Upload
Login or register

Vandeekree

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:2/21/2010
Last Login:7/29/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#8985
Highest Comment Rank:#1622
Comment Thumbs: 6272 total,  8555 ,  2283
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 17% (17/100)
Level 254 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 255 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:1
Content Views:3
Total Comments Made:2358
FJ Points:5327

latest user's comments

#46 - That's true only if you believe in relative morality. And if a… 05/11/2016 on Ghey 0
#34 - This is true, a lot of Christians point to the old testament w…  [+] (10 new replies) 05/11/2016 on Ghey 0
User avatar
#41 - esioh (05/11/2016) [-]
to claim something is OBJECTIVELY wrong or right based on religion is to be retarded. If you honestly belive Homosexuality or whatever is a sin sure go for it. However to act like thats some kind of universal truth is autistic and you dam well know it
User avatar
#47 - Vandeekree (05/11/2016) [-]
And what do you base that on? Some objective morality yourself? Of course not. Your idea that me thinking that is subjective and thus not truly right or wrong either. And so if my idea is "autistic" you seem to be asserting that it being so is bad. But if you say your and my morality system is subjective then there's nothing go or bad about being autistic either. Your point is self defeating when you argue my point is morally wrong because there is no right and wrong.
User avatar
#48 - esioh (05/11/2016) [-]
except the point is not self defeating. Consider the following. Any point anyone makes about right and wrong is automatically null and void. Then to simply make an argument for something to be right or wrong in the first place IS to be autistic. Therefore my argumet still holds.
User avatar
#49 - Vandeekree (05/11/2016) [-]
But if there is no right and wrong, then all actions are valid. And if all actions are valid, then there is no move you can make that is better or worse. Perhaps you die and turn to dust, perhaps you become ruler of all you survey. Neither is good or bad or matters. And so to act in a way you would call autistic, such as arguing, is just as autistic as any other move. Arguing is equally autistic as calling someone who argues autistic.
User avatar
#50 - esioh (05/11/2016) [-]
yes
User avatar
#51 - Vandeekree (05/11/2016) [-]
And so if everything is autistic...nothing is.
User avatar
#52 - esioh (05/11/2016) [-]
nah nah nah nah nah, we were getting somewhere mate and then you had to ruin it. You cant always think abot things in a relative sense. If everything is autistic, everything is STLL autistic. You see what I'm saying? Like sure relatively speaking everything becomes not autistic, but its not always about relativity is it
User avatar
#53 - Vandeekree (05/11/2016) [-]
But why mention something that goes without saying? Is there a need to hand someone and apple and say "Here is not a dog, not a car, not a rock, not a star, not a..." on and on until you have said everything that thing is not? Of course not. By telling what that thing is, you are telling what it is not as well. And vice versa. And so why would you point out that everything in the universe is, by your surmising, autistic?

So if being autistic is neither good nor bad and everything is autistic already. Then stating it is autistic has no purpose, it's the same as saying nothing at all. So why even say it?

But I'm glad you've come full circle to see my original point about morality. That being that relativism has no foothold without something objective to stand on.
#38 - thermobil (05/11/2016) [-]
Homosexuality is a reality and human labels "right and "wrong" are only based on the emotional response to the topic. Emotions and human labels can´t change reality.
User avatar
#46 - Vandeekree (05/11/2016) [-]
That's true only if you believe in relative morality. And if all morality is relative then I agree, nothing it right and wrong. In order to see what is truly right or wrong it would take the ability to see everything and thus be a true and infallible judge. Such a judge could exist in the form of the Christian God.

I personally subscribe to absolute morality. It makes more sense and counters determinism. The problem with determinism, as you said, is that it would mean we really are just robots driven by the emotions in our brains which are driven by chemical reactions. If that's the case then we cannot choose and so nothing we do matters because we are as the river that does not choose which way to flow. We may think we have consciousness but it's simply not true, we are watching the movie of our lives and even the way we watch it is predetermined. And if you can do nothing, change nothing, and there is no right or wrong, then in the words of the late Freddy "nothing really matters"
#36 - I see the gay card also gets you out of being called on dodgin… 05/08/2016 on Lesbian -3
#26 - I don't see why people make fun of this. It seems to …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/05/2016 on FAIR POINT... +1
User avatar
#27 - whitie (05/05/2016) [-]
Well different people have different interpretations of what life is about, i believe that centralizing power leads to innovation, for example ; if all resources were spread evenly across the world to all people, there would be no single country rich enough to innovate in space flight, severely impeding the rate at which our scientific knowledge expands

Perhaps you remember from high school biology how for a long time all life on earth was single cells, because they lacked the energy to cross the threshold into multi cellular life, the symbiosis of mitochondria and bacterium is what allowed the gap to be crossed

I like to think that human society behaves in a similar way, the wealth of poor nations goes to richer countries and in exchange those rich countries provide innovation that allows poor countries to catch up to that level of wealth; and if killing you enemies is necessary to keep your material wealth secure then it is morally admissable to me because it is simply the best solution to protect ourselves and our desire to move forward
#115 - It's simply what sells. Most players like to fantasize when th…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/01/2016 on RPG races +10
User avatar
#135 - rickardur (05/01/2016) [-]
Jealousy makes people rebel.
User avatar
#125 - nudybooty (05/01/2016) [-]
Honestly, most girls that play RPG'S want their characters to be sexy as well. Maybe not the bikini armour, but every girl I know that plays games wants to look beautiful and badass.
#148 - wattlegobbler (05/01/2016) [-]
Well, there is actually no problem that women portrayed in Video Games are Slim and fit what would make sense for a asassin/warrior, but in 7/10 cases we get Female characters with nearly to no armor at all, especially in the boob/Crouch area. And i'm not Nerd enough to say that i wanna see my character look like this
User avatar
#182 - nudybooty (05/02/2016) [-]
I agree, thats why I said maybe not the bikini armour
#122 - kappathan (05/01/2016) [-]
Totally true.
Oh boy would I love to be as buff as that orc over there.
#12 - Interesting, well thank you for sharing your thoughts. 05/01/2016 on home 0
#10 - So the only purpose for a human to be alive might be to help t…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/01/2016 on home 0
User avatar
#11 - nerdreaper (05/01/2016) [-]
Not the only purpose but in my beliefs, yes.
User avatar
#12 - Vandeekree (05/01/2016) [-]
Interesting, well thank you for sharing your thoughts.
#7 - Ah, so he's simply saying that, because the world is relativel…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/01/2016 on home 0
User avatar
#8 - nerdreaper (05/01/2016) [-]
I the short term rationing makes sense, but in the long term humanity would benefit have greater numbers of manpower, thus the balancing act. The does not need to and will not exist forever, just long enough for us to learn how to expand our resources.
User avatar
#10 - Vandeekree (05/01/2016) [-]
So the only purpose for a human to be alive might be to help the rest of humanity survive?
User avatar
#11 - nerdreaper (05/01/2016) [-]
Not the only purpose but in my beliefs, yes.
User avatar
#12 - Vandeekree (05/01/2016) [-]
Interesting, well thank you for sharing your thoughts.
User avatar
#9 - nerdreaper (05/01/2016) [-]
*The Earth*
#2 - Where does that logic come from? To help each other because th…  [+] (9 new replies) 05/01/2016 on home +1
User avatar
#6 - nerdreaper (05/01/2016) [-]
As anon said, the logic is that, as we cannot currently escape this world for another, then it would be a benefit to take care of it. In extension of, properly taking care of the world would best be done by everyone, thereore everyone should help take care for each other.
Also the size of the planet does not matter in his speech, it was a redundant phrase.
User avatar
#7 - Vandeekree (05/01/2016) [-]
Ah, so he's simply saying that, because the world is relatively small then it is relatively valuable. And that it is necessary to preserve the resource that is the Earth until more can be found and inhabited. So it's not a moral debate at all, more of a statement on the current market value of a resource.

And yet he mentions that we should take care of our fellow human. That seems contradictory sense, in order to keep the Earth livable for longer, reducing the amount of competition for that finite resource would be the best way to "ration" it.
User avatar
#8 - nerdreaper (05/01/2016) [-]
I the short term rationing makes sense, but in the long term humanity would benefit have greater numbers of manpower, thus the balancing act. The does not need to and will not exist forever, just long enough for us to learn how to expand our resources.
User avatar
#10 - Vandeekree (05/01/2016) [-]
So the only purpose for a human to be alive might be to help the rest of humanity survive?
User avatar
#11 - nerdreaper (05/01/2016) [-]
Not the only purpose but in my beliefs, yes.
User avatar
#12 - Vandeekree (05/01/2016) [-]
Interesting, well thank you for sharing your thoughts.
User avatar
#9 - nerdreaper (05/01/2016) [-]
*The Earth*
#5 - anon (05/01/2016) [-]
To poorly summarize what would be a long explanation, the idea is that we're mucking up the only place we've got.
User avatar
#3 - zenler (05/01/2016) [-]
i got no idea, but what i do know is the guy is in space
#30 - Damn those Bulgarians and their milk induced longevity. 04/30/2016 on What China thinks of Europe +2