Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Have the FunnyJunk newsletter e-mailed to you
Rank #12113 on Comments
Level 152 Comments: Faptastic
Send mail to ReyJavikVI
Invite ReyJavikVI to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Highest Comment Rank:
Content Level Progress:
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress:
Level 152 Comments: Faptastic → Level 153 Comments: Faptastic
Total Comments Made:
What people say about ReyJavikVI
You can't scare me
300 like a sir
latest user's comments
- "Leaps in judgement" are also sometimes called "…
- "Just accept that if you're not part of an educated minor…
Minimum Wage Explained
you wont have a job, but you wont die of hunger either because the machine is making the food...
...and you'll buy it for what, when you'll be out of a job, so no paycheck?. Automation only works in socialism/communism, where the machines and their production are owned and shared by everyone, so people can do more interesting things, instead of working menial jobs. In capitalism, it's mass starvation time. Or, the second people start to starve, it's...
comparing 1940s technology to today's modern automation technology and thinking a similar result will occur.
that's where you're wrong kiddo
Ain't a viewpoint, bleak reality.
Scientific progress marches on, trampling anyone left behind. For the good of humanity, maybe. Maybe.
- This is probably gonna get buried but I don't care. The…
Fuck Common Core bullshit
- Safe abortions are done before the three months IIRC, otherwis…
Straight white boys
- You literally know nothing about math.
I knew enough to end up on a team that helps program GPS and rocket projection for the military.
- So by that logic someone could argue that ISIS is not really Islam?
um no, what they do is explicitly detailed within their text as a good thing and outright told to lie cheat and kill non believers. Try again please
- Scooby Doo.
anon is shutdown
- But maybe there are Muslims who don't believe a religion is th…
- If a human being really has no inherent value, why don't you j…
mad dog mattis memes are...
Because my life has value. It has no inherent value, but I've spend - and continues to spend - my life accruing a variety of useful skills and knowledges. That gives it value.
The people in the middle east might have some modicum of value, but I sincerely doubt it'll be any significant lose.
This isn't a race-thing. I'm not suggesting that they be killed because they're black, I'm suggesting they be killed because of all the problems they've cause and continue to cause. I'm suggesting they be killed because the religion and culture they have lived their lives in thralldom to, have so perverted their minds as to render them utterly incapable of living in civilized society. They must killed, both for their own good and the good of the people around them. Ideally, it would be good if they would simply live their squalid lives isolated and alone in their own lands, but Islam is such an insidious evil that it wont allow them to. Islam has a conquering spirit build into it, so as to force its adherents to forever fight against everyone else who aren't Muslim. It will only stop, when all the world is enthralled by Islam. Read up on this. Its actually incredibly chilling when you realize this.
So no, I'm not racist. I am anti-Islamic, yes, I'll gladly admit to that, but racist? No. I am not.
Dont talk of math when you dont understand it. As I already said, Islam will forever continue to be a problem until we squash it or it is reformed. its had over a thousand years to reform. I doubt it ever will. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that it will continue to be a problem forever. Therefore, the deaths it will continue to cause if left alive are literally countable. Infinite dead. Since "infinite" isn't a physical size, lets just be reasonable and state with absolute certainty that it'll cause many times the death toll that a simple nuclear cleansing would.
The math checks out. In fact, if I bothered, I am almost certain I would calculate roughly how many years it would take, before Islam had caused the same number of deaths as a nuclear cleansing would, thereby proving without a shred of doubt that a nuclear cleansing would've been the morally right cause of action.
You do not understand math. Do not speak of it.
Every human has the potential to become something great that helps humanity in ways we can't imagine. Every loss of human life is the potential loss of a new Gandhi, Einstein or MLK.
Humanity spent most of the Dark Ages in constant war and because of that we barely progressed as a species. I don't want that to happen again. That is why your suggestion to murder so many people sicken me.
Another example of a person who does not understand mathematics.
Every human life is random. Some turn out to be marvelous contributions, others turn out to be marvelous detractions. All in all, it more or less cancels itself out unless great effort is undertaken to ensure that even the people who would otherwise be detractors are dragged onto an acceptable level of contribution.
Thats why a human life no inherent value. It has potential, but that potential is so inherently chaotic that it doesn't amount to anything on average.
We're at a constant state of war presently. Our enemies are just so inferior, that we dont notice it much. If you abhor a state of constant war, you should happily accept my idea. It proposes an end to the war.
Sure. It is a quick end to this war. What about the next one? Are we just gonna bomb every one that declares war on us?
What if a terrorist group was started in Denmark and declared war on the West? According to you it is apparently acceptable to bomb Denmark to dust. Very few people in the East support the actions of the Terrorists. Try to see things from their perspective
If it had taken 16 years to root out the terrorist cell, they constantly attacked the rest of the world, a sizable portion of the Danish population were in agreement with their views and they suffered from terrible mental defect that made reformation an utter impossibility, then yes. We should destroy Denmark to save the rest of the world from their insanity.
I am not an insane lunatic, and as such, I could never see it from their perspective.
You know that the definition of a psychopath is a lack of empathy right? Inability to see things from the perspective of others is a very strong sign of a psychopath.
You say that humans are chaotic by nature and, when using the law of average, human life has no value. Then why have we progressed so much since the Renaissance? Knowledge can overcome chaos. It can give everyone a potential to do great things. Why should we murder so many people when instead there is hope that we can teach them the error of their ways.
Your perspective to just murder everyone that causes problems would have been disastrous if it was shared by the majority of humans. Could you imagine what would have happened if the people of Hiroshima or Nagasaki wasn't given a warning weeks before the nuclear bombing? What if USA had just bombed Japan to the ground when history proved there was no reason to do so? What if England just murdered Gandhi and his followers? Humanity would be so far behind
I dont mind if I'm psycopathic. It seems like a good way to get shit done. Also, I am perfectly capable from seeing things from other peoples perspective. In fact, I'm quite good at it. There is no other perspective in this case. As I said, they are insane lunatics. Their perspective is a distorted and insane one. Its not a valid perspective.
We have progressed so much because of education. The people in the middle east hate knowledge and they hate education. They hate it, because it challenges their ridge dogmatic belief system. They are insane zealots, who refuse educaion, who refuse progress and refuse reform. "Hope" is an idiotic sentiment. We've been hoping for more than 16 years and whats it gotten us? Piles of corpses. The time for hope is over. They've exhausted my patience and they should've exhausted yours as well.
There was a reason to bomb Japan to the ground and the USA did bomb them to the ground. The Japanese were clever enough to stand down after the initial bombing, but you can bet that more bombs would've been dropped had the Japanese not relented. This is what I'm proposing we do with the east. It fixed the Japanese. Hopefully, it'll fix the Arabians as well.
Gandhi didn't advocate for mass killings. He protested peacefully. Big difference.
Thats the point, you want to erradicate everyone from a place and time, Because a few people are lunatics.... what you are saying is basicly to nuke denmark because you are in there with a different opinion.... and NEVER EVER USE MATH IF ITS ABOUT HUMAN LIFE, ONE HUMAN LIFE LOST IS ALREADY TOO MUCH
"Gandhi didn't advocate for mass killings. He protested peacefully. Big difference."
Yeah, you know why? It is an insane and horrible thing to do. But you advocate for it.
And please, don't act like you know how every person in the middle east is as a human. I've been there. (A couple of years ago. Was in Base Security in the Air Force and we were sent to help UN with guarding an air strip while they were changing locations of different soldiers.) And it was one of the nicest experiences of my life. We played football with the kids while they had recess since we slept right next to a school. They would constantly ask us questions and were really curious about a lot of different stuff.
I believe that if we just teach the new generation the errors of the muslim laws they will start to question them and oppose them. You need to remember that they haven't had a Renaissance period like us. Give them time and they will get there, but they need to take that step themselves. We can't force a culture to enter a Renaissance period
there is a reason psychopaths should not be leader...
No. Once again, you hilariously misunderstand what I said.
I said that if the lunatics had persisted for an extremely long time, refused all peace talks and that a sizable portion of the Danish population were sympathetic to the lunatics course, then the only reasonable course of action might well be to nuke Denmark.
You dont understand because you dont listen. You dont listen because you aren't staying calm. Stay calm. Listen. Understand.
Math is a useful tool for making logical and calm decisions. If possible, every decision ever should be based exclusively on math. It is the language of universal truth. Some systems are just too complicated to do so, so we dont.
This isn't one of those systems and as such, I apply math to it. If you wee calm and listening, you'd understand this.
If psycopathy makes me able to make choices that other people find difficult or impossible, but are objectively the right choices to make, then that makes a psycopath a wonderful leader.
never become a leader of anything please.... meh you probably couldnt anyway, you need empathy to lead... you get that those lunics will only double if we nuke the area out? You get that i wouldnt stand still and let my goverment nuke innocent people ?
What you are calling for is a civil war for the reason that you dont comprehend!
Oh i get that you want to use maths, because maths is the easy way , math also helps you eliminate yourself of the equation...
"Sir, this was mathematicly the best decision" said the lazy idiot to the world, well too bad, maths dont work for human
and you wanna know why? because every person substracted is a living being dead, every living being dead has consequences you cant even start to predict, and you are saying you want to start a chain reaction of that scale?
now i ask of you CAN YOU predict what will happen if you kill that many people with that lousy of an excuse as yours? Civil fucking war and every nation in the world has every right, no, MUST criticize us for looking for such an Lazy way
But ofc lets come down to your main argument "MUH LUNITICS" well, if we didnt fuck up in the first place, throwing over regimenes, using puppet wars etc. we would not have those, sure we would have a very small number, but that number is very very small compareable to murderer. so will your argument then be the same? Genocide because of a few people? how about genocide all Norway because you are in it? wait suddenly i shouldnt? but i am sure i can find a few lunies as well...
Psychopaths also have the very interesting aspect of not giving a fuck about anyone else, yeah its the empathy thing, MEANING, they dont make the hard or difficult choices for whats best for OTHER people, but for themselfs... so no they are horrible leader
I've actually proven a pretty competent leader in the past. Assuming people live up to my expectations. I have empathy. I just temper that empathy with a cold logic that you seem keenly incapable of even approximating.
Math isn't easy, but it is the language of truth. What few people realize, is that math isn't some abstract thing. Its just a formulation of basic logical principles, expressed in a fashion that makes them easier to work with. That is,
If mathematics says its true, its because it is universally true via simple undeniable logic. If you fail to accept a mathematical principle, you are simply failing to understand a facet of undeniable reality, no different than if you denied that "2+2=4".
You assume far too much of people. You assume that anyone would care about those who have died. How many people would even be left to care about them? Nothing many, if we are thorough enough. You assume that those people would then take up arms and fight, after having seen what happens to those who fight. Unlikely. How many times have you seen people raise up, when a person has been raped or murdered? Rarely. Very rarely. We simply do not care. As a species, we do not care about each other unless we have kind of direct connection. This is a macroscopic example of the chaotic nature of man. We acknowledge this reality on some subconscious level. We acknowledge that each of us do not matter and should not be mourned unless that person matters to us specifically. I assure you, you yourself are guilty of this. Everybody is. I just chose to acknowledge it and absolve myself of this universal hypocrisy.
People might take caring for a little while, but eventually, they would relax back into listless carelessness as they have done multiple times before.
The course of this present conflict concern me little. Whats done cannot be undone. We can only seek to remedy the problem now. I am not in Norway, I am in Denmark.
And no, I am but one person. A person who seeks to contribute as much as possible to humanity. I have value. Even if you somehow came to the erroneous conclusion that I detract more than I contribute, I am but 1/5000000 people living in Denmark. I assure you, the fractional degree of lunatics in the east is far greater than that.
Psychopaths might realize that sometimes, the best situation for themselves is the best situation for the collective. In such a situation, the psychopath would seek the best solution for the entirety of the collective.
ok ill make this very clear for you: KILLING ALL OF THE MIDDLE EAST MAKES THE MUSLIM WE HAVE HERE FUCKING LUNITICS WITH EVERY RIGHT TO BE
Why? They dont know the vast majority of those people. They have no right to be.
If they get mad, it must necessarily be because they feel connected to them through the mind-numbing delusions of Islam and as such, they were always lunatics in disguise in the first place. I think I've made it abundantly how I think lunatics should be treated.
Ok no thats not how human works buddy
simple example, i will kill all Demarkian people because, fuck i humor you, some are murderer, we cant have that, maths dictate so, so we will nuke that place
you were out of the country with all people you care about, now common and tell me in my face you wouldnt care
Sure, but who decides what is the right choice? You? What gives you that right? What one thinks is right can vary vastly among different individuals. You see humans as absolutely worthless unless they contribute to ALL of humanity. A lot of people disagree with that view. What makes you more right than them?
You misunderstand me. I dont expect people to contribute to ALL of humanity. Just a contribution to some subsection of it while not detracting too much. Virtually nobody contributes to ALL of humanity. That would be an insane criteria.
However, people matter more the more people they contribute to. Thats just simple logic. This means that the people in the middle east who contribute little to anybody outside of their immediate community and likely cause a great deal of detraction through proliferation of Islam, matter very little. Therefore, no lose.
I consider myself an authority on whats "right" because I seek - insofar as it is possible - to make my every choice with as cold sterile logic as is humanly possible. As I already said, mathematics is the ideal method by which we can gauge right and wrong. Our human emotion is really only here to patch in the places where the system gets too complex to analyse mathematically.
I'm very well versed in mathematics and very well versed in cold sterile logic. Thats what gives me a small degree authority on matters such as these. I know its cliche, but in a nutshell, its because I'm smarter and more unbiased by emotion than most other people. You cant make a wise choice if you're uncomposed and unintelligent. I am virtually always very composed.
So every subsection of humanity matters except the Middle East then? Since contributing to their own society don't count if it is a middle eastern society according to you.
And you said yourself that humans are too chaotic to predict:
"Every human life is random. Some turn out to be marvelous contributions, others turn out to be marvelous detractions"
That makes it impossible to use math on us. You're right. Math is hard facts used to reach another hard fact that is not in anyway debatable. If a human life is random as you say then it makes the value debatable. You can't put a number on a human life.
You will probably say "Law of Averages". But that law only works if the randomness is not skewed in anyway. Have you looked through every single contribution and detraction made by a human to check? I very much doubt it. For all you know the randomness might be skewed in favor of humans contributing. If you asked any professional mathematician to calculate the worth of one human he would laugh at you. Since putting a number on something that changes and alters based on things we can't predict is stupid
What is Matyr effect, what is giving oponets weapons, what is being a dumbass, all questions you should ask yourself
Show Comments (0)