Upload
Login or register

adrilazzaro

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:1/05/2012
Location:Argentina
Stats
Comment Ranking:#9847
Highest Content Rank:#3884
Highest Comment Rank:#4621
Content Thumbs: 418 total,  504 ,  86
Comment Thumbs: 3411 total,  4898 ,  1487
Content Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 32 Content: Peasant → Level 33 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 8% (8/100)
Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 232 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:3
Content Views:30498
Times Content Favorited:24 times
Total Comments Made:2669
FJ Points:3865

latest user's comments

#114 - Well to be fair i can confirm the closet submissive feminist t…  [+] (6 replies) 08/31/2016 on manlet +3
#120 - anon (08/31/2016) [-]
Fair enough. I was just curious how deep the rabbit hole goes, like the people super outspoken about internet fetishes such as ntr or futa, as well as the whole "homophobe" thing.
User avatar
#128 - Haentar (08/31/2016) [-]
look up the number of male senators and congressmen who have been anti-gay and then been caught with male escorts.
#133 - anon (08/31/2016) [-]
I copy pasted that exact phrase and got a bunch of clickbait. Two lists said 16/17, which actually higher rate of getting caught than I expected, so I guess there's some merit to the hypocrisy debate.
User avatar
#134 - Haentar (08/31/2016) [-]
nice. I'll try and find a more reliable study on another day, and pm you when I have it
#137 - anon (08/31/2016) [-]
Good luck, I don't have an account
My curiosity was been sated for tonight anywho, so thanks for your input. Free thumbs for everyone (until someones a douche)
User avatar
#121 - adrilazzaro (08/31/2016) [-]
Doubt it's true for all "X-phobes" but I do think a fairly large fraction, particularly the more extremist and vocal about their hate for X can potentially be closet X lovers
#32 - I understand what you mean but, why limit my ass appreciation …  [+] (1 reply) 08/27/2016 on women +1
User avatar
#33 - captainprincess (08/27/2016) [-]
because sometimes, and trust me I know it'll be rough to understand this, it's rough to say it too

sometimes the ass isn't what matters
sometimes that ass has a person who has shit to do, and doesnt have time to present as bodacious a booty as they can

but the ones that do, and want your love
it's just a more worthwhile interaction overall

I mean why eat delicious food when all food has sustenance and nutrition?
It's about the quality of time spent, and the delicious meal, like the appreciate ass, is just better quality time spent
#30 - what can i say im an ass man  [+] (3 replies) 08/27/2016 on women +1
User avatar
#31 - captainprincess (08/27/2016) [-]
well
from ass-man to ass-man all I can say is

There are plenty of asses to love
plenty to focus on

and of them, plenty of them WANT your attention, your ass-love

THOSE asses don't want or need it
Those asses are attached to people who don't care that you do or dont appreciate their booties

js
your time's better spent appreciating the asses that appreciate your appreciation
I mean theyre more likely to bounce for you, jiggle for you, and even allow some touches and spanks etc, depending on accessibility
User avatar
#32 - adrilazzaro (08/27/2016) [-]
I understand what you mean but, why limit my ass appreciation to the butts that will give me action when i call love all asses indiscriminately of whether said asses want my attention or not.
User avatar
#33 - captainprincess (08/27/2016) [-]
because sometimes, and trust me I know it'll be rough to understand this, it's rough to say it too

sometimes the ass isn't what matters
sometimes that ass has a person who has shit to do, and doesnt have time to present as bodacious a booty as they can

but the ones that do, and want your love
it's just a more worthwhile interaction overall

I mean why eat delicious food when all food has sustenance and nutrition?
It's about the quality of time spent, and the delicious meal, like the appreciate ass, is just better quality time spent
#66 - havent read much into it but who'd enforce those laws if there…  [+] (2 replies) 08/27/2016 on MTG 0
User avatar
#136 - douthit (08/28/2016) [-]
Conservatism usually leads to libertarianism/Constitutionalism/minarchism, which if taken to its inevitable logical conclusion, often leads to anarcho-capitalism, also known as voluntaryism, or philosophical libertarianism.

That ignores the fact that we are intimidated, stolen from, and physically harmed if we resist, by a violent and coercive group. It ignores the moral/ethical question at hand. It's like saying, "But without slavery, who would pick the cotton"? It's a complete red herring, and doesn't deny the implication, or outright argument, that it's unethical.

Secondly, it assumes that government currently enforces laws. Many laws are not enforced, like immigration laws, the laws that Hillary Clinton has broken, crimes by cops that are ignored by the thin blue line, etc. The laws set as government limits in the Constitution and Bill of Rights are violated daily. Those in the government enforce the laws they choose. It also ignores the issue of common law, or natural law, both of which many AnCaps support and believe would be enforced in a free society.

Thirdly, it assumes that laws--as we currently know them--should be enforced. The law in its current form is just the written opinion of 51% of legislators, who very voters believe represent them. The US Congress has something like 10% support. But the lawmakers are often corrupt, career politicians who are regularly lobbied by non-free market corporations whose business is protected by said legislators and who then donate huge sums of money so they can win reelection. Common law and natural law have been forgotten.

Fourth, your question assumes that since A currently does B, that A is the only entity which can ever do B. Without horse and buggy, how do people travel? Without bow and arrow, how do people get food? It shows a lack of creativity and imagination, and a lack of reason.
#70 - anon (08/27/2016) [-]
Look into polycentric legal systems mate.
#19 - matt damon?  [+] (2 replies) 08/03/2016 on Olympics 0
#28 - kapkap (08/03/2016) [-]
that might be it
#31 - baitdoesnttalkback (08/03/2016) [-]
the bad guy from never back down