Well then, I shall do my best to explain. Lets start of with the fact that during combat, you'll only manage to take a few shoots before you perish (Some of the perks may take you a bit further.) In this case some people may bring up " But if you take cover, you'll regenerate health, and its true, but remember; you're opponent will regenerate as well, and then you're back to scratch, except with less ammo. I will admit that BF: BC2 got a wider aspect of team play, and that the ranking system in MW2 is kinda broken (No minus for dying, anyone?). But MW2 is not half bad if both of the team is equal, but this is rare. Its also pretty epic if you got 2 teams and both of the team's communicate's well.

As off balance, its all depends on what map you are playing on. The game also got a "Rock- Paper- Sciccor" like balancing system, that sometimes backfires if one team got a lot of "sciccors" and the other a lot of "rocks". Same with the perks.

That was mine 813 cents. Sorry for any bad grammar, I do not have english as my mother- tongue.
- Zlayzar

Not a fanboy, just prefer the look and feel of MW2 over BC2. I have played both, btw, and BC2 does look good and it's a great experience, but the feel of MW2 is too comfortable for me.

Funny Fact: If they agree's with you, they "got a clue", how ever; if they disagree they are "fan- boys".

I have yet to meet one person who could give me a valid fact why the game is so good

All i see is people who love the game because its not a challenge

Well then, I shall do my best to explain. Lets start of with the fact that during combat, you'll only manage to take a few shoots before you perish (Some of the perks may take you a bit further.) In this case some people may bring up " But if you take cover, you'll regenerate health, and its true, but remember; you're opponent will regenerate as well, and then you're back to scratch, except with less ammo. I will admit that BF: BC2 got a wider aspect of team play, and that the ranking system in MW2 is kinda broken (No minus for dying, anyone?). But MW2 is not half bad if both of the team is equal, but this is rare. Its also pretty epic if you got 2 teams and both of the team's communicate's well.

As off balance, its all depends on what map you are playing on. The game also got a "Rock- Paper- Sciccor" like balancing system, that sometimes backfires if one team got a lot of "sciccors" and the other a lot of "rocks". Same with the perks.

That was mine 813 cents. Sorry for any bad grammar, I do not have english as my mother- tongue.
- Zlayzar

Your're entitled to your opinion. I like Bad company 2, have it on pc, love battlfield 2. Still I like CoD 4, mw 2. I don't go saying that CoD sucks though or Bad company 2. Its just a game, get over it.

And stuffed to the brim with camp snipers, at least our snipers get off their asses

Thumb nuke launching in T9.....8......7........6.......5........4........3.......2.......1......Launch detected.

All the fanboys are gonna thumb me down

Not a fanboy, just prefer the look and feel of MW2 over BC2. I have played both, btw, and BC2 does look good and it's a great experience, but the feel of MW2 is too comfortable for me.

Funny Fact: If they agree's with you, they "got a clue", how ever; if they disagree they are "fan- boys".

I have yet to meet one person who could give me a valid fact why the game is so good

All i see is people who love the game because its not a challenge

Well then, I shall do my best to explain. Lets start of with the fact that during combat, you'll only manage to take a few shoots before you perish (Some of the perks may take you a bit further.) In this case some people may bring up " But if you take cover, you'll regenerate health, and its true, but remember; you're opponent will regenerate as well, and then you're back to scratch, except with less ammo. I will admit that BF: BC2 got a wider aspect of team play, and that the ranking system in MW2 is kinda broken (No minus for dying, anyone?). But MW2 is not half bad if both of the team is equal, but this is rare. Its also pretty epic if you got 2 teams and both of the team's communicate's well.

As off balance, its all depends on what map you are playing on. The game also got a "Rock- Paper- Sciccor" like balancing system, that sometimes backfires if one team got a lot of "sciccors" and the other a lot of "rocks". Same with the perks.

That was mine 813 cents. Sorry for any bad grammar, I do not have english as my mother- tongue.
- Zlayzar

Glad I'm not the only one that reads tf2 blog comics

Most of my music library consists of of stuff from the 60's, 70's, 80's, and the first half of the 90's. I was born on september 29th 1991. :P

ur birthday is coming up soon..happy early birthday :o)

Thanks!! Here's a thumb.

finaily someone else who was born in the 90's who understands

:) i was born in the 90s aug 16 1992

This is a repost copied from GhostRider. I still have it.

reminds me of quentin tarantino

WHY MAN??

good thing. it was an epic fail of a story. completely fake.

guns don'y kill people, people don't kill people, the sudden stop of the bullet kills people

hey faggot atleast in america you have guns to defend yourself from bad people with guns, in other parts of the world the bad people will still get guns, but will the law abiding citizens wont be able to defend themselves

shut up sheep, your a sheep, sheep aren't supposed to type!

sooo do you think that all americans are tipsy 25/7???

Not just the right to bear arms, but the constitution in itself..

so let me get this straight, if we did not have this "right to bear arms shit" then there wouldn't be regular school shootings? guess no one ever committed a mass-murder at the age of 16 before huh? owait, yeah, guns and the ability to acquire them with little effort DO make mass-murder by otherwise physically harmless people possible :)

You said "guns and the ability to acquire them with little effort DO make mass-murder by otherwise physically harmless people possible:)" well, so do axes....Google Lizzy Borden then try convince me that we would all be much safer if law abiding citizens could no longer own guns.

Orite, you must be correct. Of course there are no more murders in America where guns are legal than in Britan, and there certainly aren't more school children shot in the US.
Check this page: [url deleted]
I'll tally up the things that matter for you. Number of school shootings in the good ol' USA: 95
In the ENTIRETY OF EUROPE: 18
In the UK: Just 2
Worth noting that these are "significant" school shootings. Let's see population figures, for reference: approx 310 mill in the USA, 731 million in Europe, around 62 mill in the UK. 60 mill fits fairly nicely for ratios: 2 in 60 million in the UK, around 19 in 60 million in the US, only 1.5 in 60 million in Europe. Of course the legality of guns is a good thing.

That's great, now, pull up a tally and let me know how many school beatings, and stabbings for the respective demographics you mentioned. What I am looking for is whether or not there is a proportional increase in non armed violence in the European schools vs. American schools. Bare in mind that it is usually the kid who is bullied the most who snaps and grabs a gun. By the way, the url you provided is not available so at this point I have to just take your word for it.

are you fucking retarded? anyone who had the mind to kill someone or commit a crime wouldn't give up guns because the fucking LAW said so.

Imagine, if you will, just how bold that 16 year would have been if he knew that when he pulled out a gun at school that every single person also had a gun. Do you think he would be more effective or less effective of mass murder if all the other students, faculty and staff had guns with them as well.

if there was a gun law then that one guy wouldn't have a gun and there wouldn't have been a school shooting in the first place! if two people with guns have a fight then at least one of them going to die if two people without guns fight then it will probably be some minor injury

There are several gun laws in place right now you dip shit.

HE COULD STILL ILLEGALLY GET A GUN AND THEN SHOOT UP THE WHOLE CLASS AND NO ONE WOULD KILL HIM EXCEPT FOR THE POLICE.

I dont think so I mean hes still at school how would he get a gun if no one else in the country had guns it would be impossible to get a gun iff their isnt any guns in the country

what world are you living in? How do you recon we "get rid" of ALL the guns that are already floating around? Stop living in the "what if" fantasy that everything would be peachy keen if everybody were just like you.

IM PRETTY SURE THEY COULD ILLEGALLY BUY ONE IT JUST TAKES A SMART PERSON TO BE ABLE TO MAKE THEM OR STEAL ONE FROM THE ARMY OR SOMETHING COCAINE AND MARIJUANA ARE ILLEGAL BUT THAT DOSENT STOP PEOPLE FROM MAKING AND SELLING IT.

they wouldn't sell a gun to someone who goes to school not even the dealers because dealers only sell things iff they no and trust the person there selling it to so they know there not going to tell the police
how are you going to make one youd need the right materials wich would be impossible to get you cant just buy them anywhere and even then youd need heavy machinery and a forge and alsorts hes still in school remember
how is he going to steal one from the army WTF thats just retarded

and as for the drugs there plants so there much easier to smuggle all you need is seeds and stop using capitals you wierdo

he could have stolen the gun from someone else if there was a law he wouldnt have been able to and anyway a whole school having guns even the teachers dont you see how fucked up that is

There ARE laws already...laws don't do SHIT! My dad made a gun, .45 cal fully automatic. It doesn't LOOK pretty but it works. Its not as hard as you think.

well Im not american so I dunno just leave it I wanna look at some funny pictures

holy shit, shut the fuck up.

Close Enough

**Supernaturalfan rolls 3**

Close Enough

remember, 1 reroll, its in the rules