Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:1/30/2010
Last Login:11/27/2015
Location:Athens Georgia
Content Thumbs: 33 total,  56 ,  23
Comment Thumbs: 3520 total,  4164 ,  644
Content Level Progress: 62.71% (37/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 19% (19/100)
Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Content Views:1163
Total Comments Made:948
FJ Points:3226

latest user's comments

#20 - >Implying that living under Saddam Hussein's regime was bet…  [+] (47 replies) 03/04/2013 on Rustles My Jammies +22
#353 - pepemex (03/05/2013) [-]
>Implying that was your call to make
#294 - anon (03/05/2013) [-]
but america kille half a million children under 5 in Iraq through its sanctions, so who was worse, Saddam or America? It's not even close the government fucked up bad
#406 - anon (03/05/2013) [-]
American sanctions are hurting much of the surrounding area, but those sanctions are mostly on Iran not Iraq.
#158 - fedexman (03/05/2013) [-]
#156 - MattSwan (03/05/2013) [-]
Dude. I left a comment six hours ago that started an _awesome___ shit-storm.
#198 - anon (03/05/2013) [-]
except your a fucking douche
User avatar
#170 - thereasonableperso (03/05/2013) [-]
Its rather impressive.
User avatar
#48 - lockstin (03/04/2013) [-]
Its true that they are better off now, but the main reason we went to war with them was because they have oil. it wasn't some "they have nukes" like bush said. and look at North Korea, they are our enemies and they outwardly express that they are testing nukes and long range missiles, also their people there are starving, their dictator ship is terrible. but is the US going to war with NK? because of the lack of oil.
User avatar
#55 - goryheadstump (03/04/2013) [-]
We were and still officially are at war with North Korea.
Little thing called the Korean War.
#70 - grandterskrasao (03/04/2013) [-]

Congress has not officially declared war on any country since WW2.
#88 - roarflmao (03/04/2013) [-]
Wait what? So USA is not in war with North Korea, but South Korea is and USA is supporting South Korea. But that doesnt count?

And even if they didnt start the korean war, it was the sovjet union and USA that created the war from propaganda in hope of spreading their world view. Even though most people who died were koreans the war would never had turned out as it did, not even close if it wasnt for USA and Sovjet.

I mean okay they didnt declear it, but its commonly known that they were the reason for it
User avatar
#60 - lockstin (03/04/2013) [-]
officially are but not doing a thing because its not profitable. going to war with other countries who havent wronged us directly because of oil.
User avatar
#35 - davidavidson (03/04/2013) [-]
Get your shit together bruv
User avatar
#31 - TarnRazor (03/04/2013) [-]
Didn't Saddam Hussein die like 6 years ago? Why did the war end last year?
User avatar
#107 - mynameisgeorge (03/05/2013) [-]
Let's put it like this:

If your dad beat and molested you every day and one of the neighbors went in and killed him, destroying your house and only source of income in the process, would you just want him to leave without attempting to repay you?
User avatar
#108 - TarnRazor (03/05/2013) [-]
I don't see how turning Iraq into a danger zone is repayment.
User avatar
#109 - mynameisgeorge (03/05/2013) [-]
Training police forces
Quelling extremist forces that attempted to regain control
Attempting to encourage economic growth
User avatar
#111 - TarnRazor (03/05/2013) [-]
They obviously failed in all three of those
User avatar
#115 - mynameisgeorge (03/05/2013) [-]
Which is why:
Germany and Australian troops are still training them
Extremists are being dealt with in surrounding areas
Money is constantly pumped in to Iraq

But you're totally right, let them fend for themselves
User avatar
#119 - TarnRazor (03/05/2013) [-]
Nah. Iraq could very easily turn into Afghanistan but that still doesn't justify turning it into a blatant war zone
#30 - anon (03/04/2013) [-]
Life under saddam could be harsh, but it was bearable. Aslong you didnt oppose him you would be left alone, people could meet in the streets, go shopping, hang with friends, party, work, all the normal parts of life.

Now people are afraid to even go across the street to buy the food they(if they can even afford it now) without it being caught up in local fights for power, or be blown up by a suicide bomber.

>Imply what you want, but if you ever get a chance, sit down and have a talk with one of the refugees that had to leave Iraq after Americas "salvation" And how life was before and after americas friendly visit.
#117 - mynameisgeorge has deleted their comment.
#22 - anon (03/04/2013) [-]
>Implying poverty hasn't tripled
>Implying they have any infrastructure to repair their ruined country
>Implying their US supported corrupt government won't implode their own economy if it benefits the US
>Implying the US has any right to choose to launch a shock and awe campaign knowing they'd kill hundreds of thousands
>Implying they don't live under marshal law instated by US forces
>Implying it's not an illegal occupation with financial interest
#423 - anon (03/10/2013) [-]
>implying any of that implies greentext
#349 - rocknipples (03/05/2013) [-]
User avatar
#325 - jikario (03/05/2013) [-]
>Implying Iraq was a country with a more stable infrastructure to begin with, or any at all.
>Implying belief in evidence fabrication which would cause impeachment through both senate and congress.
>Implying the U.S. Military is even still in Iraq, AND enforcing laws that U.S. Made.
>Implying anon has any fucking idea what he/she is talking about.
#263 - anon (03/05/2013) [-]
>implying .... FJ. Fagets!
User avatar
#221 - tehbomb (03/05/2013) [-]
#197 - thenickel (03/05/2013) [-]
>Implying their country wasn't already a dictatorship that screwed 90% of the populace over
>Implying government isn't democratically elected
>Implying UN didn't approve of shock and awe campaign
>Implying US forces are still in the country
>Implying that the US is gaining oil from invasion. They are receiving less oil now than before, most Iraqi oil wells were bought by chinese and eu countries.
User avatar
#195 - JoshBauer (03/05/2013) [-]
>Implying families can't safely go out into the street they don't worry about getting shot in the fucking head or blown the fuck up.
#164 - anon (03/05/2013) [-]
>Implying poverty has tripled and that the US hasn't pumped millions upon millions of food, water, and economic resources into the country
> Implying the US hasn't spent several billion dollars repairing infastructure. Just because an extremist-housing building was bombed out doesn't mean they didn't pump nutrient rich soil onto plantations and fix water resevoirs/supply lines.
> Implying the warlord infested Hussein corrupt government was any better or even marginally up to par; Implying the US wasn't actively trying to oust corrupted elected officials since the election.
> Implying the US is the only one under such campaign, and that such campaign hasn't possibly stopped hundreds of further attacks worldwide; implying US didn't try to limit collateral damage or casualties/kill dozens of thousands of confirmed terrorists/terrorist cells.
> Implying its an illegal occupation without moral interest.
#149 - anon (03/05/2013) [-]
>Implying that the US DOESN'T have the right to invade any country.

Stop pretending your morals are superior, FJ.

The world is fucked up. The US isn't the only country that does things like this.
User avatar
#122 - mynameisgeorge (03/05/2013) [-]
>Implying that's not due to a worldwide economic collapse
>Implying they had much modern infrastructure
>Implying Saddam didn't destroy ancient architectural feats as monuments to vanity
>Implying that the "tripled poverty rate" will be worth anything to the US
>Implying the hegemonic power of the world doesn't have the right to protect the interests of itself, its allies, and civilians that are being poisoned with gasses that Hitler found cruel
>Implying the US was imposing laws rather than creating governments and police forces
>Implying extremists aren't doing the exact same thing and fighting fire with fire isn't the only way to crush them
#344 - anon (03/05/2013) [-]
>Implying that bombing a country into oblivion won't cause poverty on a massive scale
>Implying that the modern infrastructure
>Implying that it's impossible to have empathy for those in poverty
>Implying that the U.S.'s massive collateral damage in Iraq is justifiable based on "interests"
>Implying the quality of life of Iraqis has been improved by mercilessly bombing their cities in pursuit of war-targets
>Implying that U.S. rule in Iraq was just
>Implying that because one person is immoral, the U.S. can be immoral
#210 - buthow (03/05/2013) [-]
George, you're a genius.
#228 - mynameisgeorge (03/05/2013) [-]
I just like to use le me me arrows and patronize anons
#233 - buthow (03/05/2013) [-]
Well, you do a fantastic job at it!
User avatar
#234 - mynameisgeorge (03/05/2013) [-]
#280 - ilovehitler (03/05/2013) [-]
I would rape you any day, my good man. But a loving rape, like shreck rape.
#245 - buthow (03/05/2013) [-]
Well of course!
#105 - anon (03/05/2013) [-]
implying you have any sources to back up your claims
#78 - anon (03/04/2013) [-]
how was any of that implied shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit
#68 - anon (03/04/2013) [-]
meh, when it comes down to it, Americas benefiting from it. and if Americas benefiting, everyone is.
User avatar
#25 - MattSwan (03/04/2013) [-]
"Hundreds of thousands." That's not actually true.
User avatar
#69 - adrilazzaro (03/04/2013) [-]
200,000 and over deaths since america started the middle-east conflict
User avatar
#154 - propanex (03/05/2013) [-]

Do you think we just woke up one day and said "See that east that is in the middle over there? Let's fuck it up."

No you ignorant fuck tard... we had to go over there and stop Al Qaeda because they brought down the towers... oh wait, you're probably gonna say the U.S. government did that... >.>
#303 - anon (03/05/2013) [-]
Al Quada was an enemy of saddam
#70 - THANK YOU. 02/20/2013 on Cool gif 0
#69 - Fallacy. 02/20/2013 on Cool gif 0
#81 - They're all ******* annoying. I hope they die in an acid-spill.  [+] (1 reply) 02/05/2013 on Hint, ask! If not. Quit... +10
User avatar
#126 - safo (02/05/2013) [-]
yeah that was cringe worthy :(