x
Click to expand

alltimetens

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Interests: Interesting things
Date Signed Up:2/07/2012
Last Login:3/04/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#13086
Comment Ranking:#8897
Highest Content Rank:#14
Highest Comment Rank:#1365
Content Thumbs: 120653 total,  132071 ,  11418
Comment Thumbs: 5122 total,  9043 ,  3921
Content Level Progress: 3.07% (307/10000)
Level 312 Content: Wizard → Level 313 Content: Wizard
Comment Level Progress: 81% (81/100)
Level 246 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 247 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:27
Content Views:4773297
Times Content Favorited:7223 times
Total Comments Made:4694
FJ Points:110196
Favorite Tags: The Game (2)
Just an average Funny Junk user who shares images. I am not accepting any trade requests. You can have my items, however, I am not giving/trading my FJ points. Feel free to subscribe.

latest user's comments

#59 - Let's assume that those statistics are genuine, then there are…  [+] (9 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Long Charlie Hebdo comp 0
#71 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
The main thing with jewish extremist though is they tend to stay in israel. So we don't hear much about them
#62 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
Well here's the thing. not everyone in israel is jewish, not everyone in the middle east is muslim. Yes there are jews out there killing people but they're just better at covering it up.
User avatar #74 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Alright, but that really doesn't move the argument around.

I'm just responding to the original comment made by biater, where he doubted the fact that Jews do commit crimes, specifically against journalists. I'm simply saying that they do and there are recorded cases of it.

But let's be clear about this and remember that Israel denies access to journalists spontaneously and then re-allows journalists back in. During that time period, we don't know what the fuck Israel might be doing to the Palestinians. This isn't even mentioning the fact that Palis are denied access to the internet and other forms of world wide communication. So clearly, Israel is trying to cover something up here.
#77 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
exactly... sneaky little jew fucks. you know who we need to watch out for though? the Buddhists.
User avatar #81 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Buddhists do have a history (and even today) of mass-burning thousands of infants for being Muslim. Now this is rather ridiculous because nobody is technically born a Muslim. The Islamic faith is instilled into the person as they are raised or when/if they convert later in life. But then again, it's only a minority of Buddhists that commit these crimes against humanity, so I have no right to put all Buddhists in the same category.
#82 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
yeah... well if its not muslim babies its themselves
#85 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Alright, that gave me a good chuckle
#76 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I never doubted, I asked for examples.
User avatar #78 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
You did kinda come off as being doubtful of it ever happening. Usually when people ask for sources, they are doubters by default. But maybe I just overlooked things a bit.
#56 - And the other 12%?  [+] (11 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Long Charlie Hebdo comp 0
#57 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
%6 murder and the other 6% is dangerous assignment
User avatar #59 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Let's assume that those statistics are genuine, then there are still journalists being intentionally killed. Like I said, I only spent 9 seconds looking for a source. Biater originally questioned whether or not there were even cases of murders against journalists done by Jews. Clearly there are.

Now, I'm not trying to say that all Jews are bad. That would be ignorant and a mass generalization. Now let's be reasonable people and apply that same logic to Muslims. Because those 2 or 3 guys killed journalists/magazine artists, does that mean Islam and the rest of the nearly 2 billion Muslims also condone such acts? Of course not.
#71 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
The main thing with jewish extremist though is they tend to stay in israel. So we don't hear much about them
#62 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
Well here's the thing. not everyone in israel is jewish, not everyone in the middle east is muslim. Yes there are jews out there killing people but they're just better at covering it up.
User avatar #74 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Alright, but that really doesn't move the argument around.

I'm just responding to the original comment made by biater, where he doubted the fact that Jews do commit crimes, specifically against journalists. I'm simply saying that they do and there are recorded cases of it.

But let's be clear about this and remember that Israel denies access to journalists spontaneously and then re-allows journalists back in. During that time period, we don't know what the fuck Israel might be doing to the Palestinians. This isn't even mentioning the fact that Palis are denied access to the internet and other forms of world wide communication. So clearly, Israel is trying to cover something up here.
#77 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
exactly... sneaky little jew fucks. you know who we need to watch out for though? the Buddhists.
User avatar #81 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Buddhists do have a history (and even today) of mass-burning thousands of infants for being Muslim. Now this is rather ridiculous because nobody is technically born a Muslim. The Islamic faith is instilled into the person as they are raised or when/if they convert later in life. But then again, it's only a minority of Buddhists that commit these crimes against humanity, so I have no right to put all Buddhists in the same category.
#82 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
yeah... well if its not muslim babies its themselves
#85 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Alright, that gave me a good chuckle
#76 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I never doubted, I asked for examples.
User avatar #78 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
You did kinda come off as being doubtful of it ever happening. Usually when people ask for sources, they are doubters by default. But maybe I just overlooked things a bit.
#54 - Civies or Reporters?  [+] (13 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Long Charlie Hebdo comp 0
#55 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
journalists from the link you gave. you can filter it by type of death
User avatar #56 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And the other 12%?
#57 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
%6 murder and the other 6% is dangerous assignment
User avatar #59 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Let's assume that those statistics are genuine, then there are still journalists being intentionally killed. Like I said, I only spent 9 seconds looking for a source. Biater originally questioned whether or not there were even cases of murders against journalists done by Jews. Clearly there are.

Now, I'm not trying to say that all Jews are bad. That would be ignorant and a mass generalization. Now let's be reasonable people and apply that same logic to Muslims. Because those 2 or 3 guys killed journalists/magazine artists, does that mean Islam and the rest of the nearly 2 billion Muslims also condone such acts? Of course not.
#71 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
The main thing with jewish extremist though is they tend to stay in israel. So we don't hear much about them
#62 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
Well here's the thing. not everyone in israel is jewish, not everyone in the middle east is muslim. Yes there are jews out there killing people but they're just better at covering it up.
User avatar #74 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Alright, but that really doesn't move the argument around.

I'm just responding to the original comment made by biater, where he doubted the fact that Jews do commit crimes, specifically against journalists. I'm simply saying that they do and there are recorded cases of it.

But let's be clear about this and remember that Israel denies access to journalists spontaneously and then re-allows journalists back in. During that time period, we don't know what the fuck Israel might be doing to the Palestinians. This isn't even mentioning the fact that Palis are denied access to the internet and other forms of world wide communication. So clearly, Israel is trying to cover something up here.
#77 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
exactly... sneaky little jew fucks. you know who we need to watch out for though? the Buddhists.
User avatar #81 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Buddhists do have a history (and even today) of mass-burning thousands of infants for being Muslim. Now this is rather ridiculous because nobody is technically born a Muslim. The Islamic faith is instilled into the person as they are raised or when/if they convert later in life. But then again, it's only a minority of Buddhists that commit these crimes against humanity, so I have no right to put all Buddhists in the same category.
#82 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
yeah... well if its not muslim babies its themselves
#85 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Alright, that gave me a good chuckle
#76 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I never doubted, I asked for examples.
User avatar #78 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
You did kinda come off as being doubtful of it ever happening. Usually when people ask for sources, they are doubters by default. But maybe I just overlooked things a bit.
#51 - Well yeah. If your original contention is that other religious…  [+] (10 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Long Charlie Hebdo comp 0
#58 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Well I definitely don't think that, with that whole airline brought down by Sikhs, the OK city bombing by that Christian, or the Mecca Masjid bombing by Hindus. All of those things are pretty widely condemned though.

I am pretty sure if Jewish extremists shot an office for making fun of King David, it would be widely criticized

User avatar #66 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And you're right about that.

But are you implying that Muslims aren't doing their part to condemn these terrorist attacks? Again, you're 100% wrong on that.

Sheikh Afifi Al-akiti, one of the most massively respected scholars/imams in Europe, condemned all acts of Islamic terror. Not to mention the fact that the Arab League, which is basically the European Union of the Middle East, was the first to condemn the shooting mere hours after the attacks.

This isn't even considering the countless fatwas written by scholars and sheikhs across the globe. Just because you don't see about it or hear about it, doesn't mean it isn't happening. Honestly, I don't even blame you for being ignorant to the condemnations of Muslims around the world. The media is so flooded with anti-Muslim propaganda that it's easy to get distracted by what's really going on.
#73 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Please quote one thing I said that suggested or implied I thought the majority of muslims were extremist or supporters extremists. I certainly do not hold that view, and I have no idea why you are assigning this to me.
User avatar #75 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
I'm not saying you hold that view. I'm saying that you are wrong when you said that Muslims don't condemn Islamic terrorism enough.

Whether or not you choose to believe that all Muslims are brutal/violent people is your decision. And if you do decide to stoop that low, then I have no place in convincing you otherwise.
#79 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Where did I say that Muslims do not condemn terrorism? Nowhere. Why would you think I said that?

Where did I say anything at all regarding Muslims being brutal / violent people? Nowhere.
User avatar #84 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And you need to reread my comment. I didn't say you held the view that all Muslims are bad people. That was basically my first sentence. I did say, however, that if you DO hold the view, then I have no business trying to stop you.
User avatar #83 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
"Well I definitely don't think that, with that whole airline brought down by Sikhs, the OK city bombing by that Christian, or the Mecca Masjid bombing by Hindus. All of those things are pretty widely condemned though.

I am pretty sure if Jewish extremists shot an office for making fun of King David, it would be widely criticized"

Here you listed 3 or 4 terrorist attacks done by followers of the 3-4 major religions of the world. But you left out Islam. Therefore, we can only conclude that your last sentence implies that Muslims aren't condemning terrorists enough. Contextually, speaking of course.
#86 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I brought up terrorist attacks done by people other than muslims. Not terrorist attacks condemned by people other than muslims.

"I'm saying that you are wrong when you said that Muslims don't condemn Islamic terrorism enough. " - Alltimetens

I never said a single thing about the condemnation of terrorist attacks. Not a single word anywhere.
User avatar #87 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
But do you believe that Muslims aren't criticizing/condemning Islamic terrorist activities?
#88 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Definitely not, and I never said anything that should make you think that. Stop making up idiotic statements and then saying I believe them.
#49 - At the end of the day, Israel purposely kills children and infants.  [+] (12 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Long Charlie Hebdo comp 0
#50 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
So really you are saying, "sure it's a tragedy that these muslims shot an office of people for making fun of their religion, but Jews have killed people too"?
User avatar #51 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Well yeah. If your original contention is that other religious groups don't commit atrocities, then you'd be wrong on that part.
#58 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Well I definitely don't think that, with that whole airline brought down by Sikhs, the OK city bombing by that Christian, or the Mecca Masjid bombing by Hindus. All of those things are pretty widely condemned though.

I am pretty sure if Jewish extremists shot an office for making fun of King David, it would be widely criticized

User avatar #66 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And you're right about that.

But are you implying that Muslims aren't doing their part to condemn these terrorist attacks? Again, you're 100% wrong on that.

Sheikh Afifi Al-akiti, one of the most massively respected scholars/imams in Europe, condemned all acts of Islamic terror. Not to mention the fact that the Arab League, which is basically the European Union of the Middle East, was the first to condemn the shooting mere hours after the attacks.

This isn't even considering the countless fatwas written by scholars and sheikhs across the globe. Just because you don't see about it or hear about it, doesn't mean it isn't happening. Honestly, I don't even blame you for being ignorant to the condemnations of Muslims around the world. The media is so flooded with anti-Muslim propaganda that it's easy to get distracted by what's really going on.
#73 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Please quote one thing I said that suggested or implied I thought the majority of muslims were extremist or supporters extremists. I certainly do not hold that view, and I have no idea why you are assigning this to me.
User avatar #75 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
I'm not saying you hold that view. I'm saying that you are wrong when you said that Muslims don't condemn Islamic terrorism enough.

Whether or not you choose to believe that all Muslims are brutal/violent people is your decision. And if you do decide to stoop that low, then I have no place in convincing you otherwise.
#79 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Where did I say that Muslims do not condemn terrorism? Nowhere. Why would you think I said that?

Where did I say anything at all regarding Muslims being brutal / violent people? Nowhere.
User avatar #84 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And you need to reread my comment. I didn't say you held the view that all Muslims are bad people. That was basically my first sentence. I did say, however, that if you DO hold the view, then I have no business trying to stop you.
User avatar #83 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
"Well I definitely don't think that, with that whole airline brought down by Sikhs, the OK city bombing by that Christian, or the Mecca Masjid bombing by Hindus. All of those things are pretty widely condemned though.

I am pretty sure if Jewish extremists shot an office for making fun of King David, it would be widely criticized"

Here you listed 3 or 4 terrorist attacks done by followers of the 3-4 major religions of the world. But you left out Islam. Therefore, we can only conclude that your last sentence implies that Muslims aren't condemning terrorists enough. Contextually, speaking of course.
#86 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I brought up terrorist attacks done by people other than muslims. Not terrorist attacks condemned by people other than muslims.

"I'm saying that you are wrong when you said that Muslims don't condemn Islamic terrorism enough. " - Alltimetens

I never said a single thing about the condemnation of terrorist attacks. Not a single word anywhere.
User avatar #87 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
But do you believe that Muslims aren't criticizing/condemning Islamic terrorist activities?
#88 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Definitely not, and I never said anything that should make you think that. Stop making up idiotic statements and then saying I believe them.
#619 - Right here, addy. 01/09/2015 on looking for a mod or two 0
#47 - took me literally 9 seconds to find 01/09/2015 on Long Charlie Hebdo comp 0
#46 - Picture  [+] (29 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Long Charlie Hebdo comp 0
#53 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
type of death 88% crossfire. Try harder m8
User avatar #54 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Civies or Reporters?
#55 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
journalists from the link you gave. you can filter it by type of death
User avatar #56 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And the other 12%?
#57 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
%6 murder and the other 6% is dangerous assignment
User avatar #59 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Let's assume that those statistics are genuine, then there are still journalists being intentionally killed. Like I said, I only spent 9 seconds looking for a source. Biater originally questioned whether or not there were even cases of murders against journalists done by Jews. Clearly there are.

Now, I'm not trying to say that all Jews are bad. That would be ignorant and a mass generalization. Now let's be reasonable people and apply that same logic to Muslims. Because those 2 or 3 guys killed journalists/magazine artists, does that mean Islam and the rest of the nearly 2 billion Muslims also condone such acts? Of course not.
#71 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
The main thing with jewish extremist though is they tend to stay in israel. So we don't hear much about them
#62 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
Well here's the thing. not everyone in israel is jewish, not everyone in the middle east is muslim. Yes there are jews out there killing people but they're just better at covering it up.
User avatar #74 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Alright, but that really doesn't move the argument around.

I'm just responding to the original comment made by biater, where he doubted the fact that Jews do commit crimes, specifically against journalists. I'm simply saying that they do and there are recorded cases of it.

But let's be clear about this and remember that Israel denies access to journalists spontaneously and then re-allows journalists back in. During that time period, we don't know what the fuck Israel might be doing to the Palestinians. This isn't even mentioning the fact that Palis are denied access to the internet and other forms of world wide communication. So clearly, Israel is trying to cover something up here.
#77 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
exactly... sneaky little jew fucks. you know who we need to watch out for though? the Buddhists.
User avatar #81 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Buddhists do have a history (and even today) of mass-burning thousands of infants for being Muslim. Now this is rather ridiculous because nobody is technically born a Muslim. The Islamic faith is instilled into the person as they are raised or when/if they convert later in life. But then again, it's only a minority of Buddhists that commit these crimes against humanity, so I have no right to put all Buddhists in the same category.
#82 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
yeah... well if its not muslim babies its themselves
#85 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Alright, that gave me a good chuckle
#76 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I never doubted, I asked for examples.
User avatar #78 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
You did kinda come off as being doubtful of it ever happening. Usually when people ask for sources, they are doubters by default. But maybe I just overlooked things a bit.
#48 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I see journalists killed by Israelis, but not because they were journalists. Which one in particular?
User avatar #49 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
At the end of the day, Israel purposely kills children and infants.
#50 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
So really you are saying, "sure it's a tragedy that these muslims shot an office of people for making fun of their religion, but Jews have killed people too"?
User avatar #51 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Well yeah. If your original contention is that other religious groups don't commit atrocities, then you'd be wrong on that part.
#58 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Well I definitely don't think that, with that whole airline brought down by Sikhs, the OK city bombing by that Christian, or the Mecca Masjid bombing by Hindus. All of those things are pretty widely condemned though.

I am pretty sure if Jewish extremists shot an office for making fun of King David, it would be widely criticized

User avatar #66 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And you're right about that.

But are you implying that Muslims aren't doing their part to condemn these terrorist attacks? Again, you're 100% wrong on that.

Sheikh Afifi Al-akiti, one of the most massively respected scholars/imams in Europe, condemned all acts of Islamic terror. Not to mention the fact that the Arab League, which is basically the European Union of the Middle East, was the first to condemn the shooting mere hours after the attacks.

This isn't even considering the countless fatwas written by scholars and sheikhs across the globe. Just because you don't see about it or hear about it, doesn't mean it isn't happening. Honestly, I don't even blame you for being ignorant to the condemnations of Muslims around the world. The media is so flooded with anti-Muslim propaganda that it's easy to get distracted by what's really going on.
#73 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Please quote one thing I said that suggested or implied I thought the majority of muslims were extremist or supporters extremists. I certainly do not hold that view, and I have no idea why you are assigning this to me.
User avatar #75 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
I'm not saying you hold that view. I'm saying that you are wrong when you said that Muslims don't condemn Islamic terrorism enough.

Whether or not you choose to believe that all Muslims are brutal/violent people is your decision. And if you do decide to stoop that low, then I have no place in convincing you otherwise.
#79 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Where did I say that Muslims do not condemn terrorism? Nowhere. Why would you think I said that?

Where did I say anything at all regarding Muslims being brutal / violent people? Nowhere.
User avatar #84 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And you need to reread my comment. I didn't say you held the view that all Muslims are bad people. That was basically my first sentence. I did say, however, that if you DO hold the view, then I have no business trying to stop you.
User avatar #83 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
"Well I definitely don't think that, with that whole airline brought down by Sikhs, the OK city bombing by that Christian, or the Mecca Masjid bombing by Hindus. All of those things are pretty widely condemned though.

I am pretty sure if Jewish extremists shot an office for making fun of King David, it would be widely criticized"

Here you listed 3 or 4 terrorist attacks done by followers of the 3-4 major religions of the world. But you left out Islam. Therefore, we can only conclude that your last sentence implies that Muslims aren't condemning terrorists enough. Contextually, speaking of course.
#86 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I brought up terrorist attacks done by people other than muslims. Not terrorist attacks condemned by people other than muslims.

"I'm saying that you are wrong when you said that Muslims don't condemn Islamic terrorism enough. " - Alltimetens

I never said a single thing about the condemnation of terrorist attacks. Not a single word anywhere.
User avatar #87 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
But do you believe that Muslims aren't criticizing/condemning Islamic terrorist activities?
#88 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Definitely not, and I never said anything that should make you think that. Stop making up idiotic statements and then saying I believe them.
#42 - First of all, you're comparing ~15 million Jews to 1.6 BILLION…  [+] (32 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Long Charlie Hebdo comp -1
#44 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Ok, fair number comparison comment.

Now if you could point out a murder of journalists by extremist Jews for exposing Israeli crimes, I'll google the shit outta that.
User avatar #47 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
took me literally 9 seconds to find
#53 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
type of death 88% crossfire. Try harder m8
User avatar #54 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Civies or Reporters?
#55 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
journalists from the link you gave. you can filter it by type of death
User avatar #56 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And the other 12%?
#57 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
%6 murder and the other 6% is dangerous assignment
User avatar #59 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Let's assume that those statistics are genuine, then there are still journalists being intentionally killed. Like I said, I only spent 9 seconds looking for a source. Biater originally questioned whether or not there were even cases of murders against journalists done by Jews. Clearly there are.

Now, I'm not trying to say that all Jews are bad. That would be ignorant and a mass generalization. Now let's be reasonable people and apply that same logic to Muslims. Because those 2 or 3 guys killed journalists/magazine artists, does that mean Islam and the rest of the nearly 2 billion Muslims also condone such acts? Of course not.
#71 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
The main thing with jewish extremist though is they tend to stay in israel. So we don't hear much about them
#62 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
Well here's the thing. not everyone in israel is jewish, not everyone in the middle east is muslim. Yes there are jews out there killing people but they're just better at covering it up.
User avatar #74 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Alright, but that really doesn't move the argument around.

I'm just responding to the original comment made by biater, where he doubted the fact that Jews do commit crimes, specifically against journalists. I'm simply saying that they do and there are recorded cases of it.

But let's be clear about this and remember that Israel denies access to journalists spontaneously and then re-allows journalists back in. During that time period, we don't know what the fuck Israel might be doing to the Palestinians. This isn't even mentioning the fact that Palis are denied access to the internet and other forms of world wide communication. So clearly, Israel is trying to cover something up here.
#77 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
exactly... sneaky little jew fucks. you know who we need to watch out for though? the Buddhists.
User avatar #81 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Buddhists do have a history (and even today) of mass-burning thousands of infants for being Muslim. Now this is rather ridiculous because nobody is technically born a Muslim. The Islamic faith is instilled into the person as they are raised or when/if they convert later in life. But then again, it's only a minority of Buddhists that commit these crimes against humanity, so I have no right to put all Buddhists in the same category.
#82 - janosaudron (01/09/2015) [-]
yeah... well if its not muslim babies its themselves
#85 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Alright, that gave me a good chuckle
#76 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I never doubted, I asked for examples.
User avatar #78 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
You did kinda come off as being doubtful of it ever happening. Usually when people ask for sources, they are doubters by default. But maybe I just overlooked things a bit.
#48 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I see journalists killed by Israelis, but not because they were journalists. Which one in particular?
User avatar #49 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
At the end of the day, Israel purposely kills children and infants.
#50 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
So really you are saying, "sure it's a tragedy that these muslims shot an office of people for making fun of their religion, but Jews have killed people too"?
User avatar #51 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Well yeah. If your original contention is that other religious groups don't commit atrocities, then you'd be wrong on that part.
#58 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Well I definitely don't think that, with that whole airline brought down by Sikhs, the OK city bombing by that Christian, or the Mecca Masjid bombing by Hindus. All of those things are pretty widely condemned though.

I am pretty sure if Jewish extremists shot an office for making fun of King David, it would be widely criticized

User avatar #66 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And you're right about that.

But are you implying that Muslims aren't doing their part to condemn these terrorist attacks? Again, you're 100% wrong on that.

Sheikh Afifi Al-akiti, one of the most massively respected scholars/imams in Europe, condemned all acts of Islamic terror. Not to mention the fact that the Arab League, which is basically the European Union of the Middle East, was the first to condemn the shooting mere hours after the attacks.

This isn't even considering the countless fatwas written by scholars and sheikhs across the globe. Just because you don't see about it or hear about it, doesn't mean it isn't happening. Honestly, I don't even blame you for being ignorant to the condemnations of Muslims around the world. The media is so flooded with anti-Muslim propaganda that it's easy to get distracted by what's really going on.
#73 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Please quote one thing I said that suggested or implied I thought the majority of muslims were extremist or supporters extremists. I certainly do not hold that view, and I have no idea why you are assigning this to me.
User avatar #75 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
I'm not saying you hold that view. I'm saying that you are wrong when you said that Muslims don't condemn Islamic terrorism enough.

Whether or not you choose to believe that all Muslims are brutal/violent people is your decision. And if you do decide to stoop that low, then I have no place in convincing you otherwise.
#79 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Where did I say that Muslims do not condemn terrorism? Nowhere. Why would you think I said that?

Where did I say anything at all regarding Muslims being brutal / violent people? Nowhere.
User avatar #84 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
And you need to reread my comment. I didn't say you held the view that all Muslims are bad people. That was basically my first sentence. I did say, however, that if you DO hold the view, then I have no business trying to stop you.
User avatar #83 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
"Well I definitely don't think that, with that whole airline brought down by Sikhs, the OK city bombing by that Christian, or the Mecca Masjid bombing by Hindus. All of those things are pretty widely condemned though.

I am pretty sure if Jewish extremists shot an office for making fun of King David, it would be widely criticized"

Here you listed 3 or 4 terrorist attacks done by followers of the 3-4 major religions of the world. But you left out Islam. Therefore, we can only conclude that your last sentence implies that Muslims aren't condemning terrorists enough. Contextually, speaking of course.
#86 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
I brought up terrorist attacks done by people other than muslims. Not terrorist attacks condemned by people other than muslims.

"I'm saying that you are wrong when you said that Muslims don't condemn Islamic terrorism enough. " - Alltimetens

I never said a single thing about the condemnation of terrorist attacks. Not a single word anywhere.
User avatar #87 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
But do you believe that Muslims aren't criticizing/condemning Islamic terrorist activities?
#88 - biater (01/09/2015) [-]
Definitely not, and I never said anything that should make you think that. Stop making up idiotic statements and then saying I believe them.
#41 - Except that never happened. Where the **** are yo…  [+] (4 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Long Charlie Hebdo comp +1
#96 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Muslims like yourself obviously think of Muhammed in spiritual terms, but of course, historically speaking, the man was a warmonger, and highly successful warlord, who forced Jews, Christians and Pagans to convert or be slaughtered or enslaved.

See: The battle of Tabuk, battle of Badr., battle of Khaybar, battle of Medina, and the eventual conquest of Medina and Mecca.
User avatar #138 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
I'm not Muslim.

And also, I'm pretty sure Muhammad utilized force when the opposition posed a threat to Muslims.

Nobody is here to argue that Islam is a motion of pacifism. Islam is not a pacifistic faith, and anyone that tells you otherwise is a liar. Military action and violence are permitted in certain limited contexts.I suggest you study Islamic faith more to understand when war/self-defense is appropriate.
#64 - Naimzorz (01/09/2015) [-]
He's right. Instead, Islam preached tolerance of the other major religions. In fact, Mohammad even wrote a public letter to Christians declaring their right to self-governance, and guaranteed protection of their churches and monasteries ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achtiname_of_Muhammad )

Don't pull 'facts' out of your ass
User avatar #70 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Thank you so much for not being ignorant.
#242 - Kill yourself today, please.  [+] (3 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar +1
User avatar #243 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
make me
#294 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Bet you guys won't make out about it
User avatar #296 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
I might
#237 - I'm shocked that you're the sperm that won. It's a ****…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar +2
User avatar #240 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
Yeah I'm not surprised you're shocked
You don't have the mental faculties to figure things out
User avatar #242 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Kill yourself today, please.
User avatar #243 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
make me
#294 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Bet you guys won't make out about it
User avatar #296 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
I might
#236 - See your problem? You bring out your arguments. Then when some…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar -1
User avatar #238 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You've failed to do this
because all you've done is completely missed the entire point
What I said initially was never involved in an argument at all

Does the nurse know you're out of bed?
#234 - "THAT'S THE ISSUE, he just too stupid to get it. Instead,…  [+] (7 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar +1
User avatar #235 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You still managed to miss it
I'm genuinely amazed

Who ties your shoes for you?
User avatar #237 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
I'm shocked that you're the sperm that won. It's a fucking miracle.
User avatar #240 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
Yeah I'm not surprised you're shocked
You don't have the mental faculties to figure things out
User avatar #242 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Kill yourself today, please.
User avatar #243 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
make me
#294 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Bet you guys won't make out about it
User avatar #296 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
I might
#229 - THEN SHUT THE **** UP. If you're not goi…  [+] (9 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar +1
User avatar #231 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
Uh
No
You gonna make me, dipshit?
Or can you even grasp the idea

I bet you can't
Genuinely too thick to understand
User avatar #234 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
"THAT'S THE ISSUE, he just too stupid to get it. Instead, he is fixated on whether or not denying the Holocaust is a joke, instead of the legal ramifications of denying the holocaust."

I think anon did an amazing job describing your inherent stupidity, you fucking Mongoloid.

Under a TRUE democracy, you could deny the holocaust and more. So countries like France have no place to talk about "Freedom of Speech" when they're obviously being inconsistent in their ideologies.
User avatar #235 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You still managed to miss it
I'm genuinely amazed

Who ties your shoes for you?
User avatar #237 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
I'm shocked that you're the sperm that won. It's a fucking miracle.
User avatar #240 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
Yeah I'm not surprised you're shocked
You don't have the mental faculties to figure things out
User avatar #242 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Kill yourself today, please.
User avatar #243 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
make me
#294 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Bet you guys won't make out about it
User avatar #296 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
I might
#228 - OBJECTIVELY SPEAKING, BANNING HOLOCAUST-DENIAL JOKES BECA… 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar -1
#225 - "NOBODY THATS ALSO IRRELEVANT I ONLY SPOKE OUT …  [+] (12 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar 0
User avatar #228 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
OBJECTIVELY SPEAKING, BANNING HOLOCAUST-DENIAL JOKES BECAUSE IT'S "OFFENSIVE" IS A VIOLATION OF FREE SPEECH. I SHOULD BE ABLE TO DENY THE HOLOCAUST WITHOUT PERSECUTION.
User avatar #227 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
WELL I NEVER SPOKE OBJECTIVELY
HOW DID YOU MISS THAT
User avatar #229 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP.

If you're not going to be FAIR AND OBJECTIVE, THEN KEEP YOUR FUCKING MOUTH SHUT. Nobody needs your opinions that have been filtered with propaganda and bullshittery .
User avatar #231 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
Uh
No
You gonna make me, dipshit?
Or can you even grasp the idea

I bet you can't
Genuinely too thick to understand
User avatar #234 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
"THAT'S THE ISSUE, he just too stupid to get it. Instead, he is fixated on whether or not denying the Holocaust is a joke, instead of the legal ramifications of denying the holocaust."

I think anon did an amazing job describing your inherent stupidity, you fucking Mongoloid.

Under a TRUE democracy, you could deny the holocaust and more. So countries like France have no place to talk about "Freedom of Speech" when they're obviously being inconsistent in their ideologies.
User avatar #235 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You still managed to miss it
I'm genuinely amazed

Who ties your shoes for you?
User avatar #237 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
I'm shocked that you're the sperm that won. It's a fucking miracle.
User avatar #240 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
Yeah I'm not surprised you're shocked
You don't have the mental faculties to figure things out
User avatar #242 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Kill yourself today, please.
User avatar #243 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
make me
#294 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Bet you guys won't make out about it
User avatar #296 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
I might
#222 - ******* THANK YOU. IF YOU'RE GOING TO MA… 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar -1
#218 - Who. The. **** . Made. You. The. Arbiter. Of. What…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar 0
#232 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
The dumbass isn't getting that whether or not it's a joke to people, is not the actual point.

His primitive mind can't comprehend that the actual problem which that there are almost always legal consequences when criticizing Jews, but almost never when criticizing the group.

THAT'S THE ISSUE, he just too stupid to get it. Instead, he is fixated on whether or not denying the Holocaust is a joke, instead of the legal ramifications of denying the holocaust.
User avatar #223 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
NOBODY
THATS ALSO IRRELEVANT
I ONLY SPOKE OUT OF MY OWN PERSPECTIVE
YOU FUCKING STONE

HOW CAN YOU BE THIS FUCKING DENSE THIS SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE
#206 - What don't you understand about: YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO …  [+] (7 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar -1
#210 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You really are too fuckin stupid
You are absolutely bedrock shale density

Holy shit
denying the holocaust is not a joke as far as I'm concerned
I don't care who else does, wether or not it counts as a joke is none of my concern
I've never heard of censorship of jew jokes
I don't count holocasut denial as a joke

Be
less
Fucking
stupid
Dipshit
User avatar #218 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Who. The. Fuck. Made. You. The. Arbiter. Of. What. A. Joke. Is.

Even if you are being SATIRICAL about it, (the same type of satire that Charlie Dickbow utilized in his magazine) you will still go to fucking jail.

Alright, alright. Let's play Devil's Advocate. Let's assume that I'm wrong and that there is absolutely no way to joke about the Holocaust.

YOU WILL STILL GO TO FUCKING PRISON. To the Muslims, insulting Muhammad is just as offensive as denying the Holocaust to the Jews. So if we're going to censor ONE form of profanity and vulgarity, then WE MUST censor another form of profanty and vulgarity. You gotta show SOME level of consistency here.
#232 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
The dumbass isn't getting that whether or not it's a joke to people, is not the actual point.

His primitive mind can't comprehend that the actual problem which that there are almost always legal consequences when criticizing Jews, but almost never when criticizing the group.

THAT'S THE ISSUE, he just too stupid to get it. Instead, he is fixated on whether or not denying the Holocaust is a joke, instead of the legal ramifications of denying the holocaust.
User avatar #223 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
NOBODY
THATS ALSO IRRELEVANT
I ONLY SPOKE OUT OF MY OWN PERSPECTIVE
YOU FUCKING STONE

HOW CAN YOU BE THIS FUCKING DENSE THIS SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE
#217 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Dumbass, whether or not it's a joke is irrelevant. Laugh about it, cry about it, rage about it, no one cares.

What matters is that under TRUE freedom of speech, denying the Holocaust should be applicable. As such you can do it and not face any "legal ramification"
User avatar #222 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
FUCKING THANK YOU.

IF YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE HOLOCAUST-DENIAL JOKES ILLEGAL, THEN INSULTING MUHAMMAD OR ANY RELIGIOUS LEADER SHOULD BE ILLEGAL AS WELL.

OBVIOUSLY WE ARE FAVORING ONE RELIGIOUS GROUP OVER THE OTHER.
User avatar #220 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
That is still irrelevant to what I was talking about
It was never relevant
You fucking shaleskull

Jesus fucking christ is your density increasing or what
#202 - Then that means you don't understand the ******* …  [+] (9 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar 0
User avatar #204 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
No
No the concept at hand, dipshit, was that I'd never heard of censorship of jew jokes
YUou went on a rant about the definition and about governments and it was, and still is, irrelevant

Stop being
a fucking dipshit
come on
User avatar #206 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
What don't you understand about: YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO FUCKING DENY THE HOLOCAUST. EVEN IF YOU'RE JOKING ABOUT IT
#210 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You really are too fuckin stupid
You are absolutely bedrock shale density

Holy shit
denying the holocaust is not a joke as far as I'm concerned
I don't care who else does, wether or not it counts as a joke is none of my concern
I've never heard of censorship of jew jokes
I don't count holocasut denial as a joke

Be
less
Fucking
stupid
Dipshit
User avatar #218 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Who. The. Fuck. Made. You. The. Arbiter. Of. What. A. Joke. Is.

Even if you are being SATIRICAL about it, (the same type of satire that Charlie Dickbow utilized in his magazine) you will still go to fucking jail.

Alright, alright. Let's play Devil's Advocate. Let's assume that I'm wrong and that there is absolutely no way to joke about the Holocaust.

YOU WILL STILL GO TO FUCKING PRISON. To the Muslims, insulting Muhammad is just as offensive as denying the Holocaust to the Jews. So if we're going to censor ONE form of profanity and vulgarity, then WE MUST censor another form of profanty and vulgarity. You gotta show SOME level of consistency here.
#232 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
The dumbass isn't getting that whether or not it's a joke to people, is not the actual point.

His primitive mind can't comprehend that the actual problem which that there are almost always legal consequences when criticizing Jews, but almost never when criticizing the group.

THAT'S THE ISSUE, he just too stupid to get it. Instead, he is fixated on whether or not denying the Holocaust is a joke, instead of the legal ramifications of denying the holocaust.
User avatar #223 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
NOBODY
THATS ALSO IRRELEVANT
I ONLY SPOKE OUT OF MY OWN PERSPECTIVE
YOU FUCKING STONE

HOW CAN YOU BE THIS FUCKING DENSE THIS SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE
#217 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Dumbass, whether or not it's a joke is irrelevant. Laugh about it, cry about it, rage about it, no one cares.

What matters is that under TRUE freedom of speech, denying the Holocaust should be applicable. As such you can do it and not face any "legal ramification"
User avatar #222 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
FUCKING THANK YOU.

IF YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE HOLOCAUST-DENIAL JOKES ILLEGAL, THEN INSULTING MUHAMMAD OR ANY RELIGIOUS LEADER SHOULD BE ILLEGAL AS WELL.

OBVIOUSLY WE ARE FAVORING ONE RELIGIOUS GROUP OVER THE OTHER.
User avatar #220 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
That is still irrelevant to what I was talking about
It was never relevant
You fucking shaleskull

Jesus fucking christ is your density increasing or what
#193 - You see, the funny thing about being stupid is how stupid peop…  [+] (11 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar 0
User avatar #195 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
No
Your waffle is genuinely irrelevant

I was never talking about the definition of free speech, that was ALL you
I know what the definition is, what I didn't understand is how you were so blazingly thick that you managed to land on that point, and then stick to it despite being told "wtf are you on about"

Be less stupid
you fucking dipstick
User avatar #202 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Then that means you don't understand the fucking concept at hand. People defended the artists by saying that it was freedom of speech.

There's a difference between speaking out against the gov't and insulting a whole religious/ethnic group.

Let me give you an example. (seriously, I'm leaving f you don't fucking understand this final explanation)

You go to your local ghetto and walk up to a random person walking his daughter to school. You then proceed to curse out him and his daughter right on the spot. He knocks your ass out and you sue him because you have freedom of speech to curse him and his daughter out. Did you deserve it? Yes you fucking did.
User avatar #204 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
No
No the concept at hand, dipshit, was that I'd never heard of censorship of jew jokes
YUou went on a rant about the definition and about governments and it was, and still is, irrelevant

Stop being
a fucking dipshit
come on
User avatar #206 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
What don't you understand about: YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO FUCKING DENY THE HOLOCAUST. EVEN IF YOU'RE JOKING ABOUT IT
#210 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You really are too fuckin stupid
You are absolutely bedrock shale density

Holy shit
denying the holocaust is not a joke as far as I'm concerned
I don't care who else does, wether or not it counts as a joke is none of my concern
I've never heard of censorship of jew jokes
I don't count holocasut denial as a joke

Be
less
Fucking
stupid
Dipshit
User avatar #218 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Who. The. Fuck. Made. You. The. Arbiter. Of. What. A. Joke. Is.

Even if you are being SATIRICAL about it, (the same type of satire that Charlie Dickbow utilized in his magazine) you will still go to fucking jail.

Alright, alright. Let's play Devil's Advocate. Let's assume that I'm wrong and that there is absolutely no way to joke about the Holocaust.

YOU WILL STILL GO TO FUCKING PRISON. To the Muslims, insulting Muhammad is just as offensive as denying the Holocaust to the Jews. So if we're going to censor ONE form of profanity and vulgarity, then WE MUST censor another form of profanty and vulgarity. You gotta show SOME level of consistency here.
#232 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
The dumbass isn't getting that whether or not it's a joke to people, is not the actual point.

His primitive mind can't comprehend that the actual problem which that there are almost always legal consequences when criticizing Jews, but almost never when criticizing the group.

THAT'S THE ISSUE, he just too stupid to get it. Instead, he is fixated on whether or not denying the Holocaust is a joke, instead of the legal ramifications of denying the holocaust.
User avatar #223 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
NOBODY
THATS ALSO IRRELEVANT
I ONLY SPOKE OUT OF MY OWN PERSPECTIVE
YOU FUCKING STONE

HOW CAN YOU BE THIS FUCKING DENSE THIS SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE
#217 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Dumbass, whether or not it's a joke is irrelevant. Laugh about it, cry about it, rage about it, no one cares.

What matters is that under TRUE freedom of speech, denying the Holocaust should be applicable. As such you can do it and not face any "legal ramification"
User avatar #222 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
FUCKING THANK YOU.

IF YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE HOLOCAUST-DENIAL JOKES ILLEGAL, THEN INSULTING MUHAMMAD OR ANY RELIGIOUS LEADER SHOULD BE ILLEGAL AS WELL.

OBVIOUSLY WE ARE FAVORING ONE RELIGIOUS GROUP OVER THE OTHER.
User avatar #220 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
That is still irrelevant to what I was talking about
It was never relevant
You fucking shaleskull

Jesus fucking christ is your density increasing or what
#133 - oh and this website gives out a list of all the maj… 01/09/2015 on Muslamic Ray Guns 0
#189 - I'm not gonna waste my time explaining a basic concept to a 5 …  [+] (13 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar 0
User avatar #190 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You've already wasted your time
You were talking irrelevant bullshit the entire time
Do you know what irrelevant means?
User avatar #193 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
You see, the funny thing about being stupid is how stupid people don't realize they're stupid.

When you're mentally retarded, you don't see yourself as being mentally retarded. Rather, anything that you don't understand is simply dismissed as being irrelevant. That's the bullshit that you're giving me right now.
User avatar #195 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
No
Your waffle is genuinely irrelevant

I was never talking about the definition of free speech, that was ALL you
I know what the definition is, what I didn't understand is how you were so blazingly thick that you managed to land on that point, and then stick to it despite being told "wtf are you on about"

Be less stupid
you fucking dipstick
User avatar #202 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Then that means you don't understand the fucking concept at hand. People defended the artists by saying that it was freedom of speech.

There's a difference between speaking out against the gov't and insulting a whole religious/ethnic group.

Let me give you an example. (seriously, I'm leaving f you don't fucking understand this final explanation)

You go to your local ghetto and walk up to a random person walking his daughter to school. You then proceed to curse out him and his daughter right on the spot. He knocks your ass out and you sue him because you have freedom of speech to curse him and his daughter out. Did you deserve it? Yes you fucking did.
User avatar #204 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
No
No the concept at hand, dipshit, was that I'd never heard of censorship of jew jokes
YUou went on a rant about the definition and about governments and it was, and still is, irrelevant

Stop being
a fucking dipshit
come on
User avatar #206 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
What don't you understand about: YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO FUCKING DENY THE HOLOCAUST. EVEN IF YOU'RE JOKING ABOUT IT
#210 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You really are too fuckin stupid
You are absolutely bedrock shale density

Holy shit
denying the holocaust is not a joke as far as I'm concerned
I don't care who else does, wether or not it counts as a joke is none of my concern
I've never heard of censorship of jew jokes
I don't count holocasut denial as a joke

Be
less
Fucking
stupid
Dipshit
User avatar #218 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Who. The. Fuck. Made. You. The. Arbiter. Of. What. A. Joke. Is.

Even if you are being SATIRICAL about it, (the same type of satire that Charlie Dickbow utilized in his magazine) you will still go to fucking jail.

Alright, alright. Let's play Devil's Advocate. Let's assume that I'm wrong and that there is absolutely no way to joke about the Holocaust.

YOU WILL STILL GO TO FUCKING PRISON. To the Muslims, insulting Muhammad is just as offensive as denying the Holocaust to the Jews. So if we're going to censor ONE form of profanity and vulgarity, then WE MUST censor another form of profanty and vulgarity. You gotta show SOME level of consistency here.
#232 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
The dumbass isn't getting that whether or not it's a joke to people, is not the actual point.

His primitive mind can't comprehend that the actual problem which that there are almost always legal consequences when criticizing Jews, but almost never when criticizing the group.

THAT'S THE ISSUE, he just too stupid to get it. Instead, he is fixated on whether or not denying the Holocaust is a joke, instead of the legal ramifications of denying the holocaust.
User avatar #223 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
NOBODY
THATS ALSO IRRELEVANT
I ONLY SPOKE OUT OF MY OWN PERSPECTIVE
YOU FUCKING STONE

HOW CAN YOU BE THIS FUCKING DENSE THIS SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE
#217 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Dumbass, whether or not it's a joke is irrelevant. Laugh about it, cry about it, rage about it, no one cares.

What matters is that under TRUE freedom of speech, denying the Holocaust should be applicable. As such you can do it and not face any "legal ramification"
User avatar #222 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
FUCKING THANK YOU.

IF YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE HOLOCAUST-DENIAL JOKES ILLEGAL, THEN INSULTING MUHAMMAD OR ANY RELIGIOUS LEADER SHOULD BE ILLEGAL AS WELL.

OBVIOUSLY WE ARE FAVORING ONE RELIGIOUS GROUP OVER THE OTHER.
User avatar #220 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
That is still irrelevant to what I was talking about
It was never relevant
You fucking shaleskull

Jesus fucking christ is your density increasing or what
#185 - You're ******* stupid. How about that? Read this …  [+] (15 new replies) 01/09/2015 on Allah SnackBar -1
User avatar #186 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
Ok you're incapable of understanding
You're locked in some weird loop that was never relevant in the first place, and you've gone and dug into it

fuckin weirdo
User avatar #189 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
I'm not gonna waste my time explaining a basic concept to a 5 year old. You simply lack the knowledge and experience to understand it. It was my fault for expecting a child to grasp these grown-up ideas.
User avatar #190 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You've already wasted your time
You were talking irrelevant bullshit the entire time
Do you know what irrelevant means?
User avatar #193 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
You see, the funny thing about being stupid is how stupid people don't realize they're stupid.

When you're mentally retarded, you don't see yourself as being mentally retarded. Rather, anything that you don't understand is simply dismissed as being irrelevant. That's the bullshit that you're giving me right now.
User avatar #195 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
No
Your waffle is genuinely irrelevant

I was never talking about the definition of free speech, that was ALL you
I know what the definition is, what I didn't understand is how you were so blazingly thick that you managed to land on that point, and then stick to it despite being told "wtf are you on about"

Be less stupid
you fucking dipstick
User avatar #202 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Then that means you don't understand the fucking concept at hand. People defended the artists by saying that it was freedom of speech.

There's a difference between speaking out against the gov't and insulting a whole religious/ethnic group.

Let me give you an example. (seriously, I'm leaving f you don't fucking understand this final explanation)

You go to your local ghetto and walk up to a random person walking his daughter to school. You then proceed to curse out him and his daughter right on the spot. He knocks your ass out and you sue him because you have freedom of speech to curse him and his daughter out. Did you deserve it? Yes you fucking did.
User avatar #204 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
No
No the concept at hand, dipshit, was that I'd never heard of censorship of jew jokes
YUou went on a rant about the definition and about governments and it was, and still is, irrelevant

Stop being
a fucking dipshit
come on
User avatar #206 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
What don't you understand about: YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO FUCKING DENY THE HOLOCAUST. EVEN IF YOU'RE JOKING ABOUT IT
#210 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
You really are too fuckin stupid
You are absolutely bedrock shale density

Holy shit
denying the holocaust is not a joke as far as I'm concerned
I don't care who else does, wether or not it counts as a joke is none of my concern
I've never heard of censorship of jew jokes
I don't count holocasut denial as a joke

Be
less
Fucking
stupid
Dipshit
User avatar #218 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
Who. The. Fuck. Made. You. The. Arbiter. Of. What. A. Joke. Is.

Even if you are being SATIRICAL about it, (the same type of satire that Charlie Dickbow utilized in his magazine) you will still go to fucking jail.

Alright, alright. Let's play Devil's Advocate. Let's assume that I'm wrong and that there is absolutely no way to joke about the Holocaust.

YOU WILL STILL GO TO FUCKING PRISON. To the Muslims, insulting Muhammad is just as offensive as denying the Holocaust to the Jews. So if we're going to censor ONE form of profanity and vulgarity, then WE MUST censor another form of profanty and vulgarity. You gotta show SOME level of consistency here.
#232 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
The dumbass isn't getting that whether or not it's a joke to people, is not the actual point.

His primitive mind can't comprehend that the actual problem which that there are almost always legal consequences when criticizing Jews, but almost never when criticizing the group.

THAT'S THE ISSUE, he just too stupid to get it. Instead, he is fixated on whether or not denying the Holocaust is a joke, instead of the legal ramifications of denying the holocaust.
User avatar #223 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
NOBODY
THATS ALSO IRRELEVANT
I ONLY SPOKE OUT OF MY OWN PERSPECTIVE
YOU FUCKING STONE

HOW CAN YOU BE THIS FUCKING DENSE THIS SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE
#217 - anonexplains (01/09/2015) [-]
Dumbass, whether or not it's a joke is irrelevant. Laugh about it, cry about it, rage about it, no one cares.

What matters is that under TRUE freedom of speech, denying the Holocaust should be applicable. As such you can do it and not face any "legal ramification"
User avatar #222 - alltimetens (01/09/2015) [-]
FUCKING THANK YOU.

IF YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE HOLOCAUST-DENIAL JOKES ILLEGAL, THEN INSULTING MUHAMMAD OR ANY RELIGIOUS LEADER SHOULD BE ILLEGAL AS WELL.

OBVIOUSLY WE ARE FAVORING ONE RELIGIOUS GROUP OVER THE OTHER.
User avatar #220 - captainprincess (01/09/2015) [-]
That is still irrelevant to what I was talking about
It was never relevant
You fucking shaleskull

Jesus fucking christ is your density increasing or what

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 1000

Comments(141):

[ 141 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #163 - joshlol (12/21/2014) [-]
**joshlol waves at you**
User avatar #164 to #163 - alltimetens (12/21/2014) [-]
hey

i know nobody ever lived you before...


but i sorta like you
User avatar #165 to #164 - joshlol (12/21/2014) [-]
I'm not worth liking.

But thanks, what's up?
#162 - syrianassassin (05/31/2014) [-]
because you are new in the religion board, you must know what your enemy will do to your opinions

this is my first post in the religion board i talked with ethics and total respect and look what happened

www.funnyjunk.com/religion/54159#54159


now i am a troll who troll atheist trolls using their own logic and piss them off using their own life system and belief

new atheism =/= atheism

new atheism mean you shall be a total asshole against religion no matter how logical the answer is given

the board is full of heretics and you shall take care
#159 - syrianassassin (05/31/2014) [-]
i see you are a christian who came for some question in the religion board, and all you saw is some faggots trolling and ************
User avatar #160 to #159 - alltimetens (05/31/2014) [-]
I'm not really a Christian. I'm more of an agnostic.
User avatar #161 to #160 - syrianassassin (05/31/2014) [-]
and when you wanted answer, all you found is some new atheism bitches and cock sucking tranny faggots trolling you with nonsense
right?
#149 - anonexplains (04/08/2014) [-]
hey your the guy from youtube
i like your videos dude
User avatar #154 to #149 - tranquilizer (04/20/2014) [-]
He's not them
User avatar #155 to #154 - badmotorfinger (05/02/2014) [-]
get the euthanization needle. they're becoming aware.
User avatar #156 to #155 - tranquilizer (05/02/2014) [-]
Wait
Where did you come from
The future?
#157 to #156 - nickypickle (05/23/2014) [-]
I dunno if all this charade about being the one on youtube or not is all part of a 'sekretu klub' thing but its really getting to the point where someone needs some answers

yes? no? why is this such an issue I dont understand
User avatar #158 to #157 - tranquilizer (05/23/2014) [-]
Where do you people keep coming from I'm scared ;_;
#143 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
And with the mildly aroused Karasu picture, I am finished. Sorry for the spamish stuff, but you did ask me to and they do make good reaction images.
User avatar #145 to #143 - alltimetens (04/07/2014) [-]
No problem, man.

I appreciate all these reaction pics. Fukken savin' all of em'. I'm glad there are others here who have enjoyed the same anime as I.
User avatar #146 to #145 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Might be an odd thing to say, but you might want to join Tumblr. A lot of us are actually males who enjoy certain fandoms and have deep discussions about them, especially with Yu Yu Hakusho.

Might I suggest Kill La Kill or HunterXHunter? The latter apparently takes place in the future of Yu Yu Hakusho. Of course, Inuyasha is said to take place in the past, with Kikyo being Raizen's original daughter.
User avatar #147 to #146 - alltimetens (04/07/2014) [-]
Damn... I better get watching.
User avatar #148 to #147 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Go for Inuyasha first. I feel like Yu Yu Hakusho took a lot from that show. "Ooohhh we're losing viewers during the Dark Tournament, better show them Kurama's true form!" Fricken love child of Sesshomaru and Inuyasha (Which given Sesshomaru's mother isn't entirely out of the question even though they are a different species). Also, character types for both Toguro brothers, Bui, Karasu, and others were in that show.
#142 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Sometimes I edit a strikethrough over the 'not' to make a joke.
#140 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#139 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
This is my wallpaper and icon
#138 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
This too.
This too.
#137 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#136 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
By the way, there is a user named Toguro here, but they aren't named after this Toguro.
By the way, there is a user named Toguro here, but they aren't named after this Toguro.
#150 to #136 - toguro (04/17/2014) [-]
You like telling everyone that don'tcha?
User avatar #151 to #150 - zafara (04/17/2014) [-]
Well, we were talking about Toguro anyway. You usually pop up whenever Toguro is mentioned, so I wanted to let him know that you would probably show up. I also wanted to warn him that you don't really watch the show and named yourself Toguro after something else so that they didn't ask you questions about Yu Yu Hakusho you don't know.

Basically, I wanted to save some time by warning him that while you have the name, you don't know the show.

You know what I'm trying to say?
#152 to #151 - toguro (04/17/2014) [-]
Yeah I understood the 4th time you did it - I dont mind really
User avatar #153 to #152 - zafara (04/17/2014) [-]
I didn't think I was mentioning you that much. Sorry.
#135 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
This works as a good, I am mildly confused and/or disturbed by what I see
#132 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#130 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#129 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Remember this scene?
Remember this scene?
User avatar #134 to #129 - alltimetens (04/07/2014) [-]
this **** was creepy
User avatar #144 to #134 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Yep. You know what's even more creepy? Elder Toguro decapitated himself into a small aquarium and swam around in there as a head for a while without anyone really noticing.
#128 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
When someone doesn't get the joke and gets offended so you have to explain it.
#127 - zafara (04/07/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
[ 141 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)