x
Click to expand

SovietGeneral

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:4/20/2010
Last Login:4/27/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#9068
Highest Content Rank:#5516
Highest Comment Rank:#9097
Content Thumbs: 778 total,  826 ,  48
Comment Thumbs: 457 total,  555 ,  98
Content Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 77 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 78 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 141 Comments: Faptastic → Level 142 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:0
Content Views:6304
Times Content Favorited:107 times
Total Comments Made:153
FJ Points:322
Favorite Tags: The Game (2)

Funny Pictures

  • Views: 27255
    Thumbs Up 772 Thumbs Down 27 Total: +745
    Comments: 198
    Favorites: 104
    Uploaded: 05/17/10
    omegle dick slap omegle dick slap
  • Views: 1753
    Thumbs Up 19 Thumbs Down 9 Total: +10
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/30/11
    Forever alone money? Forever alone money?
  • Views: 683
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 9 Total: +6
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 06/30/11
    Bear Bear
  • Views: 387
    Thumbs Up 7 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +6
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/02/10
    Isnt Facebook Wonderful? Isnt Facebook Wonderful?

YouTube Videos

latest user's comments

#297 - ah yes the classic use of nazi bashing how very clever  [+] (5 new replies) 04/06/2015 on Indiana +1
User avatar #358 - vonspyder (04/06/2015) [-]
Remember Godwins 3rd law: for every action there is an equal and opposite mention of Hitler.
#316 - sherlockbatman (04/06/2015) [-]
are you a themed account or actually a nazi?
User avatar #418 - azumeow (04/06/2015) [-]
>Hammer and sickle
>Nazi
>sherlockbatman

Not sure if making joke or not....
User avatar #565 - sherlockbatman (04/07/2015) [-]
nazi sympathizers are nazis in my book
I don't care how red they are
User avatar #334 - Greevon (04/06/2015) [-]
Well, typically the soviets were doing their fair share of nazi bashing, albeit in a far more literal sense.

So he's just a /pol/ faggot.
#27 - Picture 03/19/2015 on Evolving into a feminist 0
#188 - In modern times yes, but back then I'm guessing safety regulat…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/26/2015 on Fat shame Friday is too... +1
#194 - fefe (02/26/2015) [-]
I just don't get people saying this is infinitely "better" when today she would be refused and complain, but back then she might die or might cause others to die when she broke part of the ride. I'd rather someone whining on tumblr than reading that she fell out of a roller-coaster and took someone with her.
#181 - I'm a Biomedical Engineering major who hasn't taken this "… 02/26/2015 on Fat shame Friday is too... 0
#175 - I didn't attack his position, I just called him a liberal bub.…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/26/2015 on Fat shame Friday is too... 0
User avatar #178 - iridium (02/26/2015) [-]
Says the guy who needs to direct people to a logical fallacy database to try to dispute someone.

I really don't give much of a shit about an exchange on the internet that will have no effect on my life tomorrow. I took that class 3 years ago and I know when I see people who hopped fresh out of Critical Thinking 101 and act like they know the ins and outs of refuting someone because they memorized a few logical fallacies. It's admittedly amusing to watch you try and dig yourself out (even though you're only digging yourself deeper) while trying to hold face in the process, and I have some time to kill (not much any more though, so feel free to take the last word if you really desire).
User avatar #181 - SovietGeneral (02/26/2015) [-]
I'm a Biomedical Engineering major who hasn't taken this "critical thinking 101" class that you keep referring back to like a broken record.

Everything you said holds absolutely zero basis in this original argument besides once more, attacking me.

"digging yourself deeper"
"act like they know the ins and outs"
etc
etc
Just shows how mature you really are, that critical thinking class must have done you wonders.

So I guess I will take the last word champ, good day.
#171 - Yes I am :^) He presented a point and I countered it…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/26/2015 on Fat shame Friday is too... -5
#172 - iridium (02/26/2015) [-]
Congrats. You fail.

Never mind the blatant hypocrisy by outright calling him a "typical liberal" (click your own link if you need to know what "ad hominem" is), you've gone about any sort of counterargument in the most pompous, arrogant way you can possibly refute someone.
#175 - SovietGeneral (02/26/2015) [-]
I didn't attack his position, I just called him a liberal bub. No hypocrisy there. Where do you see my in any way using the liberality of his comment to refute this argument?

Liberal: free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant:

You're so amusing to argue with, mostly because you're probably one of those 'self proclaimed' intellectuals who thinks themselves better then everyone else, I can really tell by the way you're structuring your 'arguments'. Now THATS an ad-homienem ;)

Please respond again, I'm enjoying this all too much.
User avatar #178 - iridium (02/26/2015) [-]
Says the guy who needs to direct people to a logical fallacy database to try to dispute someone.

I really don't give much of a shit about an exchange on the internet that will have no effect on my life tomorrow. I took that class 3 years ago and I know when I see people who hopped fresh out of Critical Thinking 101 and act like they know the ins and outs of refuting someone because they memorized a few logical fallacies. It's admittedly amusing to watch you try and dig yourself out (even though you're only digging yourself deeper) while trying to hold face in the process, and I have some time to kill (not much any more though, so feel free to take the last word if you really desire).
User avatar #181 - SovietGeneral (02/26/2015) [-]
I'm a Biomedical Engineering major who hasn't taken this "critical thinking 101" class that you keep referring back to like a broken record.

Everything you said holds absolutely zero basis in this original argument besides once more, attacking me.

"digging yourself deeper"
"act like they know the ins and outs"
etc
etc
Just shows how mature you really are, that critical thinking class must have done you wonders.

So I guess I will take the last word champ, good day.
#162 - Wow what a great logical fallacy! The two …  [+] (14 new replies) 02/26/2015 on Fat shame Friday is too... -3
User avatar #258 - MegaAwesomeSauce (02/27/2015) [-]
>I shot a lady in the face knowing full well that "Her skull wasn't strong enough to stop a bullet"

>I let a lady on the ride knowing full well that the safety bar couldn't withstand her weight

No fallacy there.
User avatar #259 - ninjaroo (02/27/2015) [-]
"Shot" and "Let" are totally different actions, especially in a time when people were expected to take care of their own safety. Yes, it's a strawman, coz it exaggerates the guilt of the park owners.

As penileburglar said, a better comparison would be blaming OREOs for killing a diabetic.
#187 - psdeath (02/26/2015) [-]
If you gotta be so damn picky:

"I let the 5 year old drive my car (somehow, don't ask too many questions this is completely logical), but he didn't know how to drive so he ran into a tree."

Why let the 5 year old in the car when he can't drive? Why let the fat lady onto the roller-coaster if it can't support her? The 5 year old didn't know it would be that hard to drive a car, and the lady didn't know the roller-coaster wouldn't support her.
User avatar #190 - psdeath (02/26/2015) [-]
Or well, correction: I assume she didn't know it wouldn't support her.
User avatar #264 - penileburglar (02/27/2015) [-]
A 5 year old could not be expected to know how hard driving is.

That woman should be able to recognize if she's not properly strapped in. If a buckle didn't buckle or a bar is still moving, you know something's wrong. But, yes, I don't know the full details--if the restraints somehow failed in a way that she COULDN'T have recognized on her own, THEN I'll give it to you that it would be the amusement park's fault.
#184 - fefe (02/26/2015) [-]
Look up the fallacy fallacy, which is what YOU did. Strawman or not, you're ignoring that parks have weight and height requirements and can be in massive shit if they don't refuse someone who obviously doesn't meet them. She made the choice to be obese, that isn't illegal, they let her on the ride when she shouldn't be, putting her and possibly others in danger, which can be illegal.
User avatar #188 - SovietGeneral (02/26/2015) [-]
In modern times yes, but back then I'm guessing safety regulations weren't as strict (wrong for me to assume). That is certainly a good point though.
#194 - fefe (02/26/2015) [-]
I just don't get people saying this is infinitely "better" when today she would be refused and complain, but back then she might die or might cause others to die when she broke part of the ride. I'd rather someone whining on tumblr than reading that she fell out of a roller-coaster and took someone with her.
User avatar #170 - iridium (02/26/2015) [-]
Congrats, you took Critical Thinking 101. News flash, directing someone to yourfallacyis and acting uppity when someone makes what you deem a reasoning error just makes you look like an officious prick.

You gonna Ad Hominem check me now too?
User avatar #171 - SovietGeneral (02/26/2015) [-]
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem Yes I am :^)

He presented a point and I countered it, that makes me an officious prick? Stop being such a child.
#172 - iridium (02/26/2015) [-]
Congrats. You fail.

Never mind the blatant hypocrisy by outright calling him a "typical liberal" (click your own link if you need to know what "ad hominem" is), you've gone about any sort of counterargument in the most pompous, arrogant way you can possibly refute someone.
#175 - SovietGeneral (02/26/2015) [-]
I didn't attack his position, I just called him a liberal bub. No hypocrisy there. Where do you see my in any way using the liberality of his comment to refute this argument?

Liberal: free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant:

You're so amusing to argue with, mostly because you're probably one of those 'self proclaimed' intellectuals who thinks themselves better then everyone else, I can really tell by the way you're structuring your 'arguments'. Now THATS an ad-homienem ;)

Please respond again, I'm enjoying this all too much.
User avatar #178 - iridium (02/26/2015) [-]
Says the guy who needs to direct people to a logical fallacy database to try to dispute someone.

I really don't give much of a shit about an exchange on the internet that will have no effect on my life tomorrow. I took that class 3 years ago and I know when I see people who hopped fresh out of Critical Thinking 101 and act like they know the ins and outs of refuting someone because they memorized a few logical fallacies. It's admittedly amusing to watch you try and dig yourself out (even though you're only digging yourself deeper) while trying to hold face in the process, and I have some time to kill (not much any more though, so feel free to take the last word if you really desire).
User avatar #181 - SovietGeneral (02/26/2015) [-]
I'm a Biomedical Engineering major who hasn't taken this "critical thinking 101" class that you keep referring back to like a broken record.

Everything you said holds absolutely zero basis in this original argument besides once more, attacking me.

"digging yourself deeper"
"act like they know the ins and outs"
etc
etc
Just shows how mature you really are, that critical thinking class must have done you wonders.

So I guess I will take the last word champ, good day.
#60 - tooooooooooooo bad shes actually just a woman :^)  [+] (2 new replies) 02/19/2015 on Drake & Josh +4
#74 - thelastelephant (02/19/2015) [-]
You say that like it's a bad thing
User avatar #61 - lronman (02/19/2015) [-]
this whole time i thought it was eva mendes..
#33 - I don't think anyone is really thinking about how intense that… 02/08/2015 on In that moment of time XXV +1
#77 - "Yeah bitch you might eat garlic doesn't change the fact … 01/30/2015 on Random Interesting Facts... +9
[ 95 Total ]

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2500

Comments(0):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)