Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

MythBuster    

Rank #52130 on Subscribers
MythBuster Avatar Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to MythBuster Block MythBuster Invite MythBuster to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 29
Date Signed Up:11/25/2009
Last Login:1/03/2014
Location:USA
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 4138 total,  4667 ,  529
Comment Thumbs: 3383 total,  5088 ,  1705
Content Level Progress: 26% (26/100)
Level 141 Content: Faptastic → Level 142 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 82% (82/100)
Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 234 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:1
Content Views:229668
Times Content Favorited:272 times
Total Comments Made:1496
FJ Points:7546
Favorite Tags: mythbuster (16) | fail (5) | random (4) | funny (3) | happens (3) | me (3) | shit (3) | that (3) | the (3) | to (3) | facebook (2) | Food (2) | in (2) | picture (2)
Fuck Yea!

latest user's comments

#31 - For some reason I see a female Nicholas cage...  [+] (1 new reply) 01/26/2013 on Female Beards... +8
#33 - russiazoe (01/26/2013) [-]
So that was what i was seeing.......knew it
#489 - True story and it's kind of a dick move for what i did but a c… 01/26/2013 on Less Adoptable Pets +1
#40 - Good idea but I think a lot of people have trouble waking up o… 01/23/2013 on Hate Tuesday? This will... 0
#102 - More like self control... 01/23/2013 on Concentration... +2
#3 - I hope he realizes he's standing waist deep in human feces  [+] (1 new reply) 01/19/2013 on My Basement +12
User avatar #9 - nippuhl (01/19/2013) [-]
He already is 6 feet of human feces.
#46 - The more I look at it.. The harder I laugh 01/19/2013 on All of my wat 0
#93 - **MythBuster rolled a random image posted in comment #6 at … 01/18/2013 on Duct-Tape Art Op Delivers +4
#228 - Who is that picture of Freddy... It looks kind of like Matt Damon haha 01/18/2013 on Wuht 0
#69 - Haha some guy uploaded this yesterday and got 275 thumbs or so…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/18/2013 on The greatest hero +5
User avatar #94 - facadeon (01/19/2013) [-]
^Saying "repost" with style.
#249 - Have drugs went away since they were banned?? There millions a…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/17/2013 on Thanks Obama! 0
User avatar #253 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Not being easily persuaded by illegitimate arguments is being closed minded? Sure. Whatever you say.
User avatar #251 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Obviously not, I was just making the example of appropriate legislation. The war on drugs doesn't work, decriminalization and fines with rehabilitation would make a difference. Just like how some gun control works and others makes things worse, like my home state's ban on concealed weapons. You say that like you know it's a fact lol. It still doesn't change the basic principle that if you reduce the availability you'll reduce the number.
#210 - All that banning will do is take it away from honest citizens,…  [+] (4 new replies) 01/17/2013 on Thanks Obama! 0
User avatar #223 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
That's not true. You need to think and consider the many ways that making something illegal could prevent someone from getting banned mags. First of all, you say "criminal" which implies that they have a criminal background. Most people who go on killing sprees do not have a criminal history. Usually people in gangs or tough neighborhoods that I would call criminals know people that could probably find them extended magazines, because perhaps they know someone who illegally deals arms. But what about those people who've never done anything criminal? They might not have that same connection. And there you go, it's a change. Maybe a small or a big change, that all depends on how successful the implementation is and how well the police handle illegal arms trafficking, but a little change today could save someone's life tomorrow.
User avatar #249 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
Have drugs went away since they were banned?? There millions and millions of extended mags circulating through the US, banning them wouldn't do shit... This argument isn't going anywhere since you're so closed minded, so have a good one man
User avatar #253 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Not being easily persuaded by illegitimate arguments is being closed minded? Sure. Whatever you say.
User avatar #251 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Obviously not, I was just making the example of appropriate legislation. The war on drugs doesn't work, decriminalization and fines with rehabilitation would make a difference. Just like how some gun control works and others makes things worse, like my home state's ban on concealed weapons. You say that like you know it's a fact lol. It still doesn't change the basic principle that if you reduce the availability you'll reduce the number.
#196 - Imagine if someone committed a shooting with a handgun and a l…  [+] (6 new replies) 01/17/2013 on Thanks Obama! 0
User avatar #200 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
That doesn't prove a point. Just that it's possible. One instance doesn't prove all the rest of the data to the contrary false. Assault rifles with legal extended mags are most commonly used in mass shootings.
User avatar #210 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
All that banning will do is take it away from honest citizens, criminals will ALWAYS find a way to illegally obtain banned mags
User avatar #223 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
That's not true. You need to think and consider the many ways that making something illegal could prevent someone from getting banned mags. First of all, you say "criminal" which implies that they have a criminal background. Most people who go on killing sprees do not have a criminal history. Usually people in gangs or tough neighborhoods that I would call criminals know people that could probably find them extended magazines, because perhaps they know someone who illegally deals arms. But what about those people who've never done anything criminal? They might not have that same connection. And there you go, it's a change. Maybe a small or a big change, that all depends on how successful the implementation is and how well the police handle illegal arms trafficking, but a little change today could save someone's life tomorrow.
User avatar #249 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
Have drugs went away since they were banned?? There millions and millions of extended mags circulating through the US, banning them wouldn't do shit... This argument isn't going anywhere since you're so closed minded, so have a good one man
User avatar #253 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Not being easily persuaded by illegitimate arguments is being closed minded? Sure. Whatever you say.
User avatar #251 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Obviously not, I was just making the example of appropriate legislation. The war on drugs doesn't work, decriminalization and fines with rehabilitation would make a difference. Just like how some gun control works and others makes things worse, like my home state's ban on concealed weapons. You say that like you know it's a fact lol. It still doesn't change the basic principle that if you reduce the availability you'll reduce the number.
#157 - I was making the example that if you ban all of them, you're b…  [+] (8 new replies) 01/17/2013 on Thanks Obama! 0
User avatar #189 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
I understand it makes your job and the others who do the same sort of activity easier... but we are talking about people's lives here man. It really does have an impact whether a shooter is able to shoot continuously for longer amounts of time. Imagine if someone committed a mass murder using a minigun.
User avatar #196 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
Imagine if someone committed a shooting with a handgun and a legal magazine size... O shit that already happened at VT. Crazy people will be crazy
User avatar #200 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
That doesn't prove a point. Just that it's possible. One instance doesn't prove all the rest of the data to the contrary false. Assault rifles with legal extended mags are most commonly used in mass shootings.
User avatar #210 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
All that banning will do is take it away from honest citizens, criminals will ALWAYS find a way to illegally obtain banned mags
User avatar #223 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
That's not true. You need to think and consider the many ways that making something illegal could prevent someone from getting banned mags. First of all, you say "criminal" which implies that they have a criminal background. Most people who go on killing sprees do not have a criminal history. Usually people in gangs or tough neighborhoods that I would call criminals know people that could probably find them extended magazines, because perhaps they know someone who illegally deals arms. But what about those people who've never done anything criminal? They might not have that same connection. And there you go, it's a change. Maybe a small or a big change, that all depends on how successful the implementation is and how well the police handle illegal arms trafficking, but a little change today could save someone's life tomorrow.
User avatar #249 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
Have drugs went away since they were banned?? There millions and millions of extended mags circulating through the US, banning them wouldn't do shit... This argument isn't going anywhere since you're so closed minded, so have a good one man
User avatar #253 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Not being easily persuaded by illegitimate arguments is being closed minded? Sure. Whatever you say.
User avatar #251 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Obviously not, I was just making the example of appropriate legislation. The war on drugs doesn't work, decriminalization and fines with rehabilitation would make a difference. Just like how some gun control works and others makes things worse, like my home state's ban on concealed weapons. You say that like you know it's a fact lol. It still doesn't change the basic principle that if you reduce the availability you'll reduce the number.
#130 - It's a .22, you can take 5 shots to the chest and live.. Plus …  [+] (10 new replies) 01/17/2013 on Thanks Obama! +2
User avatar #143 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
I wasn't talking about just .22s, you made that argument yourself and now you're attacking a strawman.
User avatar #157 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
I was making the example that if you ban all of them, you're banning a tool that honest people use everyday
User avatar #189 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
I understand it makes your job and the others who do the same sort of activity easier... but we are talking about people's lives here man. It really does have an impact whether a shooter is able to shoot continuously for longer amounts of time. Imagine if someone committed a mass murder using a minigun.
User avatar #196 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
Imagine if someone committed a shooting with a handgun and a legal magazine size... O shit that already happened at VT. Crazy people will be crazy
User avatar #200 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
That doesn't prove a point. Just that it's possible. One instance doesn't prove all the rest of the data to the contrary false. Assault rifles with legal extended mags are most commonly used in mass shootings.
User avatar #210 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
All that banning will do is take it away from honest citizens, criminals will ALWAYS find a way to illegally obtain banned mags
User avatar #223 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
That's not true. You need to think and consider the many ways that making something illegal could prevent someone from getting banned mags. First of all, you say "criminal" which implies that they have a criminal background. Most people who go on killing sprees do not have a criminal history. Usually people in gangs or tough neighborhoods that I would call criminals know people that could probably find them extended magazines, because perhaps they know someone who illegally deals arms. But what about those people who've never done anything criminal? They might not have that same connection. And there you go, it's a change. Maybe a small or a big change, that all depends on how successful the implementation is and how well the police handle illegal arms trafficking, but a little change today could save someone's life tomorrow.
User avatar #249 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
Have drugs went away since they were banned?? There millions and millions of extended mags circulating through the US, banning them wouldn't do shit... This argument isn't going anywhere since you're so closed minded, so have a good one man
User avatar #253 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Not being easily persuaded by illegitimate arguments is being closed minded? Sure. Whatever you say.
User avatar #251 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Obviously not, I was just making the example of appropriate legislation. The war on drugs doesn't work, decriminalization and fines with rehabilitation would make a difference. Just like how some gun control works and others makes things worse, like my home state's ban on concealed weapons. You say that like you know it's a fact lol. It still doesn't change the basic principle that if you reduce the availability you'll reduce the number.
#114 - I shoot gophers with my .22 so an extended mag really helps wh…  [+] (28 new replies) 01/17/2013 on Thanks Obama! +1
#118 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
You're justifying the fact that a psycho with a gun can unload more rounds in a shorter amount of time on innocent people because it's convenient for your purposes?
User avatar #154 - cycloberrick (01/17/2013) [-]
a fully automatic large mag rifle has never been obtained legally and used in a crime, they've always been illegally obtained when used for shootings
User avatar #170 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
3/4ths of guns used in mass murders are obtained legally. The six guns used in the Sandy Hook shooting were legally bought possessed by the shooter's mother.
User avatar #208 - cycloberrick (01/17/2013) [-]
gosh I just told someone I was done debating the subject so here is my final comment

which is why instead of banning something I think they should just perform background checks on people, that could also help and people could keep their guns. also the guns were obtained by a person who wasn't apart of the shooting which means the people using them were handling them illegally
User avatar #215 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Who said I was in favor of banning guns? Pro-gun rights activists usually spout that strawman when in fact we want the same reasonable legislation that you'd probably be in favor of. Federally mandated background checks, closing the gun show loophole, and banning most if not all extended magazines. I'm also in favor of banning assault rifles, but JUST assault rifles. People who want guns for morally honest reasons would be forced to buy some other type of gun, boohoo. We can't always get what we want because sometimes the government deems it dangerous to society, like illegal narcotics for example.
User avatar #228 - cycloberrick (01/17/2013) [-]
also this is totally off topic, but do you play League of Legends or own a PS3 because you seem to be one of the few reasonable people I've seen on the internet and I would like to add you as a friend on something, don't really care what game I'd add you on just any random game would work.
User avatar #232 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
I've got an Xbox? Neither of those though, sorry.
User avatar #236 - cycloberrick (01/17/2013) [-]
my brother moved out recently and I let him take it with him, damn.
User avatar #222 - cycloberrick (01/17/2013) [-]
oh sorry, I wasn't paying enough attention before and I guess I just assumed you were against gun use. But banning assault rifles, that's a very broad term and can be interpreted in many different ways. A person can look at a bolt action hunting rifle and say it can be used as an assault weapon, so sure you could ban certain firearms but please make it more specific than simply "assault rifles"
User avatar #229 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
If you didn't know, the Clinton magical fairy princessistration passed a law known as the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban, and it laid out the specific grounds for what types of guns would be banned. I actually just want that law reenacted, as it expired in 2004.
User avatar #234 - cycloberrick (01/17/2013) [-]
well we seem to have found a common ground, good debate my friend (if you could call it that because we kinda agreed on stuff)
User avatar #193 - bramdk (01/17/2013) [-]
and even if they werent they didnt grow on automatic trees , even illigal guns have bein on a store shelve someday
User avatar #195 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Not necessarily. And I don't see the point you're trying to make.
User avatar #198 - bramdk (01/17/2013) [-]
i mean that when an automatic gun is manufactured it isnt put in a public bin for the illigal person just to take
its bought by a store
who then sells it for a profit
now if you are a bad person you can go and sell this gun for a higher profit to someone who hasnt got a license but wants one to lets say do harm
then this gun is now deemed illigal
but saying it has never bein inside a store once in its time is total bullshit
User avatar #209 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
People who make guns don't just sell to gun stores. And I really fail to see the point here.
User avatar #130 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
It's a .22, you can take 5 shots to the chest and live.. Plus I shoot gophers on cow farms so yeah it's for the convince of everyone, gophers ruin grass fields and if a cow breaks its legs by stepping in a gopher hole, you have to kill it. The more cows that have to be killed, the higher the beef prices are
User avatar #143 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
I wasn't talking about just .22s, you made that argument yourself and now you're attacking a strawman.
User avatar #157 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
I was making the example that if you ban all of them, you're banning a tool that honest people use everyday
User avatar #189 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
I understand it makes your job and the others who do the same sort of activity easier... but we are talking about people's lives here man. It really does have an impact whether a shooter is able to shoot continuously for longer amounts of time. Imagine if someone committed a mass murder using a minigun.
User avatar #196 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
Imagine if someone committed a shooting with a handgun and a legal magazine size... O shit that already happened at VT. Crazy people will be crazy
User avatar #200 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
That doesn't prove a point. Just that it's possible. One instance doesn't prove all the rest of the data to the contrary false. Assault rifles with legal extended mags are most commonly used in mass shootings.
User avatar #210 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
All that banning will do is take it away from honest citizens, criminals will ALWAYS find a way to illegally obtain banned mags
User avatar #223 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
That's not true. You need to think and consider the many ways that making something illegal could prevent someone from getting banned mags. First of all, you say "criminal" which implies that they have a criminal background. Most people who go on killing sprees do not have a criminal history. Usually people in gangs or tough neighborhoods that I would call criminals know people that could probably find them extended magazines, because perhaps they know someone who illegally deals arms. But what about those people who've never done anything criminal? They might not have that same connection. And there you go, it's a change. Maybe a small or a big change, that all depends on how successful the implementation is and how well the police handle illegal arms trafficking, but a little change today could save someone's life tomorrow.
User avatar #249 - MythBuster (01/17/2013) [-]
Have drugs went away since they were banned?? There millions and millions of extended mags circulating through the US, banning them wouldn't do shit... This argument isn't going anywhere since you're so closed minded, so have a good one man
User avatar #253 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Not being easily persuaded by illegitimate arguments is being closed minded? Sure. Whatever you say.
User avatar #251 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
Obviously not, I was just making the example of appropriate legislation. The war on drugs doesn't work, decriminalization and fines with rehabilitation would make a difference. Just like how some gun control works and others makes things worse, like my home state's ban on concealed weapons. You say that like you know it's a fact lol. It still doesn't change the basic principle that if you reduce the availability you'll reduce the number.
#127 - Womens Study Major (01/17/2013) [-]
The psycho killer will just bring more magazines. Just look at columbine and virginia tech.
User avatar #140 - desuforeverlulz (01/17/2013) [-]
And they will have to reload, which gives people time to escape, or the police an opportunity to take him down. That's the point I'm making.
#138 - "Look!! I'm on the Internet and I'm a girl!!" - hair…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/17/2013 on Danish comedian posts this +31
User avatar #153 - ihaveakeyboard (01/17/2013) [-]
myth confirmed: there are no girls on the internet
#50 - Best laugh on fj in awhile.. Thanks op 01/16/2013 on My Legs Hurt 0
#88 - It looks like a train but I might be wrong 01/16/2013 on Love Story 0
#71 - The relevance is off the charts  [+] (1 new reply) 01/15/2013 on YOLO +7
#73 - Sunset has deleted their comment.
#109 - I'm a cashier by the Canadian border and a lot of them are rud… 01/15/2013 on Wolverine -1
#207 - I watched the behind the scenes where Sam cut his foot and the… 01/15/2013 on For Tolkien fans 0
#101 - i meANT CORRECT 01/15/2013 on Post Busted +1
#100 - Auto erect?  [+] (1 new reply) 01/15/2013 on Post Busted +4
User avatar #101 - MythBuster (01/15/2013) [-]
i meANT CORRECT
#635 - As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, b…  [+] (7 new replies) 01/12/2013 on Deal with it 0
User avatar #636 - thebritishguy (01/12/2013) [-]
well that was true for Hitler although obviously he had terrible ideas about what truth and justice meant as he believed the Jews were responsible for the loss of world war one and so therefore they should die, he believed that was justice and he believed that was the truth. Malcolm X believed that violence was wrong and that self defence was ok. You still have not proved that Malcolm X was a bad person.
User avatar #640 - flemsdfer (01/13/2013) [-]
Malcolm X responded to violence with violence, but Martin Luther King was working for the same cause, and doing it peacefully. That shows there was a better choice, and Malcolm just decided to go down to his oppressor's level making him just as bad as they were.
User avatar #657 - thebritishguy (01/13/2013) [-]
no because Malcolm X never did anything violent, he never harmed anyone unless it was in the boxing ring, he never told anyone to attack anyone, he said black people should have guns because white people have guns so it is equality that both races have guns.
User avatar #658 - flemsdfer (01/13/2013) [-]
I just never saw it as a good image in school learning it. One thing to have guns sure, but a lot of the photos are of everyone just waving the damn things around. I'm not saying he's in the wrong for what he wanted. I just think he could have gone a better route with his image.
User avatar #659 - thebritishguy (01/13/2013) [-]
what the fuck are you talking about, Malcolm X never told anyone to wave guns around. In my school they taught the kids that Malcolm X was violent to because they took newspaper quotes and the newspapers were desperate for people to hate Malcolm X because he was standing up to the racists.
User avatar #660 - flemsdfer (01/13/2013) [-]
Dude, I'm just saying what I was shown in school. Comparing him to Martin. He looks like he could have looked better. Iunno man ._. it's late, early....time
User avatar #661 - thebritishguy (01/13/2013) [-]
Martin Luther King was a really cool guy but I think he was a bit silly because if his followers saw a black women getting beaten up by a police man for no reason they would join hands and sing, where as Malcolm X was in a similar situation and his group ran over to the police and they ran away in fear, then they carried the body over to the police station and demanded she got hospital treatment and she did.
#633 - He supported the violence in the black movement which then tur…  [+] (9 new replies) 01/12/2013 on Deal with it 0
User avatar #634 - thebritishguy (01/12/2013) [-]
"I don't even call it violence when it's in self defense; I call it intelligence." - “I don't advocate violence; but if a man steps on my toes, I'll step on his...”
Malcolm X
he was not violent, if people mis understood or manipulated his words that does not make him a bad person! He did not lead a hate group which is what you said.
User avatar #635 - MythBuster (01/12/2013) [-]
As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice.

Do you know who said that?? Adolfo fucking hitler.. Quotes don't mean shit.
User avatar #636 - thebritishguy (01/12/2013) [-]
well that was true for Hitler although obviously he had terrible ideas about what truth and justice meant as he believed the Jews were responsible for the loss of world war one and so therefore they should die, he believed that was justice and he believed that was the truth. Malcolm X believed that violence was wrong and that self defence was ok. You still have not proved that Malcolm X was a bad person.
User avatar #640 - flemsdfer (01/13/2013) [-]
Malcolm X responded to violence with violence, but Martin Luther King was working for the same cause, and doing it peacefully. That shows there was a better choice, and Malcolm just decided to go down to his oppressor's level making him just as bad as they were.
User avatar #657 - thebritishguy (01/13/2013) [-]
no because Malcolm X never did anything violent, he never harmed anyone unless it was in the boxing ring, he never told anyone to attack anyone, he said black people should have guns because white people have guns so it is equality that both races have guns.
User avatar #658 - flemsdfer (01/13/2013) [-]
I just never saw it as a good image in school learning it. One thing to have guns sure, but a lot of the photos are of everyone just waving the damn things around. I'm not saying he's in the wrong for what he wanted. I just think he could have gone a better route with his image.
User avatar #659 - thebritishguy (01/13/2013) [-]
what the fuck are you talking about, Malcolm X never told anyone to wave guns around. In my school they taught the kids that Malcolm X was violent to because they took newspaper quotes and the newspapers were desperate for people to hate Malcolm X because he was standing up to the racists.
User avatar #660 - flemsdfer (01/13/2013) [-]
Dude, I'm just saying what I was shown in school. Comparing him to Martin. He looks like he could have looked better. Iunno man ._. it's late, early....time
User avatar #661 - thebritishguy (01/13/2013) [-]
Martin Luther King was a really cool guy but I think he was a bit silly because if his followers saw a black women getting beaten up by a police man for no reason they would join hands and sing, where as Malcolm X was in a similar situation and his group ran over to the police and they ran away in fear, then they carried the body over to the police station and demanded she got hospital treatment and she did.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2400

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #13 - sparkyoneonetwo (01/19/2014) [-]
bust any myths lately??
User avatar #11 - SwiftNinja (11/08/2012) [-]
You're a disgrace to mankind. Good day and goodbye.
User avatar #12 to #11 - MythBuster (11/08/2012) [-]
and you clearly don't know how to argue with facts and evidence. have a nice day as well :)
#8 - thuntking **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #9 to #8 - MythBuster (08/06/2012) [-]
hahahha right back atcha faggot, get raaaaaped
User avatar #4 - lulzman (04/29/2010) [-]
one thing that ussually happens to me is when i talk about an episode on tv and then it suddenly starts on a random channel. another is when im watching a commercial and i forget what im watching. i just posted this maybe to help u with your next funny pic .... 5 stars on your funny pics by the way lol
User avatar #5 to #4 - MythBuster (04/29/2010) [-]
thanks for the ideas man
User avatar #6 to #5 - lulzman (04/29/2010) [-]
no prob
User avatar #3 - MrWobblez (04/29/2010) [-]
My IM dont work, message me
User avatar #1 - SamKhan (04/29/2010) [-]
I like your comics, keep it up.
User avatar #2 to #1 - MythBuster (04/29/2010) [-]
thanks man
 Friends (0)