Upload
Login or register
x

adamks

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 20
Date Signed Up:4/05/2011
Last Login:1/12/2016
Location:Denmark
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4120
Highest Content Rank:#4892
Highest Comment Rank:#723
Content Thumbs: 1294 total,  1454 ,  160
Comment Thumbs: 9708 total,  15381 ,  5673
Content Level Progress: 95% (95/100)
Level 112 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 113 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 9% (9/100)
Level 280 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 281 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:1
Content Views:8986
Times Content Favorited:77 times
Total Comments Made:4297
FJ Points:9143

Text Posts

  • Views: 27527
    Thumbs Up 1174 Thumbs Down 96 Total: +1078
    Comments: 138
    Favorites: 68
    Uploaded: 10/27/11
    Woman anger Woman anger
  • Views: 6489
    Thumbs Up 201 Thumbs Down 12 Total: +189
    Comments: 18
    Favorites: 4
    Uploaded: 07/25/11
    The "le" sentence The "le" sentence
  • Views: 2238
    Thumbs Up 22 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +14
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 07/21/12
    Hidden rageface in Sanctum Hidden rageface in Sanctum
  • Views: 772
    Thumbs Up 18 Thumbs Down 7 Total: +11
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 04/06/11
    Defining Jesus Defining Jesus
  • Views: 592
    Thumbs Up 13 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +10
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 11/23/11
    Pizza aint green Pizza aint green
  • Views: 313
    Thumbs Up 1 Thumbs Down 8 Total: -7
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/16/11
    Just. why? Just. why?

latest user's comments

#17 - I don't imagine you've met a terrible lot of nordic people the… 01/08/2016 on National anthem +1
#15 - Welp, I happen to be from one of the nordic countries, so I ob…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/08/2016 on National anthem +1
User avatar
#16 - thechosentroll (01/08/2016) [-]
No, no, no. I never said they're patriotic. I said they're nationalist. A patriot loves their country. A nationalist hates every other country. Shit, if I mention the fact that I'm bulgarian, half of them automatically go into "smug bastard" mode and pretend nothing I say matters.
#17 - adamks (01/08/2016) [-]
I don't imagine you've met a terrible lot of nordic people then. I study with many people, and have had multiple people in my study group who was bulgarian, and they have been treated with the exact same respect as anyone else. Of course I can't speak my native language to them, but otherwise. Nationalism and patriotism is very foreign to me.
#13 - I feel like you have a personal bias here. Am I completely wrong?  [+] (4 new replies) 01/08/2016 on National anthem +1
User avatar
#14 - thechosentroll (01/08/2016) [-]
Depends on what you consider bias. I have nothing personal against nordic people. I've just never ran into one that wasn't kind of a cunt about nationalism.
#15 - adamks (01/08/2016) [-]
Welp, I happen to be from one of the nordic countries, so I obviously have a bias, but practically no people I know are patriotic. It is really rare here.
User avatar
#16 - thechosentroll (01/08/2016) [-]
No, no, no. I never said they're patriotic. I said they're nationalist. A patriot loves their country. A nationalist hates every other country. Shit, if I mention the fact that I'm bulgarian, half of them automatically go into "smug bastard" mode and pretend nothing I say matters.
#17 - adamks (01/08/2016) [-]
I don't imagine you've met a terrible lot of nordic people then. I study with many people, and have had multiple people in my study group who was bulgarian, and they have been treated with the exact same respect as anyone else. Of course I can't speak my native language to them, but otherwise. Nationalism and patriotism is very foreign to me.
#12 - Oh come on, could you possibly be more butthurt? 01/08/2016 on National anthem +4
#55 - "in the united states"  [+] (1 new reply) 01/07/2016 on white guy. -1
#57 - lean (01/07/2016) [-]
Thanks bud.
#52 - Goku can destroy planets, right? Also, why the hell would goku…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/03/2016 on Shitstorm incoming 0
User avatar
#55 - emiyashirou (01/03/2016) [-]
There's no actual reference to the speeds characters can go, but in base form they use several minutes to travel to different places on the earth-sized planet Goten and Trunks in Buu saga had travelled for 10 minutes and hadn't reached their desination yet . SSJ does boost their power levels by 50 times, so that could get cut down very much, but unclear to what extent .

Saitama has shown he can jump from the moon to the earth in 5 seconds, which is 25% of the speed of light.

DB characters can change their movement trajectory very fast with ki which should give them an advantage, but Saitama probably is faster in linear movement.
#53 - metacobalion (01/03/2016) [-]
Goku can destroy planets yes, but he needs to charge up an energy attack to do that. Saitama could just punch the ground really hard for the same effect.
Goku likes fighting fair, that's why he didn't completely wreck Vegeta or Kid Buu with Super Saiyan 3 or go 100% against Beerus. Even if Goku goes all out, Saitama's "One punch destroys whatever it hits" power will still net him the victory.
Saitama jumped from the moon to earth in practically no time at all 2 or 3 seconds at most. Pretty fucking quick. In the manga Saitama has another speed feat where he does insanely fast side jumps that leave countless afterimages. Later on in the webcomic he also blocks attacks from an S Class who claims to be faster than light.
Those sidejumps also beat the shit out of Speed o sound sonic just by doign them near him.
User avatar
#75 - thedepressedman (01/03/2016) [-]
Yeah, um... Goku can do the whole after-image thing too. Plus there's the whole teleporting thing. On top of all that, beating Goku is relatively meaningless as he would either recover and get stronger, or die and go to the spirit world to train there. It would make for a really boring movie is all I'm saying.
#86 - anon (01/03/2016) [-]
It's a bit pointless to argue for anyone other than Saitama. Goku has a defined strength. Saitama is going to be as strong as necessary to kill his opponent effortlessly. You're trying to claim that Goku is stronger than a character defined to be stronger than everyone else. We have yet to even see Saitama try in a fight.
User avatar
#87 - thedepressedman (01/03/2016) [-]
I never said Goku was stronger? I just said beating him is meaningless.
#24 - Don't you dare say a good word about Reddit on FJ, 'we' don't …  [+] (1 new reply) 01/03/2016 on Comedy gold +4
User avatar
#89 - thediamondhack (01/04/2016) [-]
i said " better ".

FJ ofc is the best
#60 - Awful comparison. Hardly any of these are accurate, and this c… 01/02/2016 on Futurama and archer 0
#101 - Boy how do people even think its a middle finger, holy damn th… 01/02/2016 on Anon on Kylo Ren +6
#81 - Kylo won effortlessly against Finn while being almost mortally… 12/30/2015 on Kylograb 0

Comments(27):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
27 comments displayed.
#27 - bizzareslam (05/02/2014) [-]
Lets make your comments all pretty and what not
Lets make your comments all pretty and what not
User avatar #23 - storebought (11/01/2012) [-]
hey are you willing to trade? i dont mean just give them to me like the guy below i mean like a trade
#24 to #23 - adamks (11/01/2012) [-]
Sure am, what do you need?
User avatar #25 to #24 - storebought (11/01/2012) [-]
well you have items from before i got to really collect items so certain items i looking for are
norh korea flags
snowman
mossy pillar
book of spellcrafting
swamp egg
strange hat
bottle of water
blue filly egg
giant butterfly
flour

if none of these are tradeable ill understand :)
#21 - alZii has deleted their comment [-]
#22 to #21 - adamks (10/03/2012) [-]
Acctually, I plan on getting back on the collecting, just haven't quite picked up yet (:
#18 - somepervert (03/03/2012) [-]
go away communist/socialist you know nothing of our history
#19 to #18 - adamks (03/03/2012) [-]
Wtf are you talking about i am the furthest from socialist you get, i tend to have anarchistic oppions, not in this life i would ever be socialistic.. faggot..
User avatar #14 - arabtroll (07/31/2011) [-]
NOOOOO YOU MESSED UP MY AMAZING POST http://funnyjunk.com/showcomment/26110525/#c47
User avatar #15 to #14 - arabtroll (07/31/2011) [-]
btw it's in the top 60
#16 to #15 - adamks (08/01/2011) [-]
And im about top 1, in minus i belive :D
User avatar #17 to #16 - arabtroll (08/01/2011) [-]
nice man but this was my first comment to make it into the top 40
User avatar #1 - Ladoris (05/30/2011) [-]
I moved to your profile, First of all you want facts you it
Marijuana is far less toxic and less addictive than alcohol.
Long-term marijuana use is far less damaging than long-term alcohol use.
Alcohol use contributes to aggressive behavior and acts of violence, whereas marijuana use reduces the likelihood of violent behavior.
Alcohol use is highly associated with violent crime, whereas marijuana use is not.
Alcohol use contributes to the likelihood of domestic violence and sexual assault and marijuana use does not.
Alcohol use is prevalent in cases of sexual assault and date rape, whereas marijuana use is not considered a contributing factor in cases of sexual assault and date rape.

#2 to #1 - adamks (05/30/2011) [-]
And yet again, i know alchohol is dangerous, a lot more damaging than marijuana, and if alchohol was not legalized today, it would not BE legalized, but that alchohol is dangerous does not make marijuana less dangerous, its like saying that murdering should be legalized because more people die by car accidents than murdering, and for my sake, just legalize it, but dont give arguments for that pot should be legalized, not something about "alchohol is more dangerous" we not discussing alchohol, we're discussing pot.
User avatar #3 to #2 - Ladoris (05/30/2011) [-]
are you retarded that's what the post was about, pot vs alcohol, omg your ******* dumb, jeez it so hard to argue with kids, maybe you should look at the post before getting into a flame war
#4 to #3 - adamks (05/30/2011) [-]
I did look at the post, and i think you are the retarded one, hes post was not pot vs alchohol hes post was, legalize pot because its less dangerous than alchohol, ergo, legalize pot. I wouldent care, i just want some reasons why pot shoud be legalized which is not: "Errrrh HURR DURR ALCOHOL IS WORSE HURR DURR!"
User avatar #5 to #4 - Ladoris (05/30/2011) [-]
I AM THE POSTER!!!! YOU DIDN'T KNOW THAT, ITS ABOUT POT VS ALCOHOL
User avatar #20 to #5 - admiralen ONLINE (05/19/2012) [-]
ladoris, THIS AINT UR ****** POST U RETARDED WHORE! and marijuana is WAY more addictive
#6 to #5 - adamks (05/30/2011) [-]
Haha so that explain your plain stupidity!..
And noo it is not my friend, i know your kind, your just looking for an argument that pot should be legal, and i dont care if it is legal, and in the bottom you do not care about alcohols danger, nor do you care about the pot danger, you just want to drink and smoke.. Dont worry, you will mature in time, but now is not your time obviously..
User avatar #7 to #6 - Ladoris (05/30/2011) [-]
wow did you just said everything true about yourself there, gj
#8 to #7 - adamks (05/30/2011) [-]
So your acctually saying im immature for not smoking pot, well thats quite the statement..
User avatar #9 to #8 - Ladoris (05/30/2011) [-]
no your immature for thinking your right, even when your not.
#11 to #9 - adamks (05/30/2011) [-]
Well anyways, at least your almost able to discuss properly, your not one of theese stupid kids just saying, "omg ****************************************** "
User avatar #12 to #11 - Ladoris (05/30/2011) [-]
i know im not, but this entire time you have been saying bad things about about pot and how it can damage lungs and make you act stupid and i have said pros and cons about both now im going to let you have last word because i got **** to do
#13 to #12 - adamks (05/30/2011) [-]
Well, i have said bad things about both alcohol AND pot, and ive said that i dont care, you have only said good things about pot. Like some little pot fanboy. You must be kidding me.
#10 to #9 - adamks (05/30/2011) [-]
Well since im not stating anything, i could not be right, nor wrong, i said i do not care about the legalization, wich puts me in a neutral position wich means im not on the right side, nor the wrong. Try again.
 Friends (0)