Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

alltimetens    

Rank #2906 on Subscribers
alltimetens Avatar Level 312 Content: Wizard
Offline
Send mail to alltimetens Block alltimetens Invite alltimetens to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Interests: Interesting things
Date Signed Up:2/07/2012
Last Login:9/02/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#2908
Comment Ranking:#7004
Highest Content Rank:#14
Highest Comment Rank:#1365
Content Thumbs: 120654 total,  132049 ,  11395
Comment Thumbs: 4951 total,  8651 ,  3700
Content Level Progress: 3.11% (311/10000)
Level 312 Content: Wizard → Level 313 Content: Wizard
Comment Level Progress: 94% (94/100)
Level 245 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 246 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:27
Content Views:4755309
Times Content Favorited:7251 times
Total Comments Made:4306
FJ Points:110113
Favorite Tags: The Game (2)
Just an average Funny Junk user who shares images. I am not accepting any trade requests. You can have my items, however, I am not giving/trading my FJ points. Feel free to subscribe.

latest user's comments

#160 - Except the risk in this case does not outweigh the benefits. A… 05/29/2014 on sensible chuckle inbound +1
#158 - Listen, you have demonstrated total ignorance on the matter. …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/29/2014 on sensible chuckle inbound +1
User avatar #325 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Theres a difference for fighting for a cause of independence and such. But attacking the innocent (which is not what americans did) and what 9/11 was, is a difference. And dont assume that i think america is innocent. The government is so corrupt and politically inept that the US debt is 17 trillion dollars. This has a very bad future for many americans. Most republics in history fail because of its domestic and political shortcomings, are we destined to as well? I dont know. I am not morally weak. I just believe in different ideas.
#3526 - Am I married to Jesus? 05/29/2014 on Your future wife/hubby 0
#3524 - **alltimetens rolled image **  [+] (1 new reply) 05/29/2014 on Your future wife/hubby 0
User avatar #3526 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Am I married to Jesus?
#3522 - Comment deleted 05/29/2014 on Your future wife/hubby 0
#461 - I am. 05/29/2014 on Biggest FJ addict 0
#145 - I'm not going to stand idly while innocent civilians are being…  [+] (12 new replies) 05/29/2014 on sensible chuckle inbound 0
User avatar #161 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
You do know how tedious it is to green a strike for a drone?

And don't blame the drones for collateral damage, it's the people who ordered the commands. It's not the gun that kills, it's the person using it.
User avatar #163 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You think I don't know that?

I'm arguing against the use of drones, not the drones themselves, idiot.

I'm saying that the entire drone program is unethical. If we're so great then how can we sit back and watch as thousands of innocents are being slaughtered?
#307 - anonymous (05/29/2014) [-]
If you took away the drones then they would revert to conventional airstrikes.

Which have 15 times the collateral.

Now who's being unethical?
User avatar #322 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You're still wrong.

I'm referring to the effect that this program may have on the future.

Remember that this is all a big experiment by the U.S government. If the drones are going to be used, then new technologies that are just as collateral as conventional air strikes but present more effortlessness will be developed. Meaning more people will by killed and less regret will be felt.
User avatar #165 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
Wow, getting too edgy for me now, calling people idiots.

Might as well ban the use of cars too.
User avatar #166 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm calling you an idiot because you're stating the obvious.
User avatar #167 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
But it seems like the "obvious" isn't going through your head.
User avatar #177 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Wut?

You said that it's not the drones themselves; it's the politicians.


Well no fucking shit. I'm arguing against this corruption as well as the program itself.
User avatar #157 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Ok, first lets calm down. Im just trying to argue my opinion serenely and not make this a shouting match.
Second i live in NY too so lets not bring that up.

Third, i can say the same for you. You have not given me a piece of credible evidence.

And finally, because thats bullshit, drones are not the reason for the start or more terrorist acts. The terrorists attack us, and us them for simply our way of life. We have such different views on how life should be lived that it leads to conflict and the war on terror. I support america, even though we shouldnt be in the situation we are in (World Police) someone has to do it.

No matter what kind of war, everything gets twisted. War is always morally conflicting, but you have to root for your country, especially america. we are the best of the worst, alot of our government is corrupt but we have many more freedoms than most other countries, especially the ones we fight. Were trying to save lives, i dont know how many innocent people america has killed, but i do know how americans they have killed. Im not saying were justified but we must fight. We cant sit here and hope they dont try anything. They will go to any means too destroy us, and for our sakes, i hope america wont.

www.livingunderdrones.org/numbers/

Also one more thing my friend, even though we do have different opinions, i dont want you to hate me. I respect your opinion, and i hope you do the same.
#155 - samuraikuroda has deleted their comment.
User avatar #158 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Listen, you have demonstrated total ignorance on the matter.

"Terrorists attack us"

You're making it sound like the U.S is the most innocent nation in the world. We're being attacked because we decided that we are allowed to plant bases on and infringe the lands of foreign nations, lands that the inhabitants consider sacred.

Ever heard of "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"?

How do you think the American Revolution happened? Were we not terrorists from British eyes?

The same applies to this except in this case, a fuckton more innocents are being mercilessly slaughtered.

You can toss all this bullshit about how this is a "war" and "it happens" but I am not morally weak to accept the slaughtering of children.
User avatar #325 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Theres a difference for fighting for a cause of independence and such. But attacking the innocent (which is not what americans did) and what 9/11 was, is a difference. And dont assume that i think america is innocent. The government is so corrupt and politically inept that the US debt is 17 trillion dollars. This has a very bad future for many americans. Most republics in history fail because of its domestic and political shortcomings, are we destined to as well? I dont know. I am not morally weak. I just believe in different ideas.
#139 - That isn't funny, man. 05/29/2014 on sensible chuckle inbound +2
#138 - You're honestly going to justify your side with "It's too…  [+] (14 new replies) 05/29/2014 on sensible chuckle inbound +1
User avatar #140 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Implying it isnt. Dude, we made bombs and guns that can level cities. And you expect us to go back to shooting each other with rifles?
User avatar #145 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm not going to stand idly while innocent civilians are being killed.

You have criticized me for not providing sufficient citations when you have not given a single link or image.

As another anon has said, 1700 out of the 2600 kills were either civilians or alleged Al Qaeda/Taliban affiliates, meaning that there was not concrete evidence that they were involved in terrorist activities.

Obama, in his 2008 speech said that drones will only target those that present an "imminent threat" to the U.S.
Well I ask you to tell me what the deaths of innocent women and children has done to make me feel any safer.

I live in NYC and I watched the towers crumble. But I never feel unsafe. I never gain a sense of security from the drone strikes.

And y'know what? I actually think these drone strikes are partially responsible for these acts of terrorism. al Qaeda and the Taliban as well as other terrorists cite political reasons as their motives. They state that they are fighting those that have gone unto their homeland. If that's the case, we're only worsening the matter by killing innocent fucking civilians.
User avatar #161 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
You do know how tedious it is to green a strike for a drone?

And don't blame the drones for collateral damage, it's the people who ordered the commands. It's not the gun that kills, it's the person using it.
User avatar #163 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You think I don't know that?

I'm arguing against the use of drones, not the drones themselves, idiot.

I'm saying that the entire drone program is unethical. If we're so great then how can we sit back and watch as thousands of innocents are being slaughtered?
#307 - anonymous (05/29/2014) [-]
If you took away the drones then they would revert to conventional airstrikes.

Which have 15 times the collateral.

Now who's being unethical?
User avatar #322 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You're still wrong.

I'm referring to the effect that this program may have on the future.

Remember that this is all a big experiment by the U.S government. If the drones are going to be used, then new technologies that are just as collateral as conventional air strikes but present more effortlessness will be developed. Meaning more people will by killed and less regret will be felt.
User avatar #165 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
Wow, getting too edgy for me now, calling people idiots.

Might as well ban the use of cars too.
User avatar #166 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm calling you an idiot because you're stating the obvious.
User avatar #167 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
But it seems like the "obvious" isn't going through your head.
User avatar #177 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Wut?

You said that it's not the drones themselves; it's the politicians.


Well no fucking shit. I'm arguing against this corruption as well as the program itself.
User avatar #157 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Ok, first lets calm down. Im just trying to argue my opinion serenely and not make this a shouting match.
Second i live in NY too so lets not bring that up.

Third, i can say the same for you. You have not given me a piece of credible evidence.

And finally, because thats bullshit, drones are not the reason for the start or more terrorist acts. The terrorists attack us, and us them for simply our way of life. We have such different views on how life should be lived that it leads to conflict and the war on terror. I support america, even though we shouldnt be in the situation we are in (World Police) someone has to do it.

No matter what kind of war, everything gets twisted. War is always morally conflicting, but you have to root for your country, especially america. we are the best of the worst, alot of our government is corrupt but we have many more freedoms than most other countries, especially the ones we fight. Were trying to save lives, i dont know how many innocent people america has killed, but i do know how americans they have killed. Im not saying were justified but we must fight. We cant sit here and hope they dont try anything. They will go to any means too destroy us, and for our sakes, i hope america wont.

www.livingunderdrones.org/numbers/

Also one more thing my friend, even though we do have different opinions, i dont want you to hate me. I respect your opinion, and i hope you do the same.
#155 - samuraikuroda has deleted their comment.
User avatar #158 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Listen, you have demonstrated total ignorance on the matter.

"Terrorists attack us"

You're making it sound like the U.S is the most innocent nation in the world. We're being attacked because we decided that we are allowed to plant bases on and infringe the lands of foreign nations, lands that the inhabitants consider sacred.

Ever heard of "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"?

How do you think the American Revolution happened? Were we not terrorists from British eyes?

The same applies to this except in this case, a fuckton more innocents are being mercilessly slaughtered.

You can toss all this bullshit about how this is a "war" and "it happens" but I am not morally weak to accept the slaughtering of children.
User avatar #325 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Theres a difference for fighting for a cause of independence and such. But attacking the innocent (which is not what americans did) and what 9/11 was, is a difference. And dont assume that i think america is innocent. The government is so corrupt and politically inept that the US debt is 17 trillion dollars. This has a very bad future for many americans. Most republics in history fail because of its domestic and political shortcomings, are we destined to as well? I dont know. I am not morally weak. I just believe in different ideas.
#136 - My argument isn't based off of statistics; it's based off of p…  [+] (20 new replies) 05/29/2014 on sensible chuckle inbound 0
#306 - anonymous (05/29/2014) [-]
Drone pilots have equally high and in some instances higher risks of PTSD as soldiers deployed into combat.

The 'piloting a drone is like playing a video game' argument is a myth.
#156 - telfyr (05/29/2014) [-]
Read Machiavelli "The Prince". There is no right or wrong. There is risk versus reward, input versus output.
#296 - xxmemosxx (05/29/2014) [-]
You do know Machiavelli wrote that steaming pile of shit of a book as a way of getting himself back into the good books of the Medici's (the Family that had tortured him and sent him into exile). It went completely against everything he wrote before or after that, it's basically satire.
User avatar #160 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Except the risk in this case does not outweigh the benefits. And the risk is far too high.

You're essentially asking whether we should risk the lives of armed, trained, and ready-to-fight soldiers or innocent children.
User avatar #137 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Its too late. That process was started when we created the bow and arrow. People will always find a way to kill people as indirectly as possible. Theres nothing else to risk, were already crossed that line when we invented nukes.
User avatar #138 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You're honestly going to justify your side with "It's too late"?

By that logic, I should start robbing people since we've been robbing each other since the beginning of man kind. Separate nomadic tribes have robbed other nomadic tribes.
User avatar #140 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Implying it isnt. Dude, we made bombs and guns that can level cities. And you expect us to go back to shooting each other with rifles?
User avatar #145 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm not going to stand idly while innocent civilians are being killed.

You have criticized me for not providing sufficient citations when you have not given a single link or image.

As another anon has said, 1700 out of the 2600 kills were either civilians or alleged Al Qaeda/Taliban affiliates, meaning that there was not concrete evidence that they were involved in terrorist activities.

Obama, in his 2008 speech said that drones will only target those that present an "imminent threat" to the U.S.
Well I ask you to tell me what the deaths of innocent women and children has done to make me feel any safer.

I live in NYC and I watched the towers crumble. But I never feel unsafe. I never gain a sense of security from the drone strikes.

And y'know what? I actually think these drone strikes are partially responsible for these acts of terrorism. al Qaeda and the Taliban as well as other terrorists cite political reasons as their motives. They state that they are fighting those that have gone unto their homeland. If that's the case, we're only worsening the matter by killing innocent fucking civilians.
User avatar #161 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
You do know how tedious it is to green a strike for a drone?

And don't blame the drones for collateral damage, it's the people who ordered the commands. It's not the gun that kills, it's the person using it.
User avatar #163 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You think I don't know that?

I'm arguing against the use of drones, not the drones themselves, idiot.

I'm saying that the entire drone program is unethical. If we're so great then how can we sit back and watch as thousands of innocents are being slaughtered?
#307 - anonymous (05/29/2014) [-]
If you took away the drones then they would revert to conventional airstrikes.

Which have 15 times the collateral.

Now who's being unethical?
User avatar #322 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You're still wrong.

I'm referring to the effect that this program may have on the future.

Remember that this is all a big experiment by the U.S government. If the drones are going to be used, then new technologies that are just as collateral as conventional air strikes but present more effortlessness will be developed. Meaning more people will by killed and less regret will be felt.
User avatar #165 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
Wow, getting too edgy for me now, calling people idiots.

Might as well ban the use of cars too.
User avatar #166 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm calling you an idiot because you're stating the obvious.
User avatar #167 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
But it seems like the "obvious" isn't going through your head.
User avatar #177 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Wut?

You said that it's not the drones themselves; it's the politicians.


Well no fucking shit. I'm arguing against this corruption as well as the program itself.
User avatar #157 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Ok, first lets calm down. Im just trying to argue my opinion serenely and not make this a shouting match.
Second i live in NY too so lets not bring that up.

Third, i can say the same for you. You have not given me a piece of credible evidence.

And finally, because thats bullshit, drones are not the reason for the start or more terrorist acts. The terrorists attack us, and us them for simply our way of life. We have such different views on how life should be lived that it leads to conflict and the war on terror. I support america, even though we shouldnt be in the situation we are in (World Police) someone has to do it.

No matter what kind of war, everything gets twisted. War is always morally conflicting, but you have to root for your country, especially america. we are the best of the worst, alot of our government is corrupt but we have many more freedoms than most other countries, especially the ones we fight. Were trying to save lives, i dont know how many innocent people america has killed, but i do know how americans they have killed. Im not saying were justified but we must fight. We cant sit here and hope they dont try anything. They will go to any means too destroy us, and for our sakes, i hope america wont.

www.livingunderdrones.org/numbers/

Also one more thing my friend, even though we do have different opinions, i dont want you to hate me. I respect your opinion, and i hope you do the same.
#155 - samuraikuroda has deleted their comment.
User avatar #158 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Listen, you have demonstrated total ignorance on the matter.

"Terrorists attack us"

You're making it sound like the U.S is the most innocent nation in the world. We're being attacked because we decided that we are allowed to plant bases on and infringe the lands of foreign nations, lands that the inhabitants consider sacred.

Ever heard of "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"?

How do you think the American Revolution happened? Were we not terrorists from British eyes?

The same applies to this except in this case, a fuckton more innocents are being mercilessly slaughtered.

You can toss all this bullshit about how this is a "war" and "it happens" but I am not morally weak to accept the slaughtering of children.
User avatar #325 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Theres a difference for fighting for a cause of independence and such. But attacking the innocent (which is not what americans did) and what 9/11 was, is a difference. And dont assume that i think america is innocent. The government is so corrupt and politically inept that the US debt is 17 trillion dollars. This has a very bad future for many americans. Most republics in history fail because of its domestic and political shortcomings, are we destined to as well? I dont know. I am not morally weak. I just believe in different ideas.
#133 - I never questioned the importance of troops' lives. A…  [+] (22 new replies) 05/29/2014 on sensible chuckle inbound -4
User avatar #135 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Tell me, and source please, what the death ratio is, Terrorists to Civilians. Tell you one thing, its not what you think
User avatar #136 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
My argument isn't based off of statistics; it's based off of psychology.

If it is much easier to kill a person with a push of a button from thousands of miles away, then would that not increase the amount of innocent civilians killed in the future? We can't risk it.
#306 - anonymous (05/29/2014) [-]
Drone pilots have equally high and in some instances higher risks of PTSD as soldiers deployed into combat.

The 'piloting a drone is like playing a video game' argument is a myth.
#156 - telfyr (05/29/2014) [-]
Read Machiavelli "The Prince". There is no right or wrong. There is risk versus reward, input versus output.
#296 - xxmemosxx (05/29/2014) [-]
You do know Machiavelli wrote that steaming pile of shit of a book as a way of getting himself back into the good books of the Medici's (the Family that had tortured him and sent him into exile). It went completely against everything he wrote before or after that, it's basically satire.
User avatar #160 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Except the risk in this case does not outweigh the benefits. And the risk is far too high.

You're essentially asking whether we should risk the lives of armed, trained, and ready-to-fight soldiers or innocent children.
User avatar #137 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Its too late. That process was started when we created the bow and arrow. People will always find a way to kill people as indirectly as possible. Theres nothing else to risk, were already crossed that line when we invented nukes.
User avatar #138 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You're honestly going to justify your side with "It's too late"?

By that logic, I should start robbing people since we've been robbing each other since the beginning of man kind. Separate nomadic tribes have robbed other nomadic tribes.
User avatar #140 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Implying it isnt. Dude, we made bombs and guns that can level cities. And you expect us to go back to shooting each other with rifles?
User avatar #145 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm not going to stand idly while innocent civilians are being killed.

You have criticized me for not providing sufficient citations when you have not given a single link or image.

As another anon has said, 1700 out of the 2600 kills were either civilians or alleged Al Qaeda/Taliban affiliates, meaning that there was not concrete evidence that they were involved in terrorist activities.

Obama, in his 2008 speech said that drones will only target those that present an "imminent threat" to the U.S.
Well I ask you to tell me what the deaths of innocent women and children has done to make me feel any safer.

I live in NYC and I watched the towers crumble. But I never feel unsafe. I never gain a sense of security from the drone strikes.

And y'know what? I actually think these drone strikes are partially responsible for these acts of terrorism. al Qaeda and the Taliban as well as other terrorists cite political reasons as their motives. They state that they are fighting those that have gone unto their homeland. If that's the case, we're only worsening the matter by killing innocent fucking civilians.
User avatar #161 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
You do know how tedious it is to green a strike for a drone?

And don't blame the drones for collateral damage, it's the people who ordered the commands. It's not the gun that kills, it's the person using it.
User avatar #163 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You think I don't know that?

I'm arguing against the use of drones, not the drones themselves, idiot.

I'm saying that the entire drone program is unethical. If we're so great then how can we sit back and watch as thousands of innocents are being slaughtered?
#307 - anonymous (05/29/2014) [-]
If you took away the drones then they would revert to conventional airstrikes.

Which have 15 times the collateral.

Now who's being unethical?
User avatar #322 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You're still wrong.

I'm referring to the effect that this program may have on the future.

Remember that this is all a big experiment by the U.S government. If the drones are going to be used, then new technologies that are just as collateral as conventional air strikes but present more effortlessness will be developed. Meaning more people will by killed and less regret will be felt.
User avatar #165 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
Wow, getting too edgy for me now, calling people idiots.

Might as well ban the use of cars too.
User avatar #166 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm calling you an idiot because you're stating the obvious.
User avatar #167 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
But it seems like the "obvious" isn't going through your head.
User avatar #177 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Wut?

You said that it's not the drones themselves; it's the politicians.


Well no fucking shit. I'm arguing against this corruption as well as the program itself.
User avatar #157 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Ok, first lets calm down. Im just trying to argue my opinion serenely and not make this a shouting match.
Second i live in NY too so lets not bring that up.

Third, i can say the same for you. You have not given me a piece of credible evidence.

And finally, because thats bullshit, drones are not the reason for the start or more terrorist acts. The terrorists attack us, and us them for simply our way of life. We have such different views on how life should be lived that it leads to conflict and the war on terror. I support america, even though we shouldnt be in the situation we are in (World Police) someone has to do it.

No matter what kind of war, everything gets twisted. War is always morally conflicting, but you have to root for your country, especially america. we are the best of the worst, alot of our government is corrupt but we have many more freedoms than most other countries, especially the ones we fight. Were trying to save lives, i dont know how many innocent people america has killed, but i do know how americans they have killed. Im not saying were justified but we must fight. We cant sit here and hope they dont try anything. They will go to any means too destroy us, and for our sakes, i hope america wont.

www.livingunderdrones.org/numbers/

Also one more thing my friend, even though we do have different opinions, i dont want you to hate me. I respect your opinion, and i hope you do the same.
#155 - samuraikuroda has deleted their comment.
User avatar #158 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Listen, you have demonstrated total ignorance on the matter.

"Terrorists attack us"

You're making it sound like the U.S is the most innocent nation in the world. We're being attacked because we decided that we are allowed to plant bases on and infringe the lands of foreign nations, lands that the inhabitants consider sacred.

Ever heard of "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"?

How do you think the American Revolution happened? Were we not terrorists from British eyes?

The same applies to this except in this case, a fuckton more innocents are being mercilessly slaughtered.

You can toss all this bullshit about how this is a "war" and "it happens" but I am not morally weak to accept the slaughtering of children.
User avatar #325 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Theres a difference for fighting for a cause of independence and such. But attacking the innocent (which is not what americans did) and what 9/11 was, is a difference. And dont assume that i think america is innocent. The government is so corrupt and politically inept that the US debt is 17 trillion dollars. This has a very bad future for many americans. Most republics in history fail because of its domestic and political shortcomings, are we destined to as well? I dont know. I am not morally weak. I just believe in different ideas.
#169 - I mean, I understand that the specs are better on the S4/S5, b…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/29/2014 on Android annihilation 0
User avatar #170 - ugoboom (05/29/2014) [-]
yep, so we know that we can both agree on the fact that the galaxy line is not worth a drop of the hype it gets. A whole lot of what I saw on the product page are just gimmicks. Motorola IMO does a good job, with the Moto X,G, and my phone, the Droid Maxx. They don't fuck with the system too much so it stays fast and not floaty.
#119 - Planes are manned, drones are unmanned. If I have to …  [+] (24 new replies) 05/29/2014 on sensible chuckle inbound +1
User avatar #131 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Do you consider a RC car unmanned? and if you do, why would you want a manned vehicle in a war zone? Isnt the lives of our troops important? Why does it matter if hes in texas operating it, or in Afghanistan manning it.
User avatar #133 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I never questioned the importance of troops' lives.

All I'm saying is that I value the lives of innocents more than the lives of armed soldiers that are prepared to go into battle.
User avatar #135 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Tell me, and source please, what the death ratio is, Terrorists to Civilians. Tell you one thing, its not what you think
User avatar #136 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
My argument isn't based off of statistics; it's based off of psychology.

If it is much easier to kill a person with a push of a button from thousands of miles away, then would that not increase the amount of innocent civilians killed in the future? We can't risk it.
#306 - anonymous (05/29/2014) [-]
Drone pilots have equally high and in some instances higher risks of PTSD as soldiers deployed into combat.

The 'piloting a drone is like playing a video game' argument is a myth.
#156 - telfyr (05/29/2014) [-]
Read Machiavelli "The Prince". There is no right or wrong. There is risk versus reward, input versus output.
#296 - xxmemosxx (05/29/2014) [-]
You do know Machiavelli wrote that steaming pile of shit of a book as a way of getting himself back into the good books of the Medici's (the Family that had tortured him and sent him into exile). It went completely against everything he wrote before or after that, it's basically satire.
User avatar #160 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Except the risk in this case does not outweigh the benefits. And the risk is far too high.

You're essentially asking whether we should risk the lives of armed, trained, and ready-to-fight soldiers or innocent children.
User avatar #137 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Its too late. That process was started when we created the bow and arrow. People will always find a way to kill people as indirectly as possible. Theres nothing else to risk, were already crossed that line when we invented nukes.
User avatar #138 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You're honestly going to justify your side with "It's too late"?

By that logic, I should start robbing people since we've been robbing each other since the beginning of man kind. Separate nomadic tribes have robbed other nomadic tribes.
User avatar #140 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Implying it isnt. Dude, we made bombs and guns that can level cities. And you expect us to go back to shooting each other with rifles?
User avatar #145 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm not going to stand idly while innocent civilians are being killed.

You have criticized me for not providing sufficient citations when you have not given a single link or image.

As another anon has said, 1700 out of the 2600 kills were either civilians or alleged Al Qaeda/Taliban affiliates, meaning that there was not concrete evidence that they were involved in terrorist activities.

Obama, in his 2008 speech said that drones will only target those that present an "imminent threat" to the U.S.
Well I ask you to tell me what the deaths of innocent women and children has done to make me feel any safer.

I live in NYC and I watched the towers crumble. But I never feel unsafe. I never gain a sense of security from the drone strikes.

And y'know what? I actually think these drone strikes are partially responsible for these acts of terrorism. al Qaeda and the Taliban as well as other terrorists cite political reasons as their motives. They state that they are fighting those that have gone unto their homeland. If that's the case, we're only worsening the matter by killing innocent fucking civilians.
User avatar #161 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
You do know how tedious it is to green a strike for a drone?

And don't blame the drones for collateral damage, it's the people who ordered the commands. It's not the gun that kills, it's the person using it.
User avatar #163 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You think I don't know that?

I'm arguing against the use of drones, not the drones themselves, idiot.

I'm saying that the entire drone program is unethical. If we're so great then how can we sit back and watch as thousands of innocents are being slaughtered?
#307 - anonymous (05/29/2014) [-]
If you took away the drones then they would revert to conventional airstrikes.

Which have 15 times the collateral.

Now who's being unethical?
User avatar #322 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You're still wrong.

I'm referring to the effect that this program may have on the future.

Remember that this is all a big experiment by the U.S government. If the drones are going to be used, then new technologies that are just as collateral as conventional air strikes but present more effortlessness will be developed. Meaning more people will by killed and less regret will be felt.
User avatar #165 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
Wow, getting too edgy for me now, calling people idiots.

Might as well ban the use of cars too.
User avatar #166 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm calling you an idiot because you're stating the obvious.
User avatar #167 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
But it seems like the "obvious" isn't going through your head.
User avatar #177 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Wut?

You said that it's not the drones themselves; it's the politicians.


Well no fucking shit. I'm arguing against this corruption as well as the program itself.
User avatar #157 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Ok, first lets calm down. Im just trying to argue my opinion serenely and not make this a shouting match.
Second i live in NY too so lets not bring that up.

Third, i can say the same for you. You have not given me a piece of credible evidence.

And finally, because thats bullshit, drones are not the reason for the start or more terrorist acts. The terrorists attack us, and us them for simply our way of life. We have such different views on how life should be lived that it leads to conflict and the war on terror. I support america, even though we shouldnt be in the situation we are in (World Police) someone has to do it.

No matter what kind of war, everything gets twisted. War is always morally conflicting, but you have to root for your country, especially america. we are the best of the worst, alot of our government is corrupt but we have many more freedoms than most other countries, especially the ones we fight. Were trying to save lives, i dont know how many innocent people america has killed, but i do know how americans they have killed. Im not saying were justified but we must fight. We cant sit here and hope they dont try anything. They will go to any means too destroy us, and for our sakes, i hope america wont.

www.livingunderdrones.org/numbers/

Also one more thing my friend, even though we do have different opinions, i dont want you to hate me. I respect your opinion, and i hope you do the same.
#155 - samuraikuroda has deleted their comment.
User avatar #158 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Listen, you have demonstrated total ignorance on the matter.

"Terrorists attack us"

You're making it sound like the U.S is the most innocent nation in the world. We're being attacked because we decided that we are allowed to plant bases on and infringe the lands of foreign nations, lands that the inhabitants consider sacred.

Ever heard of "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"?

How do you think the American Revolution happened? Were we not terrorists from British eyes?

The same applies to this except in this case, a fuckton more innocents are being mercilessly slaughtered.

You can toss all this bullshit about how this is a "war" and "it happens" but I am not morally weak to accept the slaughtering of children.
User avatar #325 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Theres a difference for fighting for a cause of independence and such. But attacking the innocent (which is not what americans did) and what 9/11 was, is a difference. And dont assume that i think america is innocent. The government is so corrupt and politically inept that the US debt is 17 trillion dollars. This has a very bad future for many americans. Most republics in history fail because of its domestic and political shortcomings, are we destined to as well? I dont know. I am not morally weak. I just believe in different ideas.
#167 - >apple's arrogance Okay, I'm going to have to disa…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/29/2014 on Android annihilation 0
User avatar #168 - ugoboom (05/29/2014) [-]
the company. a phone brand nor operating system doesn't define its users.

i hate samsung too. my parents got an s3, and after playing around with it, i was severely disappointed in what everyone claims to be the best on the market.

I like function over form, where you are the opposite. There's no one best system. Too many people get caught up in that petty argument. What i'm saying is that android is best for me, but since you told me that you don't give a flip about customizability, then yeah, an apple phone is a better fit for you.

You made that room analogy, but since I use my phone for a whole lot of different things, I do want it to work for me rather me work for it. There's this one app that came with my phone called Smart Actions, which is an "If x Then y" app. I set it so that when I have something on my calender, it will silence my phone. I put in all my school days and other important events, and now I never worry about whether i silenced my phone since it did it for me. I use rocketplayer for my music since play music was a horrible experience. I set it so that when I plug in a headphone, it will resume my music/podcast. It pauses it when I pull out the headphone. This way, I can pause/play by pulling it out and back in. This is incredibly fast and useful for work, where I listen to a podcast but I have to listen to my manager tell me something real quick. If I can get that kind of cool functionality on iOS, please tell me.

battery life on my phone is incredible too. when I had my old ipod touch 2nd gen, I had to plug it in every night or I was fucked. I can skip a few nights in a row with my phone now. If apple would actually let other manufacturers use iOS, it would serve much better for competition and we'd get that good hardware.
User avatar #169 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I mean, I understand that the specs are better on the S4/S5, but to be honest, it doesn't feel right.

Samsung just tries to violently throw in these ridiculous specs in order to make it look like the S3-S5 is better.

They're essentially trying to use the "My phone is better because it has more capabilities" strategem and it really doesn't work for me because I don't use 95% of the new and improved capabilities.
User avatar #170 - ugoboom (05/29/2014) [-]
yep, so we know that we can both agree on the fact that the galaxy line is not worth a drop of the hype it gets. A whole lot of what I saw on the product page are just gimmicks. Motorola IMO does a good job, with the Moto X,G, and my phone, the Droid Maxx. They don't fuck with the system too much so it stays fast and not floaty.
#106 - You're retarded.  [+] (26 new replies) 05/29/2014 on sensible chuckle inbound 0
User avatar #117 - cdsams (05/29/2014) [-]

I ask you the same. Tell me the difference between a drone and a radio controlled plane with a camera and automated weapons attached to it.
User avatar #119 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Planes are manned, drones are unmanned.

If I have to meticulously explain the significance of that, then I won't bother wasting my time.
User avatar #131 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Do you consider a RC car unmanned? and if you do, why would you want a manned vehicle in a war zone? Isnt the lives of our troops important? Why does it matter if hes in texas operating it, or in Afghanistan manning it.
User avatar #133 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I never questioned the importance of troops' lives.

All I'm saying is that I value the lives of innocents more than the lives of armed soldiers that are prepared to go into battle.
User avatar #135 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Tell me, and source please, what the death ratio is, Terrorists to Civilians. Tell you one thing, its not what you think
User avatar #136 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
My argument isn't based off of statistics; it's based off of psychology.

If it is much easier to kill a person with a push of a button from thousands of miles away, then would that not increase the amount of innocent civilians killed in the future? We can't risk it.
#306 - anonymous (05/29/2014) [-]
Drone pilots have equally high and in some instances higher risks of PTSD as soldiers deployed into combat.

The 'piloting a drone is like playing a video game' argument is a myth.
#156 - telfyr (05/29/2014) [-]
Read Machiavelli "The Prince". There is no right or wrong. There is risk versus reward, input versus output.
#296 - xxmemosxx (05/29/2014) [-]
You do know Machiavelli wrote that steaming pile of shit of a book as a way of getting himself back into the good books of the Medici's (the Family that had tortured him and sent him into exile). It went completely against everything he wrote before or after that, it's basically satire.
User avatar #160 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Except the risk in this case does not outweigh the benefits. And the risk is far too high.

You're essentially asking whether we should risk the lives of armed, trained, and ready-to-fight soldiers or innocent children.
User avatar #137 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Its too late. That process was started when we created the bow and arrow. People will always find a way to kill people as indirectly as possible. Theres nothing else to risk, were already crossed that line when we invented nukes.
User avatar #138 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You're honestly going to justify your side with "It's too late"?

By that logic, I should start robbing people since we've been robbing each other since the beginning of man kind. Separate nomadic tribes have robbed other nomadic tribes.
User avatar #140 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Implying it isnt. Dude, we made bombs and guns that can level cities. And you expect us to go back to shooting each other with rifles?
User avatar #145 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm not going to stand idly while innocent civilians are being killed.

You have criticized me for not providing sufficient citations when you have not given a single link or image.

As another anon has said, 1700 out of the 2600 kills were either civilians or alleged Al Qaeda/Taliban affiliates, meaning that there was not concrete evidence that they were involved in terrorist activities.

Obama, in his 2008 speech said that drones will only target those that present an "imminent threat" to the U.S.
Well I ask you to tell me what the deaths of innocent women and children has done to make me feel any safer.

I live in NYC and I watched the towers crumble. But I never feel unsafe. I never gain a sense of security from the drone strikes.

And y'know what? I actually think these drone strikes are partially responsible for these acts of terrorism. al Qaeda and the Taliban as well as other terrorists cite political reasons as their motives. They state that they are fighting those that have gone unto their homeland. If that's the case, we're only worsening the matter by killing innocent fucking civilians.
User avatar #161 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
You do know how tedious it is to green a strike for a drone?

And don't blame the drones for collateral damage, it's the people who ordered the commands. It's not the gun that kills, it's the person using it.
User avatar #163 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You think I don't know that?

I'm arguing against the use of drones, not the drones themselves, idiot.

I'm saying that the entire drone program is unethical. If we're so great then how can we sit back and watch as thousands of innocents are being slaughtered?
#307 - anonymous (05/29/2014) [-]
If you took away the drones then they would revert to conventional airstrikes.

Which have 15 times the collateral.

Now who's being unethical?
User avatar #322 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
You're still wrong.

I'm referring to the effect that this program may have on the future.

Remember that this is all a big experiment by the U.S government. If the drones are going to be used, then new technologies that are just as collateral as conventional air strikes but present more effortlessness will be developed. Meaning more people will by killed and less regret will be felt.
User avatar #165 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
Wow, getting too edgy for me now, calling people idiots.

Might as well ban the use of cars too.
User avatar #166 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I'm calling you an idiot because you're stating the obvious.
User avatar #167 - effort (05/29/2014) [-]
But it seems like the "obvious" isn't going through your head.
User avatar #177 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Wut?

You said that it's not the drones themselves; it's the politicians.


Well no fucking shit. I'm arguing against this corruption as well as the program itself.
User avatar #157 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Ok, first lets calm down. Im just trying to argue my opinion serenely and not make this a shouting match.
Second i live in NY too so lets not bring that up.

Third, i can say the same for you. You have not given me a piece of credible evidence.

And finally, because thats bullshit, drones are not the reason for the start or more terrorist acts. The terrorists attack us, and us them for simply our way of life. We have such different views on how life should be lived that it leads to conflict and the war on terror. I support america, even though we shouldnt be in the situation we are in (World Police) someone has to do it.

No matter what kind of war, everything gets twisted. War is always morally conflicting, but you have to root for your country, especially america. we are the best of the worst, alot of our government is corrupt but we have many more freedoms than most other countries, especially the ones we fight. Were trying to save lives, i dont know how many innocent people america has killed, but i do know how americans they have killed. Im not saying were justified but we must fight. We cant sit here and hope they dont try anything. They will go to any means too destroy us, and for our sakes, i hope america wont.

www.livingunderdrones.org/numbers/

Also one more thing my friend, even though we do have different opinions, i dont want you to hate me. I respect your opinion, and i hope you do the same.
#155 - samuraikuroda has deleted their comment.
User avatar #158 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
Listen, you have demonstrated total ignorance on the matter.

"Terrorists attack us"

You're making it sound like the U.S is the most innocent nation in the world. We're being attacked because we decided that we are allowed to plant bases on and infringe the lands of foreign nations, lands that the inhabitants consider sacred.

Ever heard of "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"?

How do you think the American Revolution happened? Were we not terrorists from British eyes?

The same applies to this except in this case, a fuckton more innocents are being mercilessly slaughtered.

You can toss all this bullshit about how this is a "war" and "it happens" but I am not morally weak to accept the slaughtering of children.
User avatar #325 - samuraikuroda (05/29/2014) [-]
Theres a difference for fighting for a cause of independence and such. But attacking the innocent (which is not what americans did) and what 9/11 was, is a difference. And dont assume that i think america is innocent. The government is so corrupt and politically inept that the US debt is 17 trillion dollars. This has a very bad future for many americans. Most republics in history fail because of its domestic and political shortcomings, are we destined to as well? I dont know. I am not morally weak. I just believe in different ideas.
#158 - The latest version of Samsung's OS. Pretty much all o…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/28/2014 on Android annihilation 0
User avatar #166 - ugoboom (05/29/2014) [-]
touchwiz is fucking horrible
I've heard good things about CyanogenMod, and stock android 4.5 ain't bad at all.

Yes, iOS is a lot smoother experience, but I hate the non-customizability of it. If i don't want a vanilla app, then i'm fucked. If I want an emulator, I'm fucked. If I want a custom home or lock screen, then I'm fucked. If I want another appstore, I'm fucked. If I want a 3rd party music player that works natively, then I'm fucked. It could be something great, but apple's arrogance sucks. Also, i'd have to start dealing again with itunes on windows.
User avatar #167 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
>apple's arrogance

Okay, I'm going to have to disagree with you on that because Androidfags are the most arrogant people I've met. Then again, I don't know if you mean the company Apple Inc. or its users. Either way you make no sense because Apple and Samsung are both arrogant douches.

I really don't care about customizability either because it's not a room; it's an OS.

Plus, the choppiness and ugliness of Android is not compensated for by its "customizability."
User avatar #168 - ugoboom (05/29/2014) [-]
the company. a phone brand nor operating system doesn't define its users.

i hate samsung too. my parents got an s3, and after playing around with it, i was severely disappointed in what everyone claims to be the best on the market.

I like function over form, where you are the opposite. There's no one best system. Too many people get caught up in that petty argument. What i'm saying is that android is best for me, but since you told me that you don't give a flip about customizability, then yeah, an apple phone is a better fit for you.

You made that room analogy, but since I use my phone for a whole lot of different things, I do want it to work for me rather me work for it. There's this one app that came with my phone called Smart Actions, which is an "If x Then y" app. I set it so that when I have something on my calender, it will silence my phone. I put in all my school days and other important events, and now I never worry about whether i silenced my phone since it did it for me. I use rocketplayer for my music since play music was a horrible experience. I set it so that when I plug in a headphone, it will resume my music/podcast. It pauses it when I pull out the headphone. This way, I can pause/play by pulling it out and back in. This is incredibly fast and useful for work, where I listen to a podcast but I have to listen to my manager tell me something real quick. If I can get that kind of cool functionality on iOS, please tell me.

battery life on my phone is incredible too. when I had my old ipod touch 2nd gen, I had to plug it in every night or I was fucked. I can skip a few nights in a row with my phone now. If apple would actually let other manufacturers use iOS, it would serve much better for competition and we'd get that good hardware.
User avatar #169 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I mean, I understand that the specs are better on the S4/S5, but to be honest, it doesn't feel right.

Samsung just tries to violently throw in these ridiculous specs in order to make it look like the S3-S5 is better.

They're essentially trying to use the "My phone is better because it has more capabilities" strategem and it really doesn't work for me because I don't use 95% of the new and improved capabilities.
User avatar #170 - ugoboom (05/29/2014) [-]
yep, so we know that we can both agree on the fact that the galaxy line is not worth a drop of the hype it gets. A whole lot of what I saw on the product page are just gimmicks. Motorola IMO does a good job, with the Moto X,G, and my phone, the Droid Maxx. They don't fuck with the system too much so it stays fast and not floaty.
#204 - I'm an American of Japanese descent. I couldn't give less of a… 05/28/2014 on perspective 0
#207 - Oh give me a ******* break. Every sport… 05/28/2014 on Ultimate fake out 0
#118 - Agreed. This isn't cute nor is it attractive/appealing in any …  [+] (3 new replies) 05/28/2014 on perspective +1
#129 - anonymous (05/28/2014) [-]
Fuckin' kill yourself you dirty angry eyed Jap.

Seriously, the only people who like this fucking pedophile shit is you Japs, I'm Korean and have been to Korea and our women don't do stupid shit like this.
User avatar #204 - alltimetens (05/28/2014) [-]
I'm an American of Japanese descent. I couldn't give less of a fuck about your hatred towards Japan as I'm not affiliated with useless political clashing.
User avatar #140 - hazop (05/28/2014) [-]
>dirty angry eyed jap

kill yourself you dirty angry eyed korean
#34 - She's not bad looking, but she's too slutty. 05/28/2014 on Asians Destroyed -1
#32 - I keep seeing this disgrace to Asians.  [+] (3 new replies) 05/28/2014 on Asians Destroyed 0
User avatar #35 - pizzaweed (05/28/2014) [-]
I have never seen one of her videos
#33 - anonymous (05/28/2014) [-]
Obviously whitewashed as hell, but she's still hot as fuck.
User avatar #34 - alltimetens (05/28/2014) [-]
She's not bad looking, but she's too slutty.
#55 - I actually prefer iOS over Android.  [+] (7 new replies) 05/28/2014 on Android annihilation 0
#60 - anonymous (05/28/2014) [-]
Android is faaarrr too diverse to just say you prefer IOS,

what versions of android have you used, because there are some GOD AWFUL ones, like touchwiz.
User avatar #158 - alltimetens (05/28/2014) [-]
The latest version of Samsung's OS.

Pretty much all of the Android OS that I've used are shit.
User avatar #166 - ugoboom (05/29/2014) [-]
touchwiz is fucking horrible
I've heard good things about CyanogenMod, and stock android 4.5 ain't bad at all.

Yes, iOS is a lot smoother experience, but I hate the non-customizability of it. If i don't want a vanilla app, then i'm fucked. If I want an emulator, I'm fucked. If I want a custom home or lock screen, then I'm fucked. If I want another appstore, I'm fucked. If I want a 3rd party music player that works natively, then I'm fucked. It could be something great, but apple's arrogance sucks. Also, i'd have to start dealing again with itunes on windows.
User avatar #167 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
>apple's arrogance

Okay, I'm going to have to disagree with you on that because Androidfags are the most arrogant people I've met. Then again, I don't know if you mean the company Apple Inc. or its users. Either way you make no sense because Apple and Samsung are both arrogant douches.

I really don't care about customizability either because it's not a room; it's an OS.

Plus, the choppiness and ugliness of Android is not compensated for by its "customizability."
User avatar #168 - ugoboom (05/29/2014) [-]
the company. a phone brand nor operating system doesn't define its users.

i hate samsung too. my parents got an s3, and after playing around with it, i was severely disappointed in what everyone claims to be the best on the market.

I like function over form, where you are the opposite. There's no one best system. Too many people get caught up in that petty argument. What i'm saying is that android is best for me, but since you told me that you don't give a flip about customizability, then yeah, an apple phone is a better fit for you.

You made that room analogy, but since I use my phone for a whole lot of different things, I do want it to work for me rather me work for it. There's this one app that came with my phone called Smart Actions, which is an "If x Then y" app. I set it so that when I have something on my calender, it will silence my phone. I put in all my school days and other important events, and now I never worry about whether i silenced my phone since it did it for me. I use rocketplayer for my music since play music was a horrible experience. I set it so that when I plug in a headphone, it will resume my music/podcast. It pauses it when I pull out the headphone. This way, I can pause/play by pulling it out and back in. This is incredibly fast and useful for work, where I listen to a podcast but I have to listen to my manager tell me something real quick. If I can get that kind of cool functionality on iOS, please tell me.

battery life on my phone is incredible too. when I had my old ipod touch 2nd gen, I had to plug it in every night or I was fucked. I can skip a few nights in a row with my phone now. If apple would actually let other manufacturers use iOS, it would serve much better for competition and we'd get that good hardware.
User avatar #169 - alltimetens (05/29/2014) [-]
I mean, I understand that the specs are better on the S4/S5, but to be honest, it doesn't feel right.

Samsung just tries to violently throw in these ridiculous specs in order to make it look like the S3-S5 is better.

They're essentially trying to use the "My phone is better because it has more capabilities" strategem and it really doesn't work for me because I don't use 95% of the new and improved capabilities.
User avatar #170 - ugoboom (05/29/2014) [-]
yep, so we know that we can both agree on the fact that the galaxy line is not worth a drop of the hype it gets. A whole lot of what I saw on the product page are just gimmicks. Motorola IMO does a good job, with the Moto X,G, and my phone, the Droid Maxx. They don't fuck with the system too much so it stays fast and not floaty.
#107 - Trying WAYYYY to ******* hard.  [+] (5 new replies) 05/28/2014 on perspective +8
#117 - anonymous (05/28/2014) [-]
Way WAY too hard. Grown ass women acting like "swet 3 year old girls" is one of the morst irritatnig things women can do.
User avatar #118 - alltimetens (05/28/2014) [-]
Agreed. This isn't cute nor is it attractive/appealing in any way, shape, or form. If this is what is found to be attractive in Japanese/Korean society, then I am ashamed to be Japanese.
#129 - anonymous (05/28/2014) [-]
Fuckin' kill yourself you dirty angry eyed Jap.

Seriously, the only people who like this fucking pedophile shit is you Japs, I'm Korean and have been to Korea and our women don't do stupid shit like this.
User avatar #204 - alltimetens (05/28/2014) [-]
I'm an American of Japanese descent. I couldn't give less of a fuck about your hatred towards Japan as I'm not affiliated with useless political clashing.
User avatar #140 - hazop (05/28/2014) [-]
>dirty angry eyed jap

kill yourself you dirty angry eyed korean
#106 - Such a disgrace to Asians, man. 05/28/2014 on perspective 0
#113 - What good is using your feet when you don't even have balls?  [+] (2 new replies) 05/28/2014 on Ultimate fake out +5
User avatar #201 - dawggz (05/28/2014) [-]
yeah dude, handegg is so true and patriotic, not a copy of rugby.
I don't want fries with that.
User avatar #207 - alltimetens (05/28/2014) [-]
Oh give me a fucking break.

Every sport was either copied or based off of another sport. If you're going to criticize Americans for creating their own sport based off of another sport, then you're a fucking idiot.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 1000

Comments(138):

[ 138 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#162 - syrianassassin (05/31/2014) [-]
because you are new in the religion board, you must know what your enemy will do to your opinions

this is my first post in the religion board i talked with ethics and total respect and look what happened

www.funnyjunk.com/religion/54159#54159


now i am a troll who troll atheist trolls using their own logic and piss them off using their own life system and belief

new atheism =/= atheism

new atheism mean you shall be a total asshole against religion no matter how logical the answer is given

the board is full of heretics and you shall take care
#159 - syrianassassin (05/31/2014) [-]
i see you are a christian who came for some question in the religion board, and all you saw is some faggots trolling and ************
User avatar #160 to #159 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
I'm not really a Christian. I'm more of an agnostic.
User avatar #161 to #160 - syrianassassin (05/31/2014) [-]
and when you wanted answer, all you found is some new atheism bitches and cock sucking tranny faggots trolling you with nonsense
right?
#149 - anonymous (04/08/2014) [-]
hey your the guy from youtube
i like your videos dude
User avatar #154 to #149 - tranquilizer (04/20/2014) [-]
He's not them
User avatar #155 to #154 - badmotorfinger (05/02/2014) [-]
get the euthanization needle. they're becoming aware.
User avatar #156 to #155 - tranquilizer (05/02/2014) [-]
Wait
Where did you come from
The future?
#157 to #156 - nickypickle ONLINE (05/23/2014) [-]
I dunno if all this charade about being the one on youtube or not is all part of a 'sekretu klub' thing but its really getting to the point where someone needs some answers

yes? no? why is this such an issue I dont understand
User avatar #158 to #157 - tranquilizer (05/23/2014) [-]
Where do you people keep coming from I'm scared ;_;
#143 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
And with the mildly aroused Karasu picture, I am finished. Sorry for the spamish stuff, but you did ask me to and they do make good reaction images.
User avatar #145 to #143 - alltimetens (04/07/2014) [-]
No problem, man.

I appreciate all these reaction pics. Fukken savin' all of em'. I'm glad there are others here who have enjoyed the same anime as I.
User avatar #146 to #145 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Might be an odd thing to say, but you might want to join Tumblr. A lot of us are actually males who enjoy certain fandoms and have deep discussions about them, especially with Yu Yu Hakusho.

Might I suggest Kill La Kill or HunterXHunter? The latter apparently takes place in the future of Yu Yu Hakusho. Of course, Inuyasha is said to take place in the past, with Kikyo being Raizen's original daughter.
User avatar #147 to #146 - alltimetens (04/07/2014) [-]
Damn... I better get watching.
User avatar #148 to #147 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Go for Inuyasha first. I feel like Yu Yu Hakusho took a lot from that show. "Ooohhh we're losing viewers during the Dark Tournament, better show them Kurama's true form!" Fricken love child of Sesshomaru and Inuyasha (Which given Sesshomaru's mother isn't entirely out of the question even though they are a different species). Also, character types for both Toguro brothers, Bui, Karasu, and others were in that show.
#142 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Sometimes I edit a strikethrough over the 'not' to make a joke.
#140 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#139 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
This is my wallpaper and icon
#138 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
This too.
This too.
#137 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#136 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
By the way, there is a user named Toguro here, but they aren't named after this Toguro.
By the way, there is a user named Toguro here, but they aren't named after this Toguro.
#150 to #136 - toguro (04/17/2014) [-]
You like telling everyone that don'tcha?
User avatar #151 to #150 - zafara (04/17/2014) [-]
Well, we were talking about Toguro anyway. You usually pop up whenever Toguro is mentioned, so I wanted to let him know that you would probably show up. I also wanted to warn him that you don't really watch the show and named yourself Toguro after something else so that they didn't ask you questions about Yu Yu Hakusho you don't know.

Basically, I wanted to save some time by warning him that while you have the name, you don't know the show.

You know what I'm trying to say?
#152 to #151 - toguro (04/17/2014) [-]
Yeah I understood the 4th time you did it - I dont mind really
User avatar #153 to #152 - zafara (04/17/2014) [-]
I didn't think I was mentioning you that much. Sorry.
#135 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
This works as a good, I am mildly confused and/or disturbed by what I see
#132 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#130 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#129 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Remember this scene?
Remember this scene?
User avatar #134 to #129 - alltimetens (04/07/2014) [-]
this **** was creepy
User avatar #144 to #134 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Yep. You know what's even more creepy? Elder Toguro decapitated himself into a small aquarium and swam around in there as a head for a while without anyone really noticing.
#128 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
When someone doesn't get the joke and gets offended so you have to explain it.
#127 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
[ 138 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)