have principles such as occam's razor where the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions is the preferred one.
User avatar #70401 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Exactly. Poop began as food, and food began as something else.

Saying that virtual particles have one definite origin is one-sided and ignorant.
#70383 - You do realize that these energy fields only describe what is … 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
#70382 - I'm not saying quantum mechanics isn't substantiated; I'm sayi…  [+] (18 new replies) 05/31/2014 on Religion Board 0
User avatar #70384 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
Except i have provided evidence of the fact that virtual particles pop in and out of existence from zero energy fields. Just because you're to stupid to understand this doesn't mean it doesn't have evidence. What you're trying to do is shift the burden of proof because you know you have no arguments for your irrational god position.
User avatar #70385 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
I already refuted your zero energy fields argument.

And of course I'm going to have to demand evidence from my adversary who has criticized my lack thereof.
User avatar #70389 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
And i'm merely showing you facts, i don't have to provide any alternative explanations because i'm not the one making the claim that god doesn't exist, you are the one claiming god does exist and you have failed to give one logical argument or evidence for it's existence.
User avatar #70390 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
If you're going to counter my claim, then you have to provide evidence. It doesn't matter who is making the claim, it matters who has provided the best evidence.


User avatar #70393 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
I don't even have to counter your claim because you haven't given any evidence of your claim in the first place.
User avatar #70395 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Yet I still manage to counter every single "substantiated" counter you threw at me.

You still contradicted yourself because you criticize me for not having evidence but you don't have any evidence of your own. We are essentially leading an argument that has absolutely no purpose because we don't have enough knowledge on either side.
User avatar #70397 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
No you didn't, you're simply showing how ignorant you are regarding the field of physics.
User avatar #70399 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Actually, I have, which proves that you have no argumentative skill/background.

If I'm going to make an unsubstantiated claim, then you better give me a substantiated counter that proves me wrong.

For example, I can say that Lamarck's Theory of Evolution is correct, but in order to counter that, you have to say that Darwin's Theory is correct and then provide me with evidence as a way to prove me wrong.
User avatar #70402 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
Uhm no that's not how it works at all.

I can say that Lamarck's theory of evolution is correct, but someone else will ask for evidence that it's correct. They don't have to provide an alternative explanation because they aren't making any claims, they're asking for evidence.
User avatar #70403 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
But isn't applicable to this argument.

I'm giving a proposition.

You want to prove it wrong.

In order to prove it wrong, you have to provide evidence that it is wrong, otherwise I am not convinced.
User avatar #70388 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
No you didn't, you only showed your poor understanding of physics. You claim that zero energy universes don't explain whether or not they come from nothing while a zero energy universe IS NOTHING BY DEFINITION and particles come from this state hence violating causality. It's very likely that empty space is a default position that didn't came from anything because it's NOTHING.

I already showed you evidence that time and causality can be violated even without quantum mechanics, or are you going to deny the very principles of relativity aswell?
User avatar #70391 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Nothing coming from nothing doesn't violate causality.
User avatar #70392 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
But something coming from a zero energy field does, and black holes do, and particle-wave duality does, and even time delay does.
User avatar #70394 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
You still have not provided sufficient evidence that they have originated there to begin with.

Virtual particles could have originated from zero energy universes, but what proof do you bring that states that they didn't come from another source?
User avatar #70396 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
Seriously the evidence is everywhere, physcists have done literally experiments that confirm that they come from empty space, read a book, read a journal, read anything based on physics and you'll find evidence, it's not rocket science to look it up.
www.newscientist.com/article/dn16095-its-confirmed-matter-is-merely-vacuum-fluctuations.html#.U4osKfl_vD8
books.google.nl/books?id=DyhyFSL7bNUC&pg=PP1&dq=intitle:Probing+intitle:the+intitle:Quantum+intitle:Vacuum&hl=nl#v=onepage&q&f=false
User avatar #70398 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
I know that they come from empty space.

But that does not prove that empty space is their definite origin.
User avatar #70400 - kanadetenshi (05/31/2014) [-]
That's akin to saying that just because poop comes out of your anus that doesn't mean that that's proof that me eating the food was the definite origin. It could've been that a demon planted that food inside me and gave us the illusion that we ate the food.

This is why we have principles such as occam's razor where the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions is the preferred one.
User avatar #70401 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
Exactly. Poop began as food, and food began as something else.

Saying that virtual particles have one definite origin is one-sided and ignorant.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 1000

Comments(141):

[ 141 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #163 - joshlol, inventor of being lonely (12/21/2014) [-]
**joshlol waves at you**
User avatar #164 to #163 - alltimetens (12/21/2014) [-]
hey

i know nobody ever lived you before...


but i sorta like you
User avatar #165 to #164 - joshlol, inventor of being lonely (12/21/2014) [-]
I'm not worth liking.

But thanks, what's up?
#162 - syrianassassin (05/31/2014) [-]
because you are new in the religion board, you must know what your enemy will do to your opinions

this is my first post in the religion board i talked with ethics and total respect and look what happened

www.funnyjunk.com/religion/54159#54159


now i am a troll who troll atheist trolls using their own logic and piss them off using their own life system and belief

new atheism =/= atheism

new atheism mean you shall be a total asshole against religion no matter how logical the answer is given

the board is full of heretics and you shall take care
#159 - syrianassassin (05/31/2014) [-]
i see you are a christian who came for some question in the religion board, and all you saw is some faggots trolling and ************
User avatar #160 to #159 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
I'm not really a Christian. I'm more of an agnostic.
User avatar #161 to #160 - syrianassassin (05/31/2014) [-]
and when you wanted answer, all you found is some new atheism bitches and cock sucking tranny faggots trolling you with nonsense
right?
#149 - anonymous (04/08/2014) [-]
hey your the guy from youtube
i like your videos dude
User avatar #154 to #149 - tranquilizer (04/20/2014) [-]
He's not them
User avatar #155 to #154 - badmotorfinger (05/02/2014) [-]
get the euthanization needle. they're becoming aware.
User avatar #156 to #155 - tranquilizer (05/02/2014) [-]
Wait
Where did you come from
The future?
#157 to #156 - nickypickle ONLINE (05/23/2014) [-]
I dunno if all this charade about being the one on youtube or not is all part of a 'sekretu klub' thing but its really getting to the point where someone needs some answers

yes? no? why is this such an issue I dont understand
User avatar #158 to #157 - tranquilizer (05/23/2014) [-]
Where do you people keep coming from I'm scared ;_;
#143 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
And with the mildly aroused Karasu picture, I am finished. Sorry for the spamish stuff, but you did ask me to and they do make good reaction images.
User avatar #145 to #143 - alltimetens (04/07/2014) [-]
No problem, man.

I appreciate all these reaction pics. Fukken savin' all of em'. I'm glad there are others here who have enjoyed the same anime as I.
User avatar #146 to #145 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Might be an odd thing to say, but you might want to join Tumblr. A lot of us are actually males who enjoy certain fandoms and have deep discussions about them, especially with Yu Yu Hakusho.

Might I suggest Kill La Kill or HunterXHunter? The latter apparently takes place in the future of Yu Yu Hakusho. Of course, Inuyasha is said to take place in the past, with Kikyo being Raizen's original daughter.
User avatar #147 to #146 - alltimetens (04/07/2014) [-]
Damn... I better get watching.
User avatar #148 to #147 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Go for Inuyasha first. I feel like Yu Yu Hakusho took a lot from that show. "Ooohhh we're losing viewers during the Dark Tournament, better show them Kurama's true form!" Fricken love child of Sesshomaru and Inuyasha (Which given Sesshomaru's mother isn't entirely out of the question even though they are a different species). Also, character types for both Toguro brothers, Bui, Karasu, and others were in that show.
#142 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Sometimes I edit a strikethrough over the 'not' to make a joke.
#140 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#139 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
This is my wallpaper and icon
#138 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
This too.
This too.
#137 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#136 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
By the way, there is a user named Toguro here, but they aren't named after this Toguro.
By the way, there is a user named Toguro here, but they aren't named after this Toguro.
#150 to #136 - toguro (04/17/2014) [-]
You like telling everyone that don'tcha?
User avatar #151 to #150 - zafara (04/17/2014) [-]
Well, we were talking about Toguro anyway. You usually pop up whenever Toguro is mentioned, so I wanted to let him know that you would probably show up. I also wanted to warn him that you don't really watch the show and named yourself Toguro after something else so that they didn't ask you questions about Yu Yu Hakusho you don't know.

Basically, I wanted to save some time by warning him that while you have the name, you don't know the show.

You know what I'm trying to say?
#152 to #151 - toguro (04/17/2014) [-]
Yeah I understood the 4th time you did it - I dont mind really
User avatar #153 to #152 - zafara (04/17/2014) [-]
I didn't think I was mentioning you that much. Sorry.
#135 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
This works as a good, I am mildly confused and/or disturbed by what I see
#132 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#130 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#129 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Remember this scene?
Remember this scene?
User avatar #134 to #129 - alltimetens (04/07/2014) [-]
this **** was creepy
User avatar #144 to #134 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Yep. You know what's even more creepy? Elder Toguro decapitated himself into a small aquarium and swam around in there as a head for a while without anyone really noticing.
#128 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
When someone doesn't get the joke and gets offended so you have to explain it.
#127 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
[ 141 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)