Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Vandeekree    

Rank #8344 on Comments
Vandeekree Avatar Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Online
Send mail to Vandeekree Block Vandeekree Invite Vandeekree to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/21/2010
Last Login:10/23/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#8344
Highest Comment Rank:#1622
Comment Thumbs: 3802 total,  5612 ,  1810
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 82% (82/100)
Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:2
Content Views:3
Total Comments Made:1678
FJ Points:3508

latest user's comments

#31 - Why are they automatically at fault? Perhaps you're the one wh…  [+] (6 new replies) 10/22/2014 on Hate when this happens +4
User avatar #104 - YllekNayr (17 hours ago) [-]
Because in this story, he is only talking about the scenarios where the other person is wrong.

That's the premise of the situation. He didn't say "THIS ALWAYS HAPPENS"
#113 - xxxsonic fanxxx (17 hours ago) [-]
It's faulty because how do you know that you're wrong. Most of the time, the people who complain about this shit are idiots who aren't actually right, but "know" that they are and then get infuriated when their inability to process things logically means that they won't resolve the argument.
User avatar #114 - YllekNayr (17 hours ago) [-]
Because some things are objectively factual.
Example: You argue with someone about the moon orbiting earth, rather than the other way around.
#121 - xxxsonic fanxxx (16 hours ago) [-]
"Because some things are objectively factual." Well alright, I can tell you're no engineer yet, but that's a discussion for another time.

But here again you're doing something stupid again however, you're assuming that the arguments are about things like this while nothing of the sort has been said.
User avatar #137 - YllekNayr (15 hours ago) [-]
Yes, it has.
You're being fucking stupid by picking at something that's already been established.

That's like if someone said "Whenever the weather's really cloudy outside, I don't need my sunglasses."
And you respond "Who said the weather is always cloudy? Why are you assuming it's cloudy?"
#34 - anonasuser (23 hours ago) [-]
i once had an argument with my ex
i said "agree to disagree" and she insisted she wasn't disagreeing with me
saying things like "i just think it's this way, not the way you think it is"
we argued for 30 minutes before she said "how about i just believe what i believe, and you believe what you believe"
"right. agree to disagree"
#31 - I watched this recently. Funnyjunk had spoiled all the good pa…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/19/2014 on George Martin -3
User avatar #48 - faggotville (10/19/2014) [-]
K hun.
#45 - killerraise (10/19/2014) [-]
#155 - Well I will agree with you. Common sense gets in the way of mo… 09/29/2014 on Help me with this guys 0
#153 - I never said that everything was equally true. But yes, every …  [+] (2 new replies) 09/29/2014 on Help me with this guys 0
User avatar #154 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
I'm not 100% about anything, but even if some crazy shit was true, it goes against too much commons sense and simple observations on our universe to believe. Maybe it was okay a thousand years ago when nobody knew any better, but we know how things work now. They're outdated beliefs that stand on tradition alone, and no logical merit. I don't usually talk about it, because I find beliefs a private matter, inappropriate to discuss in public, but the circumstances of this conversation excuse that.
User avatar #155 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
Well I will agree with you. Common sense gets in the way of morality quite often. After all, it makes sense to kill one person to save two others.
#151 - And I can't condone looking down on anyone. A person's words s… 09/29/2014 on Help me with this guys 0
#147 - Yes, I read it. You said you hold varying amounts of respect f…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/29/2014 on Help me with this guys 0
User avatar #148 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
I hold varying amounts of respect for different people based on many factors, with certain qualities influencing that respect to varying degrees. For example: I look down on people who believe in ridiculous things more than I look down on someone who wears those ugly running shoes that nobody should ever wear. But neither of those are a deciding factor in my interaction with a person (except for a guy that I thought was cute until I saw him wearing his non-formal clothes, which included those shoes, and I haven't bothered to interact with him since)
User avatar #151 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
And I can't condone looking down on anyone. A person's words should be taken on equal ground with anyone else's because they all come from thinking human beings and while it's easy to get into the mind set that yours is the most intelligent and right brain you've ever read, it's also the only one you've ever sifted through.
But I really hope you aren't serious when you say you stopped interacting with someone because of the shoes they wear....
#145 - You disregard a person as inherently wrong based on preconceiv…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/29/2014 on Help me with this guys 0
User avatar #146 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
Did you even read my last comment? That's literally the opposite of what I said.
User avatar #147 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
Yes, I read it. You said you hold varying amounts of respect for different people. Your statements before that proved that those varying amounts come from what you understand that person to think and feel based on what you've heard about the group as a whole without caring to get to know that individual. It's all very telling.
User avatar #148 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
I hold varying amounts of respect for different people based on many factors, with certain qualities influencing that respect to varying degrees. For example: I look down on people who believe in ridiculous things more than I look down on someone who wears those ugly running shoes that nobody should ever wear. But neither of those are a deciding factor in my interaction with a person (except for a guy that I thought was cute until I saw him wearing his non-formal clothes, which included those shoes, and I haven't bothered to interact with him since)
User avatar #151 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
And I can't condone looking down on anyone. A person's words should be taken on equal ground with anyone else's because they all come from thinking human beings and while it's easy to get into the mind set that yours is the most intelligent and right brain you've ever read, it's also the only one you've ever sifted through.
But I really hope you aren't serious when you say you stopped interacting with someone because of the shoes they wear....
#143 - And I find it sad you don't have respect for all people, but t…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/29/2014 on Help me with this guys 0
User avatar #144 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
It depends on what kind of respect I have for people; I don't think respect is a static defined thing. It's more like, "I look down upon that person's system of logic and understanding". I get along well with many such people I would consider completely retarded if other characteristics didn't exist. People aren't just their cosmology.
User avatar #145 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
You disregard a person as inherently wrong based on preconceived understandings of how their minds work based on their system of belief. I would say that's just about the same thing as not having enough respect for a person you don't know to give them the benefit of the doubt. You just assume you already know.
User avatar #146 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
Did you even read my last comment? That's literally the opposite of what I said.
User avatar #147 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
Yes, I read it. You said you hold varying amounts of respect for different people. Your statements before that proved that those varying amounts come from what you understand that person to think and feel based on what you've heard about the group as a whole without caring to get to know that individual. It's all very telling.
User avatar #148 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
I hold varying amounts of respect for different people based on many factors, with certain qualities influencing that respect to varying degrees. For example: I look down on people who believe in ridiculous things more than I look down on someone who wears those ugly running shoes that nobody should ever wear. But neither of those are a deciding factor in my interaction with a person (except for a guy that I thought was cute until I saw him wearing his non-formal clothes, which included those shoes, and I haven't bothered to interact with him since)
User avatar #151 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
And I can't condone looking down on anyone. A person's words should be taken on equal ground with anyone else's because they all come from thinking human beings and while it's easy to get into the mind set that yours is the most intelligent and right brain you've ever read, it's also the only one you've ever sifted through.
But I really hope you aren't serious when you say you stopped interacting with someone because of the shoes they wear....
#141 - I know what you zeroed in on. And if think that's tail tell mo…  [+] (8 new replies) 09/29/2014 on Help me with this guys 0
User avatar #142 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
To be 100% fair, if there is a supernatural inherent characteristic of every action taken, and a force of ultimate knowledge and creation said that if you do an action it deems evil, for whatever reason, you'll spend an infinite amount of time in ultimate agony - then yes, you are right, it's better not to do anything in that situation.

And given how unrealistic that situation is, for a multitude of reasons, I find it impossible to respect the opinion of someone who believes such things.
User avatar #143 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
And I find it sad you don't have respect for all people, but that's just another thing we disagree on.
User avatar #144 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
It depends on what kind of respect I have for people; I don't think respect is a static defined thing. It's more like, "I look down upon that person's system of logic and understanding". I get along well with many such people I would consider completely retarded if other characteristics didn't exist. People aren't just their cosmology.
User avatar #145 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
You disregard a person as inherently wrong based on preconceived understandings of how their minds work based on their system of belief. I would say that's just about the same thing as not having enough respect for a person you don't know to give them the benefit of the doubt. You just assume you already know.
User avatar #146 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
Did you even read my last comment? That's literally the opposite of what I said.
User avatar #147 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
Yes, I read it. You said you hold varying amounts of respect for different people. Your statements before that proved that those varying amounts come from what you understand that person to think and feel based on what you've heard about the group as a whole without caring to get to know that individual. It's all very telling.
User avatar #148 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
I hold varying amounts of respect for different people based on many factors, with certain qualities influencing that respect to varying degrees. For example: I look down on people who believe in ridiculous things more than I look down on someone who wears those ugly running shoes that nobody should ever wear. But neither of those are a deciding factor in my interaction with a person (except for a guy that I thought was cute until I saw him wearing his non-formal clothes, which included those shoes, and I haven't bothered to interact with him since)
User avatar #151 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
And I can't condone looking down on anyone. A person's words should be taken on equal ground with anyone else's because they all come from thinking human beings and while it's easy to get into the mind set that yours is the most intelligent and right brain you've ever read, it's also the only one you've ever sifted through.
But I really hope you aren't serious when you say you stopped interacting with someone because of the shoes they wear....
#139 - Someone's full of assumptions.  [+] (10 new replies) 09/29/2014 on Help me with this guys 0
User avatar #140 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
Unless you were using "sin" as an abstract term, then it shows you have a belief in a supernatural element, which would mean you aren't rational enough to argue with.
User avatar #141 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
I know what you zeroed in on. And if think that's tail tell more than anything. But it's fine if you want to take that out from the argument.
User avatar #142 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
To be 100% fair, if there is a supernatural inherent characteristic of every action taken, and a force of ultimate knowledge and creation said that if you do an action it deems evil, for whatever reason, you'll spend an infinite amount of time in ultimate agony - then yes, you are right, it's better not to do anything in that situation.

And given how unrealistic that situation is, for a multitude of reasons, I find it impossible to respect the opinion of someone who believes such things.
User avatar #143 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
And I find it sad you don't have respect for all people, but that's just another thing we disagree on.
User avatar #144 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
It depends on what kind of respect I have for people; I don't think respect is a static defined thing. It's more like, "I look down upon that person's system of logic and understanding". I get along well with many such people I would consider completely retarded if other characteristics didn't exist. People aren't just their cosmology.
User avatar #145 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
You disregard a person as inherently wrong based on preconceived understandings of how their minds work based on their system of belief. I would say that's just about the same thing as not having enough respect for a person you don't know to give them the benefit of the doubt. You just assume you already know.
User avatar #146 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
Did you even read my last comment? That's literally the opposite of what I said.
User avatar #147 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
Yes, I read it. You said you hold varying amounts of respect for different people. Your statements before that proved that those varying amounts come from what you understand that person to think and feel based on what you've heard about the group as a whole without caring to get to know that individual. It's all very telling.
User avatar #148 - demandsgayversion (09/29/2014) [-]
I hold varying amounts of respect for different people based on many factors, with certain qualities influencing that respect to varying degrees. For example: I look down on people who believe in ridiculous things more than I look down on someone who wears those ugly running shoes that nobody should ever wear. But neither of those are a deciding factor in my interaction with a person (except for a guy that I thought was cute until I saw him wearing his non-formal clothes, which included those shoes, and I haven't bothered to interact with him since)
User avatar #151 - Vandeekree (09/29/2014) [-]
And I can't condone looking down on anyone. A person's words should be taken on equal ground with anyone else's because they all come from thinking human beings and while it's easy to get into the mind set that yours is the most intelligent and right brain you've ever read, it's also the only one you've ever sifted through.
But I really hope you aren't serious when you say you stopped interacting with someone because of the shoes they wear....
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 1000

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #19 - kiratheunholy (05/09/2013) [-]
Do you not have morals? Like seriously do you not have any? You claim that you only do as the bible instructs every time someone asks you about morals, but do you not know right from wrong without religion?

If so perhaps you should learn it. I'm an agnostic and I still know what's right from wrong without a higher entity instructing me on it. If the only thing keeping you from being a moral-less prick is religion then you are probably a psychopath.
User avatar #16 - justinsane (04/04/2013) [-]
Lets just put this here, shall we? Fewer purple lines
User avatar #18 to #16 - justinsane (04/04/2013) [-]
Now I strongly disagree that more studies need to be done in order to come to a consensus. All of the leading bodies which have done research on the subject have found no reason to indicate that gays are naturally more likely through their expression of sexuality to have any types of adverse effects. The only people I have heard calling for more research are the same people claiming that climate change is not a thing or that natural selection doesnt happen. There is a consensus in the scientific community and it is people who are not a part of the community who claim that they cant make conclusions (because they dont like the ones made)
User avatar #17 to #16 - Vandeekree ONLINE (04/04/2013) [-]
Tis a good idea
#14 - highclassbean (02/11/2013) [-]
thank you for being so informative and calm in that religious conversation with thebritish.guy. really gave a positive look on the religious community.
User avatar #15 to #14 - Vandeekree ONLINE (02/11/2013) [-]
Why thank you. Simply following the bible though. It says to approach the nonbeliever with respect and politeness.
#10 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/07/2012) [-]
******* idiot.
#9 - Vandeekree ONLINE (09/01/2012) [-]
**Vandeekree rolled a random image posted in comment #40 at Christian dating **
#5 - Vandeekree ONLINE (09/14/2011) [-]
**Vandeekree rolled a random image**
User avatar #4 - Vandeekree ONLINE (07/27/2011) [-]
**Vandeekree rolls 1**
User avatar #3 - Vandeekree ONLINE (08/08/2010) [-]
**Vandeekree rolls 4**
#1 - bearycool **User deleted account** (07/14/2010) [-]
*pats head* don't worry my son I read your comment 80
User avatar #2 to #1 - Vandeekree ONLINE (07/14/2010) [-]
Thank you, now I feel loved. i guess that's what I get for posting in the morning when the average funnyjunker is asleep.
 Friends (0)