yesssir send me some pics when you get it built

It'll be a few months while I wait for that income tax shit.

I'm having a custom handguard made, drop in 3fp trigger, nice m16 bolt carrier group.. Basically I have everything planned for the build besides the color scheme and stock. There are so many options, but the only mil spec stuff will probably be the pins.

id get a nice acog then, good range, and if you need more you can add a magnifier, and presto.

Coolio, thanks guy

yesssir send me some pics when you get it built

It'll be a few months while I wait for that income tax shit.

I'm having a custom handguard made, drop in 3fp trigger, nice m16 bolt carrier group.. Basically I have everything planned for the build besides the color scheme and stock. There are so many options, but the only mil spec stuff will probably be the pins.

if you only plan to shoot less then like 50 meters just buy a really good RedDot, maybe with a magnifier? Anything more Id get you a nice scope. Im really not brand specific, My red dot i got on clearance at walmart for like 40$ reg 80$ and its decent, it works, has 4 different reticles, good for shorts - medium range

I wanna hunt as well as shoot down range. Not hunt anything half a mile away.. But a fair distance.

id get a nice acog then, good range, and if you need more you can add a magnifier, and presto.

Coolio, thanks guy

yesssir send me some pics when you get it built

It'll be a few months while I wait for that income tax shit.

I'm having a custom handguard made, drop in 3fp trigger, nice m16 bolt carrier group.. Basically I have everything planned for the build besides the color scheme and stock. There are so many options, but the only mil spec stuff will probably be the pins.

In other words.. Price isn't really a factor.

Yup thanks bro.

Even though it legally doesn't have to be registered.. Don't be a fuck tard, use it to protect other law abiding citizens, not menace your community.

From domestic or foreign threats, not fast cash.

Yup thanks bro.

My phone's auto correct is a nigger.

Sorry, I was thinking of pearl harbor. That was 74 years ago today.

I think the trend of people who don't live criminal lifestyles and aren't involved with or associate with criminals, but get involved with mass shootings is a problem of accessibility.
Besides that, I don't feel that gun advocates in the US, specifically the Republican party and the NRA, do nearly enough for all the other reasons they blame. You'd think that they'd be pioneering those advancements in mental health or in sponsoring single parents in poor neighbourhoods, right?

You're right, my bad, I had my figures mixed up. The number of mass shootings dropped significantly but the actual homicide rate was already beginning a downward trend due to other security measures like the NHMP. While it doesn't prove that home-made guns are a massive issue, because they make up a small percentage of guns in circulation, it does prove that gun control itself is not an all-in-one solution, although I do believe it has had a strong long term effect. Gun crime likely continued because of the number of guns that remained in circulation, but it has gone down overall, save for a couple anomaly years.
Looking more into the statistics, even though Aus saw a drop in their firearm related homicides, they already had a much lower rate of homicide than the US, like incredibly lower. Banning firearms would not immediately solve the issue, and would take many many years to take those guns out of circulation, assuming the police could remove them faster than gangs could smuggle them in. There is a wealth of other issues in the US, and while I do firmly believe that in the long term that limiting access will be beneficial, in the meantime other solutions need to be provided.

www.aic.gov.au/statistics/homicide.html

That's why I say that it isn't a gun problem with the US.. We just have shitty people in a country who doesn't have the resources to better them.

We have so many problems here that the US doesn't like to admit that are factors in crime and homicide in general.

I think the trend of people who don't live criminal lifestyles and aren't involved with or associate with criminals, but get involved with mass shootings is a problem of accessibility.
Besides that, I don't feel that gun advocates in the US, specifically the Republican party and the NRA, do nearly enough for all the other reasons they blame. You'd think that they'd be pioneering those advancements in mental health or in sponsoring single parents in poor neighbourhoods, right?

Not nearly causing an issue as big as Australia had before gun control.

Seeing as Australia's gun homicide rate has fallen to ~0.1 and the US has rate of ~3.5 (on phone, but this is easily verifiable) I'm gonna guess it's not nearly at the same scale as usage of real guns. The only stat I could find on how many guns were homemade was "10%" from a non reputable site.
You don't really get what I'm saying. I'm not saying people aren't going to make homemade guns, or even that a mass production would be attempted, I'm saying they would not have nearly the same impact as the guns that are freely available. There is, at present, no evidence that home made firearms can produce gun homicide rates to the same degree as pre-gun control levels, or even that they can outnumber the amount of illegally owned guns (that may or may not be true in the future).
Australia saw a massive drop in gun homicide rates that can only be attributed to their gun control laws. If the home-made guns problem becomes so large that gun ownership returns to pre-gun control levels and gun homicide rates raise that high as well, I would concede that the bigger issue is their out control criminal population.

If you firmly believe that gun control will not solve the issue of frequent mass shootings, and that limiting the access to deadly firearms will not lower the body count, despite the evidence, then what is the solution?

Gun crime armed robberies and other acts involving a gun, not just having one in Australia went up after the ban and it took years for their gun deaths to go down. But their intentional homicide rate stayed about the same.

I'm on mobile right now other wise I would cite my claims.

You're right, my bad, I had my figures mixed up. The number of mass shootings dropped significantly but the actual homicide rate was already beginning a downward trend due to other security measures like the NHMP. While it doesn't prove that home-made guns are a massive issue, because they make up a small percentage of guns in circulation, it does prove that gun control itself is not an all-in-one solution, although I do believe it has had a strong long term effect. Gun crime likely continued because of the number of guns that remained in circulation, but it has gone down overall, save for a couple anomaly years.
Looking more into the statistics, even though Aus saw a drop in their firearm related homicides, they already had a much lower rate of homicide than the US, like incredibly lower. Banning firearms would not immediately solve the issue, and would take many many years to take those guns out of circulation, assuming the police could remove them faster than gangs could smuggle them in. There is a wealth of other issues in the US, and while I do firmly believe that in the long term that limiting access will be beneficial, in the meantime other solutions need to be provided.

www.aic.gov.au/statistics/homicide.html

That's why I say that it isn't a gun problem with the US.. We just have shitty people in a country who doesn't have the resources to better them.

We have so many problems here that the US doesn't like to admit that are factors in crime and homicide in general.

I think the trend of people who don't live criminal lifestyles and aren't involved with or associate with criminals, but get involved with mass shootings is a problem of accessibility.
Besides that, I don't feel that gun advocates in the US, specifically the Republican party and the NRA, do nearly enough for all the other reasons they blame. You'd think that they'd be pioneering those advancements in mental health or in sponsoring single parents in poor neighbourhoods, right?