The problem with all of your statements is that you're assuming that the United States only protects itself, when in fact we protect the freedom and personal liberties of all of our allies.
(Japan, Canada, Britain, Australia, Israel, etc.)
Our military is the largest in the world because we also have a massive population/need for protection. Unlike China we are somewhat of a target for crippling international markets. If our infrastructure were to fail due to a war or political unrest then it would have catastrophic consequences across the globe. Is someone were to take out China, we'd just set up trade with whoever took it's place.
The American Military is protecting the undeniable best country on the planet. The country with the best quality of life and the largest number of opportunities to the average citizen. It's something that needs protection so please excuse us if we go a little more overboard than whatever shithole you call a homeland.

I wouldn't say USA did a good job with Japan though, considering they let the insane fucks who enacted the Three Alls Policy (Kill All, Loot All, Burn All) stay in power in Japan and let the unit 731 doctors get off with no punishment in exchange for data. And they didn't even try to make them atone for their crimes half as much as they made Germany did.

And before you say the unit 731 data saved lives, imagine the Unit 731 scientists experimented on American citizens and the Chinese let them go, you'd probably be pissed too.

is it because you can't actually find a reason? or is it because you'[re tired of losing arguments you know you can't win when it comes to the subject? The only reason I could think of as to why you would feel that way is because you're tired of not being the best, and deep down you know it's true.

It's like how closetted guys get really pissed at gay guys for no reason, they don't understand that what they're feeling is envy, so they reroute it to anger. That's what you're doing here.

I think I was initillay defending my country's decision to spend tax dollars on defense ships after some retard started spewing shit when he obviously didn't know anything about the subject.

Desert Storm was considered defensive because of potential nuclear damage. The war in Iraq was defensive because of the attack on 9/11. The Second world war was defensive because of the aforementioned allies we needed to save along with ourselves. Basically every war we've fought was in the defense of ourselves or our allies with the exception of Vietnam.

1. weapons are never strictly offensive or defensive. A strong military serves as a deterrent, "The best defense is a good offense" or "Hey maybe we shouldn't attack the US because they could have 2,000 planes here by nightfall"

2. Carriers are always escorted by other ships more than capable of blowing Mbute and his diesel sub out of the water

3. Russia could never NEVER win a non-nuclear war against the US. Russia and China, against the US only without allies is still a toss up. Russia may of had a good army when wars were fought on the ground and throwing 1 million people at the nazis to die was a viable option. But now with Air Force technology massive ground wars have become obsolete, so it comes to Naval and Air power, Which the US dominates no question

So, yes they are necessary

The problem with all of your statements is that you're assuming that the United States only protects itself, when in fact we protect the freedom and personal liberties of all of our allies.
(Japan, Canada, Britain, Australia, Israel, etc.)
Our military is the largest in the world because we also have a massive population/need for protection. Unlike China we are somewhat of a target for crippling international markets. If our infrastructure were to fail due to a war or political unrest then it would have catastrophic consequences across the globe. Is someone were to take out China, we'd just set up trade with whoever took it's place.
The American Military is protecting the undeniable best country on the planet. The country with the best quality of life and the largest number of opportunities to the average citizen. It's something that needs protection so please excuse us if we go a little more overboard than whatever shithole you call a homeland.

I wouldn't say USA did a good job with Japan though, considering they let the insane fucks who enacted the Three Alls Policy (Kill All, Loot All, Burn All) stay in power in Japan and let the unit 731 doctors get off with no punishment in exchange for data. And they didn't even try to make them atone for their crimes half as much as they made Germany did.

And before you say the unit 731 data saved lives, imagine the Unit 731 scientists experimented on American citizens and the Chinese let them go, you'd probably be pissed too.

is it because you can't actually find a reason? or is it because you'[re tired of losing arguments you know you can't win when it comes to the subject? The only reason I could think of as to why you would feel that way is because you're tired of not being the best, and deep down you know it's true.

It's like how closetted guys get really pissed at gay guys for no reason, they don't understand that what they're feeling is envy, so they reroute it to anger. That's what you're doing here.

I think I was initillay defending my country's decision to spend tax dollars on defense ships after some retard started spewing shit when he obviously didn't know anything about the subject.

Desert Storm was considered defensive because of potential nuclear damage. The war in Iraq was defensive because of the attack on 9/11. The Second world war was defensive because of the aforementioned allies we needed to save along with ourselves. Basically every war we've fought was in the defense of ourselves or our allies with the exception of Vietnam.

Your point:
You should be embarrassed by something necessary for the security of a country.

My point:
You should be embarrassed for locking your doors, what are the point of door locks besides displaying your xenophobia and intolerance for robbers?

1. weapons are never strictly offensive or defensive. A strong military serves as a deterrent, "The best defense is a good offense" or "Hey maybe we shouldn't attack the US because they could have 2,000 planes here by nightfall"

2. Carriers are always escorted by other ships more than capable of blowing Mbute and his diesel sub out of the water

3. Russia could never NEVER win a non-nuclear war against the US. Russia and China, against the US only without allies is still a toss up. Russia may of had a good army when wars were fought on the ground and throwing 1 million people at the nazis to die was a viable option. But now with Air Force technology massive ground wars have become obsolete, so it comes to Naval and Air power, Which the US dominates no question

So, yes they are necessary

The problem with all of your statements is that you're assuming that the United States only protects itself, when in fact we protect the freedom and personal liberties of all of our allies.
(Japan, Canada, Britain, Australia, Israel, etc.)
Our military is the largest in the world because we also have a massive population/need for protection. Unlike China we are somewhat of a target for crippling international markets. If our infrastructure were to fail due to a war or political unrest then it would have catastrophic consequences across the globe. Is someone were to take out China, we'd just set up trade with whoever took it's place.
The American Military is protecting the undeniable best country on the planet. The country with the best quality of life and the largest number of opportunities to the average citizen. It's something that needs protection so please excuse us if we go a little more overboard than whatever shithole you call a homeland.

I wouldn't say USA did a good job with Japan though, considering they let the insane fucks who enacted the Three Alls Policy (Kill All, Loot All, Burn All) stay in power in Japan and let the unit 731 doctors get off with no punishment in exchange for data. And they didn't even try to make them atone for their crimes half as much as they made Germany did.

And before you say the unit 731 data saved lives, imagine the Unit 731 scientists experimented on American citizens and the Chinese let them go, you'd probably be pissed too.

is it because you can't actually find a reason? or is it because you'[re tired of losing arguments you know you can't win when it comes to the subject? The only reason I could think of as to why you would feel that way is because you're tired of not being the best, and deep down you know it's true.

It's like how closetted guys get really pissed at gay guys for no reason, they don't understand that what they're feeling is envy, so they reroute it to anger. That's what you're doing here.

I think I was initillay defending my country's decision to spend tax dollars on defense ships after some retard started spewing shit when he obviously didn't know anything about the subject.

Desert Storm was considered defensive because of potential nuclear damage. The war in Iraq was defensive because of the attack on 9/11. The Second world war was defensive because of the aforementioned allies we needed to save along with ourselves. Basically every war we've fought was in the defense of ourselves or our allies with the exception of Vietnam.

>lol dats embarrassing
>lol u have no argument

that's literally what you just did. Go sit in the corner

Your point:
You should be embarrassed by something necessary for the security of a country.

My point:
You should be embarrassed for locking your doors, what are the point of door locks besides displaying your xenophobia and intolerance for robbers?

1. weapons are never strictly offensive or defensive. A strong military serves as a deterrent, "The best defense is a good offense" or "Hey maybe we shouldn't attack the US because they could have 2,000 planes here by nightfall"

2. Carriers are always escorted by other ships more than capable of blowing Mbute and his diesel sub out of the water

3. Russia could never NEVER win a non-nuclear war against the US. Russia and China, against the US only without allies is still a toss up. Russia may of had a good army when wars were fought on the ground and throwing 1 million people at the nazis to die was a viable option. But now with Air Force technology massive ground wars have become obsolete, so it comes to Naval and Air power, Which the US dominates no question

So, yes they are necessary

The problem with all of your statements is that you're assuming that the United States only protects itself, when in fact we protect the freedom and personal liberties of all of our allies.
(Japan, Canada, Britain, Australia, Israel, etc.)
Our military is the largest in the world because we also have a massive population/need for protection. Unlike China we are somewhat of a target for crippling international markets. If our infrastructure were to fail due to a war or political unrest then it would have catastrophic consequences across the globe. Is someone were to take out China, we'd just set up trade with whoever took it's place.
The American Military is protecting the undeniable best country on the planet. The country with the best quality of life and the largest number of opportunities to the average citizen. It's something that needs protection so please excuse us if we go a little more overboard than whatever shithole you call a homeland.

I wouldn't say USA did a good job with Japan though, considering they let the insane fucks who enacted the Three Alls Policy (Kill All, Loot All, Burn All) stay in power in Japan and let the unit 731 doctors get off with no punishment in exchange for data. And they didn't even try to make them atone for their crimes half as much as they made Germany did.

And before you say the unit 731 data saved lives, imagine the Unit 731 scientists experimented on American citizens and the Chinese let them go, you'd probably be pissed too.

is it because you can't actually find a reason? or is it because you'[re tired of losing arguments you know you can't win when it comes to the subject? The only reason I could think of as to why you would feel that way is because you're tired of not being the best, and deep down you know it's true.

It's like how closetted guys get really pissed at gay guys for no reason, they don't understand that what they're feeling is envy, so they reroute it to anger. That's what you're doing here.

I think I was initillay defending my country's decision to spend tax dollars on defense ships after some retard started spewing shit when he obviously didn't know anything about the subject.

Desert Storm was considered defensive because of potential nuclear damage. The war in Iraq was defensive because of the attack on 9/11. The Second world war was defensive because of the aforementioned allies we needed to save along with ourselves. Basically every war we've fought was in the defense of ourselves or our allies with the exception of Vietnam.

>there's no money from syria to germany

You either don't know what "arbitrary" means or you really need to explain what's arbitrary about refugees seeking countries with highest monetary benefits.