x
Click to expand

aabbccddeeffgghhii

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/20/2012
Last Login:3/04/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#5438
Comment Ranking:#817
Highest Content Rank:#5443
Highest Comment Rank:#473
Content Thumbs: 341 total,  420 ,  79
Comment Thumbs: 13097 total,  16168 ,  3071
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 30 Content: Peasant → Level 31 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 1% (1/100)
Level 302 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 303 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Subscribers:0
Content Views:36358
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:2448
FJ Points:10501

latest user's comments

#6 - Comment deleted  [+] (4 new replies) 02/13/2015 on Funny Junk Book Sharing 0
#7 - straightbusta Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#8 - aabbccddeeffgghhii Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#9 - straightbusta Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#10 - aabbccddeeffgghhii Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#4 - Comment deleted 02/13/2015 on Funny Junk Book Sharing 0
#2 - Comment deleted  [+] (2 new replies) 02/13/2015 on Funny Junk Book Sharing 0
#3 - diddledot Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#4 - aabbccddeeffgghhii Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#90 - ******* really. You didn't spell check at all? 02/12/2015 on Every 0
#49 - No, i mean he didn't trust Robert because people were manipu…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/12/2015 on Dale +2
User avatar #50 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
Ah, I see how you meant it now. Yeah, I haven't read the books but I agree with your assessment of the situation.
#47 - If you're interested in my reply, check what i said to the sha…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/12/2015 on Dale 0
User avatar #48 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
Well, your concerns seem to do far more with those around Robert manipulating him rather than Robert himself being untrustworthy, but I see your point.
User avatar #49 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
No, i mean he didn't trust Robert because people were manipulating him. He would have felt terrible too because he knew how strong Robert was, and he didn't need to be manipulated by the Lannister's and didn't need to massacre children to secure his throne, but those around him convinced him it was essential.

Thats why Ned flat out left when they attempted to assassinate Danny (and i don't know if you've read the book and if you have I'm pointing out the obvious here), who was 13 years old. Ned lost all respect for Rob in that moment and his trust grew lesser and lesser.

Any way you shake it, Ned didn't trust Rob past being as close as brothers (and by that I mean "i'm pretty confident he won't have me killed in my bed" kinda trust). He didn't trust his ability as a king, he didn't trust his decision making abilities (shown through the child slaughtering, plunging the crown into debt and holding extravagant tourneys) and he didn't trust the company he kept.
User avatar #50 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
Ah, I see how you meant it now. Yeah, I haven't read the books but I agree with your assessment of the situation.
#46 - Unless that is flat out said in the book, which i highly doubt…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/12/2015 on Dale +2
User avatar #52 - theshadowed (02/12/2015) [-]
It is flat out said in the book. There are POV chapters where he says exactly that.

No, thats wrong. They had an argument after the Sack of Kings Landing, so Ned left in a fury to relieve Stannis at Storms End. He then went onto the Tower of Joy, where Lyanna died
Ned then went back to Robert, and they reconciled over the death of his sister. They left as best friends again
The only reason Ned stayed home was to grieve, and he didn't want to be in the South. Robert understood that, and Jon Arryn made a better hand
Then Roberts Rebellion happened where they met again, and were still best friends

Eddard was just not a sociable person, and didn't want to be in the South. He loved the North too much

And I know, I said he didn't trust the Kings men.
And no, thats also a lie. He trusted Littlefinger and the Gold cloaks, and he was betrayed by them. Ned trusted everyone apart from the Lannisters, Varys, and Littlefinger. And when he did trust Littlefinger, he got fucked over

The series is a little different to the books, so I understand your confusion. But trust me, in the books, you are completely wrong. You misunderstand Eddard Stark- he was not Stannis honourable. He trusted as well, he was chivalry
#194 - #Implyingidonthavealife 02/12/2015 on *Acting* 0
#22 - Ned Stark didn't trust the government, he was simply too heads…  [+] (10 new replies) 02/12/2015 on Dale +9
User avatar #34 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
What theshadowed said. Ned trusted Robert fully, and Robert was deserving of that trust. It was everybody else that was the problem.
User avatar #47 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
If you're interested in my reply, check what i said to the shadowed. It hits upon Robert being "deserving of that trust" in the third point.
User avatar #48 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
Well, your concerns seem to do far more with those around Robert manipulating him rather than Robert himself being untrustworthy, but I see your point.
User avatar #49 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
No, i mean he didn't trust Robert because people were manipulating him. He would have felt terrible too because he knew how strong Robert was, and he didn't need to be manipulated by the Lannister's and didn't need to massacre children to secure his throne, but those around him convinced him it was essential.

Thats why Ned flat out left when they attempted to assassinate Danny (and i don't know if you've read the book and if you have I'm pointing out the obvious here), who was 13 years old. Ned lost all respect for Rob in that moment and his trust grew lesser and lesser.

Any way you shake it, Ned didn't trust Rob past being as close as brothers (and by that I mean "i'm pretty confident he won't have me killed in my bed" kinda trust). He didn't trust his ability as a king, he didn't trust his decision making abilities (shown through the child slaughtering, plunging the crown into debt and holding extravagant tourneys) and he didn't trust the company he kept.
User avatar #50 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
Ah, I see how you meant it now. Yeah, I haven't read the books but I agree with your assessment of the situation.
User avatar #23 - theshadowed (02/12/2015) [-]
Actually, he trusted Robert completely. He knew Kings Landing was a nest of vipers, but he thought that he could trust the King, if not his men. Obviously, he found out he was wrong
#46 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
Unless that is flat out said in the book, which i highly doubt it is, i'd disagree.

Sure, he trusted Robert to an extent and knew he wouldn't back stab him, they were basically brothers after all, but his trust was far from complete.

Ever since the sacking of Kings landing by Tywin and the Lannister forces Ned has been very disappointed with Roberts rule and his trust and respect faltered. After Tywin slaughtered every Targaryen heir, including the babies, and presented them in Lannister red to mask the blood he felt Robbert was being manipulated and his honour and aims destroyed. He felt Robert's Rebellion was stained, he disapproved so much so that he packed up, wen't to find his sister and then fucked off back to the North.

He didn't see Rob again until the Greyjoy's rebellion, which was 6 years after Roberts Rebellion, and then 9 years after that when the King road to Winterfell to ask him to be the hand of the king.

He trusted him as a friend simply because they had basically grown up together, but completely? No way in seven hells was he completely trusting.

And the Kings men? He didn't trust them as far as he could throw them! He knew EVERYONE could be bought in Kings Landing and only used his own, loyal, men. He knew Roberts men would be tame as long as he was king, that was it. He knew they weren't loyal.
User avatar #52 - theshadowed (02/12/2015) [-]
It is flat out said in the book. There are POV chapters where he says exactly that.

No, thats wrong. They had an argument after the Sack of Kings Landing, so Ned left in a fury to relieve Stannis at Storms End. He then went onto the Tower of Joy, where Lyanna died
Ned then went back to Robert, and they reconciled over the death of his sister. They left as best friends again
The only reason Ned stayed home was to grieve, and he didn't want to be in the South. Robert understood that, and Jon Arryn made a better hand
Then Roberts Rebellion happened where they met again, and were still best friends

Eddard was just not a sociable person, and didn't want to be in the South. He loved the North too much

And I know, I said he didn't trust the Kings men.
And no, thats also a lie. He trusted Littlefinger and the Gold cloaks, and he was betrayed by them. Ned trusted everyone apart from the Lannisters, Varys, and Littlefinger. And when he did trust Littlefinger, he got fucked over

The series is a little different to the books, so I understand your confusion. But trust me, in the books, you are completely wrong. You misunderstand Eddard Stark- he was not Stannis honourable. He trusted as well, he was chivalry
User avatar #30 - killjoyus (02/12/2015) [-]
well trusting robert was cool
it was his bastard incest son that was the problem
#35 - theshadowed (02/12/2015) [-]
The real issue was Roberts Rebellion
#15 - There are three requirements to being a true Nazi. 1… 02/12/2015 on Neo nazis +6
#86 - Damn ******* right, you don't mess with me … 02/12/2015 on Mindblowing content +1
#84 - You leave black science man alone Neil deGrasse…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/12/2015 on Mindblowing content 0
#85 - thejoemotes (02/12/2015) [-]
my mistake, i'll be on my way
#86 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
Damn fucking right, you don't mess with me or Neil.
#138 - Maybe its because I have never seen the answer before. …  [+] (2 new replies) 02/12/2015 on *Acting* +1
User avatar #191 - eatmynuts (02/12/2015) [-]
#implyingyoudontseeeverypieceofcontenthere
User avatar #194 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
#Implyingidonthavealife
#16 - Thanks Dr Toothbrush. 02/11/2015 on violently brushing +2
#11 - We simply call it hokey here in the UK too. We generally only … 02/11/2015 on Hockey +1
#6 - Well they say a toothbrush should only last a month or so, may…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/11/2015 on violently brushing 0
User avatar #10 - goodhomer (02/11/2015) [-]
Three months.

That is the lifespan of a toothbrush.
#16 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/11/2015) [-]
Thanks Dr Toothbrush.
#107 - Tell me about it. The worst complaint I ever hears w… 02/11/2015 on Retail Robin Comp: RAGE... 0
#12 - #Why do all #Tumblr girls have to#Hashtag#Every# *******…  [+] (9 new replies) 02/11/2015 on *Acting* +93
User avatar #172 - Kairyuka (02/12/2015) [-]
Because the person reblogged it from someone who'd written this in the tags, but tags don't follow through a reblog, so people just copy paste them up in the content if they think they're worth looking at
#97 - innocentbabies (02/12/2015) [-]
To be fair, this looks like it was supposed to be ironic, so being as over-the-top as possible makes sense in this case.
User avatar #91 - KangaRoofies (02/12/2015) [-]
because they want to
User avatar #76 - naitsabesh (02/12/2015) [-]
Yeah Good thing we don't have any Gimmicky shit like that
User avatar #72 - eatmynuts (02/12/2015) [-]
#whydoeseveryoneaskthisquestioneverytimesomethingfromtumblrispostedeventhoughits answeredeverytime
User avatar #138 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
Maybe its because I have never seen the answer before.

#rude #screwyou #noteveryoneseeseverypienceofcontentonthisgodforsakenwebsite
User avatar #191 - eatmynuts (02/12/2015) [-]
#implyingyoudontseeeverypieceofcontenthere
User avatar #194 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
#Implyingidonthavealife
#13 - dwarfboy (02/11/2015) [-]
That's kinda the tagging system? It's to keep annoying comments out of the reblog feed and just keeping them in the comments. The hashtags are there because one was particularly funny so the person reblogging it included it on the caption.
#16 - Picture 02/11/2015 on help 0
#20 - I would be happy with Either the Next Fallout or Elder scrolls… 02/11/2015 on Fallout 4 +1
#94 - Yes, but most of the time they are wrong. A lot of…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Retail Robin Comp: RAGE... 0
User avatar #95 - oodlesandoodles (02/11/2015) [-]
I agree, and, I didn't say it before, but I applaud you for how you handled the previous situation. I've never had the luxury of working in retail, but I know someone who works in a call center, so I've heard both sides. I.E. Customers who call in, screaming, because they ordered something they no longer want, and want you to fix it, as well as employees who spend almost an hour screaming at a customer who ordered hundreds of dollars worth of merchandise, and were only sent half of what they paid for.
#19 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on dude... +5
#23 - floyingonion (02/11/2015) [-]
Great. Now I'm sad
#42 - My best story was when I went to another store to cover for so…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/11/2015 on Retail Robin Comp: RAGE... +9
#106 - tksparty (02/11/2015) [-]
People are just shits. We had a guy call our head office where I work and ask for the address of our office in the city where he lived, we let him know that we didn't have a premises in that city but we were still able to delivery to his business address in the city. He got abusive over the phone and after a while letting him know that we could still deliver and that it wouldn't be a problem to do so we finally informed him that due to his abusive attitude we would be ending the phone call (which we are thankfully allowed to do at my work).

Later that day he emailed in requesting delivery to his home address, due to the nature of our business we can only deal with registered companies and only deliver to actual business addresses such as offices, warehouses, factories etc, and we informed him that we were unable to do business with him. He then filed a complaint saying we were rude and abusive with him and that we went out of our way to make his life difficult. Luckily all our email and phone correspondence is recorded so nothing came of it.
User avatar #107 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/11/2015) [-]
Tell me about it.

The worst complaint I ever hears wasn't one of mine but for one of the women I work with. She is the Nicest person you would ever want to meet or know. Not only is her personality top notch, to both customers and everyone she meets, but she's hot as hell to (that doesn't matter really but i'm chucking it in there) so everyone loves her for one reason or another.

This woman though wrote into our store and complained about her. I can't remember all of what she said (it was incoherent in most places) but the best quote was "I am emotionally and financially scared." They even brought it up in the morning meeting to laugh about the customer because it was so downright retarded and to say "If anyone writes in like this, we know its not you're fault their just digging for money."

I mean what the fuck?! Financially and Emotionally scared? We all knew she was going for money, which she eventually got, but all the managers spoke to my collegue (she was very upset by this) and said "This woman is an idiot, we don't believe anything she says. Honestly don't worry about it."

It just makes you stop and ask yourself "Whos a big enough cunt to do this?"
User avatar #93 - oodlesandoodles (02/11/2015) [-]
For some reason, people often forget that retail workers are human beings like everyone else, not mindless drones that exist to cater to our every whim. That being said, sometimes, the employees, themselves, do the exact same thing. They deal with so many difficult customers that, at some point, they just assume that the customer is always wrong.
User avatar #94 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/11/2015) [-]
Yes, but most of the time they are wrong.

A lot of the time they think they know how it works, where in a matter of fact it works nothing like they think it does.

Like, i cant reserve something in another store to be brought to ours, But thats how it is to the customers and thats how it is. End of story.
User avatar #95 - oodlesandoodles (02/11/2015) [-]
I agree, and, I didn't say it before, but I applaud you for how you handled the previous situation. I've never had the luxury of working in retail, but I know someone who works in a call center, so I've heard both sides. I.E. Customers who call in, screaming, because they ordered something they no longer want, and want you to fix it, as well as employees who spend almost an hour screaming at a customer who ordered hundreds of dollars worth of merchandise, and were only sent half of what they paid for.
#40 - Comment deleted 02/11/2015 on Retail Robin Comp: RAGE... 0
#38 - The urinal one was weird. In the UK we say Ur-eye-nu…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/11/2015 on Valentine Cards 0
User avatar #45 - wertgf (02/11/2015) [-]
Many different parts to the UK. We say Ur-in-ul here.

items

Total unique items point value: 300 / Total items point value: 300
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #19 - captainrattrap (01/13/2015) [-]
fuk
User avatar #18 - carnivoreapples (01/13/2015) [-]
it is wonderful
User avatar #16 - imboyo ONLINE (12/23/2014) [-]
I heard you made a big mistake recently and got thumbed down to the hundreds.
User avatar #15 - zhater (12/23/2014) [-]
**** you
User avatar #12 - superblade (12/05/2014) [-]
I'm a trying to figure out how you got that name
User avatar #13 to #12 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (12/05/2014) [-]
Easy, couldn't think of a username for my new account, so i typed in the alphabet. The straight alphabet was taken so i just doubled up until i reached the character limit.
User avatar #14 to #13 - superblade (12/05/2014) [-]
Make sense

Proceed
User avatar #11 - joshlol (09/20/2014) [-]
interesting username
User avatar #7 - soundofwinter ONLINE (06/20/2014) [-]
**** you
User avatar #8 to #7 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (06/20/2014) [-]
Well thats not very nice.
User avatar #5 - haranaslicer (06/15/2014) [-]
Can i have your toast?
User avatar #6 to #5 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (06/15/2014) [-]
No. Get your own toast you bum!
User avatar #1 - andranadu ONLINE (03/02/2014) [-]
nice name
User avatar #2 to #1 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (03/02/2014) [-]
Thanks! Took me ages to think of!
 Friends (0)