Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

aabbccddeeffgghhii    

Rank #879 on Comments
aabbccddeeffgghhii Avatar Level 259 Comments: Contaminated Win
Offline
Send mail to aabbccddeeffgghhii Block aabbccddeeffgghhii Invite aabbccddeeffgghhii to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/20/2012
Last Login:9/14/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#10166
Comment Ranking:#879
Highest Content Rank:#6855
Highest Comment Rank:#481
Content Thumbs: 180 total,  238 ,  58
Comment Thumbs: 7246 total,  9270 ,  2024
Content Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 16 Content: New Here → Level 17 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 91% (91/100)
Level 259 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 260 Comments: Pure Win
Subscribers:0
Content Views:21438
Times Content Favorited:6 times
Total Comments Made:1797
FJ Points:6157

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

latest user's comments

#91 - "I played this game we've been waiting for years for a we…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/13/2014 on New Smash Bros. 0
#97 - batham (09/13/2014) [-]
You mean
"I wasted money to play a demo of a game we've been watiing for years for a week before you, unless you played it at Best Buy or something"
More like stupid cred.
#83 - Dat... Not dad... ******* dat. 09/13/2014 on New Smash Bros. 0
#82 - YEAH BUT DAD GAMER CRED MAN!  [+] (5 new replies) 09/13/2014 on New Smash Bros. +4
#85 - batham (09/13/2014) [-]
Gamer cred is paying $90 for a demo that will be free in one week?
User avatar #138 - deviousdanish (09/14/2014) [-]
The public demo is limited to 30 plays.
User avatar #91 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/13/2014) [-]
"I played this game we've been waiting for years for a week before you"

Gamer cred.
#97 - batham (09/13/2014) [-]
You mean
"I wasted money to play a demo of a game we've been watiing for years for a week before you, unless you played it at Best Buy or something"
More like stupid cred.
User avatar #83 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/13/2014) [-]
Dat... Not dad... fucking dat.
#19 - I like the film for Olaf. One of the funniest comic r…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/13/2014 on Frozen 0
#48 - kageshi (09/14/2014) [-]
Bet you think Jarjar binks was a good character too?
#27 - anonymous (09/14/2014) [-]
You have terrible taste
#40 - memeticman (09/14/2014) [-]
#71 - If i did, trust me, that ******** be on eBay. …  [+] (13 new replies) 09/13/2014 on New Smash Bros. +18
#72 - batham (09/13/2014) [-]
People have paid $90 for codes.
I wonder if they know that it only has five characters, one stage, only one mode of play, and will be available for everyone next week?
User avatar #131 - greyswordsman (09/14/2014) [-]
so we ARE getting the demo? i thought it was just typical internet bullshit.
User avatar #132 - batham (09/14/2014) [-]
Demo comes out in six days for everyone.
User avatar #154 - yiffcario (09/14/2014) [-]
Sauce for proof?
#133 - greyswordsman (09/14/2014) [-]
my family...i will miss them
User avatar #137 - deviousdanish (09/14/2014) [-]
You can only play it 30 times if you don't have the special one.
User avatar #140 - greyswordsman (09/14/2014) [-]
...lets see, xi=x11∙x4∙...∙xn ~ of 30, 3.57% over 84.96 , and this is assuming that it will be available on the 20th, 11(x) ∝ 24(x), mmmm
if i do 2 matches a day, i will play just enough smash til october 3rd
#82 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/13/2014) [-]
YEAH BUT DAD GAMER CRED MAN!
#85 - batham (09/13/2014) [-]
Gamer cred is paying $90 for a demo that will be free in one week?
User avatar #138 - deviousdanish (09/14/2014) [-]
The public demo is limited to 30 plays.
User avatar #91 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/13/2014) [-]
"I played this game we've been waiting for years for a week before you"

Gamer cred.
#97 - batham (09/13/2014) [-]
You mean
"I wasted money to play a demo of a game we've been watiing for years for a week before you, unless you played it at Best Buy or something"
More like stupid cred.
User avatar #83 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/13/2014) [-]
Dat... Not dad... fucking dat.
#23 - I don't need to imagine it, its already happened. Wo…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/13/2014 on Admin vs USA +1
User avatar #38 - thegamegestapo (18 hours ago) [-]
Right enough, I'll rephrase. There's never been this much of a power gradient in human history. In the First and Second World Wars Germany was arguably the most powerful nation involved.

Two of the powerful countries always run the risk of butting head, but their's no logical argument that the weaker countries will start trouble with multiple superpowers.

I mean even if the weedy kid at school does have a baseball bat there's not way he's going to start a fight with the entire baseball league.
#28 - zeittergiest (09/13/2014) [-]
you misunderstand what OP is saying - China would side with the US in the Event of glorious Admin deciding to war. Admin knows this and will probably not ever decide to war because of it
#19 - Thanks. 09/13/2014 on (untitled) +46
#10 - "Oh thats cool" *Thumbs up, next page* … 09/13/2014 on Fallout Channel Awareness +8
#10 - I have to say, I wouldn't want a war with those guys. …  [+] (13 new replies) 09/13/2014 on Admin vs USA +3
User avatar #19 - thegamegestapo (09/13/2014) [-]
The main problem with North Korea is lack of resources. They don't have enough petrol to invade another country, plain and simple. Even if they did, famine has left their population too weak for sustained, or even short conflict.

Also, there is a legitimate concern among N.Korean officers that there would be mass defections as soon as the soldiers crossed the border.

And let's not forget that North Korea starting a war would guarantee not only American intervention but also Chinese.

Imagine the two most powerful militaries in human history coming to the mutual conclusion that you should be turned into a giant crater.

War is unlikely.
User avatar #23 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (09/13/2014) [-]
I don't need to imagine it, its already happened.

World War 2.

World War 1.

Napoleonic wars.

Punic Wars.

The Two Largest (in a lot of cases 4 or more) powers in the world have clashed before and we have turned out OK. Don't think that will stop it.

The Cold war didn't become an actual war because of M.A.D., which back in the day the Soviets and USA didn't actually know whether the other side would actually fire a nuke. These days we know no sane power would use nuclear weapons, So it would be only N.Korea who would possibly fire a nuke, and if N.Korea fired China would up and leave their asses. They don't want a nuclear war.

China and the USA would fight a conventional war, if any seeing as N.Korea is on a tight rope with China, so it would happen whether its a good idea or not.
User avatar #38 - thegamegestapo (18 hours ago) [-]
Right enough, I'll rephrase. There's never been this much of a power gradient in human history. In the First and Second World Wars Germany was arguably the most powerful nation involved.

Two of the powerful countries always run the risk of butting head, but their's no logical argument that the weaker countries will start trouble with multiple superpowers.

I mean even if the weedy kid at school does have a baseball bat there's not way he's going to start a fight with the entire baseball league.
#28 - zeittergiest (09/13/2014) [-]
you misunderstand what OP is saying - China would side with the US in the Event of glorious Admin deciding to war. Admin knows this and will probably not ever decide to war because of it
User avatar #16 - bloodredspark (09/13/2014) [-]
A lot of North Koreans know they're shit is shit.

Pretty sure most of them, if they were told "we're going to go fight America/Britain/Russia/", you'd have a lot of people trying to get out of the country. Moreso than there, supposedly is now.

Of course, there always a chance that there aren't really people in NK, who hate it. But...it's more likely the fact that people know shit is terribad, even people in their military.
#13 - panzerfront (09/13/2014) [-]
Your one of the few people I've seen to take a realistic view of the North Korean Army vs the US army.
If we had a war with them, it would be result in us getting our (The US and South Koreans) collective ass whopping. The North Korean Army would steam roll the current defenses in the peninsula and probably capture Seoul in a few days, if they hadn't reduced it to rubble via massed bombardment with 20,000 shells landing on it per hour.

But in the end we would win but it would take causalities in the hundreds of thousands to pull off, as they've studied our wars in the middle east and fortified the areas vital to any US attack (Read roads and any hub of transport) and placed a massive amount of IEDs in them.
#29 - vparrish (09/13/2014) [-]
Why would we fight a soldier based war, especially one that crosses the borders. Our vast naval and air force superiority would be a far better plan. If we were going to go in by land though, we would cross in through China where the borders aren't nearly as fortified.
#31 - panzerfront (09/13/2014) [-]
Because we already have troops in South Korea and the only scenario where North Korea goes to war with South Korea is with China backing it, because the Chinese have told the North Koreans that the South Koreans are a valuable business partner and it would cost them less money to destroy them than to adjust to not having South Korea.
The only reason that China would break ties with South Korea would be in the advent of a major rift between the two, such as South Korea refusing to trade with them.
Also air-power and navy alone cannot win a war of annihilation only troops with proper support can which it would be, as the massive North Korean submarine fleet, the largest of its kind easily dwarfing even ours isolates South Korea, from any of our Carrier based groups.
#32 - vparrish (09/13/2014) [-]
We have troops in south korea to protect from invasion. Trying to cross the DMZ with them would be ridiculous. China has already showed a decrease in support of North Korea. China supports North Korea as a protectorate, if North Korea actually declared war they would drop them instantly. China's economy is based on mass production of everyday items. If they'd be destroying their market.

I said air and naval. Using destroyers and drop ships you would be able to destroy much of the defenses on the east coast so that soldiers can land safely. After that you would have air support as you worked your way inward.
#34 - panzerfront (09/13/2014) [-]
That would mean getting into the envelop of the NK missiles that actually work, and their as I said submarine fleet.

The reason we would have to go into NK through the south would be because we have to relieve those soldiers already under fire and second, while China is losing Support for NK, they do tell the NKs that in the event of South Korea invading them or they want for whatever reason to invade SK they will give them free reign.

I do however agree with the assessment that they would lose but only without Chinese support, with it they would win.

But either way, it would take us roughly three weeks to a month to gather sufficient force to get them out of the South Korean peninsula, in which time everything south of the border is going to be demolished by a metric fuck ton of artillery shell.
#36 - vparrish (09/13/2014) [-]
They may have a larger fleet of submarines, but ours are of much higher quality.

It's not like we wouldn't be responding back. We have plenty of troops and ally's around the area. Japan could mobilize quickly to give support. Fiinally Europe would probably become involved as well if Japan, America, and South Korea became under attack.
#37 - panzerfront (09/14/2014) [-]
America might, and this is a big maybe be under attack, however it would be in the very west part of America, however I do foresee the Japanese getting more than their fair share of missile delivered chemical weapons, because should the North Koreans ever go to war again, they will not hold back any potential weapons they might have.
I'll concede quality here, but having more means you can be in more places at once, and should they have enough to overcome the technological gap, it would be very costly, especially if they play it smart and target surface vessel, and most importantly troop ships, and when they do that, the American people will rail against the war, the moment the 18,000 soldiers and sailors killed by submarine.
As an american I've seen what happens the moment we start losing soldiers, the people at home want to pull out.
This will stand in stark contrast to the North Korean response to their dead, each one will be a hero who died to smite the foreign imperialists.
#33 - vparrish (09/13/2014) [-]
You would also have the support of Japan who are a short distance away for easy access to supplies.
#16 - He wasn't needed anymore. I think (again think) he was origina… 09/13/2014 on LOTR Facts: Samwise The Brave +2

user's friends

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 550

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #7 - soundofwinter ONLINE (06/20/2014) [-]
**** you
User avatar #8 to #7 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (06/20/2014) [-]
Well thats not very nice.
User avatar #5 - haranaslicer ONLINE (06/15/2014) [-]
Can i have your toast?
User avatar #6 to #5 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (06/15/2014) [-]
No. Get your own toast you bum!
User avatar #1 - andranadu (03/02/2014) [-]
nice name
User avatar #2 to #1 - aabbccddeeffgghhii (03/02/2014) [-]
Thanks! Took me ages to think of!
 Friends (0)