Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

ajuinkonijn

Rank #7631 on Content
no avatar Level 126 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Offline
Send mail to ajuinkonijn Block ajuinkonijn Invite ajuinkonijn to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:10/07/2011
Last Login:12/20/2014
Location:belgium
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#7631
Comment Ranking:#15268
Highest Content Rank:#7483
Highest Comment Rank:#13188
Content Thumbs: 31 total,  42 ,  11
Comment Thumbs: 295 total,  376 ,  81
Content Level Progress: 44.06% (26/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 90% (9/10)
Level 126 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 127 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Content Views:3743
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:148
FJ Points:306

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

  • Views: 2158
    Thumbs Up 31 Thumbs Down 6 Total: +25
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 11/24/14
    filthy cis scum filthy cis scum
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

youtube videos

  • Views: 1573
    Thumbs Up 11 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +6
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 03/08/12
    42 42
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#7 - Well it your reply was rather dumb, given he said: That d…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/18/2014 on ajuinkonijn's profile 0
User avatar #8 - desacabose (12/18/2014) [-]
You're not forced to kill people
You have a choice
#4 - link to comment?  [+] (3 new replies) 12/18/2014 on ajuinkonijn's profile 0
#7 - ajuinkonijn (12/18/2014) [-]
Well it your reply was rather dumb, given he said:
That doesn't mean I'm going to go start petitioning to have it banned or taken down though, I just won't buy it and won't play it.
User avatar #8 - desacabose (12/18/2014) [-]
You're not forced to kill people
You have a choice
#2 - wut?  [+] (5 new replies) 12/18/2014 on ajuinkonijn's profile 0
User avatar #3 - desacabose (12/18/2014) [-]
Everybody that thumbs me down is told to play dark savior
#4 - ajuinkonijn (12/18/2014) [-]
link to comment?
#7 - ajuinkonijn (12/18/2014) [-]
Well it your reply was rather dumb, given he said:
That doesn't mean I'm going to go start petitioning to have it banned or taken down though, I just won't buy it and won't play it.
User avatar #8 - desacabose (12/18/2014) [-]
You're not forced to kill people
You have a choice
#818 - **ajuinkonijn used "*roll 2, LOL*"** **ajuinkonijn rolls Za… 12/13/2014 on all roll types 0
#30 - I'd like to pint out that breathing fire with alcohol is very … 12/12/2014 on Firemeister +2
#69 - Kom naar BelgiĆ«.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/07/2014 on King 0
User avatar #70 - mathes (12/07/2014) [-]
HAHA nee
#101 - I think you are missing my point(or im missing yours). What i …  [+] (21 new replies) 12/07/2014 on Mille anni passi sunt 0
#479 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
Your logic is flawless when considering that the 63.7/12.6 distribution is the same across the country, hint: it's not. There are many areas where the distribution is much closer to 50 and sometimes areas with blacks outnumbers whites, the odd thing about these areas is that they have the highest percentage of black on white violence.
User avatar #165 - lakumy (12/07/2014) [-]
Ya see here, due to how crime is, the victims are actually targeted. so the blacks did intend for some if not most of their victims to be white.
User avatar #114 - ninjagaiden (12/07/2014) [-]
Victims are rarely selected "at random". It is methodical.
User avatar #249 - jewsburninindaoven (12/07/2014) [-]
How can you still miss the point?
User avatar #472 - ninjagaiden (12/07/2014) [-]
I don't care about the point, the point is wrong.
User avatar #475 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
How do you know the point is wrong when you missed it?
#478 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
Says the guy who made up some bullshit about how blacks are 8 times more likely to be victims of white violence and then delete/blocks anyone who questions your shitty math.
User avatar #482 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
Uhh, I never deleted anyone's comments for questioning my math. I only deleted 2 identical comments that were just spam links. And are you just upset that I blocked you? Cause I don't block many people, just guys who are outright assholes or trolls, and phanact.
#492 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
If all it takes to be considered an asshole by you is to vote you down then get off the internet. People will disagree with you. Secondly, if there were multiples of a certain link that was not spam, then why delete them all? If you are trying to keep the convo clean then only delete the repeats. You are so full of shit, you just remove any viewpoint that doesn't mimic your own.
User avatar #493 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
If I blocked anyone who downvoted me, everyone would be blocked. And yes, they were the same troll spam link. I deleted them both because I don't want people on my posts getting trolled or getting viruses. The fact you are so convinced that I'm blocking people and deleting comments if they disagree with me (even though there is substantial evidence to the contrary) is just further proof that I was right to block you.
#500 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
Btw, you still didn't delete the obvious troll calling you a "fagget", dude you are so full of shit.
User avatar #501 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
He isn't trolling people on my posts though, just me. I don't mind if people are trolling me just as long as they aren't trolling people viewing my content.
#496 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
You blocked the very same link that is stickied in this same content.
#495 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
You blocked a link to pastebin... You lying sack of shit.
User avatar #498 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
It looked like and still looks like a rascist troll to me. That's why I blocked it.
User avatar #497 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
Wait, is that pastebin supposed to be a legit article? Looks like a troll to me talking about how black people are genetically closer to monkeys and the comment had a picture saying America has a n-word problem. Plus my antivirus doesn't trust the website
#499 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
Your AV doesn't like pastebin? That makes zero sense... What was posted in the pastebin was a series of points brought from a plethora of sources all saying the same thing. That blacks have a less evolved frontal lobe and this results in them not having the same mental capacity of a white or asian. Just because the result seems racist does not make it so, these are truths and only an imbecile would throw it away because they don't like the implications. Majoring is actuarial science my ass..
User avatar #502 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
It reminds me a lot of the "science" done a long time ago where they analyze dimples on skulls to "prove" that blacks are inferior. That's why I was dismissive of it. But now knowing these studies are real I have some imput. I know africans and europeans have slightly different brain structures, but if neuroscience has proved anything it is that the human brain is extremely plastic at a young age and the overall structure and growth of it can be altered by its environment. What I mean by that is that the overall culture and environment of black people is inferior (due to the ghettoization of blacks during the great migration) and is likely a major source for these different brain structures. The brain adapts to better suit its environment and when the environment is violent or impoverished, the brain tends to further develop the hindbrain where the most of the senses, aggression, and survival instincts are located. So I don't know if this observational data they have collected reflects genetic issues or environmental. Here is my source btw: www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-parenting/post/childhood-environment-affects-brain-growth-and-function-new-studies-find/2012/10/16/1c226baa-17ba-11e2-a55c-39408fbe6a4b_blog.html
#509 - anonymous (12/09/2014) [-]
Good studying, finally some ground we can work with. With a lack of detail into these studies I can't say much into accuracy or regard. If we are to assume the studies were done properly then the evidence would have been gathered from many different age groups and social groups. This is not always the case as we so often see but I find it difficult with so many sources that their findings to be fabricated or just incorrect. Now I'm willing to concede the potential impact of the social construct but that has to have a base to work off of. Maybe has something to do with the fact that until recently they mostly were nothing more than tribals. We see the higher brain functions come more readily to the races that have a history of society. Just saying, it's not all the white's fault for how the blacks are treated, infact there is significant evidence to say the majority of it comes from internal issues.
User avatar #494 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
Also, I'm pretty sure you are yamadashinichi
#184 - anonymous (12/07/2014) [-]
and you continue to miss his fucking point, dude.

if the number of whites attacked is the same percentage as if victims were chosen randomly, then race was not the deciding factor in why that victim was targeted. jesus christ.
#96 - My point exactly, i prove the victims were picked randomly and…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/07/2014 on Mille anni passi sunt +2
User avatar #97 - anonslayer (12/07/2014) [-]
I had a feminazi shoving statics in my face about Michael Brown and hate crime and shit. But they were all percentages. I don't care about percentages unless I have an actual number behind those results. Also I don't care about the statistics unless you can verify where they are from and how they got the stats. Example:

100% Of women will be raped in all 3 holes at once at sometime in their life
Sample group - 1 victim of gang rape
#89 - Learn to statistics, bruh. 63.7 percent whites 1…  [+] (28 new replies) 12/07/2014 on Mille anni passi sunt +26
#324 - truemecid (12/07/2014) [-]
As mathmatician this is beautiful.
#251 - anonymous (12/07/2014) [-]
fuck you you stupid fucking liberal faggot people like you are the ones ruiniign the country

that nigger michael brown stole cigrets and tried to assault a fucking police officer what the fuck did he thin k would happen

fuck you and all of you liberal low life fucks on funnyjiunk i dont giv e a fuck im drunk so fuck you im not gonna read your replies u fuckin faggets bitch ass niggas
User avatar #99 - ninjagaiden (12/07/2014) [-]
When you're dealing with crime it's not about odds so your standing on a soap box for nothing. Crime is not random, these criminals are all premeditated. Which means these people most likely target out their victims. So that little tidbit of knowledge is a huge variable to your overly simplistic mathmatics.

TLDR: If you are a criminal, you single out your own targets. Why do blacks single out whites more than others? Simple because there is 63% more? No, there is another factor that you're missing entirely.

GG
#101 - ajuinkonijn (12/07/2014) [-]
I think you are missing my point(or im missing yours). What i am trying to say is:
These results would have been about the same as when the choice of victim was random. Therefore blacks are not singling out whites as victims.
Sorry, if im unclear
#479 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
Your logic is flawless when considering that the 63.7/12.6 distribution is the same across the country, hint: it's not. There are many areas where the distribution is much closer to 50 and sometimes areas with blacks outnumbers whites, the odd thing about these areas is that they have the highest percentage of black on white violence.
User avatar #165 - lakumy (12/07/2014) [-]
Ya see here, due to how crime is, the victims are actually targeted. so the blacks did intend for some if not most of their victims to be white.
User avatar #114 - ninjagaiden (12/07/2014) [-]
Victims are rarely selected "at random". It is methodical.
User avatar #249 - jewsburninindaoven (12/07/2014) [-]
How can you still miss the point?
User avatar #472 - ninjagaiden (12/07/2014) [-]
I don't care about the point, the point is wrong.
User avatar #475 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
How do you know the point is wrong when you missed it?
#478 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
Says the guy who made up some bullshit about how blacks are 8 times more likely to be victims of white violence and then delete/blocks anyone who questions your shitty math.
User avatar #482 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
Uhh, I never deleted anyone's comments for questioning my math. I only deleted 2 identical comments that were just spam links. And are you just upset that I blocked you? Cause I don't block many people, just guys who are outright assholes or trolls, and phanact.
#492 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
If all it takes to be considered an asshole by you is to vote you down then get off the internet. People will disagree with you. Secondly, if there were multiples of a certain link that was not spam, then why delete them all? If you are trying to keep the convo clean then only delete the repeats. You are so full of shit, you just remove any viewpoint that doesn't mimic your own.
User avatar #493 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
If I blocked anyone who downvoted me, everyone would be blocked. And yes, they were the same troll spam link. I deleted them both because I don't want people on my posts getting trolled or getting viruses. The fact you are so convinced that I'm blocking people and deleting comments if they disagree with me (even though there is substantial evidence to the contrary) is just further proof that I was right to block you.
#500 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
Btw, you still didn't delete the obvious troll calling you a "fagget", dude you are so full of shit.
User avatar #501 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
He isn't trolling people on my posts though, just me. I don't mind if people are trolling me just as long as they aren't trolling people viewing my content.
#496 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
You blocked the very same link that is stickied in this same content.
#495 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
You blocked a link to pastebin... You lying sack of shit.
User avatar #498 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
It looked like and still looks like a rascist troll to me. That's why I blocked it.
User avatar #497 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
Wait, is that pastebin supposed to be a legit article? Looks like a troll to me talking about how black people are genetically closer to monkeys and the comment had a picture saying America has a n-word problem. Plus my antivirus doesn't trust the website
#499 - anonymous (12/08/2014) [-]
Your AV doesn't like pastebin? That makes zero sense... What was posted in the pastebin was a series of points brought from a plethora of sources all saying the same thing. That blacks have a less evolved frontal lobe and this results in them not having the same mental capacity of a white or asian. Just because the result seems racist does not make it so, these are truths and only an imbecile would throw it away because they don't like the implications. Majoring is actuarial science my ass..
User avatar #502 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
It reminds me a lot of the "science" done a long time ago where they analyze dimples on skulls to "prove" that blacks are inferior. That's why I was dismissive of it. But now knowing these studies are real I have some imput. I know africans and europeans have slightly different brain structures, but if neuroscience has proved anything it is that the human brain is extremely plastic at a young age and the overall structure and growth of it can be altered by its environment. What I mean by that is that the overall culture and environment of black people is inferior (due to the ghettoization of blacks during the great migration) and is likely a major source for these different brain structures. The brain adapts to better suit its environment and when the environment is violent or impoverished, the brain tends to further develop the hindbrain where the most of the senses, aggression, and survival instincts are located. So I don't know if this observational data they have collected reflects genetic issues or environmental. Here is my source btw: www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-parenting/post/childhood-environment-affects-brain-growth-and-function-new-studies-find/2012/10/16/1c226baa-17ba-11e2-a55c-39408fbe6a4b_blog.html
#509 - anonymous (12/09/2014) [-]
Good studying, finally some ground we can work with. With a lack of detail into these studies I can't say much into accuracy or regard. If we are to assume the studies were done properly then the evidence would have been gathered from many different age groups and social groups. This is not always the case as we so often see but I find it difficult with so many sources that their findings to be fabricated or just incorrect. Now I'm willing to concede the potential impact of the social construct but that has to have a base to work off of. Maybe has something to do with the fact that until recently they mostly were nothing more than tribals. We see the higher brain functions come more readily to the races that have a history of society. Just saying, it's not all the white's fault for how the blacks are treated, infact there is significant evidence to say the majority of it comes from internal issues.
User avatar #494 - jewsburninindaoven (12/08/2014) [-]
Also, I'm pretty sure you are yamadashinichi
#184 - anonymous (12/07/2014) [-]
and you continue to miss his fucking point, dude.

if the number of whites attacked is the same percentage as if victims were chosen randomly, then race was not the deciding factor in why that victim was targeted. jesus christ.
User avatar #94 - anonslayer (12/07/2014) [-]
Except Victims arent always selected randomly, though I do agree that biased statistics arent very dependable no matter what
#96 - ajuinkonijn (12/07/2014) [-]
My point exactly, i prove the victims were picked randomly and thus disprove the chart saying otherwise.
User avatar #97 - anonslayer (12/07/2014) [-]
I had a feminazi shoving statics in my face about Michael Brown and hate crime and shit. But they were all percentages. I don't care about percentages unless I have an actual number behind those results. Also I don't care about the statistics unless you can verify where they are from and how they got the stats. Example:

100% Of women will be raped in all 3 holes at once at sometime in their life
Sample group - 1 victim of gang rape
#67 - Depression is not the same as being really sad. It can be trig… 12/07/2014 on my story 0
[ 135 Total ]

user's friends


Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - desacabose ONLINE (12/18/2014) [-]
#2 to #1 - ajuinkonijn (12/18/2014) [-]
wut?
User avatar #3 to #2 - desacabose ONLINE (12/18/2014) [-]
Everybody that thumbs me down is told to play dark savior
#4 to #3 - ajuinkonijn (12/18/2014) [-]
link to comment?
#7 to #5 - ajuinkonijn (12/18/2014) [-]
Well it your reply was rather dumb, given he said:
That doesn't mean I'm going to go start petitioning to have it banned or taken down though, I just won't buy it and won't play it.
User avatar #8 to #7 - desacabose ONLINE (12/18/2014) [-]
You're not forced to kill people
You have a choice
 Friends (0)