Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

RugbyKing    

Rank #31294 on Subscribers
RugbyKing Avatar Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to RugbyKing Block RugbyKing Invite RugbyKing to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:2/14/2010
Last Login:10/18/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 4358 total,  4951 ,  593
Comment Thumbs: 1367 total,  1732 ,  365
Content Level Progress: 56.99% (57/100)
Level 143 Content: Faptastic → Level 144 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 67% (67/100)
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:2
Content Views:56107
Times Content Favorited:351 times
Total Comments Made:545
FJ Points:5743
Favorite Tags: i (3) | the (3) | The Tags (2) | to (2)

latest user's comments

#393 - **RugbyKing rolls 031** HE WILL MAKE IT. 09/21/2011 on And this is a story all... +1
#280 - toobadthatdidnthappen.jpeg 09/20/2011 on A shitty day -1
#451 - The great chinese wall? Really? ....No seriously, how di… 09/20/2011 on Brickgasm +8
#292 - SAM! NOOOOOOOOOO *will Smith.jpeg* 09/19/2011 on Student Wins 8 0
#290 - **RugbyKing rolled a random image**  [+] (1 new reply) 09/19/2011 on Student Wins 8 -1
User avatar #292 - RugbyKing (09/19/2011) [-]
SAM! NOOOOOOOOOO

*will Smith.jpeg*
#289 - you lucky bastard. 09/19/2011 on Student Wins 8 +1
#2129 - **RugbyKing rolled a random image** 09/16/2011 on Srsly? -2
#3111 - **RugbyKing rolled user theapocalipz ** 09/14/2011 on Look At Description +1
#547 - Holy **** i hope you dont breed 09/12/2011 on Ain't that some shit! +2
#57 - thumb ed for comic. 08/27/2011 on Bitch gets owned +18
#464 - **** you man. 08/18/2011 on tig bitties 0
#186 - LITERALLY on front page yesterday, do you not look at FJ op?  [+] (2 new replies) 08/16/2011 on Guess the browser -1
User avatar #189 - thewhimsicalfox (08/16/2011) [-]
Go and look at that comp and realise that I posted this 1 hour before he did. Move along.
#201 - xxxsonic fanxxx (08/17/2011) [-]
One hour after buddy
#1521 - it's cool bro, overwhelming virtual thumb s can replace the e… 08/16/2011 on Love Tale (Continuation) -4
#1517 - oh god i loled 08/16/2011 on Love Tale (Continuation) 0
#26 - **RugbyKing rolls 045** 08/15/2011 on Derpression 0
#567 - **RugbyKing rolls 903** 08/15/2011 on My little Pony -1
#650 - ******* true. still man, this is totally retarded. 08/13/2011 on Bath Moment -1
#625 - incest gets to front page, what the **** is wrong…  [+] (5 new replies) 08/13/2011 on Bath Moment +2
User avatar #694 - Ibiza (08/13/2011) [-]
it's not considered incest. It's actually 100% normal for young children, related or not to touch/look at eachother. it's not sexual at all, the funny part is being grown up looking back on it and going...sweet jesus.
User avatar #646 - Wumbologist (08/13/2011) [-]
You'd think we'd be used to it after SonicTeam...
User avatar #650 - RugbyKing (08/13/2011) [-]
fucking true. still man, this is totally retarded.
#634 - darkcelebi has deleted their comment.
#626 - gravitystereo (08/13/2011) [-]
#673 - They simply bump into each other, and the resulting force woul…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/12/2011 on CONSEQUENCES WILL NEVER BE... +7
#678 - siloimp (08/12/2011) [-]
#456 - 49-53 secs "i dont think that if i survived it, i…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/12/2011 on Mindfuck part 2 +8
User avatar #460 - ikeahitman (08/12/2011) [-]
DAMN IT YOU BEAT ME TO IT!!
#453 - They go after it to eat the bait, i cant see a mermaid eating … 08/10/2011 on Some comp -1
#370 - How the **** would that work?  [+] (6 new replies) 08/10/2011 on Some comp +9
#405 - yokiewartooth (08/10/2011) [-]
ummm, how do you think?
how do fish usually go after bait?
#453 - RugbyKing (08/10/2011) [-]
They go after it to eat the bait, i cant see a mermaid eating a vibrator.
#395 - nolikeusername (08/10/2011) [-]
FOR EVERYONE WITH MERMAID QUESTION!!!!
User avatar #389 - realoader (08/10/2011) [-]
Don't female fish have a hole where they expunge the eggs so they have a hole i guess.
User avatar #375 - LuckyStrikes (08/10/2011) [-]
They gotta use something to get in her mouth...
#374 - uglymidgetiii (08/10/2011) [-]
#2 - MOTHER OF GOD HE RETWEETED THIS! 08/02/2011 on Scumbag Steve Comp 0
#464 - notice "concept" but thanks anyway. 08/02/2011 on Hero of the Day +1
#437 - ehhh same concept as Billy Madison, a skip for you good sir. 08/02/2011 on Hero of the Day +3

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - copy (01/13/2012) [-]
I stand up for my beliefs and I get pinkies down. This is why we can't have intelligent discussions.
User avatar #4 to #3 - RugbyKing (01/13/2012) [-]
and i shot them down violently, because they were flawed severely. Here ill break it down for you:
P=premise C=Conclusion.

Your thought process:
P1: Good things happen to those who believe in God
P2: This man believes in God
C: Good things will happen to this man.

Now, you see, I used a counter example of children starving in Africa, which defeats your second premise. Something like 30k children die a day from starvation, using basic probability we can say that without a doubt, at least one of them believe in the same god you do, yet they are subject to a cruel malicious reality. Please don't respond with "oh there's **** waiting for them in heaven" Because we aren't talking about that, we're talking about what happened to the man with the golden voice. In this exact example, your theory doesn't work.


User avatar #5 to #4 - copy (01/13/2012) [-]
But what you didn't calculate are the many variables in which you must not have knowledge of. For if you had knowledge of these variables, then your answer would be different. For example, people who are Christians, normally have a harder life than people who don't believe in God. Evidence is of this conversation right now, and if not, then look at Egypt and Lybia, and even China, who mass murder people who claim to be Christians. Not to mention that you're logic is based on pure opinion which you have so deeply thought for so long that you now accept it as fact. Also, the children in africa, statistically wise, are either of the muslim faith, or of a natural faith found in the tribes. So they wouldn't know of God.

User avatar #6 to #5 - RugbyKing (01/14/2012) [-]
you fail to define these variables, you arent even attacking my premises, jesus what are you even saying is wrong of what im saying? christians having a hard life has nothing to do with what you said. Please tell me exactly where i am wrong here and dont dance around it. your argument isnt even an argument, it's just attempting to educate.
User avatar #7 to #6 - copy (01/14/2012) [-]
Variable. Christians are persecuted by other of different faiths.
Now if I may, use your theory of a=b=c, I'll show you your flaw.
You say that the way I am thinking is as simple as that, yet you didn't throw in the variable.
Now if we throw in this variable, then we have taken out your first sequence, in which, makes the other null and void, for there is no base in your argument. God blesses everyone on earth, not just Christians. Christians are the only ones who thank God for the blessings, in doing so, are singled out for it. By just believing in God, it does not state that your life will be filled with wonders and presents. It actually says that your life will be 10X harder to live. So in saying that, my point is, that God blessed that man with the voice, and in turn, he thanked God by giving him the glory for it. It's simple logic.

#8 to #7 - RugbyKing (01/14/2012) [-]
You are being so unbelievably vague it's hard to tell what you are even saying. take for instance:

"You say that the way I am thinking is as simple as that, yet you didn't throw in the variable. Now if we throw in this variable, then we have taken out your first sequence..."

What is "The variable" You clearly state above there are many variables, but now there is only one? You keep jumping around. Tell me exactly what you're talking about. Use simple language, it makes life a lot easier, you sound like the post-modernism bible. I'm not trying to be insulting, but there is definitely an easier way to say what you're saying without me having to break down every word, and i dont have to find 20 different interpretations.

As for your second part, god chooses to single out this man but not starving african children? Wait, what? this is seems very wrong, not something a kind, caring, god would do. And your fact that you say they are muslims is totally irrelevant, im saying in at least one of the millions of children who have died this way MUST have been a christian like you. Why do they die? Why dont they get the golden help of god? I choose to attribute this mans success to youtube and human beings, not an invisible man.

Pic related.




User avatar #10 to #8 - copy (01/14/2012) [-]
Oh, and if you want to, I can break out pictures also.
User avatar #9 to #8 - copy (01/14/2012) [-]
You're not looking at it the way I'm looking at it. I did say there are many variables, but I did not say that that is the only variable. That is just an example of a variable. I am making it as clear as possible, if you can't understand this logic then open your mind to newer things instead of closing it in.

Now to the starving children in Africa, why do you believe that God doesn't bless them? They are alive, aren't they? But the reason they are in the situation they are in is because of man, because of sin.
 Friends (0)