Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

aabbccddeeffgghhii    

Rank #593 on Comments
aabbccddeeffgghhii Avatar Level 277 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Online
Send mail to aabbccddeeffgghhii Block aabbccddeeffgghhii Invite aabbccddeeffgghhii to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/20/2012
Last Login:11/28/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#7535
Comment Ranking:#593
Highest Content Rank:#6855
Highest Comment Rank:#481
Content Thumbs: 205 total,  269 ,  64
Comment Thumbs: 9726 total,  11847 ,  2121
Content Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 18 Content: New Here → Level 19 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 12% (12/100)
Level 277 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 278 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Subscribers:0
Content Views:25022
Times Content Favorited:7 times
Total Comments Made:1965
FJ Points:7900

latest user's comments

#21 - That hurt my ears. 08/01/2014 on It's a Trap 0
#19 - I don't give a **** , i think shes hot. Would i go…  [+] (2 new replies) 08/01/2014 on It's a Trap -2
#73 - sytheris (08/01/2014) [-]
Insensitive, but I somehow doubt you meant it to be.
#29 - Womens Study Major (08/01/2014) [-]
she had a sex change, she's bodily the same as a woman, you wouldn't feel the diference
#4 - Yup, need one of these after laughing this hard. Funn… 07/31/2014 on LET HER RIP 0
#12 - FJ isn't for funny. I made a comment yesterday that p… 07/31/2014 on When I try to make a funny... 0
#115 - I play vidoe games because I can't afford to do exiting things… 07/31/2014 on What will you do? 0
#249 - The technique is actually quite accurate. Also, MS Paintskills… 07/31/2014 on How to draw with your... +1
#51 - Pretty off the bat here? Fine, let me show how you are incorre…  [+] (4 new replies) 07/30/2014 on 'Merican pride +14
User avatar #375 - forbesydemon (07/31/2014) [-]
As note to number 3 Hitler was also voted in, let us not forget that. Being voted in at the start doesn't mean you're incapable of being a dictator later. Hitler did use a whole lot of sketchy tactics to get into power but so have many past leaders.
But otherwise I agree with your points.
User avatar #348 - garymotherfingoak (07/31/2014) [-]
me too endophinsrage
#54 - endorphinsrage (07/30/2014) [-]
I like this guy
#53 - comradewinter (07/30/2014) [-]
You are still fairly wrong here:

1. Woodrow Wilson made assuring bulletins that made the Germans think they would get away easily. The Americans did everything they could to reconciliate, as they lost very few troops and saw massive trading opportunities with the Germans. So no, it wasn't just the Americans, it wasn't the Americans at all. The French, however, saw a good chance to break Germany for good.

2. You don't consider Barbarossa a success if you know anything about war. You can be in the lead in a football game until the last few minutes. You blow it, you lose. A war is determined by who wins in the end, and if an invasion fails, it remains a failure. Especially when you don't have sufficient countermeasures. Stalingrad was also important as it would secure their flanks. Because of the failed attempt to capture it, the Germans were swarmed from different angles.

3. There were also elections in the Soviet Union, Cuba, North Korea and so forth. They do elect their leaders. Problem is, the leaders tend to do what they want. The South was mostly run by old mafia, so Syngman Rhee could do what he wanted. Hence why there was an uproar in 1960 to get rid of him for his autocratic regime and corruption. Russia today is far more democratic than South Korea was.

I misread the last bit, somehow. But yes, I agree on that. It was purely ideological. But that doesn't change the fact that they were wars. And no matter what reason you have to fight a war, it remains a war.
#27 - Ok, when you use a line from a ******* front page…  [+] (31 new replies) 07/30/2014 on 'Merican pride +165
User avatar #514 - cantexplain (07/31/2014) [-]
You forgot to add that America is not secluded on an island. It's called a continent and is much bigger than Europe
User avatar #361 - Agnotizer (07/31/2014) [-]
Damn. Part of the alphabet just kicked that guy's ass.
#329 - Womens Study Major (07/31/2014) [-]
also truman banned total war in both the vietnam and korean wars. if america had wanted, they could have burned them to the ground, or turned them into nuclear craters. McArthur was technically fired because he wanted total war and truman didn't.
#241 - Womens Study Major (07/30/2014) [-]
Kind of a side note but Korea is still a bit of a conflict, the U.S. Still mans the dmz in Korea and are still prepared for further fighting
#240 - sinclairr (07/30/2014) [-]
South Korea wasn't a democracy

Blasphemy, Heresy; Syngman Rhee was not a democratic leader
#125 - Womens Study Major (07/30/2014) [-]
>WW1 raging on
>Continuous stalemate
>Merica enters war
>War over few months later
>profit?????
User avatar #570 - serotonin (07/31/2014) [-]
actually WW1 was pretty much over once Thessaly front (in Greece) was breach by allies (and USA had little to nothing to do with it)
#186 - Womens Study Major (07/30/2014) [-]
I don't think you understand how the ???? profit thing works.

I believe it started with south park when a plan is made by some gnomes or some shit...they explain a process like this:

Step 1. Collect underpants.
Step 2. ????????
Step 3. PROFIT
The ????? is supposed to be a key step that makes what you said make sense. Without it you have no fucking idea how you profit out of collecting underpants. If what you said makes sense without that ????? then you are using it wrong, and if you use it after the word profit then you are just fucking retarded.

User avatar #109 - wotterpatch (07/30/2014) [-]
To be fair, what combat the Americans did see during world war one showed them sweeping the floor for the most part
User avatar #84 - masdercheef (07/30/2014) [-]
Just wanted to add, something else that the US provided for the First World War was aircraft. A fuckload of aircraft, if my memory serves me correctly.
User avatar #107 - wotterpatch (07/30/2014) [-]
In world war one? Fuck, America didn't even produce aircraft for their own fliers in world war one, let alone everyone elses
User avatar #110 - masdercheef (07/30/2014) [-]
Ahhh. I think I may have mixed things up - the US provided pilots, not the planes?
User avatar #111 - wotterpatch (07/30/2014) [-]
Yes. The french had entire squadrons of american volunteers, flying french spads
User avatar #115 - masdercheef (07/30/2014) [-]
Alright, yeah. That sounds right, now. Thanks for helping by correcting what I said, I hate to get things wrong that I know I should get right - after all, I just spent the better part of a year learning US military aviation.
User avatar #77 - serotonin (07/30/2014) [-]
2) you forgot sweden, switzerland, Ireland (and bunch of axis)
#32 - comradewinter (07/30/2014) [-]
Also:

United States Air Force: 5600 Aircraft
United States Navy: 3700 Aircraft
Russian Air Force: 3500 Aircraft

www.flightglobal.com/airspace/media/reports_pdf/world-air-forces-2014-108161.aspx
#28 - comradewinter (07/30/2014) [-]
1) Everyone was tired of the war, and the fresh reinforcements made the German government reconsider their chances of winning the war. There are also Woodrow Wilson's 10 bulletins, which persuaded them into thinking the war reparations would be just, which didn't happen. It was purely psychological, but if you know there is no chance of winning, you take what you can get.

2) They invaded knowing that if they spent more than 6 months from Stalingrad to Moscow, they would face the cold, harsh winter. If they had waited until the middle of January, they would be fighting in much better conditions. A war was inevitable, but stretching their soldiers thin on every line meant they couldn't win either.

3) War declaration is just words written on a piece of paper. When you invade another country, you are at war. Hence why they're called The Vietnam War and The Korean War rather than The Vietnam Scuffle and The Korean Barfight.

Also, South Vietnam and South Korea were both run by dictators. Communism is not a contradiction to democracy, it's the opposite of capitalism, which is what the US fought for. It's true that the wars were purely inspired by ideology, but then again, the rivalry between Nazi Germany and The Soviet Union were the same. Wars can happen for any reason. It's like saying The Crusades don't count as wars because they were inspired by religion.

So no, you're pretty off the bat, here.
#295 - confusedasian (07/31/2014) [-]
South Vietnam was never ran by a dictator, neither was the north. The north had a communist leader, the leader of the south was put in place by Americans.

#298 - comradewinter (07/31/2014) [-]
They were. Military Junta in the South, Ho Chi Minh to the North.
#306 - confusedasian (07/31/2014) [-]
Hi Chi Minh was loved by us. He was a great man that fought for Vietnamese independence. He fought the Chinese, French, and Americans. Though he turned to communism. Ngo Dinh Diem was a corrupt asshat. If it were a fair election people would have voted Ho Chi Minh in a landslide, but he was pro communisism and the US at the time was afraid of the domino effect. Ho and his supporters moved north. Americans placed Ngo as south leader. Even the anti communist south hated him and would have voted Minh.
#314 - comradewinter (07/31/2014) [-]
Ho Chi Minh was a dictator, but a fair one. Instead of turning to Stalinism as Kim Il-Sung and Mao did, he was a firm supporter of the original Leninist movement. Dictator doesn't constitute unjust actions. It's not uncommon during war times to place power within the hands of a few trusted people, because democracy is slow, albeit stable. I don't criticize autocratic governments, but it doesn't change the fact that dictators were in both states. Hence there wasn't a discussion about democracy or not, it was communism or capitalism.
#325 - confusedasian (07/31/2014) [-]
Dictator is single person. Communism is a single party of people. That's who he was. He was like Saddam Hussein of Vietnam. General asshole, but good at coming off as a good man. He wasn't ruling on his own he had a group/ party with him.
#331 - comradewinter (07/31/2014) [-]
It's impossible to be a dictator, and there has never been any true dictatorships in the world. Dictatorship basically means you have the power to make a decree and it will be followed with no questions asked. A state is still run on its own, but if the dictator decides that something should be done, it will be done. The Stalin era in the USSR was run after Stalin's wish, but it still had roads built and so forth without consulting the mustacheman. It's impossible to decide everything on your own.
#344 - confusedasian (07/31/2014) [-]
"Ho Chi Minh was a dictator, but a fair one"

"It's impossible to be a dictator"


This conversation is over. Good night.
#349 - comradewinter (07/31/2014) [-]
He was a dictator. Like I said, it's defined by the ability of a single person to decide everything. Therefore, he was a dictator, but most of the work (menial tasks) were handled by the party.
User avatar #517 - wrocky (07/31/2014) [-]
aw man i stopped reading here.. my brain could not take too much war info in a day.. will continue scrolling down another day thanks to everyone on the upper part of the thread i loved reading you guys go back and forth it's like an orgy of ideas and opinions make my brain deliberate by itself. i love u guize
User avatar #51 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (07/30/2014) [-]
Pretty off the bat here? Fine, let me show how you are incorrect/don't change any of the points I made.

1) You are correct, everyone was tired of war and that's why the Americans were brought in. That doesn't change the fact that the Americans were there only for the man power. They were only needed for meat to be shot at by the Germans. No political, strategic or any other help provided. Also, Lloyd George wanted to be lenient with the Germans, it was the French who pushed. So It wasn't JUST the Americans.

2) No, Germany could have won.... easily. Operation Barbarossa was very successful. Blitzkrieg wasn't as successful but the only thing that stopped them was the winter, i will give you that.

HOWEVER, when they resumed the fight with operation blue the fought to within 28 miles of Moscow and the only reason Stalin didn't flea to Mongolia was because he was a stubborn bastard. So despite the winter they still gained thousands of miles.

What lost the war for the Germans on the Eastern front was the attack on Stalingrad. Hitler dedicated his entire 6th Army to take insignificant city. There was no strategic value to the City, he only tried to take it because of the name. If he skipped Stalingrad he would have taken Moscow and then, by extension, Russia quite easily.

So whether they waited until better conditions didn't matter.

3) With regards to Korea: South Korea was run by an elected leader, where as North was not. So saying they both had Dictators is not true.

Also, when did I ever say Communism was a contradiction to democracy? You are putting words in my mouth. What i did say was that The wars in Vietnam and Korea were Ideological wars With Capitalism vs Communism. So stop putting words in my mouth, thanks.

So yes, I'm pretty much on the ball with what I said. Trust me, I'm a scientist.
User avatar #375 - forbesydemon (07/31/2014) [-]
As note to number 3 Hitler was also voted in, let us not forget that. Being voted in at the start doesn't mean you're incapable of being a dictator later. Hitler did use a whole lot of sketchy tactics to get into power but so have many past leaders.
But otherwise I agree with your points.
User avatar #348 - garymotherfingoak (07/31/2014) [-]
me too endophinsrage
#54 - endorphinsrage (07/30/2014) [-]
I like this guy
#53 - comradewinter (07/30/2014) [-]
You are still fairly wrong here:

1. Woodrow Wilson made assuring bulletins that made the Germans think they would get away easily. The Americans did everything they could to reconciliate, as they lost very few troops and saw massive trading opportunities with the Germans. So no, it wasn't just the Americans, it wasn't the Americans at all. The French, however, saw a good chance to break Germany for good.

2. You don't consider Barbarossa a success if you know anything about war. You can be in the lead in a football game until the last few minutes. You blow it, you lose. A war is determined by who wins in the end, and if an invasion fails, it remains a failure. Especially when you don't have sufficient countermeasures. Stalingrad was also important as it would secure their flanks. Because of the failed attempt to capture it, the Germans were swarmed from different angles.

3. There were also elections in the Soviet Union, Cuba, North Korea and so forth. They do elect their leaders. Problem is, the leaders tend to do what they want. The South was mostly run by old mafia, so Syngman Rhee could do what he wanted. Hence why there was an uproar in 1960 to get rid of him for his autocratic regime and corruption. Russia today is far more democratic than South Korea was.

I misread the last bit, somehow. But yes, I agree on that. It was purely ideological. But that doesn't change the fact that they were wars. And no matter what reason you have to fight a war, it remains a war.
#110 - That quality tho. 07/30/2014 on Post some more webm's as... +2
#73 - "We also have ships that go under water, there called sub…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/30/2014 on cheeky cunt +14
#144 - Elemental (07/30/2014) [-]
Our Airforce is smaller than any time since 1947.
Still the biggest in the world.
The second biggest? The US Navy. You dumb cunt.
#80 - keybladewarrior (07/30/2014) [-]
Obama tapped into his black side.
#113 - hybridxproject (07/30/2014) [-]
"visited your website quite a bit, and it still doesn't work"

bitch nigga
#14 - Theres Rush Hour. This is my spare PC, not too… 07/29/2014 on nice +4
#173 - If its him here he definitely does a great job. Would go watch it. 07/29/2014 on Deadpool leaked movie test... 0
#157 - No i know that, it was more for dramatic effect. I ha…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/29/2014 on Deadpool leaked movie test... +3
User avatar #171 - seancwatts (07/29/2014) [-]
I think if they do go through with this his voice would be perfect, hes got that non serious voice and i think it fits well
User avatar #173 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (07/29/2014) [-]
If its him here he definitely does a great job. Would go watch it.
#154 - HE ****** UP THE LAST DEADPOOL AND THEY'RE GIVING…  [+] (14 new replies) 07/29/2014 on Deadpool leaked movie test... -5
#175 - acadia (07/29/2014) [-]
his horrible deadpool wasnt his fault, whoever came up with the idea for that deadpool is the one who fucked it up, his did a great job as wade though
User avatar #174 - jsrf (07/29/2014) [-]
actully i think he played it fine because deadpool dident become dead pool until after his healing factor. long story short he had cancer before, the healing factor saved him from it, and he ended up being driven insane by the pain of his cells tearing apart and regenerating constantly thus becoming deadpool
User avatar #160 - valax (07/29/2014) [-]
Dude, he didn't seem like Deadpool at all to me either. He seemed like just a random dude.
#176 - butakun (07/29/2014) [-]
Did he not seem like Deadpool more because of the acting, or more because he didn't look like Deadpool?
User avatar #177 - valax (07/29/2014) [-]
Both, I guess.
Did he seem like Deadpool to you?
#179 - butakun (07/29/2014) [-]
I like Deadpool, but I wouldn't classify myself as enough of a fan to have strong sense of how he "should" be... in retrospect I think he was fine (at least while his character was still just Wade Wilson rather than that... weird, chimeric thing), but honestly I think a lot of my concept of Deadpool relies on how crazy he is, which might not apply properly to the character in the movie. I don't have a super deep understanding of the original though, as I mentioned.
User avatar #182 - valax (07/29/2014) [-]
I think internal dialogue is a big part of the character.
That maybe needs to be there.
#185 - butakun (07/29/2014) [-]
Well, if they ever get around to making an actual big budget Deadpool movie, if they're at all interested in doing it right I suspect they'll include the internal dialogue. And probably make fun of Origins: Wolverine while they're at it.
User avatar #186 - valax (07/29/2014) [-]
Off-topic:

Isn't your username selling yourself a bit short?
#188 - butakun (07/29/2014) [-]
Wait, you actually know what it means? Haha, first comment I've ever gotten on it.

It's a dumb nickname from in high school... had curly hair in back and a couple of silly Japanese friends. Honestly I wasn't thinking about it that much when I picked it, more just to have it be different from the ones I use elsewhere.
User avatar #155 - fluttermon (07/29/2014) [-]
the teaser trailer seems okay to me..

anything else isn't canon anyway
User avatar #157 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (07/29/2014) [-]
No i know that, it was more for dramatic effect.

I have no issue with Ryan Reynolds. He didn't butt fuck Deadpool, the film company did.
User avatar #171 - seancwatts (07/29/2014) [-]
I think if they do go through with this his voice would be perfect, hes got that non serious voice and i think it fits well
User avatar #173 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (07/29/2014) [-]
If its him here he definitely does a great job. Would go watch it.
#60 - Hey **** you man, this was all me! …  [+] (2 new replies) 07/29/2014 on Best Comic-Con cosplay this... 0
#62 - Womens Study Major (07/29/2014) [-]
Morons, it was obviously mine
User avatar #68 - swagfagit (07/29/2014) [-]
you amazing faggot
#26 - Picture 07/28/2014 on Legit. 0
#23 - As a Certified Britishman i can tell you that this was a Joke. 07/28/2014 on Legit. -1
#7 - Oh, fair point. 07/28/2014 on Freddie Mercury 0
#5 - The other one being?  [+] (2 new replies) 07/28/2014 on Freddie Mercury 0
User avatar #6 - guiguito (07/28/2014) [-]
ghandi
User avatar #7 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (07/28/2014) [-]
Oh, fair point.
#10 - I mean the original picture.... Look at where Dolan i…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/28/2014 on Why? 0
User avatar #11 - twostepstoomany (07/28/2014) [-]
Holy Shit there is. My bad fellow FJ user as it turns out im blind. Didn't even notice the first time.
#19 - Here's ours  [+] (5 new replies) 07/28/2014 on Legit. -1
User avatar #24 - joefwginge (07/28/2014) [-]
nobody in our country is this retarded
#26 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (07/28/2014) [-]
#22 - themajesticsnail (07/28/2014) [-]
Giv malvinas
#21 - Womens Study Major (07/28/2014) [-]
As a certified Britishman I can assure you fj this is not how we see the world
#23 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (07/28/2014) [-]
As a Certified Britishman i can tell you that this was a Joke.
#23 - I know, the sad thing is its always been like that. So even th…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/28/2014 on waht teh fak mains 0
User avatar #24 - soule (07/28/2014) [-]
We have a German friend that comes by every now and again and every time he comes here he buys loads and LOADS of jeans. lol He also buys a lot of technological stuff (stereos, tv's, etc) And we think we have it hard. :\
#21 - Yeah, the UK is closer to £650 (we get ****** ov…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/28/2014 on waht teh fak mains +1
User avatar #22 - soule (07/28/2014) [-]
I know what you mean with prices. lol I was over there a few years back and thought it funny that everything was priced the same as it is in the US, but because of conversion everything was actually almost double the price. (You pay 8 pounds for a meal and McDonald's, just like you'd pay $8 here, but it actually equates to about $14.) You poor people.
User avatar #23 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (07/28/2014) [-]
I know, the sad thing is its always been like that. So even though £350 for a PS4 is a lot of money, it actually doesn't seem like a lot for a PS4 if that makes sense?

Its like, "They just cost that much" and we live with it.

I know a kid who is middle to low income (not poor in any respect but is no where near rich). His parents saved for about 2 years to go to America, Florida to be precise.

He came back with a brand new iPhone. His parents took his Christmas money, which was going to be spent on a new phone, and bought it for him.

He got a brand new iPhone for the price of like a Galaxy S3 (which was what, 2 years old at that point?) Its fucking crazy.
User avatar #24 - soule (07/28/2014) [-]
We have a German friend that comes by every now and again and every time he comes here he buys loads and LOADS of jeans. lol He also buys a lot of technological stuff (stereos, tv's, etc) And we think we have it hard. :\
#26 - *2 weeks later* OMG SHE WAS SUCH A PRINCESS! …  [+] (1 new reply) 07/28/2014 on No, bad Bing! +1
#35 - gunslayer (07/28/2014) [-]
#19 - But even then a Laptop is far superior. You can do s…  [+] (5 new replies) 07/28/2014 on waht teh fak mains 0
User avatar #20 - soule (07/28/2014) [-]
I think the Pro version is actually around $600. I have the standard version. :l
User avatar #21 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (07/28/2014) [-]
Yeah, the UK is closer to £650 (we get fucked over on prices. Its a fucking con but there we go.)

Going purely from a British perspective though its better to go for something like a MBA for like, £750 (which is actually surprising for apple, they have dropped it £100). Thats only £100 more for a fully fledged laptop.

Even if we look at the RT version its better to go for a Samsung Tab/iPad Air because they do Word, Powerpoint and exel and you can get fantastic keyboards for them reletively cheap.

I know im ranting but the Surface does baffle me. Its like "WHAT DO YOU DO!? WHO WANTS YOU!?"

At least from my perspective.
User avatar #22 - soule (07/28/2014) [-]
I know what you mean with prices. lol I was over there a few years back and thought it funny that everything was priced the same as it is in the US, but because of conversion everything was actually almost double the price. (You pay 8 pounds for a meal and McDonald's, just like you'd pay $8 here, but it actually equates to about $14.) You poor people.
User avatar #23 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (07/28/2014) [-]
I know, the sad thing is its always been like that. So even though £350 for a PS4 is a lot of money, it actually doesn't seem like a lot for a PS4 if that makes sense?

Its like, "They just cost that much" and we live with it.

I know a kid who is middle to low income (not poor in any respect but is no where near rich). His parents saved for about 2 years to go to America, Florida to be precise.

He came back with a brand new iPhone. His parents took his Christmas money, which was going to be spent on a new phone, and bought it for him.

He got a brand new iPhone for the price of like a Galaxy S3 (which was what, 2 years old at that point?) Its fucking crazy.
User avatar #24 - soule (07/28/2014) [-]
We have a German friend that comes by every now and again and every time he comes here he buys loads and LOADS of jeans. lol He also buys a lot of technological stuff (stereos, tv's, etc) And we think we have it hard. :\
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 300 / Total items point value: 300

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #11 - joshlol (09/20/2014) [-]
interesting username
User avatar #8 to #7 - aabbccddeeffgghhii ONLINE (06/20/2014) [-]
Well thats not very nice.
User avatar #5 - haranaslicer (06/15/2014) [-]
Can i have your toast?
User avatar #6 to #5 - aabbccddeeffgghhii ONLINE (06/15/2014) [-]
No. Get your own toast you bum!
User avatar #1 - andranadu ONLINE (03/02/2014) [-]
nice name
User avatar #2 to #1 - aabbccddeeffgghhii ONLINE (03/02/2014) [-]
Thanks! Took me ages to think of!
 Friends (0)