Rank #18330 on SubscribersLevel 148 Comments: Faptastic
OfflineSend mail to acfurryface Block acfurryface Invite acfurryface to be your friend
Level 17 Forever Alone
latest user's comments
|#479 - David Cameron||04/07/2013 on Change the name of anonymous||0|
|#31 - I'll take care of you Hanako.. [+] (1 new reply)||02/10/2013 on Fuck thumbs. this is for...||0|
|#19 - Picture||01/15/2013 on magic||0|
|#23 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||12/18/2012 on Gun Laws||0|
|#21 - But if the lightsaber wasn't there, he couldn't have killed th… [+] (12 new replies)||12/18/2012 on Gun Laws||+39|
#902 - anonymous (12/19/2012) [-]
You can make VERY powerful bombs with bleach, salt substitute, Vaseline, metal piping, a few other comm goods, and some know-how. Banning guns would just get people to use bombs again, which he could have thrown one in each classroom and killed the whole fucking school with. Guns aren't these awful killing machines, household objects are.
It's also very fun light these and throw them in ditches and stuff if you live in a remote area. Except you don't want metal piping, have a plastic or cardboard or something else so there isn't any/much shrapnel.
#1110 - anonymous (12/19/2012) [-]
You seem to dense to grasp my point. A gun's purpose, aside from hunting/recreation, is to defend yourself from other individuals and threats both foreign and domestic.
When you have someone mad like that who creates very simple chemical bombs bursting through the door of a building you're in, what are you going to do? The police will take at least 10 minutes to respond, you could all be dead and they could have escaped by then. Or you could get your ASSAUHULT WAPEON and kill the fucker.
What about WW2 Germany? Those Jews didn't need any guns, right! Especially anything with high capacity magazines or anything! they could have went on a shooting rampage! We need to take all the guns away from German citizens because the fuhrer says they're only used to kill and have no legitimate use!
Either stop being such a reactionary and illogical fool who's blind to the world or kindly go fuck yourself.
|#137 - Yeah, sorry about that. But all I've seen are people defending…||12/16/2012 on Facebook (2)||-1|
|#136 - In fairness, everyone in Britain hates Piers Morgan as well. W…||12/16/2012 on Facebook (2)||0|
|#8 - As a UK resident, I find Americans primitive and stupid in rel… [+] (24 new replies)||12/15/2012 on Facebook (2)||+26|
#89 - chazzxz (12/16/2012) [-]
You just said yourself it's a people issue, fact is as American's most of us like being armed, and like having the ability to protect ourselves whenever we need to. What American's truly need to do is ensure that adults purchasing guns understand how to keep them out of the hands of their children and others that should not have them.
#56 - anonymous (12/16/2012) [-]
The problem is that we're in America, and the lawmakers are more likely to make it more difficult for the law-abiding citizen to get guns, and not the ones who are carrying out the mass-murders.
I do however agree with you, and I also wish we could be a bit more like Australia in that sense, at least.
#55 - riceronijabrony (12/16/2012) [-]
You know what I hate...well who I hate.... Piers FUCKING Morgan. This douch, like many news hosts is talking about gun control right now, which is fine. BUT Piers isn't even American, I'm sorry but you should be from a country before you go and preach about what is wrong with it...
Like what if an American TV host had a show in the UK and preached about what was wrong with your laws, you'd be annoyed right? Thats how I feel about Peirs
#137 - acfurryface (12/16/2012) [-]
Yeah, sorry about that. But all I've seen are people defending the second amendment to the death. I know there's been exceptions, but the exceptions are rare. Looking at Australia, it seems obvious that its far better to change the gun law than to just let this pass. As for claims that protecting yourself will be harder, deal with it- It works just fine in the EU on the whole.
#47 - unncommon (12/16/2012) [-]
Contrary to popular belief, the "Vietnam War" wasn't a war at all, it was a 'Police-Action'. You (being presumably ignorant for foreign affairs) may not recognize the difference, and I'd be glad to elaborate: In any "War" one party would posses the ability to overthrow another governing party, whilst in a 'Police-Action', there was no official 'declaration of war", meaning that party A doesn't have the ability to overthrow party B's gov't.
Plus, if you believe those protesting liberal-fucks, then you could say that the Americans lost the "Vietnam War". But, statistically speaking, 47,359 (Hostile Vietnamese Deaths) - 10,797 (American Deaths).
#15 - allamericandude (12/15/2012) [-]
Guns in America aren't unregulated, you know. If our government was actually useful at enforcing the gun laws that are already in place, a good portion of these sorts of shootings wouldn't happen.
There are a few common-sense gun laws that could be put into place, but a prohibition on guns would not work in America--for the same reason every other prohibition hasn't worked.
|#83 - Picture||12/14/2012 on When Siblings Fight||0|
|#4 - This is the post which has convinced me i've out grown FunnyJu… [+] (6 new replies)||09/27/2012 on Collectors on /b/||-13|
#16 - anonymous (09/28/2012) [-]
And yet here you are. Grow up, child
#13 - abbraxys (09/28/2012) [-]
"Charles, I've conjured a humorous, hypothetical scenario. Perhaps as the established gentleman you are you could lend me your insight: What might one poor person say to another?"
"My mental faculties have been exhausted, Alexander. What might such an urchin bespeak of?"
"The answer is irrelevant! They are poor folk! Ho ho ho ho ho!"
#12 - oliphan (09/28/2012) [-]
I screencapped it because I made it up and posted it. I even commented the same story on my old content so I could prove that I posted it. funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4089254/So+I+posted+my+story+on+4chan/2#2
Join Subscribe lol-channel