Terminal velocity. At 120 mph, the human body cannot fall any faster. After about 20 seconds of freefall, they were going the same speed.

chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/10/15/video-felix-baumgartner-skydives-from-24-miles-up-reaches-speeds-of-over-800-mph/

which makes you wrong.

hurr durr he topped out at about 830. take your degree in faggot somewhere else.

He is right. After the acceleration the have the have the same speed in the same height.

*they have the same speed

Terminal velocity factors in air resistance, Felix was near space so less air resistance = faster than standard terminal velocity.

I don´t think there is such a thing as standard terminal velocity, the terminal velocity depends on the thickness of the medium it is in. The air gets thicker the less the height is. So after the few seconds of accelerating he slows down all the time because the air gets thicker. So in the same height his speed was the same as Kittingers.

I suppose.

he broke the sound barrier my good friend

*almost broke

but you are completely right about the friction thing

No, he did break the sound barrier. Do some research my friend. He reached Mach 1.24. Pressure also determines terminal velocity. The pressure is nearly zero 24 miles above the Earth. So yeah, he could break the sound barrier no problem.

he reached 766mph, speed of sound is 768mph

Speed of sound changes with altitude. It's slower in the upper atmosphere, and nothing in space.

He went fast.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443675404578056061642681072.html

Here is my source. I just got done reading this before I came onto funnyjunk.

yeah but he has to make the hard decision to do nothing about it

Yes of course, how blind of me.

Temperature also affects density, bro. I was just trying to simplify it.

It can yes, but it wasn't a factor much in this case so simplifying it made it sound wrong, sorry. Temperature affects density but density affects sp/sound, that first link is confusing by itself.

I agree with you, but I'm willing to argue that it is a significant portion of it.

So are all of them. None of them are the end all be all, we can only do our best.

So why keep something unnecessary that enable awful things to happen?

Well by that logic, let's also get rid of money, oh and all entertainment drugs cos people fight over that, no alcohol, no more property rights, no more governments, philosophy, social policies, art, culture, etc cos none of those are necessary for base human survival, etc etc.

I see your point but just because people can and do fight over something doesn't make them inherently evil. You CAN be a fucking wacko drunk but we don't ban alcohol for everybody on the planet for you and the 20% of drinkers like you. We know how well banning shit goes over anyway.

Point being, dumbass cancerous behavior is on the part of the individual and the stupid who get sucked into it, not the entire population. Enforcing that on the religious is no better than the religious enforcing shit on you.

Yes I know of the shift key; but I don't use it often so sue me? I don't know what you want from me, perfect grammar every single comment sorry can't do that I am human we make mistakes.

You don't have to be perfect, but excessive mistakes or lack of proper syntax does make it difficult to take you seriously, and nobody should be written off for looking childish. Just a debate tip.

no, see i wont because ive already been there already and instead of being a bitch and cutting my self i manned the fuck up and learned to ignore the insults which has lead to me having a 0 fucks given about what people think about me. so i guess thats my advise man up and get over it...

Ok then. You go right ahead and keep your way and I'll keep mine.

I "got over it" without cutting too but it doesn't mean I don't sympathize. Its really easy to blame yourself and self harm or commit suicide over it. You shouldn't be bragging over it but it's a human life here; it's worth as much as mine at least, and when I was alone I'd have given anything for somebody to stop and stand me back on my feet, cos I didn't find the hope to do it by myself for years.

Seriously though. It's called the shift key bro.

Yes I know of the shift key; but I don't use it often so sue me? I don't know what you want from me, perfect grammar every single comment sorry can't do that I am human we make mistakes.

You don't have to be perfect, but excessive mistakes or lack of proper syntax does make it difficult to take you seriously, and nobody should be written off for looking childish. Just a debate tip.

The first monotheistic religion to become common is Judaism, Abraham, the "father" of Judaism had 2 sons, Isaac (Who then went to be Christian) and Ishmael (Who became Islamic).
The Christians were actually Jewish, hence Judaic-Christian, and Islam was part of this, when Christ came, Christianity/What would become Islam split from Judaism, Then later when Muhammad came, Islam split from early Christians.
So by default, Muslims are part Christian, who are part Jewish, hence why they have the same basic ideals, and the Torah is in the Bible (It's the first 5 books of the Old Testament) and then the Quran is basically the extended Bible, since it has everything from the Bible and then Muhammad's scriptures.
This is also why they all claim Jerusalem as neutral territory as it belongs to all 3 religions.

Yes I know Hinduism is "technically" monotheistic, but when Brahman represents them-self in 5 million+ ways, it's arguable.

I know that history. The French have roots in the gauls, as do the english, but they don't believe all the same things either.

right, because the only religion in the world is christianity.

Was referring to the fact that all the photos he used were of Christians and yet he placed 9/11 photos up there.

The first monotheistic religion to become common is Judaism, Abraham, the "father" of Judaism had 2 sons, Isaac (Who then went to be Christian) and Ishmael (Who became Islamic).
The Christians were actually Jewish, hence Judaic-Christian, and Islam was part of this, when Christ came, Christianity/What would become Islam split from Judaism, Then later when Muhammad came, Islam split from early Christians.
So by default, Muslims are part Christian, who are part Jewish, hence why they have the same basic ideals, and the Torah is in the Bible (It's the first 5 books of the Old Testament) and then the Quran is basically the extended Bible, since it has everything from the Bible and then Muhammad's scriptures.
This is also why they all claim Jerusalem as neutral territory as it belongs to all 3 religions.

Yes I know Hinduism is "technically" monotheistic, but when Brahman represents them-self in 5 million+ ways, it's arguable.

I know that history. The French have roots in the gauls, as do the english, but they don't believe all the same things either.

All I'm saying is that there's a difference between mental depression, mental disorders, and being a pussy about things. And cutting yourself is being a pussy about things. I'm not saying I know your life, and you don't know mine, but being a pussy about things is never the answer.

You're still wrong about it not being a disorder, seriously even animals display this behavior. And what superhuman on earth can undergo daily misery brought on by the cancerous behavior of others without going a little bit crazy one way or another? We are human, and we are not indestructible. What we have survived unscathed is deadly to our ten best friends; and the victorious battles they fight a death sentence to us.

Fortunate are those of us who bent and never broke, but not every tree survives a hurricane.