|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #32539 on CommentsLevel 118 Content: Funny Junkie
OfflineSend mail to airdick Block airdick Invite airdick to be your friend
- Views: 64557James Bong
2196 341 Total: +1855
- Views: 1155Internet Fools
29 9 Total: +20
- Views: 1183Epic Family Photo
20 9 Total: +11
- Views: 610its everywhere
12 4 Total: +8
- Views: 995worst feeling
14 8 Total: +6
- Views: 246Nose Marie
3 9 Total: -6
latest user's comments
|#44 - **airdick rolled image ** ayy||09/18/2014 on ayy||-1|
|#481 - i'm a huge hockey fan, been playing all my life and thought th…||04/26/2013 on It's the little differences||+5|
|#2 - didn't ask||04/22/2013 on Secret Services||-2|
|#10 - **airdick rolls 76**||04/22/2013 on Topic||0|
|#77 - Picture||01/26/2013 on At the bar||0|
|#71 - I do see where you are coming from, and it does make sense in …||01/26/2013 on Pilot Error||0|
|#52 - my apologies but this is the stupidest ******* th… [+] (2 new replies)||01/26/2013 on Pilot Error||0|
#67 - galaxyguy (01/26/2013) [-]
My thoughts exactly. But it does make some sense.
For instance, the materials inside planes, particuarly the seats (I think it was the seats), release noxious fumes when they catch fire. In the event of a fire on the plane, having the pilots present increases the risk that they be knocked out and rendered incapable of flying their aircraft, effectively dooming all aboard.
Now imagine if the pilot was instead sitting in the control tower, controlling the plane remotely. No chance of knocking out due to noxious fumes, sudden depressurization, diving sickness (due to rapid descent), et cetra.
#71 - airdick (01/26/2013) [-]
I do see where you are coming from, and it does make sense in a way
But i do still feel that when it comes to remote controls, many more things can go wrong. For instance, when you're completely depending on remote control, it is so much easier to lose contact or signal to the plane. Where as when theres a pilote on board even if computers start to fail, theres still the possibility of manually controlling the aircraft, right?
As for toxic fumes and such, a) why wouldnt they just re design and use non harmul material and stuff (although possibly expensive, its better than the remote control idea) and b) why not make the cockpit have its own ventilation system, as well a fire proof it and totally isolated from the main cabin, so if anything does go wrong, the flight attendants could be trained to deal with it, while the pilots, the trained pilots, are locked in ensuring the safety of all by doing whatever is necessary.
In my eyes, I just beleive there are simpler, more convienient ways to deal with these sorts of problems.
We all know KISS, keep it simple stupid. (not saying anyone is stupid, its just the expression)
|#71 - **airdick rolled a random image posted in comment #2838016 …||01/26/2013 on wut||0|
|#221 - and cousin and father all in one||01/26/2013 on wut||0|
|#94 - Chuck? is that you?||09/16/2012 on Ultra combo||0|