x
Click to expand

aabbccddeeffgghhii

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/20/2012
Last Login:3/01/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#5460
Comment Ranking:#801
Highest Content Rank:#5445
Highest Comment Rank:#473
Content Thumbs: 341 total,  420 ,  79
Comment Thumbs: 13080 total,  16151 ,  3071
Content Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 30 Content: Peasant → Level 31 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 84% (84/100)
Level 301 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 302 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Subscribers:0
Content Views:36339
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:2434
FJ Points:10484

latest user's comments

#99 - Say what you will, but Muslims know how to get **** …  [+] (7 new replies) 02/15/2015 on The Reason for Crusades +1
User avatar #103 - sympathyforme (02/15/2015) [-]
What shit do they know how to get done? Beheadings?
User avatar #104 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/15/2015) [-]
Well, as a generalised rule they are good at warfare. There also great scholars with Muslims reviving a lot of the scientific studies the Greeks started, but that were lost in the intervening years.

They also invented the numerical system the world uses today (hence why they are called Arabic Numbers).

Islam is the second (if not the) largest religion in the world, they have produced a lot of good things over the last 1,500 years.
User avatar #184 - turkeyslapper (02/15/2015) [-]
Arabs didn't invent the arabic numerical system, it was just called that because the arab merchants were the ones who introduced it to the west. It was actually invented by hindu's.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu%E2%80%93Arabic_numeral_system
User avatar #106 - sympathyforme (02/15/2015) [-]
They are good at warfare or_ were_ good?

User avatar #107 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/15/2015) [-]
Well, they haven't really had a war in a long while but they kept the USA (the LARGEST Military EVER) at bay for like, 11 years with sticks, RPGs and fucking Cave Hideouts.

So yeah, they are good at warfare.
User avatar #116 - magictheg (02/15/2015) [-]
Because they were using gorilla tactics, the US Military is designed to fight conventional wars, and the last time we had a conventional war(Gulf War) it was over in 6 months. Old Soviet tech is not sticks, It might me old but AK-47s, RPKs and RPG-7s are just as dangerous as the ever were.
And I don't think they ever 'Held them off' it was more of a resistance kind of thing, the US basically had control of the entire country.
User avatar #114 - sympathyforme (02/15/2015) [-]
"The invasion began on 20 March 2003. The U.S., joined by the United Kingdom and several coalition allies, launched a "shock and awe" surprise attack without declaring war. Iraqi forces were quickly overwhelmed as U.S. forces swept through the country. The invasion led to the collapse of the Ba'athist government; Saddam was captured in December 2003 and executed by a military court three years later."

~Wiki

Of course the fighting continued for years after that thanks to guerilla warfare tactics like hiding in caves, but the Americans got what they wanted.
#61 - 'Bout to drop the sickest Rap Album of 1943 02/15/2015 on WWII posters part 3 +35
#686 - So, RomDomCom... You live in Bridgend? I'm so sorry to hear th…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/15/2015 on Where are you from FJ? 0
User avatar #2500 - romdomcom (02/16/2015) [-]
Could be worse, could live in Maesteg
User avatar #2503 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/16/2015) [-]
Always look on the bright side!
#681 - You mean Argentinian? i'm actually British a… 02/15/2015 on Where are you from FJ? 0
#11 - Isn't this basically the plot to Good Will Hunting? 02/15/2015 on A beginner's guide to College 0
#32 - Is there anyway i can request not to have someone who visits T… 02/15/2015 on Prehistoric yet golden 0
#75 - "Go ahead and skip, but i guess you're going to miss... … 02/15/2015 on The panty raid +4
#58 - No... No i don't think he is. 02/15/2015 on true love +4
#10 - Comment deleted 02/13/2015 on Funny Junk Book Sharing +1
#8 - Comment deleted  [+] (2 new replies) 02/13/2015 on Funny Junk Book Sharing 0
#9 - straightbusta Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#10 - aabbccddeeffgghhii Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#6 - Comment deleted  [+] (4 new replies) 02/13/2015 on Funny Junk Book Sharing 0
#7 - straightbusta Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#8 - aabbccddeeffgghhii Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#9 - straightbusta Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#10 - aabbccddeeffgghhii Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#4 - Comment deleted 02/13/2015 on Funny Junk Book Sharing 0
#2 - Comment deleted  [+] (2 new replies) 02/13/2015 on Funny Junk Book Sharing 0
#3 - diddledot Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#4 - aabbccddeeffgghhii Comment deleted by aabbccddeeffgghhii
#90 - ******* really. You didn't spell check at all? 02/12/2015 on Every 0
#49 - No, i mean he didn't trust Robert because people were manipu…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/12/2015 on Dale +2
User avatar #50 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
Ah, I see how you meant it now. Yeah, I haven't read the books but I agree with your assessment of the situation.
#47 - If you're interested in my reply, check what i said to the sha…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/12/2015 on Dale 0
User avatar #48 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
Well, your concerns seem to do far more with those around Robert manipulating him rather than Robert himself being untrustworthy, but I see your point.
User avatar #49 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
No, i mean he didn't trust Robert because people were manipulating him. He would have felt terrible too because he knew how strong Robert was, and he didn't need to be manipulated by the Lannister's and didn't need to massacre children to secure his throne, but those around him convinced him it was essential.

Thats why Ned flat out left when they attempted to assassinate Danny (and i don't know if you've read the book and if you have I'm pointing out the obvious here), who was 13 years old. Ned lost all respect for Rob in that moment and his trust grew lesser and lesser.

Any way you shake it, Ned didn't trust Rob past being as close as brothers (and by that I mean "i'm pretty confident he won't have me killed in my bed" kinda trust). He didn't trust his ability as a king, he didn't trust his decision making abilities (shown through the child slaughtering, plunging the crown into debt and holding extravagant tourneys) and he didn't trust the company he kept.
User avatar #50 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
Ah, I see how you meant it now. Yeah, I haven't read the books but I agree with your assessment of the situation.
#46 - Unless that is flat out said in the book, which i highly doubt…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/12/2015 on Dale +2
User avatar #52 - theshadowed (02/12/2015) [-]
It is flat out said in the book. There are POV chapters where he says exactly that.

No, thats wrong. They had an argument after the Sack of Kings Landing, so Ned left in a fury to relieve Stannis at Storms End. He then went onto the Tower of Joy, where Lyanna died
Ned then went back to Robert, and they reconciled over the death of his sister. They left as best friends again
The only reason Ned stayed home was to grieve, and he didn't want to be in the South. Robert understood that, and Jon Arryn made a better hand
Then Roberts Rebellion happened where they met again, and were still best friends

Eddard was just not a sociable person, and didn't want to be in the South. He loved the North too much

And I know, I said he didn't trust the Kings men.
And no, thats also a lie. He trusted Littlefinger and the Gold cloaks, and he was betrayed by them. Ned trusted everyone apart from the Lannisters, Varys, and Littlefinger. And when he did trust Littlefinger, he got fucked over

The series is a little different to the books, so I understand your confusion. But trust me, in the books, you are completely wrong. You misunderstand Eddard Stark- he was not Stannis honourable. He trusted as well, he was chivalry
#194 - #Implyingidonthavealife 02/12/2015 on *Acting* 0
#22 - Ned Stark didn't trust the government, he was simply too heads…  [+] (10 new replies) 02/12/2015 on Dale +9
User avatar #34 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
What theshadowed said. Ned trusted Robert fully, and Robert was deserving of that trust. It was everybody else that was the problem.
User avatar #47 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
If you're interested in my reply, check what i said to the shadowed. It hits upon Robert being "deserving of that trust" in the third point.
User avatar #48 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
Well, your concerns seem to do far more with those around Robert manipulating him rather than Robert himself being untrustworthy, but I see your point.
User avatar #49 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
No, i mean he didn't trust Robert because people were manipulating him. He would have felt terrible too because he knew how strong Robert was, and he didn't need to be manipulated by the Lannister's and didn't need to massacre children to secure his throne, but those around him convinced him it was essential.

Thats why Ned flat out left when they attempted to assassinate Danny (and i don't know if you've read the book and if you have I'm pointing out the obvious here), who was 13 years old. Ned lost all respect for Rob in that moment and his trust grew lesser and lesser.

Any way you shake it, Ned didn't trust Rob past being as close as brothers (and by that I mean "i'm pretty confident he won't have me killed in my bed" kinda trust). He didn't trust his ability as a king, he didn't trust his decision making abilities (shown through the child slaughtering, plunging the crown into debt and holding extravagant tourneys) and he didn't trust the company he kept.
User avatar #50 - nigeltheoutlaw (02/12/2015) [-]
Ah, I see how you meant it now. Yeah, I haven't read the books but I agree with your assessment of the situation.
User avatar #23 - theshadowed (02/12/2015) [-]
Actually, he trusted Robert completely. He knew Kings Landing was a nest of vipers, but he thought that he could trust the King, if not his men. Obviously, he found out he was wrong
#46 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
Unless that is flat out said in the book, which i highly doubt it is, i'd disagree.

Sure, he trusted Robert to an extent and knew he wouldn't back stab him, they were basically brothers after all, but his trust was far from complete.

Ever since the sacking of Kings landing by Tywin and the Lannister forces Ned has been very disappointed with Roberts rule and his trust and respect faltered. After Tywin slaughtered every Targaryen heir, including the babies, and presented them in Lannister red to mask the blood he felt Robbert was being manipulated and his honour and aims destroyed. He felt Robert's Rebellion was stained, he disapproved so much so that he packed up, wen't to find his sister and then fucked off back to the North.

He didn't see Rob again until the Greyjoy's rebellion, which was 6 years after Roberts Rebellion, and then 9 years after that when the King road to Winterfell to ask him to be the hand of the king.

He trusted him as a friend simply because they had basically grown up together, but completely? No way in seven hells was he completely trusting.

And the Kings men? He didn't trust them as far as he could throw them! He knew EVERYONE could be bought in Kings Landing and only used his own, loyal, men. He knew Roberts men would be tame as long as he was king, that was it. He knew they weren't loyal.
User avatar #52 - theshadowed (02/12/2015) [-]
It is flat out said in the book. There are POV chapters where he says exactly that.

No, thats wrong. They had an argument after the Sack of Kings Landing, so Ned left in a fury to relieve Stannis at Storms End. He then went onto the Tower of Joy, where Lyanna died
Ned then went back to Robert, and they reconciled over the death of his sister. They left as best friends again
The only reason Ned stayed home was to grieve, and he didn't want to be in the South. Robert understood that, and Jon Arryn made a better hand
Then Roberts Rebellion happened where they met again, and were still best friends

Eddard was just not a sociable person, and didn't want to be in the South. He loved the North too much

And I know, I said he didn't trust the Kings men.
And no, thats also a lie. He trusted Littlefinger and the Gold cloaks, and he was betrayed by them. Ned trusted everyone apart from the Lannisters, Varys, and Littlefinger. And when he did trust Littlefinger, he got fucked over

The series is a little different to the books, so I understand your confusion. But trust me, in the books, you are completely wrong. You misunderstand Eddard Stark- he was not Stannis honourable. He trusted as well, he was chivalry
User avatar #30 - killjoyus (02/12/2015) [-]
well trusting robert was cool
it was his bastard incest son that was the problem
#35 - theshadowed (02/12/2015) [-]
The real issue was Roberts Rebellion
#15 - There are three requirements to being a true Nazi. 1… 02/12/2015 on Neo nazis +6
#86 - Damn ******* right, you don't mess with me … 02/12/2015 on Mindblowing content +1
#84 - You leave black science man alone Neil deGrasse…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/12/2015 on Mindblowing content 0
#85 - thejoemotes (02/12/2015) [-]
my mistake, i'll be on my way
#86 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
Damn fucking right, you don't mess with me or Neil.
#138 - Maybe its because I have never seen the answer before. …  [+] (2 new replies) 02/12/2015 on *Acting* +1
User avatar #191 - eatmynuts (02/12/2015) [-]
#implyingyoudontseeeverypieceofcontenthere
User avatar #194 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (02/12/2015) [-]
#Implyingidonthavealife
#16 - Thanks Dr Toothbrush. 02/11/2015 on violently brushing +2
#11 - We simply call it hokey here in the UK too. We generally only … 02/11/2015 on Hockey +1

items

Total unique items point value: 300 / Total items point value: 300
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #19 - captainrattrap (01/13/2015) [-]
fuk
User avatar #18 - carnivoreapples ONLINE (01/13/2015) [-]
it is wonderful
User avatar #16 - imboyo (12/23/2014) [-]
I heard you made a big mistake recently and got thumbed down to the hundreds.
User avatar #15 - zhater (12/23/2014) [-]
**** you
User avatar #12 - superblade (12/05/2014) [-]
I'm a trying to figure out how you got that name
User avatar #13 to #12 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (12/05/2014) [-]
Easy, couldn't think of a username for my new account, so i typed in the alphabet. The straight alphabet was taken so i just doubled up until i reached the character limit.
User avatar #14 to #13 - superblade (12/05/2014) [-]
Make sense

Proceed
User avatar #11 - joshlol (09/20/2014) [-]
interesting username
User avatar #8 to #7 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (06/20/2014) [-]
Well thats not very nice.
User avatar #5 - haranaslicer (06/15/2014) [-]
Can i have your toast?
User avatar #6 to #5 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (06/15/2014) [-]
No. Get your own toast you bum!
User avatar #1 - andranadu (03/02/2014) [-]
nice name
User avatar #2 to #1 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (03/02/2014) [-]
Thanks! Took me ages to think of!
 Friends (0)