Rank #33865 on SubscribersLevel 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
OfflineSend mail to RugbyKing Block RugbyKing Invite RugbyKing to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||2/14/2010|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Content Thumbs:||4358 total, 4952 , 594|
|Comment Thumbs:||1367 total, 1732 , 365|
|Content Level Progress:|| 56.99% (57/100) |
Level 143 Content: Faptastic → Level 144 Content: Faptastic
|Comment Level Progress:|| 67% (67/100) |
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
|Times Content Favorited:||346 times|
|Total Comments Made:||545|
|Favorite Tags:||i (3) | the (3) | The Tags (2) | to (2)|
latest user's comments
|#276 - it's called worshipping the gaps, the fallacy of "if scie… [+] (1 new reply)||08/08/2012 on Science or Religion||+1|
|#4 - you rolled me having a religious debate, nice||08/03/2012 on penguin club||0|
|#231 - Comment deleted||07/17/2012 on Gave me an ultra feel||+1|
|#230 - Comment deleted||07/17/2012 on Gave me an ultra feel||+2|
|#229 - Comment deleted [+] (1 new reply)||07/17/2012 on Gave me an ultra feel||+2|
|#493 - 1. You have two choices in this case then -etiher I am rig…||07/06/2012 on Fucking Catholics Fucking...||0|
|#492 - WHAT? This isnt pascals wager, not even at all. Pascals wa… [+] (2 new replies)||07/06/2012 on Fucking Catholics Fucking...||0|
|#342 - Look this is in fact a very important battle here.... … [+] (4 new replies)||07/06/2012 on Fucking Catholics Fucking...||-1|
#492 - RugbyKing (07/06/2012) [-]
WHAT? This isnt pascals wager, not even at all.
Pascals wager is stating that you SHOULD believe in God because it is safer, I'm saying that it is important to know whether we are going to hell or not because it would be nice to know that tidbit of information or find some proof, because if there was some proof, it wouldnt be a matter of "believing" it would be a matter of knowing, thus rendering pascal's wager invalid.
TL:DR This is not pascal's wager and you should feel bad.
|#1250 - I am especially angry that you called out my deep angry atheis…||07/06/2012 on Arguing with a Christian||0|
|#339 - 1) God DID write the bible, just indirectly, he used the vario… [+] (2 new replies)||07/06/2012 on Fucking Catholics Fucking...||0|
#348 - alfredtheweak (07/06/2012) [-]
(Damn you for making me log in to reply to your stupidity)
1. You're an idiot. Inspiration is not dictation.
2. See above.
3. Prove it.
4. Little to say? The Gospels ARE his words...
5. Read the anon's whole comment before replying to it.
Jesus does address the fact that he has changed some teachings from the Old Testament. He says that the Jews' hearts were made of stone, so they could not receive the full law. And no, I'm not going to cite it. I'm far too lazy.
#493 - RugbyKing (07/06/2012) [-]
1. You have two choices in this case then
-etiher I am right
-or the writers of the bible can go wrong, and if they are, who is anyone to decide how god REALLY wanted it? How the hell do you know that they're even right? You cant be picky, you cant be choosy. The authors either have the word of god here or they dont, because they second they dont you can start to second guess the whole fucking book.
3. "And no, I'm not going to cite it. I'm far too lazy"
4. all of the sudden these words are flawless and are the words of jesus, youre selectively reading the bible again.
5. fine ill use another counterargument IF THE BIBLE IS EDITED, WHY FOLLOW IT? You're supposed to follow the word of god, how do you decide where that is in the mess of edits?