actually before that and in some other forms. his body had not fully matured yet so his powers were still not fully realized..

if his powers were in full effect since day one, then he would never have aged and forever stayed as a baby. since y know, the yellow light radiation makes him effectively immortal.

not to mention if a baby would have had his levels of powers then earth would have been destroyed in an instant...

I'd imagine Satan uses his magic to no let that happen. So it stays unbearable torture for eternity.

>/pol/ hates the movie
Not really m8. Spastic shitposters hate the movie.

>Still inferior...
How so? He was the only one who realized killing civilians is a bad thing.

He's an inferior stormtrooper because of that. A stormtrooper is supposed to be a faceless soldier that just follows orders.

that's not actually true. the empire uses storm troopers for the exact opposite of that reason, which is the reason they used the CIS and clones prior, because they were faceless and emotionless. The empire realized that it takes logic and emotion to be a better soldier.

But we're not talking about the empire now.

Although I do have very little knowledge concerning the first order

the first order is purely the remnants of the empire. Just like Vader before him, Kylo Ren believes in the usefulness of full clone units (you can hear him and his master arguing about them when they're discussing capture of BB-8). However, the empire used constription - any man in the empire could join and be a storm trooper as an aside, they were stationed with their families on the original deathstar and fight for the empire that protected his homeland.

I'm bi

it's the tremendous amount of cocks in his work that made me tick i'm not saying it's a bad thing tho ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

theyll all vote for Hillary just because shes a woman

Mate, this whole website is filled to the brim with content that's already been posted and comments already been commented.

Shulk beat a god that almost rewrote the universe. Bayo is strong, but she's far from the strongest

get a dog, declare it an emotion support whatever.

then it would be illegal for them to evict you or whatever because of the dog.


at least thats what ive read in those lifehack reposts.

maybe do some research before you pay attention to me

It's a legit thing. But its a bit of a process to go through. You basically need a legal document to show its an emotional support companion and to get that I think you need a psychiatrist to approve it.

But if the landlord is a scumbag they'll start finding any reason to kick you out.

that's kinda how languages work...
you ever heard old english? it's the "original" english, but people started saying stuff wrong or differently, and the language changed.

Plus, look at your own argument:

"People accepted octopi as the correct word, so now I'm mad when people accept octopuses as the correct word instead."

A.) That's how languages work. People talk, languages change based on how people start talking. that's WHY we don't speak old english anymore, so if you want to be that uptight about it, I expect you to go learn old english and abandon modern English entirely, since that's the original accepted version of all our words, and therefore in your terms, the "right" version

B.) The word is Greek, so the plural form should be "Octopuses" anyway.

C.) Since both forms are in the dictionary, as well as octopodes, they're all technically correct... wow, it's almost like sometimes languages have different words for the same thing?!? Plus, a cursory google search tells us that all three words have existed in English for about the same amount of time, so your argument of "Original root" isn't even right, since they all were invented together.

Also, just real quick, let's look at "With brevity being the single category to judge a potential replacement with difference in neither denotation nor connotation, "octopuses" is a failure as a replacement."... that's just stupid... if you're replacing a word with a new word, there's ALWAYS no difference in denotation or connotation, since the new word isn't yet a word... there is, however, the subject of the NORMALITY of the word. For example, by your logic, we should replace the plural form of dictionary (dictionaries) with dictionarys, because it's slightly shorter. However, by EVERYBODY ELSE'S LOGIC, that's stupid, because the rule is change y to ie, so that's what we do.

tl;dr: In trying to make an argument, you pulled things out of your ass that were completely unnecessary, because nobody cares that much, and still managed to be wrong. It's only 5 minutes to read wikipedia, and even shorter to just look at the first Google links. With facts being the single category to judge a potential rant with neither interesting topic nor relevant place to post, your argument is a failure as a rant

Steve, please don't tell me I know you. I swear I've heard this exact rant before and it shames me to see you pull this stunt in public.
Come home Steve, Jacob and I are very worried about you.