Upload
Login or register

MuahahaOfLore

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 26
Date Signed Up:4/05/2010
Location:NJ USA
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#22
Comment Ranking:#131
Highest Content Rank:#6
Highest Comment Rank:#30
Content Thumbs: 510428 total,  540549 ,  30121
Comment Thumbs: 86235 total,  92575 ,  6340
Content Level Progress: 55.81% (5581/10000)
Level 339 Content: Practically Famous → Level 340 Content: Sold Soul
Comment Level Progress: 89.6% (896/1000)
Level 370 Comments: Immortal → Level 371 Comments: Immortal
Subscribers:96
Content Views:22038463
Times Content Favorited:36176 times
Total Comments Made:8098
FJ Points:392361
Favorite Tags: cat (2) | with (2)

latest user's comments

#1 - <comment> 05/28/2016 on love it 0
#24 - im 12 and what is this? 05/28/2016 on My fave webms comp, Pt 33 +3
#36 - well someone needs to be an adult 05/28/2016 on Black Meme-Comp 1 +4
#86 - ive been trying to figure out what to do with this piri piri s… 05/27/2016 on Cheeky Nandos? +2
#1 - He gets new pants switches to Iron Thighs 05/25/2016 on /fit/izen uses a rusty barbell +56
#17 - to me being a thin 33; 32 actually seems big on a woman  [+] (1 new reply) 05/25/2016 on Size 20 (2XL) plus size... -1
User avatar
#18 - downhillGuy (05/25/2016) [-]
32 is big on a woman. Hence its the top of the normal BMI range
#15 - much smaller than that is not healthy  [+] (3 new replies) 05/25/2016 on Size 20 (2XL) plus size... -1
User avatar
#16 - downhillGuy (05/25/2016) [-]
Depends how tall the girl. From my experience the normal healthy range 22-32 inchs.
User avatar
#17 - MuahahaOfLore (05/25/2016) [-]
to me being a thin 33; 32 actually seems big on a woman
User avatar
#18 - downhillGuy (05/25/2016) [-]
32 is big on a woman. Hence its the top of the normal BMI range
#12 - beauty standard implies what we find attractive. most…  [+] (7 new replies) 05/25/2016 on Size 20 (2XL) plus size... +2
User avatar
#14 - downhillGuy (05/25/2016) [-]
I thought beauty standard is the most correct terminology, Im not sure what to use instead.
To not have less than a 25inch waist in american sizing is disturbing. A lot of women with normal BMIs are under that
#20 - dudulli (05/26/2016) [-]
How about "clothing size" instead of "beauty standard"?

If I would make clothes and lived somewhere with 90% of the people having size X (random size) I wouldn't make clothes size X minus 10 or somthing.
User avatar
#21 - downhillGuy (05/26/2016) [-]
I feel like saying "clothing size" is useless, as it is just a measurement. What has happened is a categorical shift in body size and thus clothing sizes available.
#15 - MuahahaOfLore (05/25/2016) [-]
much smaller than that is not healthy
User avatar
#16 - downhillGuy (05/25/2016) [-]
Depends how tall the girl. From my experience the normal healthy range 22-32 inchs.
User avatar
#17 - MuahahaOfLore (05/25/2016) [-]
to me being a thin 33; 32 actually seems big on a woman
User avatar
#18 - downhillGuy (05/25/2016) [-]
32 is big on a woman. Hence its the top of the normal BMI range
#2 - i want cuddles 05/25/2016 on In the end they are all... +1
#9 - it is?  [+] (9 new replies) 05/25/2016 on Size 20 (2XL) plus size... -1
User avatar
#11 - downhillGuy (05/25/2016) [-]
Notice how the US sizing starts at UK/AU 6. Also EU shops generally start stock 26 and above
User avatar
#12 - MuahahaOfLore (05/25/2016) [-]
beauty standard implies what we find attractive.

most Americans still like girls with a normal BMI
User avatar
#14 - downhillGuy (05/25/2016) [-]
I thought beauty standard is the most correct terminology, Im not sure what to use instead.
To not have less than a 25inch waist in american sizing is disturbing. A lot of women with normal BMIs are under that
#20 - dudulli (05/26/2016) [-]
How about "clothing size" instead of "beauty standard"?

If I would make clothes and lived somewhere with 90% of the people having size X (random size) I wouldn't make clothes size X minus 10 or somthing.
User avatar
#21 - downhillGuy (05/26/2016) [-]
I feel like saying "clothing size" is useless, as it is just a measurement. What has happened is a categorical shift in body size and thus clothing sizes available.
#15 - MuahahaOfLore (05/25/2016) [-]
much smaller than that is not healthy
User avatar
#16 - downhillGuy (05/25/2016) [-]
Depends how tall the girl. From my experience the normal healthy range 22-32 inchs.
User avatar
#17 - MuahahaOfLore (05/25/2016) [-]
to me being a thin 33; 32 actually seems big on a woman
User avatar
#18 - downhillGuy (05/25/2016) [-]
32 is big on a woman. Hence its the top of the normal BMI range